News:

PD.com: Where we throw rocks at your sacred cows

Main Menu

Official Favorite Tumblr Thread

Started by Salty, March 04, 2014, 12:49:36 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Faust

Sleepless nights at the chateau

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."


Sita

Quote from: Nigel on March 04, 2014, 02:08:39 PM
Quote from: Faust on March 04, 2014, 11:49:53 AM
Quote from: Alty on March 04, 2014, 12:56:29 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 04, 2014, 12:54:03 AM
Quote from: Alty on March 04, 2014, 12:49:36 AM

thisisthinprivilege


Landed on that one right away.   :lulz:

I haven't found much disagreeable with them.

uhhh

"Additional fun about those Special K ads: If you put a full bowl of Frosties and a full bowl of Special K next to each other there is exactly one calorie difference. The extra one is in the Special K. I despise that product, makes itself out to be healthy (it isn't), tells you you can't be happy without it (you can) and steals from body-positivity projects to sell its complete bollocks."

if you want to make a point about special k being no better than frosties don't use bullshit science to back it up.

Even If you put two full bowls of special K beside each other you are you're going to have more of a discrepancy than "exactly one calorie difference"  let alone when you compare it to a bowl frosties.


I'm REALLY surprised because making an obvious  point in a tenuous,  meandering, off mark or otherwise irritating way certainly isn't characteristic of the tumblr privilege crowd, no not at all.

Are they talking about Frosted Flakes, or some cereal we don't have here and is unfindable in Google? According to the Internet, 1 cup of Frosted Flakes is 147 calories while 1 cup of Special K is 117. I'm not going to deny the exploitative and insecurity-provoking advertising imagery, but flat-out lying kind of undermines whatever point they're trying no make, not to mention that calorie count isn't a good measure of nutritive value, or "healthiness", by any means.
It's the same. For some reason Kellogg's calls them Frosties over in the UK.
:ninja:
Laugh, even if you are screaming inside. Smile, because the world doesn't care if you feel like crying.

Faust

Quote from: Nigel on March 04, 2014, 04:35:26 PM
Quote from: Faust on March 04, 2014, 02:23:10 PM
Also everyone should check out the Bartkira project:

http://www.tumblr.com/search/bartkira

The ad on that page was priceless!


I'm afraid the image wont load.

I should probably have given some context for the bartkira project.

Artists are invited to redraw their favourite page of akira with Simpsons characters in place of the originals.

The concept is just a silly game but there have been some incredible submissions by some really talented artists, even some by a few well known artists.
Sleepless nights at the chateau

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

Quote from: Faust on March 04, 2014, 04:56:48 PM
Quote from: Nigel on March 04, 2014, 04:35:26 PM
Quote from: Faust on March 04, 2014, 02:23:10 PM
Also everyone should check out the Bartkira project:

http://www.tumblr.com/search/bartkira

The ad on that page was priceless!


I'm afraid the image wont load.

I should probably have given some context for the bartkira project.

Artists are invited to redraw their favourite page of akira with Simpsons characters in place of the originals.

The concept is just a silly game but there have been some incredible submissions by some really talented artists, even some by a few well known artists.

It was funny! But the ad was funnier. I'll try to save it somewhere I can share it more easily.
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."


MMIX

Quote from: Faust on March 04, 2014, 11:49:53 AM
Quote from: Alty on March 04, 2014, 12:56:29 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 04, 2014, 12:54:03 AM
Quote from: Alty on March 04, 2014, 12:49:36 AM

thisisthinprivilege


Landed on that one right away.   :lulz:

I haven't found much disagreeable with them.

uhhh

"Additional fun about those Special K ads: If you put a full bowl of Frosties and a full bowl of Special K next to each other there is exactly one calorie difference. The extra one is in the Special K. I despise that product, makes itself out to be healthy (it isn't), tells you you can't be happy without it (you can) and steals from body-positivity projects to sell its complete bollocks."

if you want to make a point about special k being no better than frosties don't use bullshit science to back it up.

Even If you put two full bowls of special K beside each other you are you're going to have more of a discrepancy than "exactly one calorie difference"  let alone when you compare it to a bowl frosties.


I'm REALLY surprised because making an obvious  point in a tenuous,  meandering, off mark or otherwise irritating way certainly isn't characteristic of the tumblr privilege crowd, no not at all.

