Principia Discordia

Principia Discordia => Apple Talk => Topic started by: Nephew Twiddleton on February 01, 2012, 06:27:24 PM

Title: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on February 01, 2012, 06:27:24 PM
So, let me ask you guys a question about a dilemma.

Imagine that you're about to look at some internet porn, rub a quick one out and go about your business for the day. You start browsing a particular category (nothing crazy, just a specific thing) and you see a video that looks promising. You click it and suddenly you realize that the girl looks a lot like your old high school crush that everybody including her knew you had a crush on. It's an amateur video so it's plausible. You stop thinking about that wank entirely and watch the video in certain parts over and over to find out if it actually is. You try and listen to the voice when she's talking, try to figure out the eye color, and no, it couldn't be it's just a doppelganger.... and then she smiles and it's all holy shit it totally is her.

Now with this 99.9999999985% certainty that it's her, what do you do? Do you tell her that her porn vid is online? I mean, you were that awkward guy in the friend zone that pined after her for what seemed like ages and now you know what her vulva and titties looks like, and if you tell her, then she knows that you know what her vulva and titties looks like. But she is still your friend, if in a mostly lost touch with but can communicate anytime easily sort of way.

Ladies, what would you like your friend to do in this situation?
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Jasper on February 01, 2012, 06:31:43 PM
Maybe allude to the fact that you heard a sex video of her is on the internet, so you decided to warn her as a friend.  That would possibly be the most delicate, if moderately honest way of going about it.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on February 01, 2012, 06:36:32 PM
Forget you ever saw it.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on February 01, 2012, 06:36:56 PM
That can be kinda tricky though too, since it's like, "heard through the grapevine that you have a sex vid online. Not sure how many people have seen it, and I can't tell you who I heard it from. By the way, thanks for writing happy birthday on my wall back in August. It was very nice of you."

We have a mutual friend that I would trust to pass the info along for me, and that she would be comfortable hearing the info from.

Problem is that he's gay and wouldn't be looking at porn that had women in it.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on February 01, 2012, 06:37:40 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on February 01, 2012, 06:36:32 PM
Forget you ever saw it.

That is the option that gets me in the least amount of awkwardness.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on February 01, 2012, 06:38:42 PM
Quote from: Billy the Twid on February 01, 2012, 06:36:56 PM
That can be kinda tricky though too, since it's like, "heard through the grapevine that you have a sex vid online. Not sure how many people have seen it, and I can't tell you who I heard it from. By the way, thanks for writing happy birthday on my wall back in August. It was very nice of you."

We have a mutual friend that I would trust to pass the info along for me, and that she would be comfortable hearing the info from.

Problem is that he's gay and wouldn't be looking at porn that had women in it.

Fuck that.  Either she already knows, in which case there's no need to say it, or she doesn't know and there's NOTHING SHE CAN DO ABOUT IT EITHER WAY...So why shorten the time in which she can enjoy her life without that hideous bit of knowledge?

And if her name isn't listed anywhere, it won't come back to haunt her unless, well, you tell her.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Phox on February 01, 2012, 06:39:25 PM
I'm not the person to ask. If a porn vid of me ever surfaces, it's 99.99999% likely that I am responsible for it making it to the internet in the first place.  :lulz:

Aside from that, I think Roger has the right of it.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Jasper on February 01, 2012, 06:41:41 PM
Roger has a point.  Unless there's a way to put a name to the face, it's could be better to let sleeping dogs lie.

Unless she could lodge a takedown or lawsuit notice with the website and avoid some creep from blackmailing her with it.  I'm sure a porn site gets complaints all the time, and since porn is easy to come by, why risk a lawsuit over one video?  Help her avoid blackmail, I say.  It's awkward and difficult and embarrassing, but it's what a true friend would do.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Luna on February 01, 2012, 06:42:55 PM
Erp.

If it were me, I'd want to know, not sure if I'd want to know who saw (and posibly wanked to) it.

An e-mail from an anon Google address, saying, "I saw this, I know you, I didn't want to make it weird by telling you, but I thought you should know the video is (link).  If you don't want to know who this is, I'll delete this account in a month and forget I ever saw it.  If you want to know who this is, ask, and I will tell you."

Gives her the option of knowing who you are and not worrying about it, or NOT knowing, and not weirding things up.

