Did you know, gentle readers, that every year over 50 Peruvian children are gored to death by wild llamas? That this has been going on for as long as man has coexisted with llamas? Yet assets sometimes believe that beasts of burden are "cool", and they fall into a pattern of abuse that leads to brain damage, social interaction problems, and the antlers of a 12-point llama fatally rammed through their torsos.
Part of the problem is the cutural approval via celebrities of dangerous practices concerning beasts of burden. Juan Valdez, for example, is constantly shown living the easy life of a coffee bean farmer, using a mule with no sign of the ill effects thereof. But the main stream media and Hollywood never talk about what happened to him in the early 1980s...Gored by a bull llama, and hurled off a mountain trail to his death a thousand feet below. They only show him happily bopping up and down his mountains, doing quality control on one bean at a time.
You will hear people say that llamas should be legalized in this country, that it's everyone's right to keep the animal of their choice as a pet or even a means of income. What this would do, of course, is allow Big Llama to cash in, and in the process make llamas more accessible to our assets.
Our assets are our most precious commidity. Which is why any of the little bastards caught with llamas should be given the bastinado and then thrown in the obliettes under the Tucson City Center for life without trial. For the children. I mean the assets.
LLAMAS: NOT EVEN ONCE.
I hear llamas wear AIDS rings. I want MORE POLICE AT OUR SCHOOLS.
:lulz:
So, does that mean Alpacas are alright? They kill more people, but obviously because they're legal it means they're okay. Right?
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 05:01:39 PM
:lulz:
So, does that mean Alpacas are alright? They kill more people, but obviously because they're legal it means they're okay. Right?
No, Alpacas should be illegal, but the grossly mishandled Alpaca prohibition of 1920-1939 has political prevented any effective action.
I myself occasionally own an Alpaca, but my kids are really smart and won't ever become addicts, unlike Those People's kids, who are not as bright and careful as my children. Also, I only the Alpaca when the kids are in bed.
Assets sometimes liquidate other assets with pressure cookers. Perhaps we should prevent this by liquidating all of the assets. For the assets.
Quote from: Twigel on September 05, 2013, 05:06:31 PM
Assets sometimes liquidate other assets with pressure cookers. Perhaps we should prevent this by liquidating all of the assets. For the assets.
Let's stay on topic, here. Llamas are obviously a greater threat, in terms of assets harmed over time. Terrorist attacks only happen occasionally, llama-gorings happen ALL THE TIME.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:04:57 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 05:01:39 PM
:lulz:
So, does that mean Alpacas are alright? They kill more people, but obviously because they're legal it means they're okay. Right?
No, Alpacas should be illegal, but the grossly mishandled Alpaca prohibition of 1920-1939 has political prevented any effective action.
I myself occasionally own an Alpaca, but my kids are really smart and won't ever become addicts, unlike Those People's kids, who are not as bright and careful as my children. Also, I only the Alpaca when the kids are in bed.
:mittens:
Roger, what is your stance on the legalization of emus?
I heard that this one guy in Florida had an emu and ate another guy's face off.
But what about the people that have found llamas to be better alternative transportation? They've tried cars and bikes, but don't feel they are a good fit for their transportation needs, especially going up rocky mountain paths. They also find llamas to have fewer negative side effects, like costly gas expenses and the damage burning fossil fuels does to the environment. Shouldn't they have the option of using llamas as means of getting around, as long as they don't take any children on those trips?
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:04:57 PM
Also, I only the Alpaca when the kids are in bed.
:lulz:
I heard recently that Washington legalized llama ownership, and they actually had a /decrease/ in llama related problems. What do you have to say about that?
Quote from: Facemeat on September 05, 2013, 05:17:19 PM
Roger, what is your stance on the legalization of emus?
It would be a total disaster. Most people aren't smart enough to have them de-clawed, let alone neutered. Within a year or so, America would be completely denuded of vegetation, becoming a desert just like New Guinea, their native habitat.
I oppose research into emus. It just "teaches the controversy", and gives Big Flightless Bird a chance to get their foot in the door. Possession of emu should result in diversion for Quality People, and life at hard labor in the potato mines of Iowa for Those Other People.
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 05:23:23 PM
I heard recently that Washington legalized llama ownership, and they actually had a /decrease/ in llama related problems. What do you have to say about that?
I'd say that the irresponsible people that published that article are obviously shills for Big Llama.
I have researched a study that says the exact opposite thing will happen. Link not forthcoming, because you fuckers won't accept my completely unbiased source.
Quote from: Facemeat on September 05, 2013, 05:19:06 PM
I heard that this one guy in Florida had an emu and ate another guy's face off.
This is exactly what I'm talking about. And who is thinking of the assets? Tell me that.
You know, I'm not a huge llama fan... I've tried them a few times, you know, just to see how well they carry my stuff, and they just aren't my thing. But I've never actually seen anyone get gored by one; in fact, come to think of it, they don't even have horns. A review of the literature on llamas didn't indicate that they're dangerous at all. I'm not saying that everyone should have llamas, and I'm definitely not saying that kids should be allowed to have llamas, but it does seem a little silly to actually imprison people just for using llamas as pack animals.
Quote from: trippinprincezz13 on September 05, 2013, 05:20:42 PM
But what about the people that have found llamas to be better alternative transportation? They've tried cars and bikes, but don't feel they are a good fit for their transportation needs, especially going up rocky mountain paths. They also find llamas to have fewer negative side effects, like costly gas expenses and the damage burning fossil fuels does to the environment. Shouldn't they have the option of using llamas as means of getting around, as long as they don't take any children on those trips?
It's just not worth the risk. Kids will have greater access, and then and then and then the Visigoths are at the gates and the whole army has been gored to death on their terrible antlers and I HOPE YOU'RE HAPPY NOW.
I heard that the llama death statistical data was grossly mishandled for decades by the rubber industry, which profited from the increased use of bikes and automobiles after llamas were banned. Now it is very difficult to do research on the actual lethal potential of llamas, because the llama, wolverine, and candy bureau controls who gets permits to research studies and it has been posited that they may potentially have a bias, since managing llama infractions is a huge percentage of their federal budget. How can we be sure your data is accurate?
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:27:10 PM
Quote from: Facemeat on September 05, 2013, 05:17:19 PM
Roger, what is your stance on the legalization of emus?
It would be a total disaster. Most people aren't smart enough to have them de-clawed, let alone neutered. Within a year or so, America would be completely denuded of vegetation, becoming a desert just like New Guinea, their native habitat.
I oppose research into emus. It just "teaches the controversy", and gives Big Flightless Bird a chance to get their foot in the door. Possession of emu should result in diversion for Quality People, and life at hard labor in the potato mines of Iowa for Those Other People.
But what about the people for whom conventional birds just don't work, or are too expensive? Emus are natural and have few unwanted side effects.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:28:40 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 05:23:23 PM
I heard recently that Washington legalized llama ownership, and they actually had a /decrease/ in llama related problems. What do you have to say about that?
I'd say that the irresponsible people that published that article are obviously shills for Big Llama.
I have researched a study that says the exact opposite thing will happen. Link not forthcoming, because you fuckers won't accept my completely unbiased source.
Right, Big Llama. :roll:
You know, the only reason why llamas were made illegal in the first place was competition with cotton, despite llama wool being a far superior product. I bet they're still lobbying against llama legalization for that reason. They can't compete, so they have to make up all these excuses about why llamas are too dangerous.
For the record, I lost it at "12-point llama".
Quote from: Facemeat on September 05, 2013, 05:29:28 PM
But I've never actually seen anyone get gored by one; in fact, come to think of it, they don't even have horns.
See, this is EXACTLY the sort of shilling I'm talking about. We KNOW they have horns, because people have been gored. We know that the people were gored, because llamas have horns.
You People should learn to research a study. I have. My entire team looks to me for guidance on this sort of thing because I'm really smart and totally "hip" to the assets and their llama-related issues. Why, I talk at them all the time in school auditoriums. They look up to me, you know.
I mean, I hate the people who are all "legalize everything no controls on anything" and talk about nothing but emus and llamas ALL THE TIME, that's just obnoxious. But it seems like everything I've read shows that places that legalize llamas but still have regulations and taxes in place to keep llamas out of the hands of kids assets actually end up with lower rates of llama ownership, and those people who do keep llamas are more responsible owners.
Plus, our legal system is bottlenecked with all these non-violent llama possession cases, and it seems like a huge waste of taxpayer money to keep prosecuting people for something as trivial as just having a llama. Wouldn't it be better for everyone if we free up those resources by making it no longer a crime to have a llama?
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:34:38 PM
Quote from: Facemeat on September 05, 2013, 05:29:28 PM
But I've never actually seen anyone get gored by one; in fact, come to think of it, they don't even have horns.
