It's that time of year again...

[The Good Reverend Roger]

"anyone else on this board" hasn't had creeps make obscene remarks about their kids,

Yeah?  Do tell.

And you are aiding and abetting them by publishing PI without permission.  You feel good aboit yourself?

Obscene remarks about your kids, scooter?  I believe I missed that.  Perhaps you can link me to it.

I once had someone on this forum claim they were going to come to my house and stomp me.  Strangely, they never showed... even after I pm'd them my address.  Funny thing about internet tough guys.

CU or GITM?   

[Hoopla!]

"anyone else on this board" hasn't had creeps make obscene remarks about their kids,

Yeah?  Do tell.

And you are aiding and abetting them by publishing PI without permission.  You feel good aboit yourself?

Obscene remarks about your kids, scooter?  I believe I missed that.  Perhaps you can link me to it.

I once had someone on this forum claim they were going to come to my house and stomp me.  Strangely, they never showed... even after I pm'd them my address.  Funny thing about internet tough guys.

CU or GITM?   

Neither actually... I don't wanna say here, in case he sniffs around and doesn't want to be embarrassed about it.  But I'll PM it if you like.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

"anyone else on this board" hasn't had creeps make obscene remarks about their kids,

Yeah?  Do tell.

And you are aiding and abetting them by publishing PI without permission.  You feel good aboit yourself?

Obscene remarks about your kids, scooter?  I believe I missed that.  Perhaps you can link me to it.

Have you forgotten about Agrippa who wanted to go out with my (then) 5 year old girl?

You think that's funny?

Yes, I have forgotten it.  I don't even really remember Agrippa.  Perhaps you can link to it.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

Here's Agrippa's account.

http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php?action=profile;u=4374

I looked through the 6 pages of posts he has, and I didn't see anything like that.  I may have missed it, in which case you could perhaps point it out?

[East Coast Hustle]

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

to be fair, I'm pretty sure the astroturfing programs they've paid for are primarily targeting twitter and facebook. He's not playing anchortext games with his links, either.

I don't think he is, either, to be perfectly honest.  Because he'd have been fired for incompetence years ago.  He's convinced more people to be rabidy anti-prohibition than anything else.  I know I went from being on the fence in 2010 (I was in favor of decriminalization but not really legalization) to wanting weed to be completely legalized in 2012.

And I am reasonably certain that I am not alone in that.

I've been saying for over a year that sometimes I'm half-convinced that he's working for the legalization campaign, because he's sort of the one-man Westboro Baptist Church of prohibition.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

to be fair, I'm pretty sure the astroturfing programs they've paid for are primarily targeting twitter and facebook. He's not playing anchortext games with his links, either.

I don't think he is, either, to be perfectly honest.  Because he'd have been fired for incompetence years ago.  He's convinced more people to be rabidy anti-prohibition than anything else.  I know I went from being on the fence in 2010 (I was in favor of decriminalization but not really legalization) to wanting weed to be completely legalized in 2012.

And I am reasonably certain that I am not alone in that.

I've been saying for over a year that sometimes I'm half-convinced that he's working for the legalization campaign, because he's sort of the one-man Westboro Baptist Church of prohibition.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

Here's Agrippa's account.

http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php?action=profile;u=4374

I looked through the 6 pages of posts he has, and I didn't see anything like that.  I may have missed it, in which case you could perhaps point it out?

Perhaps this?

http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php/topic,18695.msg620883.html#msg620883

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

to be fair, I'm pretty sure the astroturfing programs they've paid for are primarily targeting twitter and facebook. He's not playing anchortext games with his links, either.

I don't think he is, either, to be perfectly honest.  Because he'd have been fired for incompetence years ago.  He's convinced more people to be rabidy anti-prohibition than anything else.  I know I went from being on the fence in 2010 (I was in favor of decriminalization but not really legalization) to wanting weed to be completely legalized in 2012.

And I am reasonably certain that I am not alone in that.

I've been saying for over a year that sometimes I'm half-convinced that he's working for the legalization campaign, because he's sort of the one-man Westboro Baptist Church of prohibition.

If you think about it, I was on the fence about prohibition. You were on the fence. But after hearing Scooter's arguments, and the counter-arguments, it was hard not to come down on the side of legalization.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

Here's Agrippa's account.

http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php?action=profile;u=4374

I looked through the 6 pages of posts he has, and I didn't see anything like that.  I may have missed it, in which case you could perhaps point it out?

Perhaps this?

http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php/topic,18695.msg620883.html#msg620883

Yep.  Dealt with.

[LMNO]

And that one hit of weed will impair you for at least 10 days.

Some employers are dicks.  Employers in an 'at-will' state can fire you for looking at them the wrong way.  An even-handed employer would look at the test along with the rest of the picture,  If you tested positive, but have been a model employee, productive, timely, etc., you are very likely not going to get fired.


But, employers should have tools available to them to catch the ones who are coming impaired and posing a risk to others.  Do you disagree with that notion?  If so, why?

There you go, assuming facts not in evidence.

Are you seriously arguing that employees never go to work impaired ever?  Really?

I'm seriously arguing that a piss test is not evidence of impairment.

An argument that you have yet to address.

I have addressed it, you don't like the answer.

Employers are risk averse. 

ECH claims there is a reliable test for impairment, if so, then hopefully employers will use them when it is legal.  Until all employers get there, they have to use the tools available and make their best judgement.  Would you want to be responsible for someone who tested positive and caused a workplace accident that claimed another life?

Or are you going to keep skirting that issue and pretending it doesn't exist?

"Employers are risk averse" does not mean "Piss tests are/are not evidence of impairment."

Not even close.

First, address that issue, as that is the only one I am talking about right now.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

Here's Agrippa's account.

http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php?action=profile;u=4374

I looked through the 6 pages of posts he has, and I didn't see anything like that.  I may have missed it, in which case you could perhaps point it out?

Perhaps this?

http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php/topic,18695.msg620883.html#msg620883

Yep.  Dealt with.

I don't know what thread it was in originally, it was five years ago, but he was dogpiled pretty hard for it.

[AFK]

The point being, there are creeps like that, like Loveshade, who come to this site, you know this, you know I have kids, YET, you grease the wheels for these creeps anyway.

You are a pathetic excuse of a man.

[AFK]

But a typical example of humanity.

[Q. G. Pennyworth]

When your kids get on the internet you're going to have heart attacks DAILY.