News:

Your political affiliations, your brand loyalties, and your opinions are all quicker, easier, and contain no user-serviceable parts.


Main Menu

More of a complaint than a rant; it's about you.

Started by Danjanon, February 17, 2012, 05:54:09 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

The Rev

Quote from: Nigel on February 22, 2012, 07:40:10 PM
Quote from: Charley on February 22, 2012, 05:08:38 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on February 22, 2012, 05:06:17 PM
Quote from: Twid,  not Billy on February 22, 2012, 05:05:25 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on February 22, 2012, 05:04:16 PM
Quote from: Twid,  not Billy on February 22, 2012, 05:03:32 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on February 22, 2012, 05:01:57 PM
Quote from: Twid,  not Billy on February 22, 2012, 04:25:02 PM
Joke made. Offense taken. Hilarity resulted.

I know I offended the hell out of Cram yesterday.

Why wasn't that "hilarity"?

Well, that was an open attack and not an attempt at humor. I see a big difference there.

So, if I'd honked a bicycle horn and thrown a cream pie while I did it, it would be okay?

Are you deliberately being obtuse? You damn well know the difference.

Nope.  I do not.  Because I attacked a particular person, it isn't funny.  If I attack an entire race or gender, it's funny.  I don't understand that.

Bullshit, no race or gender was attacked and you know it. If there hadn't been such a over the top reaction to a dumb joke the entire thing would have gone away. In true Discordian fashion we merely reacted  to the reaction.

:lulz: This just gets better and better every time I leave and come back. Apparently "LOLMISOGYNY" is an over the top reaction, but pages and pages of butthurt over someone saying "LOLMISOGYNY" isn't.

:lulz: :lulz: :lulz:
This thread has gone all the way back around to the other side.

Yeah, because you are always right. Oh, that  has nothing to do with you being a woman, but has a great deal to do with your arrogance.

Don Coyote

Quote from: Nigel on February 22, 2012, 07:40:10 PM
Quote from: Charley on February 22, 2012, 05:08:38 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on February 22, 2012, 05:06:17 PM
Quote from: Twid,  not Billy on February 22, 2012, 05:05:25 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on February 22, 2012, 05:04:16 PM
Quote from: Twid,  not Billy on February 22, 2012, 05:03:32 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on February 22, 2012, 05:01:57 PM
Quote from: Twid,  not Billy on February 22, 2012, 04:25:02 PM
Joke made. Offense taken. Hilarity resulted.

I know I offended the hell out of Cram yesterday.

Why wasn't that "hilarity"?

Well, that was an open attack and not an attempt at humor. I see a big difference there.

So, if I'd honked a bicycle horn and thrown a cream pie while I did it, it would be okay?

Are you deliberately being obtuse? You damn well know the difference.

Nope.  I do not.  Because I attacked a particular person, it isn't funny.  If I attack an entire race or gender, it's funny.  I don't understand that.

Bullshit, no race or gender was attacked and you know it. If there hadn't been such a over the top reaction to a dumb joke the entire thing would have gone away. In true Discordian fashion we merely reacted  to the reaction.

:lulz: This just gets better and better every time I leave and come back. Apparently "LOLMISOGYNY" is an over the top reaction, but pages and pages of butthurt over someone saying "LOLMISOGYNY" isn't.

:lulz: :lulz: :lulz:
This thread has gone all the way back around to the other side.

But can't you see it Nigel? Your scathing ALL CAPS wounded them deeply in the hindmost region of their souls. And it is all your fault being legally female all over the place.

Freeky

Quote from: Nigel on February 22, 2012, 07:40:10 PM


:lulz: This just gets better and better every time I leave and come back. Apparently "LOLMISOGYNY" is an over the top reaction, but pages and pages of butthurt over someone saying "LOLMISOGYNY" isn't.

:lulz: :lulz: :lulz:
This thread has gone all the way back around to the other side.

Truth.  Apparently :roll::evilmad: :argh!: :mad:

:lulz: 


Mesozoic Mister Nigel

Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on February 22, 2012, 05:27:34 PM
Quote from: Twid,  not Billy on February 22, 2012, 05:26:12 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on February 22, 2012, 05:24:53 PM
Also, apparently we ban people for disagreeing with us now, Cain.

Why didn't I get the memo on that?

You're just going to keep poking at me, aren't you?

But I thought that was the funny part?  :?

It's only funny if you do it to other people, Reverend. Different people.


"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."


Mesozoic Mister Nigel

Quote from: Out on February 22, 2012, 05:33:22 PM
Quote from: Cain on February 22, 2012, 04:33:02 PM
Clearly Nigel this is your fault for being a woman and so having to be right all the time.

We still haven't established if she is in fact legally a woman. First we need to prove that then we will need to require her to carry around the appropriate papers other wise she would be running around illegally female.

My original birth certificate is archived in the State of Oregon, but they did issue me this certified copy... that should be good enough, right?
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."


Freeky

Quote from: Nigel on February 22, 2012, 07:52:27 PM
Quote from: Out on February 22, 2012, 05:33:22 PM
Quote from: Cain on February 22, 2012, 04:33:02 PM
Clearly Nigel this is your fault for being a woman and so having to be right all the time.