However, Roger may very well have the right of it, and she may either already know, or knowing would cause her grief.  It's out there, and there's nothing she can do.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on February 01, 2012, 06:43:08 PM
Quote from: Jasper on February 01, 2012, 06:41:41 PM
Roger has a point.  Unless there's a way to put a name to the face, it's could be better to let sleeping dogs lie.

Unless she could lodge a takedown or lawsuit notice with the website and avoid some creep from blackmailing her with it.  I'm sure a porn site gets complaints all the time, and since porn is easy to come by, why risk a lawsuit over one video?  Help her avoid blackmail, I say.  It's awkward and difficult and embarrassing, but it's what a true friend would do.

Any civil/legal action would be a matter of public record and would thus be easily searchable.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on February 01, 2012, 06:43:36 PM
Yeah, it definitely wasn't her that uploaded it. I checked the uploader profile and it's some 54 year old dude. Pretty sure she never got it on with a 54 year old dude, so...

Also, I guess this goes to show that you should never, ever make a sex tape unless you want that shit to be seen, possibly by people who know you.

Looks like forget it happened is the way to go about it.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on February 01, 2012, 06:48:29 PM
Quote from: Luna on February 01, 2012, 06:42:55 PM
Erp.

If it were me, I'd want to know, not sure if I'd want to know who saw (and posibly wanked to) it.

An e-mail from an anon Google address, saying, "I saw this, I know you, I didn't want to make it weird by telling you, but I thought you should know the video is (link).  If you don't want to know who this is, I'll delete this account in a month and forget I ever saw it.  If you want to know who this is, ask, and I will tell you."

Gives her the option of knowing who you are and not worrying about it, or NOT knowing, and not weirding things up.

However, Roger may very well have the right of it, and she may either already know, or knowing would cause her grief.  It's out there, and there's nothing she can do.

Ack. Yeah there's that bit of it too.

I dunno, it's probably best to just forget about it, but I don't know.

Also, didn't wank to it. At first I was shocked and also, it would be really weird and creepy.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on February 01, 2012, 06:49:58 PM
Probably can't even have the odd fantasy about her anymore either.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Luna on February 01, 2012, 06:52:34 PM
Quote from: Billy the Twid on February 01, 2012, 06:48:29 PM
Quote from: Luna on February 01, 2012, 06:42:55 PM
Erp.

If it were me, I'd want to know, not sure if I'd want to know who saw (and posibly wanked to) it.

An e-mail from an anon Google address, saying, "I saw this, I know you, I didn't want to make it weird by telling you, but I thought you should know the video is (link).  If you don't want to know who this is, I'll delete this account in a month and forget I ever saw it.  If you want to know who this is, ask, and I will tell you."

Gives her the option of knowing who you are and not worrying about it, or NOT knowing, and not weirding things up.

However, Roger may very well have the right of it, and she may either already know, or knowing would cause her grief.  It's out there, and there's nothing she can do.

Ack. Yeah there's that bit of it too.

I dunno, it's probably best to just forget about it, but I don't know.

Also, didn't wank to it. At first I was shocked and also, it would be really weird and creepy.

Didn't mean to imply you had, you said you didn't.  However, risk is that, regardless of what you say, she'll think you did.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on February 01, 2012, 06:56:41 PM
Quote from: Luna on February 01, 2012, 06:52:34 PM
Quote from: Billy the Twid on February 01, 2012, 06:48:29 PM
Quote from: Luna on February 01, 2012, 06:42:55 PM
Erp.

If it were me, I'd want to know, not sure if I'd want to know who saw (and posibly wanked to) it.

An e-mail from an anon Google address, saying, "I saw this, I know you, I didn't want to make it weird by telling you, but I thought you should know the video is (link).  If you don't want to know who this is, I'll delete this account in a month and forget I ever saw it.  If you want to know who this is, ask, and I will tell you."

Gives her the option of knowing who you are and not worrying about it, or NOT knowing, and not weirding things up.

However, Roger may very well have the right of it, and she may either already know, or knowing would cause her grief.  It's out there, and there's nothing she can do.

Ack. Yeah there's that bit of it too.

I dunno, it's probably best to just forget about it, but I don't know.

Also, didn't wank to it. At first I was shocked and also, it would be really weird and creepy.

Didn't mean to imply you had, you said you didn't.  However, risk is that, regardless of what you say, she'll think you did.

Yeah that's true. Especially if it's from a guy she knows was nuts about her.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on February 01, 2012, 06:57:11 PM
Put it in realpolitik terms:

What do you have to gain by informing her?

Nothing, as near as I can tell.

What do you have to lose by informing her?

