ATTN: ADMIN TEAM (and everyone else, for the sake of transparency)

[the last yatto]

Let's all get some sugar cubes and go see social network movie

[Adios]

Let's all get some sugar cubes and go see social network movie

Don't make me kill you, I'll miss you, but I will still kill you.

[the last yatto]

If you do anything of the sort... I'll say 'he who shall not be named' name three times and summon him to haunt this place

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

And if it that is contentious, you can jam your protests somewhere dark and painful, because quite frankly I'm tired of having to explain myself when I've done nothing wrong.

What Charley and Roger said is totally true, Cain. Yes, your request was reasonable, and you are not the reason they got pissed off.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

If you do anything of the sort... I'll say 'he who shall not be named' name three times and summon him to haunt this place

I forget that guy's name, but you just gave me an idea. An awesome idea. Can you PM his name to me?

Never mind, I found it.

[Adios]

If you do anything of the sort... I'll say 'he who shall not be named' name three times and summon him to haunt this place

I AM HE WHO SHALL NOT BE NAMED DAMMIT.

[the last yatto]

Ill do one better and reveal a few of our hidden trolls.

Kaos is even around somewhere

[Faust]

Let's all get some sugar cubes and go see social network movie

That was actually surprisingly good. David fincher is a talented director.

[Doktor Howl]

To clear up any possible confusion, this is exactly what I said earlier on

Uh, can we please lay off the vague accusations about people until those who actually have the power to check an IP say something?  Please?  It's only a little thing I'm asking here, since, if you don't have said power, you don't know and you're just wildly speculating anyway. 

Just a trend I've noticed recently (not just Hawk) and it's starting to irritate slightly.  I know how I'd react on a board which treated my first post with suspicion.

I don't think this request is unreasonable, or was asked in an unreasonable manner?  I'm not saying if someone acts like a tard you should treat them with kid gloves, I'm saying if you're going to accuse someone of being a previous troll, at least have some evidence to back this up.  Being annoying or having some knowledge of things that happened on the board don't exactly count (especially since most people know to lurk more by now), and if they are being annoying...well, that falls under the acting like a tard bit I posted before.

I really just think this is common sense, and don't see that it should be contentious at all.  I'd rather not act like the tards at The Cellar and similar places, where, IIRC, some of us were treated with that initial suspicion.  It tends to result in negative feedback loops and downward spirals of interaction, until the situation that was initially trying to be avoided is happening  ie everyone flips into troll mode for no good reason. 

That's all.

Yeah, you're right.

I just had an undeniable urge to yank on Cram's chain, due to one (1) post he made.

169% my fault.

[East Coast Hustle]

1) People don't like being told what to do.
2) People don't like being told that people don't like being told what to do.
3) Goto 1)

Please point me to where anybody is being told what to do ITT.

otherwise, not helping anything dude.

Not directly, no.  However, there were misperceptions that someone was telling someone else what to do.  And for some odd reason, that was enough to start the hissyshitstorm.

a misperception based on the misperceivers either utterly lacking reading comprehension or having their heads buried firmly up their asses, and therefore inexcusable.

[Adios]

To clear up any possible confusion, this is exactly what I said earlier on

Uh, can we please lay off the vague accusations about people until those who actually have the power to check an IP say something?  Please?  It's only a little thing I'm asking here, since, if you don't have said power, you don't know and you're just wildly speculating anyway. 

Just a trend I've noticed recently (not just Hawk) and it's starting to irritate slightly.  I know how I'd react on a board which treated my first post with suspicion.

I don't think this request is unreasonable, or was asked in an unreasonable manner?  I'm not saying if someone acts like a tard you should treat them with kid gloves, I'm saying if you're going to accuse someone of being a previous troll, at least have some evidence to back this up.  Being annoying or having some knowledge of things that happened on the board don't exactly count (especially since most people know to lurk more by now), and if they are being annoying...well, that falls under the acting like a tard bit I posted before.

I really just think this is common sense, and don't see that it should be contentious at all.  I'd rather not act like the tards at The Cellar and similar places, where, IIRC, some of us were treated with that initial suspicion.  It tends to result in negative feedback loops and downward spirals of interaction, until the situation that was initially trying to be avoided is happening  ie everyone flips into troll mode for no good reason. 

That's all.

Yeah, you're right.

I just had an undeniable urge to yank on Cram's chain, due to one (1) post he made.

169% my fault.

You don't get all the credit, asshole.

[Adios]

1) People don't like being told what to do.
2) People don't like being told that people don't like being told what to do.
3) Goto 1)

I think you are saying that you don't think that I knew what I was saying because I didn't know what someone else was saying because I thought they were saying  something they were not saying.
AMIRITE?

Please point me to where anybody is being told what to do ITT.

otherwise, not helping anything dude.

Not directly, no.  However, there were misperceptions that someone was telling someone else what to do.  And for some odd reason, that was enough to start the hissyshitstorm.

a misperception based on the misperceivers either utterly lacking reading comprehension or having their heads buried firmly up their asses, and therefore inexcusable.

[BIG MAC]

principiadiscordia.com, where mods fight over trivial shit in order to retain power and stature that doesn't exist.

[Jimmy Chitwood]

Ill do one better and reveal a few of our hidden trolls.

Kaos is even around somewhere

Who are they does weltbooger have more than 1 profile I have a feeling alot of this thread was him ???

[the last yatto]

Ill do one better and reveal a few of our hidden trolls.

Kaos is even around somewhere

Who are they does weltbooger have more than 1 profile I have a feeling alot of this thread was him ???

not constructive