News:

TESTEMONAIL:  Right and Discordianism allows room for personal interpretation. You have your theories and I have mine. Unlike Christianity, Discordia allows room for ideas and opinions, and mine is well-informed and based on ancient philosophy and theology, so, my neo-Discordian friends, open your minds to my interpretation and I will open my mind to yours. That's fair enough, right? Just claiming to be discordian should mean that your mind is open and willing to learn and share ideas. You guys are fucking bashing me and your laughing at my theologies and my friends know what's up and are laughing at you and honestly this is my last shot at putting a label on my belief structure and your making me lose all hope of ever finding a ideological group I can relate to because you don't even know what the fuck I'm talking about and everything I have said is based on the founding principals of real Discordianism. Expand your mind.

Main Menu

CHANGE you can believe in

Started by tyrannosaurus vex, September 24, 2008, 05:18:37 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Jenne

:lol:  :mittens:

But seriously, I think military presence as Cain laid out is reasonable, just not necessarily feasible, since this nation is hell-bent on putting fire-and-brimstone assholes in office:


Zenpeanut

psycho-analyze presidential candidates (the last two at least) and release the statements to the public.

Jasper

I like where that one's going.  Psychoanalyze candidates and force people to read, understand, and pass a test on them, before voting for that person so you definitely know what you're buying.

wade

Quote from: YattoDobbs on September 26, 2008, 05:23:00 AM


didn't Athens choose random citizens almost like a jury for its senate? if lawmakers are isolated and given shorter terms this could actually be very useful.  Lobbyists can still write the bills as they do now, just they have to have a random set of people to argue over its details instead of their good buddy.




I was thinking something like this earlier in the thread.   throw anyone in there with a proven capacity to learn, they could do the job just as well as anyone in there right now.  Do this when we get to vote on issues rather then the assholes.

a new form of "jury duty"
REALLY real discordians

i wouldnt hurt a fly
:thumb: :kojak:

Cain

The Athenian system had its upsides and its downsides.

The problem would be a lazy or apathetic citizenry, most likely.  I suspect the mob rule aspect would be less of a problem, given the nature of your constitution, but it would still exist.  Without an informed citizenry, political endeavour would tend towards knee-jerk reactions and recieved wisdom, instead of more considered responses.

Another problem may be the amount of positions and relative power of higher level institutions, such as the Senate. With so few positions and so much power, it would either require a very quick refresh rate in order to ensure more than a minority got seats (which would also make any coherent policy impossible) or some sort of devolving of power down to the state and county level, which while not sounding too bad, may face even more resistance and be harder to inititate.

Jasper

Quote from: Cain on September 27, 2008, 01:24:13 PM
or some sort of devolving of power down to the state and county level

I'm not sure what this is.  Is it like State vs. Federal systems in America?

Sir Bearington

My three are

- Freedom
- Liberty
- And getting your shit together to make it happen.