Just a friendship.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Jasper on February 01, 2012, 07:00:15 PM
I would want to be told, so I'm going with that. 

But then again, I'm too used to people who prefer honesty and disclosure no matter the cost.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on February 01, 2012, 07:01:40 PM
Quote from: Jasper on February 01, 2012, 07:00:15 PM
I would want to be told, so I'm going with that. 

But then again, I'm too used to people who prefer honesty and disclosure no matter the cost.

"What an ugly baby."   :lulz:
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on February 01, 2012, 07:02:32 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on February 01, 2012, 06:57:11 PM
Put it in realpolitik terms:

What do you have to gain by informing her?

Nothing, as near as I can tell.

What do you have to lose by informing her?

Just a friendship.

Yep. Not that we're particularly close these days anyway, but I do like to talk to her here and there. She's living out of state and has a wife (and no, that wasn't the category- her video buddy was a dude) and seems to be settling into the being married thing.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Jasper on February 01, 2012, 07:03:03 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on February 01, 2012, 07:01:40 PM
Quote from: Jasper on February 01, 2012, 07:00:15 PM
I would want to be told, so I'm going with that. 

But then again, I'm too used to people who prefer honesty and disclosure no matter the cost.

"What an ugly baby."   :lulz:

No babies yet, but yeah.  They'd likely take that if it was patently true.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on February 01, 2012, 07:03:25 PM
Quote from: Billy the Twid on February 01, 2012, 07:02:32 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on February 01, 2012, 06:57:11 PM
Put it in realpolitik terms:

What do you have to gain by informing her?

Nothing, as near as I can tell.

What do you have to lose by informing her?

Just a friendship.

Yep. Not that we're particularly close these days anyway, but I do like to talk to her here and there. She's living out of state and has a wife (and no, that wasn't the category- her video buddy was a dude) and seems to be settling into the being married thing.

Given that, DO NOT TELL HER.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on February 01, 2012, 07:04:07 PM
Quote from: Jasper on February 01, 2012, 07:00:15 PM
I would want to be told, so I'm going with that. 

But then again, I'm too used to people who prefer honesty and disclosure no matter the cost.

Yeah, I would too.

But then again, I would also probably try to make the situation funny by asking, "so what did you think, eh?"
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Elder Iptuous on February 01, 2012, 07:04:32 PM
hmm, would it have been badwrong to wank to it? i mean, if it was known that it was available without her consent, then yeah.  but if it's not, then...  is it badwrong in the case of any video where it isn't explicitly clear that it is a production piece, and has their full consent?  could be, huh?

so, was it a surreptitious type video, or one that she obviously knew was being made?
also, there's sites that cater specifically to 'revenge vids' of ex-girlfriends.  which is pretty fucked up.

also, i have a feeling that one of the larger name pornstars is a girl that i had a crush on in 2nd grade.  (same name, and i could totally see an age progression of her 2nd grade pic looking like this woman)
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on February 01, 2012, 07:08:42 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on February 01, 2012, 07:03:25 PM
Quote from: Billy the Twid on February 01, 2012, 07:02:32 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on February 01, 2012, 06:57:11 PM
Put it in realpolitik terms:

What do you have to gain by informing her?

Nothing, as near as I can tell.

What do you have to lose by informing her?

Just a friendship.

Yep. Not that we're particularly close these days anyway, but I do like to talk to her here and there. She's living out of state and has a wife (and no, that wasn't the category- her video buddy was a dude) and seems to be settling into the being married thing.

Given that, DO NOT TELL HER.

Yeah- good point. Her missus might end up seeing the email and the link by accident, among other things like putting the whole thing behind her at this point.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Jasper on February 01, 2012, 07:10:02 PM
Quote from: Iptuous on February 01, 2012, 07:04:32 PM
hmm, would it have been badwrong to wank to it? i mean, if it was known that it was available without her consent, then yeah.  but if it's not, then...  is it badwrong in the case of any video where it isn't explicitly clear that it is a production piece, and has their full consent?  could be, huh?

so, was it a surreptitious type video, or one that she obviously knew was being made?
also, there's sites that cater specifically to 'revenge vids' of ex-girlfriends.  which is pretty fucked up.

The rule of consent that I follow is that if consent cannot be determined, then the default is no.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Jasper on February 01, 2012, 07:10:38 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on February 01, 2012, 07:03:25 PM
Quote from: Billy the Twid on February 01, 2012, 07:02:32 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on February 01, 2012, 06:57:11 PM
Put it in realpolitik terms:

What do you have to gain by informing her?

