Unlimited Wikileaks Shenanigans

[Prince Glittersnatch III]

It occurs to me that the only way the media helping Wikileaks in exchange for shutting up about Israel only makes sense if you buy into a Jewish conspiracy that controls the media.

Yeah, this too.

[E.O.T.]

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/12/08/gordon-duff-busted-wikileaks-working-for-israel/

Assange agreed to connections with media in return for "disappearing" info about Israel in general & 9/11?
I had this link forwarded by one friend. It's a pretty great read. Anyone familiar with this?

There have been some cables from Tel Aviv but none of them have been very exciting so far. I'm really hoping that something leaks about Israel's nuclear program becase the shitstorm that would create would be EPIC.

REALLY?

            i thought everyone knew about & accepted that oxymoron

[E.O.T.]

It occurs to me that the only way the media helping Wikileaks in exchange for shutting up about Israel only makes sense if you buy into a Jewish conspiracy that controls the media.

[the last yatto]

theres the strings there but i think its like Munich, paying to keep your own hands clean
more so since we are seeing this as the same time openleaks and pdfleaks spring to the scene

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/155183.html
Press TV: Dr. Roberts, first your thoughts on what's happening with the WikiLeaks story, in particular the US, led by Joe Lieberman, has been forcing WikiLeaks offline.

Roberts: We see censorship. We see the truth of Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi propaganda chief statement that "truth is the enemy of the state." We can see all kinds of attacks on WikiLeaks. One of course being the fake rape case, and another being all the disinformation put out that he is really an agent of Mossad or the CIA, or in the least he is being unknowingly used by them to leak fabricated documents that boost Israel's chances of having the Americans attack Iran. So we are seeing every kind of effort to reflect the real meaning of the documents away from the revealed mendacity and lies and deceptions on the United States government by trying to discredit WikiLeaks.


http://mycatbirdseat.com/2010/11/gordon-duff-wikileaks-a-touch-of-assange-and-the-stench-of-aipac/

What won't we see in Wikileaks:

Nothing in Wikileaks will accuse anyone, even Pakistan or Afghanistan, or complicity in narcotics trafficking nor mention the huge new narcotics industry operating in Iraq.  Ask yourself why.

One of the biggest areas of complaint in the Pentagon, more classified White Papers have been written on this than anything else:  "How Israel is Endangering the United States"

In fact, the biggest "classified" debate in America is what supporting Israel, a nation with incredible wealth and utterly obnoxious leaders costs the United States.  Rumors of such issues aren't rumors at all.  When General Petraeus presented his now famous power-point presentation to Admiral Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, outlining how Israel is undermining American foreign policy, he wasn't operating without tens of thousands of pages of intelligence behind him.  Not one page, not one word of these studies will be in Wikileaks.

When Vice President Joe Biden said the following to Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu:    
"This is starting to get dangerous for us, what you're doing here undermines the security of our troops who are fighting in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. That endangers us and it endangers regional peace."
Are we to believe these statements were taken out of thin air?

[Requia ☣]

It occurs to me that the only way the media helping Wikileaks in exchange for shutting up about Israel only makes sense if you buy into a Jewish conspiracy that controls the media.

You're being ridiculous, how can I cite my own personal ideas?

[E.O.T.]

WHAT

          the article I linked suggests are omissions of information. This is what I asked about in regards to anyone having a heads up.

REQUIA

          i don't think that asking you to support your opinion is ridiculous when you're suggesting the alternative is a conspiracy theory.

[Requia ☣]

Uh, no, I'm suggesting that *you* buy into a conspiracy theory.  There's no reason for a paper like the Guardian to withhold help from Wikileaks until Wikileaks caves to Israels demands unless a conspiracy where Israel controls The Guardian is in place.

[the last yatto]

"WikiLeaks represents a new kind of advocacy, one that brings to mind the activism of the '60s, one in which people want to get their own hands on information and do their own digging," she said. "What you are seeing is just a crack in the door right now. No one can tell where this is really going."

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/13/business/media/13carr.html

[geekdad]

Michael Mukasey, President George W. Bush's last attorney general:

The distinction I'm drawing is that it is easier, from a policy standpoint, to prosecute Assange. There's a clearer case with respect to Assange. With regard to the [New York] Times, I think, just as a matter of discretion, I would hold back.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/12/mukasey-prosecute-assange-easier-times/

[the last yatto]

Julian Assange should be awarded Nobel peace prize, suggests Russia
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/dec/09/julian-assange-nobel-peace-prize

[geekdad]

Julian Assange should be awarded Nobel peace prize, suggests Russia
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/dec/09/julian-assange-nobel-peace-prize

Until there are leaks from Russia, then it'll be "OFF WITH THEIR HEADS"

[Adios]

Arguing that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has "weakened the organization," a newly organized rival to the website known for leaking official secrets says it will launch Monday.

The founders of Openleaks.org say they are former WikiLeaks members unhappy with the way WikiLeaks is being run under Assange.

"It has weakened the organization," one of those founders, Daniel Domscheit-Berg says in a documentary airing Sunday night on Swedish television network SVT. He said WikiLeaks has become "too much focused on one person, and one person is always much weaker than an organization."
http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/web/12/12/wikileaks.rival/index.html?hpt=T2

The more the merrier.

[Cramulus]

hah! called it

[the last yatto]

Is that the wiki rebels documentary I've been hearing about?

[the last yatto]

Julian Assange should be awarded Nobel peace prize, suggests Russia
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/dec/09/julian-assange-nobel-peace-prize

Until there are leaks from Russia, then it'll be "OFF WITH THEIR HEADS"

US Embassy? Think they are enjoying listening to NATO plans
Sure maybe next time

And Russky Reporter claims to have access to a wikileak activist and freelance journalist... Israel Shamir. Which so far is putting a fierce anti US rhetoric flavor to the coverage

But I believe Kremlin is doing this as a nod to china and Liu Xiaobo