See, this is EXACTLY the sort of shilling I'm talking about. We KNOW they have horns, because people have been gored. We know that the people were gored, because llamas have horns.
You People should learn to research a study. I have. My entire team looks to me for guidance on this sort of thing because I'm really smart and totally "hip" to the assets and their llama-related issues. Why, I talk at them all the time in school auditoriums. They look up to me, you know.
But can you show me any of the studies you've researched? Look, I have a picture of a llama right here:
(http://www.bloomingvalleyminis.com/Sunny___Northwestern_Michigan_Llama_Show_2009051.jpg)
Quote from: Queen Gogira Pennyworth, BSW on September 05, 2013, 05:31:04 PM
How can we be sure your data is accurate?
It is based on countless studies. Some of which were conducted at great risk to preventionists world-wide. For example, MPP Horace Anderson was critically injured in a freak collating accident.
And you'd just throw his sacrifice away so you could just llama in public in front of stupid people.
Quote from: Facemeat on September 05, 2013, 05:40:31 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:34:38 PM
Quote from: Facemeat on September 05, 2013, 05:29:28 PM
But I've never actually seen anyone get gored by one; in fact, come to think of it, they don't even have horns.
See, this is EXACTLY the sort of shilling I'm talking about. We KNOW they have horns, because people have been gored. We know that the people were gored, because llamas have horns.
You People should learn to research a study. I have. My entire team looks to me for guidance on this sort of thing because I'm really smart and totally "hip" to the assets and their llama-related issues. Why, I talk at them all the time in school auditoriums. They look up to me, you know.
But can you show me any of the studies you've researched? Look, I have a picture of a llama right here:
(http://www.bloomingvalleyminis.com/Sunny___Northwestern_Michigan_Llama_Show_2009051.jpg)
Well, DUH. That's a doe. You are a poopy head.
Quote from: Facemeat on September 05, 2013, 05:37:05 PM
Plus, our legal system is bottlenecked with all these non-violent llama possession cases, and it seems like a huge waste of taxpayer money to keep prosecuting people for something as trivial as just having a llama. Wouldn't it be better for everyone if we free up those resources by making it no longer a crime to have a llama?
We can use diversion for the quality people.
Quote from: Facemeat on September 05, 2013, 05:31:36 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:27:10 PM
Quote from: Facemeat on September 05, 2013, 05:17:19 PM
Roger, what is your stance on the legalization of emus?
It would be a total disaster. Most people aren't smart enough to have them de-clawed, let alone neutered. Within a year or so, America would be completely denuded of vegetation, becoming a desert just like New Guinea, their native habitat.
I oppose research into emus. It just "teaches the controversy", and gives Big Flightless Bird a chance to get their foot in the door. Possession of emu should result in diversion for Quality People, and life at hard labor in the potato mines of Iowa for Those Other People.
But what about the people for whom conventional birds just don't work, or are too expensive? Emus are natural and have few unwanted side effects.
LIES.
Emus make you blind and you grow hair on your palms. Then you get addicted and OD. Broken homes, empty schools, and lost assets.
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 05:32:21 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:28:40 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 05:23:23 PM
I heard recently that Washington legalized llama ownership, and they actually had a /decrease/ in llama related problems. What do you have to say about that?
I'd say that the irresponsible people that published that article are obviously shills for Big Llama.
I have researched a study that says the exact opposite thing will happen. Link not forthcoming, because you fuckers won't accept my completely unbiased source.
Right, Big Llama. :roll:
You know, the only reason why llamas were made illegal in the first place was competition with cotton, despite llama wool being a far superior product. I bet they're still lobbying against llama legalization for that reason. They can't compete, so they have to make up all these excuses about why llamas are too dangerous.
Conspiracy theory.
Llamas kill. This is documented fact. It is documented fact. DOCUMENTED. FACT.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:41:22 PM
Quote from: Queen Gogira Pennyworth, BSW on September 05, 2013, 05:31:04 PM
How can we be sure your data is accurate?
It is based on countless studies. Some of which were conducted at great risk to preventionists world-wide. For example, MPP Horace Anderson was critically injured in a freak collating accident.
And you'd just throw his sacrifice away so you could just llama in public in front of stupid people.
Well, sure it's based on studies,
but like I said in the part of the post that you edited out, most of those studies were funded by organizations that have a vested interest in keeping llamas illegal.
Also, I don't even want a llama. I had a boyfriend who would llama sometimes and I couldn't even be in the same room with him while he was doing it, I get a rash just from second-hand llama. But, you know, I think that's a personal problem, and not something that everyone else should have to pay for.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:43:07 PM
Quote from: Facemeat on September 05, 2013, 05:37:05 PM
Plus, our legal system is bottlenecked with all these non-violent llama possession cases, and it seems like a huge waste of taxpayer money to keep prosecuting people for something as trivial as just having a llama. Wouldn't it be better for everyone if we free up those resources by making it no longer a crime to have a llama?
We can use diversion for the quality people.
By which you mean, /anyone who isn't an asset/. Under the age of 18 and you own a llama? We'll cuddle you and slap you on the wrist and give you counceling. Over the age of 18? JAIL FOREVER. The funny part about this is, assets become adults. I know, it seems weird, but it's true. You don't give a damn about adults do you?
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:45:16 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 05:32:21 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:28:40 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 05:23:23 PM
I heard recently that Washington legalized llama ownership, and they actually had a /decrease/ in llama related problems. What do you have to say about that?
I'd say that the irresponsible people that published that article are obviously shills for Big Llama.
I have researched a study that says the exact opposite thing will happen. Link not forthcoming, because you fuckers won't accept my completely unbiased source.
Right, Big Llama. :roll:
You know, the only reason why llamas were made illegal in the first place was competition with cotton, despite llama wool being a far superior product. I bet they're still lobbying against llama legalization for that reason. They can't compete, so they have to make up all these excuses about why llamas are too dangerous.
Conspiracy theory.
Llamas kill. This is documented fact. It is documented fact. DOCUMENTED. FACT.
AND FACTS DON'T LIE!
Quote from: Queen Gogira Pennyworth, BSW on September 05, 2013, 05:46:06 PM
I had a boyfriend who would llama sometimes and I couldn't even be in the same room with him while he was doing it, I get a rash just from second-hand llama.
Further proof that llamas should be illegal. Thank you for your support.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:47:12 PM
Quote from: Queen Gogira Pennyworth, BSW on September 05, 2013, 05:46:06 PM
I had a boyfriend who would llama sometimes and I couldn't even be in the same room with him while he was doing it, I get a rash just from second-hand llama.
Further proof that llamas should be illegal. Thank you for your support.
You keep editing out the substance of my post and only responding to the parts you want to! That's not how you have a conversation at all, you're just lecturing and doing it poorly!
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 05:46:33 PM
By which you mean, /anyone who isn't an asset/. Under the age of 18 and you own a llama? We'll cuddle you and slap you on the wrist and give you counceling. Over the age of 18? JAIL FOREVER. The funny part about this is, assets become adults. I know, it seems weird, but it's true. You don't give a damn about adults do you?
Well, there's more to it than that. Low-quality assets also don't get diversion because they can't learn.
Quote from: Queen Gogira Pennyworth, BSW on September 05, 2013, 05:48:03 PM
you're lecturing!
I am often paid to lecture. I am a policy maker, and I rub elbows with governors and foreign potentates.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:45:16 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 05:32:21 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:28:40 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 05:23:23 PM
I heard recently that Washington legalized llama ownership, and they actually had a /decrease/ in llama related problems. What do you have to say about that?
I'd say that the irresponsible people that published that article are obviously shills for Big Llama.
I have researched a study that says the exact opposite thing will happen. Link not forthcoming, because you fuckers won't accept my completely unbiased source.
Right, Big Llama. :roll:
You know, the only reason why llamas were made illegal in the first place was competition with cotton, despite llama wool being a far superior product. I bet they're still lobbying against llama legalization for that reason. They can't compete, so they have to make up all these excuses about why llamas are too dangerous.
Conspiracy theory.
Llamas kill. This is documented fact. It is documented fact. DOCUMENTED. FACT.
You have yet to link ONE PIECE OF EVIDENCE that llamas kill. All I'm hearing is hearsay and strawmen. Yap yap yap. Also, a simple Google search will show you llamas don't have antlers. I can't believe I even have to explain this stuff to you.
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 05:49:36 PM
You have yet to link ONE PIECE OF EVIDENCE that llamas kill. All I'm hearing is hearsay and strawmen. Yap yap yap. Also, a simple Google search will show you llamas don't have antlers. I can't believe I even have to explain this stuff to you.
I have. You ignored it.
