Anarchism and Welfare

[East Coast Hustle]

I think a whole lot of people are missing the point.

The point is not "don't be mean to BH". FFS, we all hate him and he's a shitty human being, although being mean to him is just giving him what he wants anyway. The point is "if you're going to ignore BH, then fucking IGNORE him and that way if he does start a thread that someone else is actually interested in you don't have to get your panties all in a bunch and shit all over the thread because you're fucking IGNORING him, remember?"

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

I think a whole lot of people are missing the point.

The point is not "don't be mean to BH". FFS, we all hate him and he's a shitty human being, although being mean to him is just giving him what he wants anyway. The point is "if you're going to ignore BH, then fucking IGNORE him and that way if he does start a thread that someone else is actually interested in you don't have to get your panties all in a bunch and shit all over the thread because you're fucking IGNORING him, remember?"

That might be YOUR point. You are welcome to it, too.

[navkat]

I was gonna say something but I thought better of it.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

I mean, I agree that shitting on him just makes him happy, so it's a bit counter productive, as I pointed out early on in this thread.

But what I was specifically objecting to is Joh'Nyx's odd proposal that somehow shitting on someone you find repugnant runs counter to some imaginary PD ethic (and the fact that he later tried to transfer the concept of a PD ethic onto me when I responded to him) and Nav's (apparent, if I understood) idea that if he is bad, he should be banned, and if he's not bad enough to be banned, we shouldn't be mean to him.

Seriously, wat?

Everyone shitting on him, he has all on his own gone out of his way to insult, with some pretty heinous stuff. And then to have some people who weren't even there to see it getting up in arms and telling them they're wrong for jumping his stupid shit?

Sorry, that's complete and utter baloney. And it's really a little insulting to have someone say "I'M NOT REALLY AROUND MUCH AND I REALLY HAVE NO IDEA WHAT'S GOING ON BUT I THINK ALL OF YOU PEOPLE ARE REMISS FOR PICKING ON THIS ONE GUY. ALSO I AM GOING TO IGNORE EVERYTHING YOU SAY ABOUT HOW HE HAS INSULTED AND ALIENATED EACH OF YOU INDIVIDUALLY AND INSTEAD PIN IT ON SOME SORT OF HIVE MIND THING."

For perspective, I am a person who feels annoyed when certain predictable members here just can't resist trying to one-up one of the resident trolls. I mean, just leave it already, right? But in this case, the troll in question has personally and individually insulted the shit out of each of the participants.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

Oh, and add to that the fact that until he was more or less abused out of the habit, he used to jack the shit out of other people's threads. Fuck that guy.

[Doktor Howl]

But what I was specifically objecting to is Joh'Nyx's odd proposal that somehow shitting on someone you find repugnant runs counter to some imaginary PD ethic (and the fact that he later tried to transfer the concept of a PD ethic onto me when I responded to him) and Nav's (apparent, if I understood) idea that if he is bad, he should be banned, and if he's not bad enough to be banned, we shouldn't be mean to him.

Seriously, wat?

It's simple.  They have to display disapproval of your (and my) Wrong Behavior.

Even if it means sticking up for a nasty fucking deviant like BH.  They don't WANT to, Nigel, but YOU'RE JUST NOT VERY SHINY SO WHAT CHOICE DID THEY HAVE?

[Doktor Howl]

Oh, and add to that the fact that until he was more or less abused out of the habit, he used to jack the shit out of other people's threads. Fuck that guy.

He still does it.  That's why I don't usually answer him in other peoples' threads.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

But what I was specifically objecting to is Joh'Nyx's odd proposal that somehow shitting on someone you find repugnant runs counter to some imaginary PD ethic (and the fact that he later tried to transfer the concept of a PD ethic onto me when I responded to him) and Nav's (apparent, if I understood) idea that if he is bad, he should be banned, and if he's not bad enough to be banned, we shouldn't be mean to him.

Seriously, wat?

It's simple.  They have to display disapproval of your (and my) Wrong Behavior.

Even if it means sticking up for a nasty fucking deviant like BH.  They don't WANT to, Nigel, but YOU'RE JUST NOT VERY SHINY SO WHAT CHOICE DID THEY HAVE?

WE MADE THEM DO IT.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

Oh, and add to that the fact that until he was more or less abused out of the habit, he used to jack the shit out of other people's threads. Fuck that guy.

He still does it.  That's why I don't usually answer him in other peoples' threads.

Yeah, I try to give him a wide berth. In other people's threads. If you give him a nibble he'll run with it.