Nothing, as near as I can tell.

What do you have to lose by informing her?

Just a friendship.

Yep. Not that we're particularly close these days anyway, but I do like to talk to her here and there. She's living out of state and has a wife (and no, that wasn't the category- her video buddy was a dude) and seems to be settling into the being married thing.

Given that, DO NOT TELL HER.

Didn't know it could wreck a marriage.  Don't tell.  2nded.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on February 01, 2012, 07:12:58 PM
Quote from: Iptuous on February 01, 2012, 07:04:32 PM
hmm, would it have been badwrong to wank to it? i mean, if it was known that it was available without her consent, then yeah.  but if it's not, then...  is it badwrong in the case of any video where it isn't explicitly clear that it is a production piece, and has their full consent?  could be, huh?

so, was it a surreptitious type video, or one that she obviously knew was being made?
also, there's sites that cater specifically to 'revenge vids' of ex-girlfriends.  which is pretty fucked up.

also, i have a feeling that one of the larger name pornstars is a girl that i had a crush on in 2nd grade.  (same name, and i could totally see an age progression of her 2nd grade pic looking like this woman)

She knew she was being filmed. It was shot POV style.

It would have been bad to wank because I wanted her and was rejected. It was something I was never meant to see but merely imagine. It would feel like peeping on her. I know what the real thing looks like now.

I think it would be like masturapetion in this specific circumstance.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on February 01, 2012, 07:17:26 PM
Quote from: Billy the Twid on February 01, 2012, 07:12:58 PM
It would have been bad to wank because I wanted her and was rejected. It was something I was never meant to see but merely imagine. It would feel like peeping on her. I know what the real thing looks like now.

Yep.  That's one reason lesbian porn has no appeal for me.  They wouldn't want me under any circumstances, so there's no suspension of disbelief.

Which is what really, really puzzles me about the apparent appeal of "barely legal" pron in the 35-65 demographic.  It's fucking disturbing.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Elder Iptuous on February 01, 2012, 07:17:56 PM
Quote from: Jasper on February 01, 2012, 07:10:02 PM
Quote from: Iptuous on February 01, 2012, 07:04:32 PM
hmm, would it have been badwrong to wank to it? i mean, if it was known that it was available without her consent, then yeah.  but if it's not, then...  is it badwrong in the case of any video where it isn't explicitly clear that it is a production piece, and has their full consent?  could be, huh?

so, was it a surreptitious type video, or one that she obviously knew was being made?
also, there's sites that cater specifically to 'revenge vids' of ex-girlfriends.  which is pretty fucked up.

The rule of consent that I follow is that if consent cannot be determined, then the default is no.

so the girls in the amateur or 'pro amateur' type stuff (who are generally more attractive, no?) are out, as there would always be question there...
gotta be some big label with the obviously pornstar ladies...

hm... what if twid remembers the video while wanking in the future?  :lol:  not diligently pushing it out of his mind, or letting it linger a bit too long would be badwrong....

(i'm just spouting here, not trying to be offensive at all.  tell me to stfu, if i am.)
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on February 01, 2012, 07:20:32 PM
Quote from: Iptuous on February 01, 2012, 07:17:56 PM
Quote from: Jasper on February 01, 2012, 07:10:02 PM
Quote from: Iptuous on February 01, 2012, 07:04:32 PM
hmm, would it have been badwrong to wank to it? i mean, if it was known that it was available without her consent, then yeah.  but if it's not, then...  is it badwrong in the case of any video where it isn't explicitly clear that it is a production piece, and has their full consent?  could be, huh?

so, was it a surreptitious type video, or one that she obviously knew was being made?
also, there's sites that cater specifically to 'revenge vids' of ex-girlfriends.  which is pretty fucked up.

The rule of consent that I follow is that if consent cannot be determined, then the default is no.

so the girls in the amateur or 'pro amateur' type stuff (who are generally more attractive, no?) are out, as there would always be question there...
gotta be some big label with the obviously pornstar ladies...

hm... what if twid remembers the video while wanking in the future?  :lol:  not diligently pushing it out of his mind, or letting it linger a bit too long would be badwrong....

(i'm just spouting here, not trying to be offensive at all.  tell me to stfu, if i am.)

I dunno man, I don't think that I'll be able to fantasize about her at all anymore. It would be weird.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: LMNO on February 01, 2012, 07:20:49 PM
Uncomfortable question: If you knew she consented to it being uploaded, would you still feel weird about masturbating to it?  And if so, what makes anonymity more arousing?