And those pictures are all of FEMALE llamas.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:54:17 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 05:49:36 PM
You have yet to link ONE PIECE OF EVIDENCE that llamas kill. All I'm hearing is hearsay and strawmen. Yap yap yap. Also, a simple Google search will show you llamas don't have antlers. I can't believe I even have to explain this stuff to you.
I have. You ignored it.
And those pictures are all of FEMALE llamas.
So you're saying there are no pictures of male llamas anywhere on the Internet? If there are no pictures, if no one's seen it, how can you expect me to believe A) the males have antlers and B) they gore people with them? It's complete BS.
I'll have You People know I contributed a lot to this board in 2002. So I'm not going anywhere.
I know that some people find llamas therapeutic, I even researched a study on it. Shouldn't medical llama be legalized?
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:01:49 PM
are no pictures of male llamas anywhere on the Internet? If there are no pictures, if no one's seen it, how can you expect me to believe A) the males have antlers and B) they gore people with them? It's complete BS.
Big Llama has a lot of money. They arrange things, you see, so that only the
relatively harmless
appearing llamas get shown.
Do I have to explain EVERYTHING around here?
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:49:18 PM
Quote from: Queen Gogira Pennyworth, BSW on September 05, 2013, 05:48:03 PM
you're lecturing!
I am often paid to lecture. I am a policy maker, and I rub elbows with governors and foreign potentates.
Now you're just doing it on purpose! What did I do to deserve this treatment? I was trying to take you seriously and address the issue, but you insist on being a fuckwit about it.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:02:01 PM
I'll have You People know I contributed a lot to this board in 2002. So I'm not going anywhere.
Yeah, whatever. Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
And you still haven't answered my question.
Quote from: Waffleman on September 05, 2013, 06:03:39 PM
I know that some people find llamas therapeutic, I even researched a study on it. Shouldn't medical llama be legalized?
No, this will make llamas more accessible to children, so you'll just have to put on your big boy pants when you go for your chemotherapy.
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:04:22 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:02:01 PM
I'll have You People know I contributed a lot to this board in 2002. So I'm not going anywhere.
Yeah, whatever. Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
And you still haven't answered my question.
I did. You didn't listen because my opinion is unpopular with the "cool kids".
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:03:47 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:01:49 PM
are no pictures of male llamas anywhere on the Internet? If there are no pictures, if no one's seen it, how can you expect me to believe A) the males have antlers and B) they gore people with them? It's complete BS.
Big Llama has a lot of money. They arrange things, you see, so that only the relatively harmless appearing llamas get shown.
Do I have to explain EVERYTHING around here?
Big Llama controls Google Image search? O.o
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:05:46 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:03:47 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:01:49 PM
are no pictures of male llamas anywhere on the Internet? If there are no pictures, if no one's seen it, how can you expect me to believe A) the males have antlers and B) they gore people with them? It's complete BS.
Big Llama has a lot of money. They arrange things, you see, so that only the relatively harmless appearing llamas get shown.
Do I have to explain EVERYTHING around here?
Big Llama controls Google Image search? O.o
They're very powerful.
I have researched a study or two in my time, and I have seen the effects of llama-goring. If you had, you'd agree with me...But you only pay attention to the paid shills.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:05:05 PM
Quote from: Queen Gogira Pennyworth, BSW on September 05, 2013, 06:04:04 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:49:18 PM
Quote from: Queen Gogira Pennyworth, BSW on September 05, 2013, 05:48:03 PM
you're lecturing!
I am often paid to lecture. I am a policy maker, and I rub elbows with governors and foreign potentates.
Now you're just doing it seriously and address the issue.
I am a professional.
Oh, come on, that one isn't even grammatically correct. If you're going to mince my words at least don't make a dunce out of me.
Quote from: Queen Gogira Pennyworth, BSW on September 05, 2013, 06:07:15 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:05:05 PM
Quote from: Queen Gogira Pennyworth, BSW on September 05, 2013, 06:04:04 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:49:18 PM
Quote from: Queen Gogira Pennyworth, BSW on September 05, 2013, 05:48:03 PM
you're lecturing!
I am often paid to lecture. I am a policy maker, and I rub elbows with governors and foreign potentates.
Now you're just doing it seriously and address the issue.
I am a professional.
Oh, come on, that one isn't even grammatically correct. If you're going to mince my words at least don't make a dunce out of me.
I can't help it if you can't express yourself properly. This is just another tragic result of emu-abuse.
Now listen here. You're willing to make sick people's lives considerably worse to protect kids... Sorry, "assets"...from an imaginary threat?
Fuckwad.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:05:36 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:04:22 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:02:01 PM
I'll have You People know I contributed a lot to this board in 2002. So I'm not going anywhere.
Yeah, whatever. Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
And you still haven't answered my question.
I did. You didn't listen because my opinion is unpopular with the "cool kids".
How does it go? Step one, I was just trolling. Step two, blame the mind control lasers. Yeah, I think we're right on track here.
Quote from: Waffleman on September 05, 2013, 06:08:56 PM
Now listen here. You're willing to make sick people's lives considerably worse to protect kids... Sorry, "assets"...from an imaginary threat?
Fuckwad.
Oh, so 50 dead Peruvian children a year is "imaginary"?
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:09:01 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:05:36 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:04:22 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:02:01 PM
I'll have You People know I contributed a lot to this board in 2002. So I'm not going anywhere.
Yeah, whatever. Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
And you still haven't answered my question.
I did. You didn't listen because my opinion is unpopular with the "cool kids".
How does it go? Step one, I was just trolling. Step two, blame the mind control lasers. Yeah, I think we're right on track here.
You'll do anything to "fit in", won't you?
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:09:48 PM
Quote from: Waffleman on September 05, 2013, 06:08:56 PM
Now listen here. You're willing to make sick people's lives considerably worse to protect kids... Sorry, "assets"...from an imaginary threat?
Fuckwad.
Oh, so 50 dead Peruvian children a year is "imaginary"?
You made that up, just like the rest of your bullshit.
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:10:20 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:09:48 PM
Quote from: Waffleman on September 05, 2013, 06:08:56 PM
Now listen here. You're willing to make sick people's lives considerably worse to protect kids... Sorry, "assets"...from an imaginary threat?
Fuckwad.
Oh, so 50 dead Peruvian children a year is "imaginary"?
You made that up, just like the rest of your bullshit.
Oh, and I suppose a bunch of congressmen crammed into a sheriff's office would just sit and listen to bullshit, right?
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:10:13 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:09:01 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:05:36 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:04:22 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:02:01 PM
I'll have You People know I contributed a lot to this board in 2002. So I'm not going anywhere.
Yeah, whatever. Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
And you still haven't answered my question.
I did. You didn't listen because my opinion is unpopular with the "cool kids".
How does it go? Step one, I was just trolling. Step two, blame the mind control lasers. Yeah, I think we're right on track here.
You'll do anything to "fit in", won't you?
You know what? I don't even care about the damn llama legalization. I don't own them, I don't ride them, and I've never even them /once/. I just know you're being a douche about this.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:11:02 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:10:20 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:09:48 PM
Quote from: Waffleman on September 05, 2013, 06:08:56 PM
Now listen here. You're willing to make sick people's lives considerably worse to protect kids... Sorry, "assets"...from an imaginary threat?
Fuckwad.
Oh, so 50 dead Peruvian children a year is "imaginary"?
You made that up, just like the rest of your bullshit.
Oh, and I suppose a bunch of congressmen crammed into a sheriff's office would just sit and listen to bullshit, right?
Never happened. Besides, half the congressmen own llamas anyway.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:08:40 PM
Quote from: Queen Gogira Pennyworth, BSW on September 05, 2013, 06:07:15 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:05:05 PM
Quote from: Queen Gogira Pennyworth, BSW on September 05, 2013, 06:04:04 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:49:18 PM
Quote from: Queen Gogira Pennyworth, BSW on September 05, 2013, 05:48:03 PM
you're lecturing!
I am often paid to lecture. I am a policy maker, and I rub elbows with governors and foreign potentates.
Now you're just doing it seriously and address the issue.
I am a professional.
Oh, come on, that one isn't even grammatically correct. If you're going to mince my words at least don't make a dunce out of me.
I can't help it if you can't express yourself properly. This is just another tragic result of emu-abuse.
I don't do emu either, you're just making wild assumptions based on the fact that I don't agree with you. And I didn't even start out disagreeing with you that strongly, you just keep pushing me with your dishonest argumentation into a more radical pro-llama stance, out of spite!
I think it's really rich that someone who goes on about how we don't know who he really is because we only interact with him online would have the gall to make shit up about animal use like that.
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:11:50 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:10:13 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:09:01 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:05:36 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:04:22 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:02:01 PM
I'll have You People know I contributed a lot to this board in 2002. So I'm not going anywhere.