We still haven't established if she is in fact legally a woman. First we need to prove that then we will need to require her to carry around the appropriate papers other wise she would be running around illegally female.

My original birth certificate is archived in the State of Oregon, but they did issue me this certified copy... that should be good enough, right?

Is it the short form birth certificate?  If so, I'm afraid not.

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

Quote from: Cain on February 22, 2012, 05:40:07 PM
Quote from: Pope Coyote of the Wolffnords on February 22, 2012, 05:33:22 PM
Quote from: Cain on February 22, 2012, 04:33:02 PM
Clearly Nigel this is your fault for being a woman and so having to be right all the time.

We still haven't established if she is in fact legally a woman. First we need to prove that then we will need to require her to carry around the appropriate papers other wise she would be running around illegally female.

Surely, the only way we can scientifically test her womanness is to argue with her.

If you lose, regardless of the validity of your premises, then we must conclude she is a woman.

oshit  :lulz:
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."


Don Coyote

Quote from: The Freeky of SCIENCE! on February 22, 2012, 07:53:07 PM
Quote from: Nigel on February 22, 2012, 07:52:27 PM
Quote from: Out on February 22, 2012, 05:33:22 PM
Quote from: Cain on February 22, 2012, 04:33:02 PM
Clearly Nigel this is your fault for being a woman and so having to be right all the time.

We still haven't established if she is in fact legally a woman. First we need to prove that then we will need to require her to carry around the appropriate papers other wise she would be running around illegally female.

My original birth certificate is archived in the State of Oregon, but they did issue me this certified copy... that should be good enough, right?

Is it the short form birth certificate?  If so, I'm afraid not.

I am afraid only an extremely invasive medical examination performed by a team experts on women will do. And by experts I mean men. And by team I mean it will also be televised on Fox.

Cain

Isn't that required for a driving licence in the state of Virginia?

Freeky


Mesozoic Mister Nigel

Quote from: Charley on February 22, 2012, 07:43:03 PM
Quote from: Nigel on February 22, 2012, 07:40:10 PM
Quote from: Charley on February 22, 2012, 05:08:38 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on February 22, 2012, 05:06:17 PM
Quote from: Twid,  not Billy on February 22, 2012, 05:05:25 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on February 22, 2012, 05:04:16 PM
Quote from: Twid,  not Billy on February 22, 2012, 05:03:32 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on February 22, 2012, 05:01:57 PM
Quote from: Twid,  not Billy on February 22, 2012, 04:25:02 PM
Joke made. Offense taken. Hilarity resulted.

I know I offended the hell out of Cram yesterday.

Why wasn't that "hilarity"?

Well, that was an open attack and not an attempt at humor. I see a big difference there.

So, if I'd honked a bicycle horn and thrown a cream pie while I did it, it would be okay?

Are you deliberately being obtuse? You damn well know the difference.

Nope.  I do not.  Because I attacked a particular person, it isn't funny.  If I attack an entire race or gender, it's funny.  I don't understand that.

Bullshit, no race or gender was attacked and you know it. If there hadn't been such a over the top reaction to a dumb joke the entire thing would have gone away. In true Discordian fashion we merely reacted  to the reaction.

:lulz: This just gets better and better every time I leave and come back. Apparently "LOLMISOGYNY" is an over the top reaction, but pages and pages of butthurt over someone saying "LOLMISOGYNY" isn't.

:lulz: :lulz: :lulz:
This thread has gone all the way back around to the other side.

Yeah, because you are always right. Oh, that  has nothing to do with you being a woman, but has a great deal to do with your arrogance.

Are you all doped up on something? What the hell are you even trying to say?  :lulz:
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."


Don Coyote

Quote from: Cain on February 22, 2012, 07:56:00 PM
Isn't that required for a driving licence in the state of Virginia?
If by required you mean once proven legal female they aren't allowed to drive legal, then yes.

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

Quote from: Out on February 22, 2012, 07:55:06 PM
Quote from: The Freeky of SCIENCE! on February 22, 2012, 07:53:07 PM
Quote from: Nigel on February 22, 2012, 07:52:27 PM
Quote from: Out on February 22, 2012, 05:33:22 PM
Quote from: Cain on February 22, 2012, 04:33:02 PM
Clearly Nigel this is your fault for being a woman and so having to be right all the time.

We still haven't established if she is in fact legally a woman. First we need to prove that then we will need to require her to carry around the appropriate papers other wise she would be running around illegally female.

My original birth certificate is archived in the State of Oregon, but they did issue me this certified copy... that should be good enough, right?

Is it the short form birth certificate?  If so, I'm afraid not.

I am afraid only an extremely invasive medical examination performed by a team experts on women will do. And by experts I mean men. And by team I mean it will also be televised on Fox.

:spittake:
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."


Cain

Just because you're a woman Nigel, it doesn't excuse your arrogance.

Don Coyote

I move that without proof the to other wise, that as Nigel is a man's name, that Nigel is in fact a man and not a woman. As such pursuant to standard argumentational logic is automatically wrong.
Regardless of that even if it were proven that he is in fact legally female, as a woman he would not have the right to express any opinions, despite being automatically correct.