Poll
Question:
Which would you rather fuck?
Option 1: Somebody who is very beautiful but very passive in bed
votes: 3
Option 2: Somebody who is great in bed but only average looking
votes: 37
(http://www.myconfinedspace.com/wp-content/uploads/tdomf/143625/i'm%20on%20a%20boat.png)
Watch, I'll be the only guy who chose pretty.
Why, you ask?
Because it'd be something new. :lulz:
Quote from: Sigmatic on May 12, 2010, 11:21:58 PM
Watch, I'll be the only guy who chose pretty.
Why, you ask?
Because it'd be something new. :lulz:
I'm just going to follow you around the board for the next 20 minutes or so with the rimshot emote based on your last 5 posts. :lulz:
What. All my exes are either magnificent lays or neither. It's not my fault I'm so pragmatic. :wink:
Some people seem to think that all they have to do is look good/have the "right" physical proportions/play up how naughty they are and when they actually get in the sack assume that they've done their part.
Stamina, technique, eagerness, willingness, imagination, a filthy degenerate mind that propells a marathon of depravity that leaves you feelig exahausted and sore for a week...I'll take that over a big rack any day.
I'll fuck a fish if I want to fucking fuck that fish.
I would rather masturbate than fuck a lousy lay.
The man said "passive", not lousy.
I can work with passive. :twisted:
I prefer to damage bedroom furniture, so I'm going with the plain-Jane bedroom olympiad.
Also, too damn old to be lookin' at damned barbie doll types.
Quote from: Sigmatic on May 12, 2010, 11:44:39 PM
The man said "passive", not lousy.
I can work with passive. :twisted:
They are the same.
Yes.
The worst is the blank stare with no movement at all.
I was once with a woman who did that while I was doing my damndest and said, "Should I be doing something?" like I was changing the oil on my car and she felt guilty for not helping.
Then again maybe the problem was me. :?
Quote from: Alty on May 13, 2010, 12:21:35 AM
Yes.
The worst is the blank stare with no movement at all.
I was once with a woman who did that while I was doing my damndest and said, "Should I be doing something?" like I was changing the oil on my car and she felt guilty for not helping.
"Yes. You should be wearing THIS! MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!"
I've uh... I've never heard of that. :?
Now I feel bad.
Quote from: Sigmatic on May 12, 2010, 11:44:39 PM
The man said "passive", not lousy.
I can work with passive. :twisted:
pffffft.
Quote from: Doktor Howl on May 13, 2010, 12:22:40 AM
Quote from: Alty on May 13, 2010, 12:21:35 AM
Yes.
The worst is the blank stare with no movement at all.
I was once with a woman who did that while I was doing my damndest and said, "Should I be doing something?" like I was changing the oil on my car and she felt guilty for not helping.
"Yes. You should be wearing THIS! MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!"
:lulz:
I ought to aquire some terrifying metal headgear for that kind of situation.
You know what's the worst? A man with a big dick who doesn't know how to use it. :crankey:
Assuming there's a basic level of attraction (which IME has very little to do with looks) I'll take skill over looks every time.
The only thing that's worse than a passive guy who lacks skill is a really energetic guy who lacks skill. Oh my god. It makes me feel like I'm having sex with an excited puppy... settle down and give me a damn chance to concentrate! At least with the passive one I can get on top, close my eyes, and get myself off.
FISH FUCK BABY! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rhqbp4QVhbE)
this is all assuming just a one time deal, right?
because if it's a 'desert island' type scenario, you might want to keep in mind that you could possibly teach a person how to fuck properly....
I have.
Also, my vote isn't a universal preference. My track record would tell you that. It's just what I'm in the mood for at the moment.
Quote from: BADGE OF HONOR on May 13, 2010, 12:42:01 AM
You know what's the worst? A man with a big dick who doesn't know how to use it. :crankey:
ding!
Quote from: Iptuous on May 13, 2010, 02:31:36 AM
this is all assuming just a one time deal, right?
because if it's a 'desert island' type scenario, you might want to keep in mind that you could possibly teach a person how to fuck properly....
...or the fact that interesting, intelligent people become more attractive the longer you know them.
Can we have an option for interesting and intelligent?
I absolutely prefer a great lay over someone who looks good.
Incidentally, there seem to be a lot more really good looking women who are bad at sex than there are average women who are bad at sex.
Quote from: eighteen buddha strike on May 13, 2010, 01:52:01 AM
FISH FUCK BABY! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rhqbp4QVhbE)
shit. I came to this thread to do just this.
Um, I vote for the beautiful women who is good in bed and knows how to use the .. thing what you call it in english? Sort of like a narrow clamp, except it doesn't stretch as easily?