Yeah, whatever. Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
And you still haven't answered my question.
I did. You didn't listen because my opinion is unpopular with the "cool kids".
How does it go? Step one, I was just trolling. Step two, blame the mind control lasers. Yeah, I think we're right on track here.
You'll do anything to "fit in", won't you?
You know what? I don't even care about the damn llama legalization. I don't own them, I don't ride them, and I've never even them /once/. I just know you're being a douche about this.
For the record:
You're high. I know people who can help you with that. For starters, there aren't any black people, man or woman, in my office. The woman I'm assuming you are thinking is black is just a very tan white woman. I've never suspected any co-workers having a thing for me so that is something you are just pulling out of your ass.
I've never said my paycheck doesn't come from state and federal. I've flat out said that is where it comes from on numerous occassions.
Yeah, my boss is an MLlH. There are two managers, one an MLlH and me, the MPP. I've never said the other MLlHs in my office are incompetent, but they do utiliz my assitance and expertise quite often due to my experience and track record. I get shit done.
Specifically, I leave letters out of words, to confuse Big Llama's search engines.
They stomp up and down the underside of my stairs all night, you know.
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:12:59 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:11:02 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:10:20 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:09:48 PM
Quote from: Waffleman on September 05, 2013, 06:08:56 PM
Now listen here. You're willing to make sick people's lives considerably worse to protect kids... Sorry, "assets"...from an imaginary threat?
Fuckwad.
Oh, so 50 dead Peruvian children a year is "imaginary"?
You made that up, just like the rest of your bullshit.
Oh, and I suppose a bunch of congressmen crammed into a sheriff's office would just sit and listen to bullshit, right?
Never happened. Besides, half the congressmen own llamas anyway.
Sure it happened. I've posted about it many times.
Quote from: Queen Gogira Pennyworth, BSW on September 05, 2013, 06:13:37 PM
I don't do emu either, you're just making wild assumptions based on the fact that I don't agree with you. And I didn't even start out disagreeing with you that strongly, you just keep pushing me with your dishonest argumentation into a more radical pro-llama stance, out of spite!
I think it's really rich that someone who goes on about how we don't know who he really is because we only interact with him online would have the gall to make shit up about animal use like that.
Look, I know you want to be able to sit on the couch and do emu all day while watching Dukes of Hazard re-runs and eating Cheetohs. And if it were just you At Risk, I'd be less inclined to suggest the death penalty. However, assets are at risk, so they should be taken away to be beaten to death in foster care. For the assets.
My wife disagrees with me on this, but we get along fine. I may even tell her where I live, someday.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:15:31 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:11:50 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:10:13 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:09:01 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:05:36 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:04:22 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:02:01 PM
I'll have You People know I contributed a lot to this board in 2002. So I'm not going anywhere.
Yeah, whatever. Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
And you still haven't answered my question.
I did. You didn't listen because my opinion is unpopular with the "cool kids".
How does it go? Step one, I was just trolling. Step two, blame the mind control lasers. Yeah, I think we're right on track here.
You'll do anything to "fit in", won't you?
You know what? I don't even care about the damn llama legalization. I don't own them, I don't ride them, and I've never even them /once/. I just know you're being a douche about this.
For the record:
You're high. I know people who can help you with that. For starters, there aren't any black people, man or woman, in my office. The woman I'm assuming you are thinking is black is just a very tan white woman. I've never suspected any co-workers having a thing for me so that is something you are just pulling out of your ass.
I've never said my paycheck doesn't come from state and federal. I've flat out said that is where it comes from on numerous occassions.
Yeah, my boss is an MLlH. There are two managers, one an MLlH and me, the MPP. I've never said the other MLlHs in my office are incompetent, but they do utiliz my assitance and expertise quite often due to my experience and track record. I get shit done.
Specifically, I leave letters out of words, to confuse Big Llama's search engines.
They stomp up and down the underside of my stairs all night, you know.
1) No, I'm not, and you're being an /ass/.
2) I don't give a damn who you date, white or black or Asian or Na'vi.
3) So you're surfing a webforum on federal funds. Nice.
4) I have no idea what those acronyms mean so I'll just assume you don't either.
5) You're a paranoid turd with an Alpaca problem.
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:20:19 PM
5) You're a paranoid turd with an Alpaca problem.
I have very strong will power. I can't get addicted. It's the rest of you I'm concerned about.
My wife is a very tan white woman.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:21:42 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:20:19 PM
5) You're a paranoid turd with an Alpaca problem.
I have very strong will power. I can't get addicted. It's the rest of you I'm concerned about.
My wife is a very tan white woman.
I bet you're Alpaca right now.
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:23:15 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:21:42 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:20:19 PM
5) You're a paranoid turd with an Alpaca problem.
I have very strong will power. I can't get addicted. It's the rest of you I'm concerned about.
My wife is a very tan white woman.
I bet you're Alpaca right now.
How would that be relevant? My assets are at school.
Hey, I was searching around and found this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0
Nice suit. :lulz: This is the "meeting at the sheriff's office", right? Looks more like a dance club where you can park your Alpaca right outside. The speech you gave something else. :lulz:
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:26:43 PM
Hey, I was searching around and found this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0
Nice suit. :lulz: This is the "meeting at the sheriff's office", right? Looks more like a dance club where you can park your Alpaca right outside. The speech you gave something else. :lulz:
WHERE DID YOU GET THAT?
ADMINS! PI!
Oh, yeah, they're all in the "cool kids club". So you can get away with that.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:24:53 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:23:15 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:21:42 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:20:19 PM
5) You're a paranoid turd with an Alpaca problem.
I have very strong will power. I can't get addicted. It's the rest of you I'm concerned about.
My wife is a very tan white woman.
I bet you're Alpaca right now.
How would that be relevant? My assets are at school.
Because when they come home, you're just getting back from riding your Alpaca. Your Alpaca is parked right outside. EVERYONE can see it. Your kids can see it. They can see what it does to you.
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:29:17 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:24:53 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:23:15 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:21:42 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:20:19 PM
5) You're a paranoid turd with an Alpaca problem.
I have very strong will power. I can't get addicted. It's the rest of you I'm concerned about.
My wife is a very tan white woman.
I bet you're Alpaca right now.
How would that be relevant? My assets are at school.
Because when they come home, you're just getting back from riding your Alpaca. Your Alpaca is parked right outside. EVERYONE can see it. Your kids can see it. They can see what it does to you.
But my kids are smart, and they know better. And I have the Alpaca thing under control. As I said, I have willpower and volition, unlike Those People I'm protecting.
Also, Alpaca isn't a gateway animal like llamas. Once kids get ahold of llamas, they're doing dromedaries all damn day.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:31:08 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:29:17 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:24:53 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:23:15 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:21:42 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:20:19 PM
5) You're a paranoid turd with an Alpaca problem.
I have very strong will power. I can't get addicted. It's the rest of you I'm concerned about.
My wife is a very tan white woman.
I bet you're Alpaca right now.
How would that be relevant? My assets are at school.
Because when they come home, you're just getting back from riding your Alpaca. Your Alpaca is parked right outside. EVERYONE can see it. Your kids can see it. They can see what it does to you.
But my kids are smart, and they know better. And I have the Alpaca thing under control. As I said, I have willpower and volition, unlike Those People I'm protecting.
Also, Alpaca isn't a gateway animal like llamas. Once kids get ahold of llamas, they're doing dromedaries all damn day.
Alpaca isn't a gateway animal because it's socially acceptable. That doesn't mean they don't kill thousands of people in Alpaca/automobile collisions every year.
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:33:21 PM
Alpaca isn't a gateway animal because it's socially acceptable. That doesn't mean they don't kill thousands of people in Alpaca/automobile collisions every year.
And llamas result in hundreds of llama-smuggling deaths per year, let ALONE the gorings.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:35:01 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:33:21 PM
Alpaca isn't a gateway animal because it's socially acceptable. That doesn't mean they don't kill thousands of people in Alpaca/automobile collisions every year.
And llamas result in hundreds of llama-smuggling deaths per year, let ALONE the gorings.
Because llamas are ILLEGAL. If they were LEGAL, there wouldn't be any SMUGGLING. And even WITH the smuggling, that's far less than Alpaca related deaths.
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:37:17 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:35:01 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 06:33:21 PM
Alpaca isn't a gateway animal because it's socially acceptable. That doesn't mean they don't kill thousands of people in Alpaca/automobile collisions every year.
And llamas result in hundreds of llama-smuggling deaths per year, let ALONE the gorings.
Because llamas are ILLEGAL. If they were LEGAL, there wouldn't be any SMUGGLING. And even WITH the smuggling, that's far less than Alpaca related deaths.
