WHAT KIND OF MONSTERS

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

i knew i was going to get spock in the reply as soon as i hit enter.  that came out kinda lame.
what i mean is i don't understand why people get their feathers ruffled over what people do to their junk more than they do to other parts of their body for aesthetic purposes, with a dose of 'it's bad/wrong', or as you put it 'unacceptable' (not sure what you meant by that exactly)

i guess evolutionarily it would make sense to have an aversion to doing any junk modification, so maybe that's all it is...

What I am disgusted and horrified by is that the very IDEA that a vagina or balls need cosmetic surgery in order to look more appealing IS A MARKETING CONCEPT.

It's what *I* can't see that sells YOU. 

We've come full circle.

When I was a young girl, I remember comparing clits with some of my friends. We were like, hey, look, some of us have a part here that you can see and some of us don't. Huh.

Unlike the things that have a standard of beauty, like our noses and ears and breasts, we never agonized over whether our clits met a standard of beauty. In order to market a beauty product or procedure, first potential customers must have insecurities about what that product addresses. In order to be insecure about whether something meets a standard of beauty, a standard of beauty first has to exist... and somewhere in the 30-ish years since I was a young girl, marketing geniuses have invented a standard of beauty for vulvas.

Great.

[Elder Iptuous]

 
alright, alright, i concede!