Another uncomfortable question: How do you know that other amateur porn you may or may not have wanked to was uploaded consentually, and would it affect your desire, regardless of whether you knew the woman involved?
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on February 01, 2012, 07:22:52 PM
Naive idalism aside, in this day and age if you consent to being filmed having sex then you should understand that you are also de facto consenting to having that footage posted on the internet.

And, by extension, de facto consenting to having strangers (or occasionally friends) find it and wank to it.

Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Jasper on February 01, 2012, 07:23:34 PM
Oh, well, in the case of free online porn?  I dunno, I doubt it's possible to enact a moral regarding viewing amateur porn that extends beyond "don't seek out unconsenting porn"  (revenge tapes et al).  Anything more would constitute a thought crime IMO, and I don't regulate my internal workings like that.  Makes me neurotic to try.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on February 01, 2012, 07:24:18 PM
in short: It's only weird because you're making it weird. If I came across footage of some girl I'd lusted after forever and never gotten to hook up with, I'd probably have to get treated for carpal tunnel later that week, just on principle.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on February 01, 2012, 07:28:36 PM
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on February 01, 2012, 07:20:49 PM
Uncomfortable question: If you knew she consented to it being uploaded, would you still feel weird about masturbating to it?  And if so, what makes anonymity more arousing?

Another uncomfortable question: How do you know that other amateur porn you may or may not have wanked to was uploaded consentually, and would it affect your desire, regardless of whether you knew the woman involved?

Never really thought about the consent issue, but I guess if you're allowing yourself to get filmed, consent is implied. I dunno. It's just really weird because I know her.

It's not that anonymity is more arousing. It's that it's less awkward.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on February 01, 2012, 07:29:58 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on February 01, 2012, 07:24:18 PM
in short: It's only weird because you're making it weird. If I came across footage of some girl I'd lusted after forever and never gotten to hook up with, I'd probably have to get treated for carpal tunnel later that week, just on principle.


:lulz:
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Elder Iptuous on February 01, 2012, 07:31:40 PM
is it current?
perhaps it her wife that U/L it, perhaps?
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on February 01, 2012, 07:32:27 PM
Thing is too though that this video may be about 10 years old. I'm not sure how easy it was to upload home sex videos on the internet for your average Joe back then. She may well not have thought it would have come out of this guy's video collection.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on February 01, 2012, 07:34:58 PM
Quote from: Iptuous on February 01, 2012, 07:31:40 PM
is it current?
perhaps it her wife that U/L it, perhaps?

No, doubtful.

She was having straight sex in the video. (Category was glasses. Otherwise it was just very straightforward hetero stuff).
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: AFK on February 01, 2012, 07:36:51 PM
Just to pursue a slightly different angle.

Are you really, really certain it is her?  Is there any possibility that after you had that fleeting thought that it might be her, that you started Lo5ing some attributes to make it be her?

The mind can get tricky like that if you let it. 
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on February 01, 2012, 07:41:08 PM
Quote from: RWHN on February 01, 2012, 07:36:51 PM
Just to pursue a slightly different angle.

Are you really, really certain it is her?  Is there any possibility that after you had that fleeting thought that it might be her, that you started Lo5ing some attributes to make it be her?

The mind can get tricky like that if you let it.

I'm reasonably certain. I tried convince myself it wasn't her.

It was the smile that convinced me- not just because of the smile itself but because of her teeth as well.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: P3nT4gR4m on February 01, 2012, 07:48:16 PM
My advice: Post the OP as your facebook status for great awkwardness :evil:
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: LMNO on February 01, 2012, 07:50:33 PM
Quote from: Billy the Twid on February 01, 2012, 07:34:58 PM
Category was glasses.


Spoken like a true PD pervert.



LMNO
-It's pretty annoying to clean them afterwords, though.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on February 01, 2012, 07:51:25 PM
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on February 01, 2012, 07:50:33 PM
Quote from: Billy the Twid on February 01, 2012, 07:34:58 PM
Category was glasses.


Spoken like a true PD pervert.



LMNO
-It's pretty annoying to clean them afterwords, though.

:lol:
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on February 01, 2012, 07:51:49 PM
Quote from: Billy the Twid on February 01, 2012, 07:34:58 PM
Category was glasses.