Do you think those smugglers would just go away? No. They'd start moving dromedaries.
Also, legal llama would still be illegally abused by assets, so your point is invalid.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:42:20 PM
Quote from: Facemeat on September 05, 2013, 05:40:31 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:34:38 PM
Quote from: Facemeat on September 05, 2013, 05:29:28 PM
But I've never actually seen anyone get gored by one; in fact, come to think of it, they don't even have horns.
See, this is EXACTLY the sort of shilling I'm talking about. We KNOW they have horns, because people have been gored. We know that the people were gored, because llamas have horns.
You People should learn to research a study. I have. My entire team looks to me for guidance on this sort of thing because I'm really smart and totally "hip" to the assets and their llama-related issues. Why, I talk at them all the time in school auditoriums. They look up to me, you know.
But can you show me any of the studies you've researched? Look, I have a picture of a llama right here:
(http://www.bloomingvalleyminis.com/Sunny___Northwestern_Michigan_Llama_Show_2009051.jpg)
Well, DUH. That's a doe. You are a poopy head.
No really, I've looked at a lot of pictures of llamas now and I can't find even one that shows them with horns. Besides, I have a friend who is a zoologist and she says they're actually quite harmless other than being a little obnoxious sometimes. Nowhere near as dangerous as cars, or even horses. Look, here's a whole bunch of them:
(http://www.studentsoftheworld.info/infopays/photos/PER/lamas.jpg)
And even some different-colored ones:
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-TPLCMdq9_mI/Tj4N6gxx7TI/AAAAAAAAAGs/OxDe3N6ELHw/s400/alpacas-llama.jpg)
I'm really just not finding any evidence that they gore people or are dangerous at all, really. Couldn't you post some of the research you're talking about, just so we can see where you're getting your information? Maybe we're all missing something. A lot of highly educated and experienced zoologists like my friend seem to think that, purely from a harm-reduction viewpoint, llamas should be legalized, as sending people to jail is more harmful to society than just letting them own llamas. Surely you agree that there must be some validity to her viewpoint even though it's different from yours?
Don't bother, Nigel, he'll just quote your posts out of context and ignore any information that conflicts with his conclusions.
Kai thats just nasty. Roger may be wrong about llama but that youtube is low. Please stop.
Quote from: Facemeat on September 05, 2013, 06:47:39 PM
No really, I've looked at a lot of pictures of llamas now and I can't find even one that shows them with horns.
I already explained that.
QuoteBesides, I have a friend who is a zoologist and she says they're actually quite harmless other than being a little obnoxious sometimes.
I suggest your friend, who obviously has no experience in these things, should go take some classes somewhere. Besides, what do zoologists know? Policy makers
study these things, and we get things done.
QuoteI'm really just not finding any evidence that they gore people or are dangerous at all, really. Couldn't you post some of the research you're talking about, just so we can see where you're getting your information?
Google is your friend.
But not google images, of course, for reasons explained earlier. Why, I've had llama enthusiasts come round the house looking for revenge against my unpopular opinion...And, might I add, the unpopularity of my opinion validates said opinion. They come and peek in my windows. I wear an oversized suit to throw them off the trail.
Quote from: Twigel on September 05, 2013, 06:53:21 PM
Kai thats just nasty. Roger may be wrong about llama but that youtube is low. Please stop.
He's one of the "cool kids". The rules don't apply to him.
Quote from: Twigel on September 05, 2013, 06:53:21 PM
Kai thats just nasty. Roger may be wrong about llama but that youtube is low. Please stop.
Hey, if he didn't want it talked about, he shouldn't have posted on youtube as a public record.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:55:53 PM
Quote from: Queen Gogira Pennyworth, BSW on September 05, 2013, 06:50:44 PM
Don't bother, Nigel, he'll just information.
That's what I do.
I hate you and everywhere you've ever been. I have to go pick up my "assets" from school, you might wanna do that too you smug cunt.
Quote from: Queen Gogira Pennyworth, BSW on September 05, 2013, 06:57:37 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 06:55:53 PM
Quote from: Queen Gogira Pennyworth, BSW on September 05, 2013, 06:50:44 PM
Don't bother, Nigel, he'll just information.
That's what I do.
I hate you and everywhere you've ever been. I have to go pick up my "assets" from school, you might wanna do that too you smug cunt.
My wife has the assets this week.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:42:20 PM
Quote from: Facemeat on September 05, 2013, 05:40:31 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:34:38 PM
Quote from: Facemeat on September 05, 2013, 05:29:28 PM
But I've never actually seen anyone get gored by one; in fact, come to think of it, they don't even have horns.
See, this is EXACTLY the sort of shilling I'm talking about. We KNOW they have horns, because people have been gored. We know that the people were gored, because llamas have horns.
You People should learn to research a study. I have. My entire team looks to me for guidance on this sort of thing because I'm really smart and totally "hip" to the assets and their llama-related issues. Why, I talk at them all the time in school auditoriums. They look up to me, you know.
But can you show me any of the studies you've researched? Look, I have a picture of a llama right here:
(http://www.bloomingvalleyminis.com/Sunny___Northwestern_Michigan_Llama_Show_2009051.jpg)
Well, DUH. That's a doe. You are a poopy head.
Those things on his head look like developing antlers to me. I wouldn't take any chances around something like that.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:43:07 PM
Quote from: Facemeat on September 05, 2013, 05:37:05 PM
Plus, our legal system is bottlenecked with all these non-violent llama possession cases, and it seems like a huge waste of taxpayer money to keep prosecuting people for something as trivial as just having a llama. Wouldn't it be better for everyone if we free up those resources by making it no longer a crime to have a llama?
We can use diversion for the quality people.
We need to corral the Other people anyway. Then we can EMPOWER them with our knowledge about llamas.
This conversation is incredibly frustrating and keeps going nowhere, can we just drop it? I feel like every time anyone mentions llamas or emus or legalization it turns into another one of these TGRR llama threads. TGRR, you have to have other interests besides llama prohibition, what about those?
Quote from: Facemeat on September 05, 2013, 07:01:48 PM
This conversation is incredibly frustrating and keeps going nowhere, can we just drop it? I feel like every time anyone mentions llamas or emus or legalization it turns into another one of these TGRR llama threads. TGRR, you have to have other interests besides llama prohibition, what about those?
And I have to go to class soon. This has been such an incredible waste of time. He's a perpetual stream of BS.
Only read FIRST PAGE! I LOVE YOU GUYS! Will read when I come back!
Quote from: Facemeat on September 05, 2013, 07:01:48 PM
This conversation is incredibly frustrating and keeps going nowhere, can we just drop it? I feel like every time anyone mentions llamas or emus or legalization it turns into another one of these TGRR llama threads. TGRR, you have to have other interests besides llama prohibition, what about those?
I used to have other interests, before I GOT THINGS DONE. Now I am focused like a laser beam. Too bad You People can't do this sort of thing. The world would be a better place, if people knew their place and applied themselves to their tasks.
But You People are all stupid, so once again I have to take the rains.
Quote from: Reverend What's His Bear on September 05, 2013, 08:23:05 PM
Only read FIRST PAGE! I LOVE YOU GUYS! Will read when I come back!
BAD BEARMAN! NO BREAKING CHARACTER IN THREAD!
See? You People clearly can't be allowed to operate without a policy maker at the helm.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 08:49:25 PM
See? You People clearly can't be allowed to operate without a policy maker at the helm.
Oh, please, you don't even make
good policy. More assets go to jail than you save from even the most inflated projections of llama goring.
Excuse him, he was busy telling all the lowly MPH's how to function. They NEEDED him.
So how long before we start womping Roger's face onto jesters and soccer players who are being anally sodomized?
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 08:46:31 PM
Quote from: Facemeat on September 05, 2013, 07:01:48 PM
This conversation is incredibly frustrating and keeps going nowhere, can we just drop it? I feel like every time anyone mentions llamas or emus or legalization it turns into another one of these TGRR llama threads. TGRR, you have to have other interests besides llama prohibition, what about those?
I used to have other interests, before I GOT THINGS DONE. Now I am focused like a laser beam. Too bad You People can't do this sort of thing. The world would be a better place, if people knew their place and applied themselves to their tasks.
But You People are all stupid, so once again I have to take the rains.
:spittake:
Quote from: Queen Gogira Pennyworth, BSW on September 05, 2013, 08:53:32 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 08:49:25 PM
See? You People clearly can't be allowed to operate without a policy maker at the helm.
Oh, please, you don't even make good policy. More assets go to jail than you save from even the most inflated projections of llama goring.
But there's no other choice, or assets may be at risk.
Quote from: Pergamos on September 05, 2013, 08:56:33 PM
So how long before we start womping Roger's face onto jesters and soccer players who are being anally sodomized?