[Doktor Howl]

But what I was specifically objecting to is Joh'Nyx's odd proposal that somehow shitting on someone you find repugnant runs counter to some imaginary PD ethic (and the fact that he later tried to transfer the concept of a PD ethic onto me when I responded to him) and Nav's (apparent, if I understood) idea that if he is bad, he should be banned, and if he's not bad enough to be banned, we shouldn't be mean to him.

Seriously, wat?

It's simple.  They have to display disapproval of your (and my) Wrong Behavior.

Even if it means sticking up for a nasty fucking deviant like BH.  They don't WANT to, Nigel, but YOU'RE JUST NOT VERY SHINY SO WHAT CHOICE DID THEY HAVE?

WE MADE THEM DO IT.

We have machines at work, that destroy themselves if they are started without process fluid in them.

Push the button, destroy the machine.

Here, with some people, we push the button just by existing.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

But what I was specifically objecting to is Joh'Nyx's odd proposal that somehow shitting on someone you find repugnant runs counter to some imaginary PD ethic (and the fact that he later tried to transfer the concept of a PD ethic onto me when I responded to him) and Nav's (apparent, if I understood) idea that if he is bad, he should be banned, and if he's not bad enough to be banned, we shouldn't be mean to him.

Seriously, wat?

It's simple.  They have to display disapproval of your (and my) Wrong Behavior.

Even if it means sticking up for a nasty fucking deviant like BH.  They don't WANT to, Nigel, but YOU'RE JUST NOT VERY SHINY SO WHAT CHOICE DID THEY HAVE?

WE MADE THEM DO IT.

We have machines at work, that destroy themselves if they are started without process fluid in them.

Push the button, destroy the machine.

Here, with some people, we push the button just by existing.

We're bad people.

[Doktor Howl]

But what I was specifically objecting to is Joh'Nyx's odd proposal that somehow shitting on someone you find repugnant runs counter to some imaginary PD ethic (and the fact that he later tried to transfer the concept of a PD ethic onto me when I responded to him) and Nav's (apparent, if I understood) idea that if he is bad, he should be banned, and if he's not bad enough to be banned, we shouldn't be mean to him.

Seriously, wat?

It's simple.  They have to display disapproval of your (and my) Wrong Behavior.

Even if it means sticking up for a nasty fucking deviant like BH.  They don't WANT to, Nigel, but YOU'RE JUST NOT VERY SHINY SO WHAT CHOICE DID THEY HAVE?

WE MADE THEM DO IT.

We have machines at work, that destroy themselves if they are started without process fluid in them.

Push the button, destroy the machine.

Here, with some people, we push the button just by existing.

We're bad people.

I'm okay with that.  It's kind of fun, pushing the button.  I make predictions on the outcome, and then congratulate myself when it happens the way I called it.

For example, I KNEW Babylon Horuv would go after one of the women on this board when I started fucking with him in this thread, because he ALWAYS does that.  He did it with Khara, Stella, etc, before, and he went after Freeky this time.  Because he's a worthless & cowardly piece of shit...But it IS kind of funny watching him be so fucking predictable.

Likewise, there are people who will take the exact opposite side from me on any argument, no matter how fucking ridiculously it makes them behave.  I enjoy that.  A lot.

[East Coast Hustle]

But what I was specifically objecting to is Joh'Nyx's odd proposal that somehow shitting on someone you find repugnant runs counter to some imaginary PD ethic (and the fact that he later tried to transfer the concept of a PD ethic onto me when I responded to him) and Nav's (apparent, if I understood) idea that if he is bad, he should be banned, and if he's not bad enough to be banned, we shouldn't be mean to him.

Seriously, wat?

It's simple.  They have to display disapproval of your (and my) Wrong Behavior.

Even if it means sticking up for a nasty fucking deviant like BH.  They don't WANT to, Nigel, but YOU'RE JUST NOT VERY SHINY SO WHAT CHOICE DID THEY HAVE?

That's some high quality Herpaderp you've got yourself there, mister.

Because that's EXACTLY what's happening. Everyone is sticking up for BH and trying to put you down.

[East Coast Hustle]

LOOK AT ME, MISTER BAD GUY! LOOK HOW FURIOUSLY I IGNORE YOU! IN EVERY THREAD YOU START OR POST IN!
\


I hate the guy as much as you do. But I hate having to wade through pages of this shit every time he makes a post just as much as I hate him. So all I'm asking is that people get with the program (hell, it's YOUR program) and just SHUT UP.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

LOOK AT ME, MISTER BAD GUY! LOOK HOW FURIOUSLY I IGNORE YOU! IN EVERY THREAD YOU START OR POST IN!
\


I hate the guy as much as you do. But I hate having to wade through pages of this shit every time he makes a post just as much as I hate him. So all I'm asking is that people get with the program (hell, it's YOUR program) and just SHUT UP.

Wait, "having to"?