I would suggest that the point is based on Kelloggs own figures, available from their website. This shows comparative data for a set portion portion of each of their products. For Special K & Frosties [Frosted Flakes in the US] the data is for a 30 g portion of cereal plus 125 ml of semi-skimmed milk. The stated difference is indeed 1 calorie. Sorry but I'm not detecting any bullshit science there - oh, except that they got the spare calorie the wrong way round, apparently there are 172 calories in the standard sample of Special K and 173 in Frosties.
"The ultimate hidden truth of the world is that it is something we make and could just as easily make differently" David Graeber

Salty

Quote from: Faust on March 04, 2014, 11:49:53 AM
Quote from: Alty on March 04, 2014, 12:56:29 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 04, 2014, 12:54:03 AM
Quote from: Alty on March 04, 2014, 12:49:36 AM

thisisthinprivilege


Landed on that one right away.   :lulz:

I haven't found much disagreeable with them.

uhhh

"Additional fun about those Special K ads: If you put a full bowl of Frosties and a full bowl of Special K next to each other there is exactly one calorie difference. The extra one is in the Special K. I despise that product, makes itself out to be healthy (it isn't), tells you you can't be happy without it (you can) and steals from body-positivity projects to sell its complete bollocks."

if you want to make a point about special k being no better than frosties don't use bullshit science to back it up.

Even If you put two full bowls of special K beside each other you are you're going to have more of a discrepancy than "exactly one calorie difference"  let alone when you compare it to a bowl frosties.


I'm REALLY surprised because making an obvious  point in a tenuous,  meandering, off mark or otherwise irritating way certainly isn't characteristic of the tumblr privilege crowd, no not at all.

Well, I'm not saying they blow liquid sunshine out of their asses or anything.

Certainly, posting that person's comment was stupid and doesn't do amyhing to help their cause.
The world is a car and you're the crash test dummy.

Faust

Quote from: MMIX on March 04, 2014, 08:29:28 PM
Quote from: Faust on March 04, 2014, 11:49:53 AM
Quote from: Alty on March 04, 2014, 12:56:29 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 04, 2014, 12:54:03 AM
Quote from: Alty on March 04, 2014, 12:49:36 AM

thisisthinprivilege


Landed on that one right away.   :lulz:

I haven't found much disagreeable with them.

uhhh

"Additional fun about those Special K ads: If you put a full bowl of Frosties and a full bowl of Special K next to each other there is exactly one calorie difference. The extra one is in the Special K. I despise that product, makes itself out to be healthy (it isn't), tells you you can't be happy without it (you can) and steals from body-positivity projects to sell its complete bollocks."

if you want to make a point about special k being no better than frosties don't use bullshit science to back it up.

Even If you put two full bowls of special K beside each other you are you're going to have more of a discrepancy than "exactly one calorie difference"  let alone when you compare it to a bowl frosties.


I'm REALLY surprised because making an obvious  point in a tenuous,  meandering, off mark or otherwise irritating way certainly isn't characteristic of the tumblr privilege crowd, no not at all.

I would suggest that the point is based on Kelloggs own figures, available from their website. This shows comparative data for a set portion portion of each of their products. For Special K & Frosties [Frosted Flakes in the US] the data is for a 30 g portion of cereal plus 125 ml of semi-skimmed milk. The stated difference is indeed 1 calorie. Sorry but I'm not detecting any bullshit science there - oh, except that they got the spare calorie the wrong way round, apparently there are 172 calories in the standard sample of Special K and 173 in Frosties.

Ok so it's quoting the cereal boxes figures. Those are bullshit figures, but I guess in this case they are second hand bullshit figures.

Everyone knows special k and frosties are basically the same unhealthy shit marketed differently. Those who care are probably eating something that is 90 percent grain with no sugar.

It's not the outrage over the cereal differences, I agree with a lot of that. It's the pedantry (if that's a word).
Sleepless nights at the chateau

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

Quote from: Faust on March 04, 2014, 09:19:22 PM
Quote from: MMIX on March 04, 2014, 08:29:28 PM
Quote from: Faust on March 04, 2014, 11:49:53 AM
Quote from: Alty on March 04, 2014, 12:56:29 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 04, 2014, 12:54:03 AM
Quote from: Alty on March 04, 2014, 12:49:36 AM

thisisthinprivilege


Landed on that one right away.   :lulz:

I haven't found much disagreeable with them.

uhhh

"Additional fun about those Special K ads: If you put a full bowl of Frosties and a full bowl of Special K next to each other there is exactly one calorie difference. The extra one is in the Special K. I despise that product, makes itself out to be healthy (it isn't), tells you you can't be happy without it (you can) and steals from body-positivity projects to sell its complete bollocks."

if you want to make a point about special k being no better than frosties don't use bullshit science to back it up.

Even If you put two full bowls of special K beside each other you are you're going to have more of a discrepancy than "exactly one calorie difference"  let alone when you compare it to a bowl frosties.