I call that a distinct lack of gratitude and I forbid you from doing it.
Quote from: stelz on September 05, 2013, 08:54:45 PM
Excuse him, he was busy telling all the lowly MPH's how to function. They NEEDED him.
Also, zoologists. They need help with their zoos.
I don't LIKE being the smartest guy in the room, but I have to step up. It's my doody.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 09:35:32 PM
Quote from: stelz on September 05, 2013, 08:54:45 PM
Excuse him, he was busy telling all the lowly MPH's how to function. They NEEDED him.
Also, zoologists. They need help with their zoos.
I don't LIKE being the smartest guy in the room, but I have to step up. It's my doody.
How about the zoologists that work at /museums and universities/ and don't care about zoos? You know, considering the root words for "zoology". You're smart, /of course/ you know this.
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 09:41:35 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 09:35:32 PM
Quote from: stelz on September 05, 2013, 08:54:45 PM
Excuse him, he was busy telling all the lowly MPH's how to function. They NEEDED him.
Also, zoologists. They need help with their zoos.
I don't LIKE being the smartest guy in the room, but I have to step up. It's my doody.
How about the zoologists that work at /museums and universities/ and don't care about zoos? You know, considering the root words for "zoology". You're smart, /of course/ you know this.
You clearly have no understanding of how science works, Kai. I am an MPP. I have to know this stuff. I don't expect people with messy biology degrees to understand things outside of their narrow scope of study.
Anyway, our studies (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jofNR_WkoCE) are the only reputable ones.
Quote from: stelz on September 05, 2013, 09:55:10 PM
Anyway, our studies (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jofNR_WkoCE) are the only reputable ones.
:crankey:
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 09:57:15 PM
Quote from: stelz on September 05, 2013, 09:55:10 PM
Anyway, our studies (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jofNR_WkoCE) are the only reputable ones.
:crankey:
HEY! THAT WAS A DEA FUNDED STUDY ON LLAMA GORING!
Llabas
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 09:47:33 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 09:41:35 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 09:35:32 PM
Quote from: stelz on September 05, 2013, 08:54:45 PM
Excuse him, he was busy telling all the lowly MPH's how to function. They NEEDED him.
Also, zoologists. They need help with their zoos.
I don't LIKE being the smartest guy in the room, but I have to step up. It's my doody.
How about the zoologists that work at /museums and universities/ and don't care about zoos? You know, considering the root words for "zoology". You're smart, /of course/ you know this.
You clearly have no understanding of how science works, Kai. I am an MPP. I have to know this stuff. I don't expect people with messy biology degrees to understand things outside of their narrow scope of study.
Like Public Policy is such a /broad/ field. :roll: My degree encompasses millions of species. Yours deals with a very small portion of topics about one species. How is mine narrow?
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 09:57:15 PM
Quote from: stelz on September 05, 2013, 09:55:10 PM
Anyway, our studies (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jofNR_WkoCE) are the only reputable ones.
:crankey:
Norwegian reasearched study. Says it all.
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 10:21:50 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 09:47:33 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 09:41:35 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 09:35:32 PM
Quote from: stelz on September 05, 2013, 08:54:45 PM
Excuse him, he was busy telling all the lowly MPH's how to function. They NEEDED him.
Also, zoologists. They need help with their zoos.
I don't LIKE being the smartest guy in the room, but I have to step up. It's my doody.
How about the zoologists that work at /museums and universities/ and don't care about zoos? You know, considering the root words for "zoology". You're smart, /of course/ you know this.
You clearly have no understanding of how science works, Kai. I am an MPP. I have to know this stuff. I don't expect people with messy biology degrees to understand things outside of their narrow scope of study.
Like Public Policy is such a /broad/ field. :roll: My degree encompasses millions of species. Yours deals with a very small portion of topics about one species. How is mine narrow?
Bug penises are pretty narrow.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 11:25:12 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 10:21:50 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 09:47:33 PM
Quote from: Kai on September 05, 2013, 09:41:35 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 09:35:32 PM
Quote from: stelz on September 05, 2013, 08:54:45 PM
Excuse him, he was busy telling all the lowly MPH's how to function. They NEEDED him.
Also, zoologists. They need help with their zoos.
I don't LIKE being the smartest guy in the room, but I have to step up. It's my doody.
How about the zoologists that work at /museums and universities/ and don't care about zoos? You know, considering the root words for "zoology". You're smart, /of course/ you know this.
You clearly have no understanding of how science works, Kai. I am an MPP. I have to know this stuff. I don't expect people with messy biology degrees to understand things outside of their narrow scope of study.
Like Public Policy is such a /broad/ field. :roll: My degree encompasses millions of species. Yours deals with a very small portion of topics about one species. How is mine narrow?
Bug penises are pretty narrow.
Or wide. Depends on the bug.
What, you thought I was going to take you seriously?
Quote from: stelz on September 05, 2013, 09:55:10 PM
Anyway, our studies (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jofNR_WkoCE) are the only reputable ones.
NO. FUCK YOU INTERNET.
Quote from: Waffleman on September 05, 2013, 10:28:07 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 05, 2013, 09:57:15 PM
Quote from: stelz on September 05, 2013, 09:55:10 PM
Anyway, our studies (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jofNR_WkoCE) are the only reputable ones.
:crankey:
Norwegian reasearched study. Says it all.
The US came up with similar findings (http://words2vomit.wordpress.com/2012/06/18/walmart-called-your-photos-are-ready/).
Peruvians acting badly:
http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/09/05/20338603-more-profitable-than-cocaine-peru-becomes-top-source-of-counterfeit-us-cash?lite
This is further evidence of the perils of llama-indulgence. ANYTHING to feed that habit.
For a long while, I thought people were giving TGRR a harder time than he really deserved. Sure, this is PD.com and you gotta roll with the punches, but it seemed like he was catching a lot more flak than somebody with a less controversial opinion would. I just thought he was really dedicated to what he thought was the right thing, protecting assets from something that can, certainly, be potentially harmful. I thought the personal attacks were going too far, what with bringing his estranged wife into the argument just because he never introduced her to his family, or lived in the same house, or shared his full legal name. Someone whose work involves something as sensitive as llama legislation has the right to guard his PI.
Then he started saying things like how we were all pixels on a screen to him, but that we really shouldn't make assessments of him based on what he posts. Like, really? Double fucking standard much?
And every time I saw a thread drifting towards what looked like meaningful discussion, I would tune in and eagerly await the presentation of solid evidence from his side. But it was always, at best, something written by the same people who get both their funding and sense of worth as human beings from prohibitionist policies. The rest of the time it would be "not for public viewing" or he'd just change the fucking subject.
So fuck his bullshit, and the bizarre anti-Llama nightmare universe he has completely receded into. The people are sick of lives being destroyed over llama, and eventually public opinion will lead us out of this stupid moralistic control freak nonsense.
And then, I'm sure, all of our assets will be immediately gored to death by llama abuse. Just like in the Netherlands, where they legalized llama use and now literally every single Dutch asset is dead, and the survivors just spend all day in their cafes, using llamas all day. Or so TGRR would have us believe.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 06, 2013, 09:46:42 PM
Peruvians acting badly:
http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/09/05/20338603-more-profitable-than-cocaine-peru-becomes-top-source-of-counterfeit-us-cash?lite
This is further evidence of the perils of llama-indulgence. ANYTHING to feed that habit.
That article said nothing whatsoever about llamas. Also, did you notice that it was written by Carla Salazar? I suspect there might be a bias if she's any relation to Enrico. You know the old Salazorian feud with Peru.
Quote from: Facemeat on September 06, 2013, 10:34:24 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 06, 2013, 09:46:42 PM
Peruvians acting badly:
http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/09/05/20338603-more-profitable-than-cocaine-peru-becomes-top-source-of-counterfeit-us-cash?lite
This is further evidence of the perils of llama-indulgence. ANYTHING to feed that habit.
That article said nothing whatsoever about llamas. Also, did you notice that it was written by Carla Salazar? I suspect there might be a bias if she's any relation to Enrico. You know the old Salazorian feud with Peru.
Attacking the messenger, ITT.
I'll have you know that the Salazar family has produced many fine journalists, with impeccable reputations. For example, Hermillio Salazar was nominated for the Pulitzer Prize for his ground-breaking "Do Like This, llama-fucker"...Which had NOTHING bad to say about Peru.
So your argument is invalid.
Quote from: Cainad on September 06, 2013, 10:30:27 PM
For a long while, I thought people were giving TGRR a harder time than he really deserved. Sure, this is PD.com and you gotta roll with the punches, but it seemed like he was catching a lot more flak than somebody with a less controversial opinion would. I just thought he was really dedicated to what he thought was the right thing, protecting assets from something that can, certainly, be potentially harmful. I thought the personal attacks were going too far, what with bringing his estranged wife into the argument just because he never introduced her to his family, or lived in the same house, or shared his full legal name. Someone whose work involves something as sensitive as llama legislation has the right to guard his PI.