Quote from: Triple Zero on May 13, 2010, 08:25:55 AM
Um, I vote for the beautiful women who is good in bed and knows how to use the .. thing what you call it in english? Sort of like a narrow clamp, except it doesn't stretch as easily?
A narrow clamp?
:lulz:
Luckily for me, I do not have to choose.
That said, I enjoy both passive and dominant roles, so beautiful it is.
Also:
(http://imgur.com/5Y7py.gif)
Quote from: Ne+@uNGr0+ on May 13, 2010, 09:02:48 AM
Quote from: Triple Zero on May 13, 2010, 08:25:55 AM
Um, I vote for the beautiful women who is good in bed and knows how to use the .. thing what you call it in english? Sort of like a narrow clamp, except it doesn't stretch as easily?
A narrow clamp?
Well, not really a proper clamp, of course. It's more round, usually. Unless you got a cheap one.
(or, you know, a really
really expensive one :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :fap:)
PC muscle.
That's what trip means.
Sometimes a trainable lover is a good thing.
Other times having them be pre-milfed is awesome.
Also cervix bashing if you are well endowed HURTS! I have no preference for size in that respect but the cervix bashing is not fun.
Quote from: Rainy Day Pixie on May 13, 2010, 09:31:47 AM
I have no preference for size in that respect but the cervix bashing is not fun.
You should of thought about that before you decided to have a tiny vagina.
Hey I can't help that!
Some girls are smaller than others.
Just trust The Doctor when he says the box is bigger on the inside.
Quote from: Triple Zero on May 13, 2010, 10:04:56 AM
Just trust The Doctor when he says the box is bigger on the inside.
:potd:
:lulz:
Even though I voted for B, it still doesn't mean I'd be churlish enough to turn a hot chick down, just because she is "passive". How shallow do you think I am?
Voted for 'B'.
Cram your "Difficult Choices" are becoming less difficult.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Payne on May 13, 2010, 12:12:51 PM
Voted for 'B'.
Cram your "Difficult Choices" are becoming less difficult.
I immediately began to think of a third choice, ie, Me and the "great in bed" chick, persuading the "passive hot chick" to go for a threesome. Then we'd see how "passive" she really was.
Makes no diff to me. Once you start cranking the voltage up they twitch about just the same. :evil:
If A can learn then it might be a worthwhile investment. But in a once off scenario definitely B.
Quote from: P3nT4gR4m on May 13, 2010, 01:06:53 PM
Makes no diff to me. Once you start cranking the voltage up they twitch about just the same. :evil:
:lulz: :lulz: :lulz: :lulz:
P3nt wins fread.
Well, I of course am married, and I'm married to a happy combination of the two. :mrgreen:
Quote from: Alty on May 13, 2010, 12:21:35 AM
The worst is the blank stare with no movement at all.
I was once with a woman who did that while I was doing my damndest and said, "Should I be doing something?" like I was changing the oil on my car and she felt guilty for not helping.
ugh! Been with a few chicks like that, no thank you!
Implicit in this choice is the dichotomy between being "good in bed" and being "passive". Do you guys think that's a fair distinction?
Can you be really passive and still be good in bed?
Quote from: Cramulus on May 13, 2010, 02:48:13 PM
Quote from: Alty on May 13, 2010, 12:21:35 AM
The worst is the blank stare with no movement at all.
I was once with a woman who did that while I was doing my damndest and said, "Should I be doing something?" like I was changing the oil on my car and she felt guilty for not helping.
ugh! Been with a few chicks like that, no thank you!
Implicit in this choice is the dichotomy between being "good in bed" and being "passive". Do you guys think that's a fair distinction?
Can you be really passive and still be good in bed?
No.
maybe if you'd be all tantric zen like about it, though?
Wait, do you mean Passive like, "I'll let you do anything you want to me," or Passive like, "whatever, I'll just lie here like a squishier RealDoll."?
Because the former can be fun, while the latter can't.
When Mrs. Hawk and I got together we almost killed each other in bed for the first 4 years. Then came her plumbing being removed. Then my meds kicked in. We still occasionally have sex and it is still incredible. But even without the sex we still have a great relationship because we are best friends. I am weird I guess in that just casual sex without some type of emotional content was never very satisfying.
It can be if you are a budding necro.
No Aini!. I said necro.
It's still rape if the corpse doesn't consent.
Not if you carve "surprise" into it :D
Quote from: Cramulus on May 13, 2010, 02:48:13 PM
Quote from: Alty on May 13, 2010, 12:21:35 AM
The worst is the blank stare with no movement at all.
I was once with a woman who did that while I was doing my damndest and said, "Should I be doing something?" like I was changing the oil on my car and she felt guilty for not helping.
ugh! Been with a few chicks like that, no thank you!