I'm REALLY surprised because making an obvious  point in a tenuous,  meandering, off mark or otherwise irritating way certainly isn't characteristic of the tumblr privilege crowd, no not at all.

I would suggest that the point is based on Kelloggs own figures, available from their website. This shows comparative data for a set portion portion of each of their products. For Special K & Frosties [Frosted Flakes in the US] the data is for a 30 g portion of cereal plus 125 ml of semi-skimmed milk. The stated difference is indeed 1 calorie. Sorry but I'm not detecting any bullshit science there - oh, except that they got the spare calorie the wrong way round, apparently there are 172 calories in the standard sample of Special K and 173 in Frosties.

Ok so it's quoting the cereal boxes figures. Those are bullshit figures, but I guess in this case they are second hand bullshit figures.

Everyone knows special k and frosties are basically the same unhealthy shit marketed differently. Those who care are probably eating something that is 90 percent grain with no sugar.

It's not the outrage over the cereal differences, I agree with a lot of that. It's the pedantry (if that's a word).

Weird, in the US they are two very distinctly different cereals.
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."


Faust

Special K, crunchy nut cornflakes and frosties are all basically all the same thing give or take a small handful of sugar.
Sleepless nights at the chateau

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

Quote from: Faust on March 04, 2014, 10:13:02 PM
Special K, crunchy nut cornflakes and frosties are all basically all the same thing give or take a small handful of sugar.

I have no idea what crunchy nut cornflakes are. Here, frosted flakes are basically cornflakes that have been hosed with a buttload of sugar (both cornflakes and Frosted Flakes belong to a category I call "yellow cereal"), while Special K doesn't have any corn and is less sugary, more like Wheaties (a larger category I call "brown cereal").

There is also white cereal. It's made out of rice and tastes like air.
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."


Faust

Quote from: Nigel on March 04, 2014, 10:24:10 PM
Quote from: Faust on March 04, 2014, 10:13:02 PM
Special K, crunchy nut cornflakes and frosties are all basically all the same thing give or take a small handful of sugar.

I have no idea what crunchy nut cornflakes are. Here, frosted flakes are basically cornflakes that have been hosed with a buttload of sugar (both cornflakes and Frosted Flakes belong to a category I call "yellow cereal"), while Special K doesn't have any corn and is less sugary, more like Wheaties (a larger category I call "brown cereal").

There is also white cereal. It's made out of rice and tastes like air.

Maybe I'm mixing up special k with frosties.
We have pretty much the same selection, rice crispies and cocopops with zero nutritional value and will leave you hungry an hour later.
Cornflakes, frosties and the like, high in sugar but better for you than the rice stuff.

And then the wholegrain and wheat stuff which tastes bad for a week and suddenly starts tasting amazing after that.
Sleepless nights at the chateau

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

Quote from: Faust on March 04, 2014, 10:56:52 PM
Quote from: Nigel on March 04, 2014, 10:24:10 PM
Quote from: Faust on March 04, 2014, 10:13:02 PM
Special K, crunchy nut cornflakes and frosties are all basically all the same thing give or take a small handful of sugar.

I have no idea what crunchy nut cornflakes are. Here, frosted flakes are basically cornflakes that have been hosed with a buttload of sugar (both cornflakes and Frosted Flakes belong to a category I call "yellow cereal"), while Special K doesn't have any corn and is less sugary, more like Wheaties (a larger category I call "brown cereal").

There is also white cereal. It's made out of rice and tastes like air.

Maybe I'm mixing up special k with frosties.
We have pretty much the same selection, rice crispies and cocopops with zero nutritional value and will leave you hungry an hour later.
Cornflakes, frosties and the like, high in sugar but better for you than the rice stuff.

And then the wholegrain and wheat stuff which tastes bad for a week and suddenly starts tasting amazing after that.

Special K (in the US) is basically a wheat bran flake that's been lightly coated in sugar. Less sugar than Frosted Flakes though, more of a clear glaze than a white frost.

I noticed that on the labels here, the portions are listed differently. The calories-per-portion of Special K is for 1 cup (dry), whereas for Frosted Flakes it's 3/4 cup (dry), making it look at first glance as if they have nearly identical calorie counts.

I imagine MMIX will chime in shortly to try to make at least one of us WRONG again, as that is, apparently, the only time she ever posts. :lol:
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."


The Good Reverend Roger

I have been informed by reliable sources that I am a "shitlord".

:lol:

I'll show THEM shitlord.  Oh, my, yes.
" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

"Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 04, 2014, 11:07:20 PM
I have been informed by reliable sources that I am a "shitlord".

:lol:

I'll show THEM shitlord.  Oh, my, yes.

:lulz: Oh Tumblr, what wrath have you unleashed?
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."