Then he started saying things like how we were all pixels on a screen to him, but that we really shouldn't make assessments of him based on what he posts. Like, really? Double fucking standard much?
And every time I saw a thread drifting towards what looked like meaningful discussion, I would tune in and eagerly await the presentation of solid evidence from his side. But it was always, at best, something written by the same people who get both their funding and sense of worth as human beings from prohibitionist policies. The rest of the time it would be "not for public viewing" or he'd just change the fucking subject.
So fuck his bullshit, and the bizarre anti-Llama nightmare universe he has completely receded into. The people are sick of lives being destroyed over llama, and eventually public opinion will lead us out of this stupid moralistic control freak nonsense.
And then, I'm sure, all of our assets will be immediately gored to death by llama abuse. Just like in the Netherlands, where they legalized llama use and now literally every single Dutch asset is dead, and the survivors just spend all day in their cafes, using llamas all day. Or so TGRR would have us believe.
Wait Cainad is trying to say here is that he supports the horrible death by goring of children world-wide, and that he wants 3 year olds to have access to llamas.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 06, 2013, 10:39:32 PM
Quote from: Facemeat on September 06, 2013, 10:34:24 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 06, 2013, 09:46:42 PM
Peruvians acting badly:
http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/09/05/20338603-more-profitable-than-cocaine-peru-becomes-top-source-of-counterfeit-us-cash?lite
This is further evidence of the perils of llama-indulgence. ANYTHING to feed that habit.
That article said nothing whatsoever about llamas. Also, did you notice that it was written by Carla Salazar? I suspect there might be a bias if she's any relation to Enrico. You know the old Salazorian feud with Peru.
Attacking the messenger, ITT.
I'll have you know that the Salazar family has produced many fine journalists, with impeccable reputations. For example, Hermillio Salazar was nominated for the Pulitzer Prize for his ground-breaking "Do Like This, llama-fucker"...Which had NOTHING bad to say about Peru.
So your argument is invalid.
But her piece didn't even mention llamas!
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 06, 2013, 10:40:33 PM
Quote from: Cainad on September 06, 2013, 10:30:27 PM
For a long while, I thought people were giving TGRR a harder time than he really deserved. Sure, this is PD.com and you gotta roll with the punches, but it seemed like he was catching a lot more flak than somebody with a less controversial opinion would. I just thought he was really dedicated to what he thought was the right thing, protecting assets from something that can, certainly, be potentially harmful. I thought the personal attacks were going too far, what with bringing his estranged wife into the argument just because he never introduced her to his family, or lived in the same house, or shared his full legal name. Someone whose work involves something as sensitive as llama legislation has the right to guard his PI.
Then he started saying things like how we were all pixels on a screen to him, but that we really shouldn't make assessments of him based on what he posts. Like, really? Double fucking standard much?
And every time I saw a thread drifting towards what looked like meaningful discussion, I would tune in and eagerly await the presentation of solid evidence from his side. But it was always, at best, something written by the same people who get both their funding and sense of worth as human beings from prohibitionist policies. The rest of the time it would be "not for public viewing" or he'd just change the fucking subject.
So fuck his bullshit, and the bizarre anti-Llama nightmare universe he has completely receded into. The people are sick of lives being destroyed over llama, and eventually public opinion will lead us out of this stupid moralistic control freak nonsense.
And then, I'm sure, all of our assets will be immediately gored to death by llama abuse. Just like in the Netherlands, where they legalized llama use and now literally every single Dutch asset is dead, and the survivors just spend all day in their cafes, using llamas all day. Or so TGRR would have us believe.
Wait Cainad is trying to say here is that he supports the horrible death by goring of children world-wide, and that he wants 3 year olds to have access to llamas.
Uh, I didn't see anything like that in his post, at all. He didn't say anything about assets being gored or having access to llamas.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 06, 2013, 10:40:33 PM
Quote from: Cainad on September 06, 2013, 10:30:27 PM
<snip>
Wait Cainad is trying to say here is that he supports the horrible death by goring of children world-wide, and that he wants 3 year olds to have access to llamas.
Sigh. This is why I really can't respect you anymore, man.
You've turned your whole life into llamas. If one day you got your every wish, and all the llama in the world just up and vanished, what would you have left? Neener-neenering us on the Internet about how you finally "won"?
Quote from: Facemeat on September 06, 2013, 11:31:33 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 06, 2013, 10:40:33 PM
Quote from: Cainad on September 06, 2013, 10:30:27 PM
For a long while, I thought people were giving TGRR a harder time than he really deserved. Sure, this is PD.com and you gotta roll with the punches, but it seemed like he was catching a lot more flak than somebody with a less controversial opinion would. I just thought he was really dedicated to what he thought was the right thing, protecting assets from something that can, certainly, be potentially harmful. I thought the personal attacks were going too far, what with bringing his estranged wife into the argument just because he never introduced her to his family, or lived in the same house, or shared his full legal name. Someone whose work involves something as sensitive as llama legislation has the right to guard his PI.
Then he started saying things like how we were all pixels on a screen to him, but that we really shouldn't make assessments of him based on what he posts. Like, really? Double fucking standard much?
And every time I saw a thread drifting towards what looked like meaningful discussion, I would tune in and eagerly await the presentation of solid evidence from his side. But it was always, at best, something written by the same people who get both their funding and sense of worth as human beings from prohibitionist policies. The rest of the time it would be "not for public viewing" or he'd just change the fucking subject.
So fuck his bullshit, and the bizarre anti-Llama nightmare universe he has completely receded into. The people are sick of lives being destroyed over llama, and eventually public opinion will lead us out of this stupid moralistic control freak nonsense.
And then, I'm sure, all of our assets will be immediately gored to death by llama abuse. Just like in the Netherlands, where they legalized llama use and now literally every single Dutch asset is dead, and the survivors just spend all day in their cafes, using llamas all day. Or so TGRR would have us believe.
Wait Cainad is trying to say here is that he supports the horrible death by goring of children world-wide, and that he wants 3 year olds to have access to llamas.
Uh, I didn't see anything like that in his post, at all. He didn't say anything about assets being gored or having access to llamas.
It's what he meant. You have to read between the lines. He's obviously been brainwashed by groupthink and Big Llama.
Quote from: Cainad on September 06, 2013, 11:33:16 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 06, 2013, 10:40:33 PM
Quote from: Cainad on September 06, 2013, 10:30:27 PM
<snip>
Wait Cainad is trying to say here is that he supports the horrible death by goring of children world-wide, and that he wants 3 year olds to have access to llamas.
Sigh. This is why I really can't respect you anymore, man.
You've turned your whole life into llamas. If one day you got your every wish, and all the llama in the world just up and vanished, what would you have left? Neener-neenering us on the Internet about how you finally "won"?
Well, yes.
It would be a glorious victory.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 06, 2013, 11:34:26 PM
Quote from: Facemeat on September 06, 2013, 11:31:33 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 06, 2013, 10:40:33 PM
Quote from: Cainad on September 06, 2013, 10:30:27 PM
For a long while, I thought people were giving TGRR a harder time than he really deserved. Sure, this is PD.com and you gotta roll with the punches, but it seemed like he was catching a lot more flak than somebody with a less controversial opinion would. I just thought he was really dedicated to what he thought was the right thing, protecting assets from something that can, certainly, be potentially harmful. I thought the personal attacks were going too far, what with bringing his estranged wife into the argument just because he never introduced her to his family, or lived in the same house, or shared his full legal name. Someone whose work involves something as sensitive as llama legislation has the right to guard his PI.
Then he started saying things like how we were all pixels on a screen to him, but that we really shouldn't make assessments of him based on what he posts. Like, really? Double fucking standard much?
And every time I saw a thread drifting towards what looked like meaningful discussion, I would tune in and eagerly await the presentation of solid evidence from his side. But it was always, at best, something written by the same people who get both their funding and sense of worth as human beings from prohibitionist policies. The rest of the time it would be "not for public viewing" or he'd just change the fucking subject.
So fuck his bullshit, and the bizarre anti-Llama nightmare universe he has completely receded into. The people are sick of lives being destroyed over llama, and eventually public opinion will lead us out of this stupid moralistic control freak nonsense.
And then, I'm sure, all of our assets will be immediately gored to death by llama abuse. Just like in the Netherlands, where they legalized llama use and now literally every single Dutch asset is dead, and the survivors just spend all day in their cafes, using llamas all day. Or so TGRR would have us believe.