Implicit in this choice is the dichotomy between being "good in bed" and being "passive". Do you guys think that's a fair distinction?
Can you be really passive and still be good in bed?
Passive no.
Aloof though can be weirld enjoyable sometimes, but only if she starts it, "come, we're having sex now" and then goes relaxed but that girl was cold and bossy all the time.
And passive can be a challenge. It's like saying "What car would you prefer? A crappy looking old Ford, that goes like stink, or a Lambourghini, that wont go, because the battery is flat.
All it takes is a bit of a push, and you're away!
I dunno. Some people just don't have drive. For example, some people simply do not enjoy giving head. They may do it because they know their partner likes it, but there's a load of difference betweent someone who does it that way and someone who LOVES to give head.
Technique is one thing, eagerness is another.
Some people are just fridgid.
Alty,
dated one. One.
Quote from: BadBeast on May 13, 2010, 05:46:54 PM
And passive can be a challenge. It's like saying "What car would you prefer? A crappy looking old Ford, that goes like stink, or a Lambourghini, that wont go, because the battery is flat.
All it takes is a bit of a push, and you're away!
I've found that people who are bad in bed don't change. It's like a bad kisser; they could learn, in theory, but in practice I've yet to be able to retrain one. It's because they're doing what turns THEM on. Better to find someone you're compatible with from the start.
Also, at my age, if the reason they're not good is "inexperience" then I really want nothing to do with them.
It would have been a hard choice if the options were either an unbelievably sexy person that didn't really do much, or a person that, although quite hard to look at, could do incredible things to you in bed.
yeah, at 29 to 2, this was hardly a "difficult choice"
:dok:
On the plus side, this means I'M the weird one around here!
:magick:
Lol, this thread. I feel inspired all of a sudden.
I dated a girl who would answer the phone during sex.
That relationship didn't last very long.
I could see that not bothering me much, as long as she didn't stop, or use my minutes up.
Doggystyle's good for when you need to fold laundry.
Quote from: eighteen buddha strike on May 13, 2010, 10:11:56 PM
I dated a girl who would answer the phone during sex.
That relationship didn't last very long.
Mario would answer the phone while we were having sex. It drove me crazy. He'd also get up and make snacks or let the dog out. I guess that kind of thing is sort of necessary if you're at it for more than a couple of hours though.
Quote from: eighteen buddha strike on May 13, 2010, 10:11:56 PM
I dated a girl who would answer the phone during sex.
That relationship didn't last very long.
I dated a girl, who would ring up her friend during sex, and tell her what we were doing. She would even get me talk to her friend to confirm she was telling the truth.
Quote from: BadBeast on May 13, 2010, 10:23:05 PM
Quote from: eighteen buddha strike on May 13, 2010, 10:11:56 PM
I dated a girl who would answer the phone during sex.
That relationship didn't last very long.
I dated a girl, who would ring up her friend during sex, and tell her what we were doing. She would even get me talk to her friend to confirm she was telling the truth.
::is oddly aroused::
Quote from: Sigmatic on May 13, 2010, 09:12:11 PM
On the plus side, this means I'M the weird one around here!
8):hi5::)
I guess for us, "passive" doesn't automatically translate to "bad."
Quote from: Sigmatic on May 13, 2010, 10:28:22 PM
Quote from: BadBeast on May 13, 2010, 10:23:05 PM
Quote from: eighteen buddha strike on May 13, 2010, 10:11:56 PM
I dated a girl who would answer the phone during sex.
That relationship didn't last very long.
I dated a girl, who would ring up her friend during sex, and tell her what we were doing. She would even get me talk to her friend to confirm she was telling the truth.
::is oddly aroused::
She even rang up her mother once, and managed to have a conversation about Bus times.
Quote from: Ne+@uNGr0+ on May 13, 2010, 10:36:03 PM
Quote from: Sigmatic on May 13, 2010, 09:12:11 PM
On the plus side, this means I'M the weird one around here!
8):hi5::)
I guess for us, "passive" doesn't automatically translate to "bad."
That's not what it means at the power exchange. :lulz:
Quote from: Cramulus on May 13, 2010, 09:07:22 PM
yeah, at 29 to 2, this was hardly a "difficult choice"
:dok:
I dare you to go ask this question on Gaia Online!!!
Too predictable. :lol:
I'm unsure, isn't the big deal that Gaia is filled with little kids talking about pokemon all the time and being all KAWAIII ^______^?
What's that got to do with this being a difficult choice for them?
Gaia is populated mostly by kids, yes, but it also has 4channers and socially inept adults, too.
The predictable part is that they'd choose the pretty girl because they have no taste.
Quote from: Sigmatic on May 15, 2010, 02:17:00 AM
The predictable part is that they'd choose the pretty girl because they have no taste.