This is why I keep coming back to PD.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: AFK on February 01, 2012, 07:52:22 PM
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on February 01, 2012, 07:50:33 PM
Quote from: Billy the Twid on February 01, 2012, 07:34:58 PM
Category was glasses.


Spoken like a true PD pervert.



LMNO
-It's pretty annoying to clean them afterwords, though.

That's why I'm a monacle man, myself. 
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on February 01, 2012, 07:55:30 PM
Quote from: RWHN on February 01, 2012, 07:52:22 PM
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on February 01, 2012, 07:50:33 PM
Quote from: Billy the Twid on February 01, 2012, 07:34:58 PM
Category was glasses.


Spoken like a true PD pervert.



LMNO
-It's pretty annoying to clean them afterwords, though.

That's why I'm a monacle man, myself.

But how many times can you whack it to Ilsa, She-Wolf of the SS?
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: LMNO on February 01, 2012, 07:56:29 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on February 01, 2012, 07:55:30 PM
Quote from: RWHN on February 01, 2012, 07:52:22 PM
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on February 01, 2012, 07:50:33 PM
Quote from: Billy the Twid on February 01, 2012, 07:34:58 PM
Category was glasses.


Spoken like a true PD pervert.



LMNO
-It's pretty annoying to clean them afterwords, though.

That's why I'm a monacle man, myself.

But how many times can you whack it to Ilsa, She-Wolf of the SS?

That sounds suspiciously like a challenge.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on February 01, 2012, 07:57:57 PM
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on February 01, 2012, 07:56:29 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on February 01, 2012, 07:55:30 PM
Quote from: RWHN on February 01, 2012, 07:52:22 PM
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on February 01, 2012, 07:50:33 PM
Quote from: Billy the Twid on February 01, 2012, 07:34:58 PM
Category was glasses.


Spoken like a true PD pervert.



LMNO
-It's pretty annoying to clean them afterwords, though.

That's why I'm a monacle man, myself.

But how many times can you whack it to Ilsa, She-Wolf of the SS?

That sounds suspiciously like a challenge.

Never forget OUR little arrangement, LMNO.  I'm just holding off til my back hair starts to turn grey.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: LMNO on February 01, 2012, 08:01:25 PM
Oh, lord.  My wife is going to be so confused when she hears the screaming.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Cramulus on February 01, 2012, 09:11:02 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on February 01, 2012, 07:24:18 PM
in short: It's only weird because you're making it weird. If I came across footage of some girl I'd lusted after forever and never gotten to hook up with, I'd probably have to get treated for carpal tunnel later that week, just on principle.

ECH is right.

Twid, post the link already, we've got work to do.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on February 01, 2012, 11:07:32 PM
Quote from: Cramulus on February 01, 2012, 09:11:02 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on February 01, 2012, 07:24:18 PM
in short: It's only weird because you're making it weird. If I came across footage of some girl I'd lusted after forever and never gotten to hook up with, I'd probably have to get treated for carpal tunnel later that week, just on principle.

ECH is right.

Twid, post the link already, we've got work to do.

Tell you what. You can watch a bunch of glasses porn and then take a guess as to which one it is.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: navkat on February 01, 2012, 11:20:03 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on February 01, 2012, 06:38:42 PM
Quote from: Billy the Twid on February 01, 2012, 06:36:56 PM
That can be kinda tricky though too, since it's like, "heard through the grapevine that you have a sex vid online. Not sure how many people have seen it, and I can't tell you who I heard it from. By the way, thanks for writing happy birthday on my wall back in August. It was very nice of you."

We have a mutual friend that I would trust to pass the info along for me, and that she would be comfortable hearing the info from.

Problem is that he's gay and wouldn't be looking at porn that had women in it.

Fuck that.  Either she already knows, in which case there's no need to say it, or she doesn't know and there's NOTHING SHE CAN DO ABOUT IT EITHER WAY...So why shorten the time in which she can enjoy her life without that hideous bit of knowledge?

And if her name isn't listed anywhere, it won't come back to haunt her unless, well, you tell her.

RIGHTTT???

If you tell her, you're an insensitive wanker and if you tell people she knows EVER, you're a cocksucker. Your best move is to rub one out to it, get the novelty out of your system and have a really awesome secret that you die knowing.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on February 01, 2012, 11:23:08 PM
Quote from: navkat on February 01, 2012, 11:20:03 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on February 01, 2012, 06:38:42 PM
Quote from: Billy the Twid on February 01, 2012, 06:36:56 PM
That can be kinda tricky though too, since it's like, "heard through the grapevine that you have a sex vid online. Not sure how many people have seen it, and I can't tell you who I heard it from. By the way, thanks for writing happy birthday on my wall back in August. It was very nice of you."