Wait Cainad is trying to say here is that he supports the horrible death by goring of children world-wide, and that he wants 3 year olds to have access to llamas.
Uh, I didn't see anything like that in his post, at all. He didn't say anything about assets being gored or having access to llamas.
It's what he meant. You have to read between the lines. He's obviously been brainwashed by groupthink and Big Llama.
What groupthink? Just because he thinks you're not only wrong but also being a complete jackass about it doesn't have anything to do with "groupthink". The majority opinion is not automatically a function of mob rule.
Interestingly enough, there were recent studies done (outside the US of course, but by trusted allies) which showed a much stronger than random chance that "recreational therapy" time with llamas directly correlated with high recovery rates from invasive cancers.
I ask you, is shielding our assets from llama over-exposure really worth losing the generation which personally witnessed humanity climb it's way out of the trenches and cloth covered biplane dogfights into the new age of satellite planned, laser guided drone-strikes?
In fact, Judge Llung, the DEA Administrative Judge who ruled to remove Llamas from Schedule 1 of the Controlled and Endangered Species Act* noted that it would take at least a herd (that being, five or more llamas within a 3 yard radius area) in order to cause risk of serious injury or death. We can trust that most parents will not exposed their assets to such a situation, or have already desensitized their assets to the reality that is the county fair.
* The 'interpretation' of the Controlled and Endangered Species Act is a classified state secret. Judge Llung's ruling was administratively over-ruled, the appeal of which took 9 years to process. The appeal was subsequently over-ruled on counter-appeal.
You know, I don't really have a strong opinion one way or another about legalizing llamas for casual pack animals, but I do think more study is called for on whether they're efficient for transporting goods at high, rocky altitudes. It seems a shame to shut the door on that just because some people on the lowlands might use them just for fun.
I HAVE 3 LLAMAS IN MY GARAGE RIGHT NOW AND SOMETIMES I EVEN RIDE THEM TO WORK. YOU CAN'T TELL ME WHAT TO DO.
Woah man, like, llamas are part of my, like, spirituality man. Having llamas is part of my, like, amendment rights or something.
This is the sort of llama-glorifying hard rock that I've been complaining about.
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/llama
Cripes, first he's all Welshophobic and now he's standing in the way of Discordians to llama or not llama as their pineal glands tell them! :argh!:
FREE THE VICUNA FIVE!
Besides, you would deny all those Buddhists their daily llama.
Quote from: Telarus on September 07, 2013, 05:35:08 AM
Interestingly enough, there were recent studies done (outside the US of course, but by trusted allies) which showed a much stronger than random chance that "recreational therapy" time with llamas directly correlated with high recovery rates from invasive cancers.
THANK YOU.
I was
hoping someone in this thread would have the compassion to mention medical llama. There are so many suffering people who could be helped!
And it's not at all that I want the occasional llama myself or even an emu now and then. Did you know the even the U.S. Government itself had a emu cultivation program of its own in WW2? CHECK IT OUT AND FREE YOUR MINDS!!11
Quote from: Pere Ubu on October 15, 2013, 03:45:13 AM
Besides, you would deny all those Buddhists their daily llama.
You will fucking pay for that. :crankey:
Quote from: Dirty Old Uncle Roger on October 15, 2013, 04:24:03 AM
Quote from: Pere Ubu on October 15, 2013, 03:45:13 AM
Besides, you would deny all those Buddhists their daily llama.
You will fucking pay for that. :crankey:
It's okay, I can pay in alpacascrip.
OH, THAT'S right. You won't accept that, you internet fascist. :FFF:
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/552665_10152248600433140_1963289492_n.jpg)
STOP THE MADNESS.
Today, pigs.
Tomorrow, your entire family.
Quote from: Dirty Old Uncle Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:27:10 PM
Quote from: Facemeat on September 05, 2013, 05:17:19 PM
Roger, what is your stance on the legalization of emus?
Possession of emu should result in diversion for Quality People, and life at hard labor in the potato mines of Iowa for Those Other People.
sure that's not Idaho?
Quote from: Pere Ubu on October 15, 2013, 03:45:13 AM
Besides, you would deny all those Buddhists their daily llama.
:lulz:
Quote from: dontblameyoko on January 25, 2014, 04:13:25 AM
Quote from: Dirty Old Uncle Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:27:10 PM
Quote from: Facemeat on September 05, 2013, 05:17:19 PM
Roger, what is your stance on the legalization of emus?
Possession of emu should result in diversion for Quality People, and life at hard labor in the potato mines of Iowa for Those Other People.
sure that's not Idaho?
Idaho is entirely fictional, invented in 1834 by William F. Zittiger as part of an elaborate tax loophole. It's statehood was never revoked because by the time anyone noticed, we had 50 states and everyone thought it would be a real shame to lose that nice, round number.
Quote from: Cainad (dec.) on January 25, 2014, 04:16:35 AM
Quote from: dontblameyoko on January 25, 2014, 04:13:25 AM
Quote from: Dirty Old Uncle Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:27:10 PM
Quote from: Facemeat on September 05, 2013, 05:17:19 PM
Roger, what is your stance on the legalization of emus?
Possession of emu should result in diversion for Quality People, and life at hard labor in the potato mines of Iowa for Those Other People.
sure that's not Idaho?
Idaho is entirely fictional, invented in 1834 by William F. Zittiger as part of an elaborate tax loophole. It's statehood was never revoked because by the time anyone noticed, we had 50 states and everyone thought it would be a real shame to lose that nice, round number.
Can't we just substitute Guam?
Quote from: Cardinal Pizza Deliverance. on January 25, 2014, 04:58:24 AM
Quote from: Cainad (dec.) on January 25, 2014, 04:16:35 AM
Quote from: dontblameyoko on January 25, 2014, 04:13:25 AM
Quote from: Dirty Old Uncle Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:27:10 PM
Quote from: Facemeat on September 05, 2013, 05:17:19 PM
Roger, what is your stance on the legalization of emus?
Possession of emu should result in diversion for Quality People, and life at hard labor in the potato mines of Iowa for Those Other People.
sure that's not Idaho?
Idaho is entirely fictional, invented in 1834 by William F. Zittiger as part of an elaborate tax loophole. It's statehood was never revoked because by the time anyone noticed, we had 50 states and everyone thought it would be a real shame to lose that nice, round number.
Can't we just substitute Guam?
Guam's a nice thickening agent, I put it in my breakfast smoothie after the ice and frozen fruit, to make it extra-creamy.
I personally never saw what the fuss was all about with llama. I tried it a few times, even.
I inhaled. I exhaled. I stroked an ear or two.
I scratched it on the head and said "Aww! Who's a nice Llama then?"
I do have to say it was very relaxing.
But I never felt a deep craving for llama afterward. I could always take or leave llama.
I think this whole llama addiction thing has been greatly exaggerated. But naturally, since Roger makes his money preventing llama, his vested interest isn't in telling the truth about llama.
Quote from: Cainad (dec.) on January 25, 2014, 04:16:35 AM
Quote from: dontblameyoko on January 25, 2014, 04:13:25 AM
Quote from: Dirty Old Uncle Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:27:10 PM
Quote from: Facemeat on September 05, 2013, 05:17:19 PM
Roger, what is your stance on the legalization of emus?
Possession of emu should result in diversion for Quality People, and life at hard labor in the potato mines of Iowa for Those Other People.
sure that's not Idaho?
Idaho is entirely fictional, invented in 1834 by William F. Zittiger as part of an elaborate tax loophole. It's statehood was never revoked because by the time anyone noticed, we had 50 states and everyone thought it would be a real shame to lose that nice, round number.
TRUTH! http://www.fantasymaps.com/stuff/idaho.html
Quote from: Telarus on January 25, 2014, 06:13:31 AM
Quote from: Cainad (dec.) on January 25, 2014, 04:16:35 AM
Quote from: dontblameyoko on January 25, 2014, 04:13:25 AM
Quote from: Dirty Old Uncle Roger on September 05, 2013, 05:27:10 PM
Quote from: Facemeat on September 05, 2013, 05:17:19 PM
Roger, what is your stance on the legalization of emus?
Possession of emu should result in diversion for Quality People, and life at hard labor in the potato mines of Iowa for Those Other People.
sure that's not Idaho?
Idaho is entirely fictional, invented in 1834 by William F. Zittiger as part of an elaborate tax loophole. It's statehood was never revoked because by the time anyone noticed, we had 50 states and everyone thought it would be a real shame to lose that nice, round number.
TRUTH! http://www.fantasymaps.com/stuff/idaho.html
I beg your pardon sir!
I am not Da Ho. :argh!:
Quote from: Alty on January 20, 2014, 11:57:16 PM
Today, pigs.
Tomorrow, your entire family.
Pigs: not even once.