Also because they think they'd get more cred to want a pretty girl, because otherwise you're TEH GAYAIDS. And they'd be claiming that they'd all have only done total hotties, no matter what.
I would say they choose the hot one because when you're getting no sex, and mostly likely haven't ever, even passive is still pretty damn good.
For fun I asked this question in CB. So far all 6 answers have been for the great lay.
I feel dirty just going in there, though, so I'ma stop that.
Quote from: Sigmatic on May 15, 2010, 02:17:00 AM
The predictable part is that they'd choose the pretty girl because they have no taste.
Some are tart at times, but in my experience pretty girls taste just fine.
Aaagh! My brain is full of fuck!! Die!
:lulz:
I posted this question in Yahoo, if anyone wants to compare results here, with results there.
hxxp://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AoiEp99K.vUhfl18jPTP_mKzFQx.;_ylv=3?qid=20100514155645AAnglGe
Quote from: The Lord and Lady Omnibus Fuck on May 13, 2010, 05:59:33 PM
Quote from: BadBeast on May 13, 2010, 05:46:54 PM
And passive can be a challenge. It's like saying "What car would you prefer? A crappy looking old Ford, that goes like stink, or a Lambourghini, that wont go, because the battery is flat.
All it takes is a bit of a push, and you're away!
I've found that people who are bad in bed don't change. It's like a bad kisser; they could learn, in theory, but in practice I've yet to be able to retrain one. It's because they're doing what turns THEM on. Better to find someone you're compatible with from the start.
Also, at my age, if the reason they're not good is "inexperience" then I really want nothing to do with them.
I went from bad kisser to mediocre after having what I was doing wrong explained. So it is possible to retrain a bad kisser (although I doubt I'll ever be great at it, at least I'm not terrible any longer)
Quote from: BabylonHoruv on May 17, 2010, 07:18:07 AM
Quote from: The Lord and Lady Omnibus Fuck on May 13, 2010, 05:59:33 PM
Quote from: BadBeast on May 13, 2010, 05:46:54 PM
And passive can be a challenge. It's like saying "What car would you prefer? A crappy looking old Ford, that goes like stink, or a Lambourghini, that wont go, because the battery is flat.
All it takes is a bit of a push, and you're away!
I've found that people who are bad in bed don't change. It's like a bad kisser; they could learn, in theory, but in practice I've yet to be able to retrain one. It's because they're doing what turns THEM on. Better to find someone you're compatible with from the start.
Also, at my age, if the reason they're not good is "inexperience" then I really want nothing to do with them.
I went from bad kisser to mediocre after having what I was doing wrong explained. So it is possible to retrain a bad kisser (although I doubt I'll ever be great at it, at least I'm not terrible any longer)
How old are you? I'm just curious to compare/contrast your learning skills with the age/trainability of the guys I've tried to retrain.
This is starting to remind me of a pet training thread or someshit... :lulz:
Quote from: The Lord and Lady Omnibus Fuck on May 17, 2010, 09:26:30 AM
Quote from: BabylonHoruv on May 17, 2010, 07:18:07 AM
Quote from: The Lord and Lady Omnibus Fuck on May 13, 2010, 05:59:33 PM
Quote from: BadBeast on May 13, 2010, 05:46:54 PM
And passive can be a challenge. It's like saying "What car would you prefer? A crappy looking old Ford, that goes like stink, or a Lambourghini, that wont go, because the battery is flat.
All it takes is a bit of a push, and you're away!
I've found that people who are bad in bed don't change. It's like a bad kisser; they could learn, in theory, but in practice I've yet to be able to retrain one. It's because they're doing what turns THEM on. Better to find someone you're compatible with from the start.
Also, at my age, if the reason they're not good is "inexperience" then I really want nothing to do with them.
I went from bad kisser to mediocre after having what I was doing wrong explained. So it is possible to retrain a bad kisser (although I doubt I'll ever be great at it, at least I'm not terrible any longer)
How old are you? I'm just curious to compare/contrast your learning skills with the age/trainability of the guys I've tried to retrain.
Who? Me? Im 43, and well past the point where I can be restrained, thank you very muchly! :lulz:
edit: Retrained, I meant! :lol:
Quote from: Professor Freeky on May 17, 2010, 05:53:35 PM
This is starting to remind me of a pet training thread or someshit... :lulz:
Hey, maybe there'll be some useful tips!
Quote from: The Lord and Lady Omnibus Fuck on May 17, 2010, 06:46:40 PM
Quote from: Professor Freeky on May 17, 2010, 05:53:35 PM
This is starting to remind me of a pet training thread or someshit... :lulz:
Hey, maybe there'll be some useful tips!
Rub my...uh....belly and I am yours forever.