We have a mutual friend that I would trust to pass the info along for me, and that she would be comfortable hearing the info from.

Problem is that he's gay and wouldn't be looking at porn that had women in it.

Fuck that.  Either she already knows, in which case there's no need to say it, or she doesn't know and there's NOTHING SHE CAN DO ABOUT IT EITHER WAY...So why shorten the time in which she can enjoy her life without that hideous bit of knowledge?

And if her name isn't listed anywhere, it won't come back to haunt her unless, well, you tell her.

RIGHTTT???

If you tell her, you're an insensitive wanker and if you tell people she knows EVER, you're a cocksucker. Your best move is to rub one out to it, get the novelty out of your system and have a really awesome secret that you die knowing.

Probably not going to fap to it. But yeah. I'll keep my mouth shut and try not to feel too awkward if and when I see her in person next.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Richter on February 02, 2012, 01:00:02 AM
Quote from: Billy the Twid on February 01, 2012, 06:27:24 PM
So, let me ask you guys a question about a dilemma.

Imagine that you're about to look at some internet porn, rub a quick one out and go about your business for the day. You start browsing a particular category (nothing crazy, just a specific thing) and you see a video that looks promising. You click it and suddenly you realize that the girl looks a lot like your old high school crush that everybody including her knew you had a crush on. It's an amateur video so it's plausible. You stop thinking about that wank entirely and watch the video in certain parts over and over to find out if it actually is. You try and listen to the voice when she's talking, try to figure out the eye color, and no, it couldn't be it's just a doppelganger.... and then she smiles and it's all holy shit it totally is her.

Now with this 99.9999999985% certainty that it's her, what do you do? Do you tell her that her porn vid is online? I mean, you were that awkward guy in the friend zone that pined after her for what seemed like ages and now you know what her vulva and titties looks like, and if you tell her, then she knows that you know what her vulva and titties looks like. But she is still your friend, if in a mostly lost touch with but can communicate anytime easily sort of way.

Ladies, what would you like your friend to do in this situation?

Save it until you have a use for it.  No good to come of revealing it any sooner or later.
It may never come up, but you can kneecap the shit out of anything with the right info at the right time.
Up to your own moral flexibility when "right" is. 
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on February 02, 2012, 01:26:27 AM
Quote from: Richter on February 02, 2012, 01:00:02 AM
Quote from: Billy the Twid on February 01, 2012, 06:27:24 PM
So, let me ask you guys a question about a dilemma.

Imagine that you're about to look at some internet porn, rub a quick one out and go about your business for the day. You start browsing a particular category (nothing crazy, just a specific thing) and you see a video that looks promising. You click it and suddenly you realize that the girl looks a lot like your old high school crush that everybody including her knew you had a crush on. It's an amateur video so it's plausible. You stop thinking about that wank entirely and watch the video in certain parts over and over to find out if it actually is. You try and listen to the voice when she's talking, try to figure out the eye color, and no, it couldn't be it's just a doppelganger.... and then she smiles and it's all holy shit it totally is her.

Now with this 99.9999999985% certainty that it's her, what do you do? Do you tell her that her porn vid is online? I mean, you were that awkward guy in the friend zone that pined after her for what seemed like ages and now you know what her vulva and titties looks like, and if you tell her, then she knows that you know what her vulva and titties looks like. But she is still your friend, if in a mostly lost touch with but can communicate anytime easily sort of way.

Ladies, what would you like your friend to do in this situation?

Save it until you have a use for it.  No good to come of revealing it any sooner or later.
It may never come up, but you can kneecap the shit out of anything with the right info at the right time.
Up to your own moral flexibility when "right" is.

....

Damn dude. I doubt I would ever have need of this information other than if she went "Some bastard uploaded my sex tape, does anyone know where I can find it."

Though the concept of hoarding intel sounds fun in general.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Triple Zero on February 02, 2012, 01:32:19 AM
Roger is speaking the troofpaste. As is Navkat.

Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on February 01, 2012, 06:36:32 PM
Forget you ever saw it.

This.

Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on February 01, 2012, 06:38:42 PMFuck that.  Either she already knows, in which case there's no need to say it, or she doesn't know and there's NOTHING SHE CAN DO ABOUT IT EITHER WAY...So why shorten the time in which she can enjoy her life without that hideous bit of knowledge?

And if her name isn't listed anywhere, it won't come back to haunt her unless, well, you tell her.

Especially this.

Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on February 01, 2012, 07:03:25 PM
Quote from: Billy the Twid on February 01, 2012, 07:02:32 PM
Yep. Not that we're particularly close these days anyway, but I do like to talk to her here and there. She's living out of state and has a wife (and no, that wasn't the category- her video buddy was a dude) and seems to be settling into the being married thing.

Given that, DO NOT TELL HER.

And most certainly THIS.

Quote from: Richter on February 02, 2012, 01:00:02 AMSave it until you have a use for it.  No good to come of revealing it any sooner or later.
It may never come up, but you can kneecap the shit out of anything with the right info at the right time.
Up to your own moral flexibility when "right" is.

Possibly this.






Also, fap. To something. Just fap.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Richter on February 02, 2012, 02:39:57 AM
Quote from: Billy the Twid on February 02, 2012, 01:26:27 AM
Quote from: Richter on February 02, 2012, 01:00:02 AM
Quote from: Billy the Twid on February 01, 2012, 06:27:24 PM
So, let me ask you guys a question about a dilemma.

Imagine that you're about to look at some internet porn, rub a quick one out and go about your business for the day. You start browsing a particular category (nothing crazy, just a specific thing) and you see a video that looks promising. You click it and suddenly you realize that the girl looks a lot like your old high school crush that everybody including her knew you had a crush on. It's an amateur video so it's plausible. You stop thinking about that wank entirely and watch the video in certain parts over and over to find out if it actually is. You try and listen to the voice when she's talking, try to figure out the eye color, and no, it couldn't be it's just a doppelganger.... and then she smiles and it's all holy shit it totally is her.

Now with this 99.9999999985% certainty that it's her, what do you do? Do you tell her that her porn vid is online? I mean, you were that awkward guy in the friend zone that pined after her for what seemed like ages and now you know what her vulva and titties looks like, and if you tell her, then she knows that you know what her vulva and titties looks like. But she is still your friend, if in a mostly lost touch with but can communicate anytime easily sort of way.

Ladies, what would you like your friend to do in this situation?

Save it until you have a use for it.  No good to come of revealing it any sooner or later.
It may never come up, but you can kneecap the shit out of anything with the right info at the right time.
Up to your own moral flexibility when "right" is.

....

Damn dude. I doubt I would ever have need of this information other than if she went "Some bastard uploaded my sex tape, does anyone know where I can find it."

Though the concept of hoarding intel sounds fun in general.

Granted, this is my selective sociopathy talking.  It's easy in this case, I'm detached from the situation.  Everything inherently has advantage and disadvantage.  The only limit are the lengths and means you use to employ them. 
YOU do not have to be the one who tells her about it.  There are always options for setting up 3rd parties.  Especially the kind who are just about guaranteed to blab to her about it.

It's like having a single shot rocket launcher, in a way.  Guilt free, no strings attached.  Just firing the damn thing would be a senseless violent act.  Forgetting about it or "loosing" it would gain nothing.  Turning it in would cause a lot of questions.  Stashing it nice and safe though, you always have the options to truly fuck something if you ever have to.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on July 13, 2012, 10:28:33 AM
In the course of searching for another thread, I do have further info on this.

My old crush has a British clone.

Seriously. It's not her. But it may as well be facewise. I found an extended version in my... extracurricular activities (not tonight, but awhile ago).

The actress in question, while an extremely convincing doppleganger, is in fact British to my satisfaction (my crush was English American, but not British), rather than New Englander.

RWHN was right.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on July 13, 2012, 10:31:49 AM
I also, forgot what I was looking for.

Hmmm.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: AFK on July 13, 2012, 10:34:17 AM
Quote from: Bruce Twiddleton on July 13, 2012, 10:28:33 AM
RWHN was right.


Woo Hoo!
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on July 13, 2012, 10:38:53 AM
Quote from: Gen. Disregard on July 13, 2012, 10:34:17 AM
Quote from: Bruce Twiddleton on July 13, 2012, 10:28:33 AM
RWHN was right.


Woo Hoo!

More importantly, I can whack to it, providing that I can find it again.
Title: Re: Hypothetical question.
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on July 13, 2012, 10:46:32 AM
Less importantly, what the hell was I looking for? It was a thread I started... I got distracted...

I did come across a bad music video addressed to Coyote, who I miss talking to.