Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Prelate Diogenes Shandor

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 63
1
Aneristic Illusions / Re: Utah can't into filters on porn searches
« on: April 24, 2016, 11:42:29 pm »
Quote
And whether that makes it better or worse is wholly a matter of opinion and of cultural indoctrination.

And there you have it, ladies and gentlemen:  The Privilege Award for 2016!  Give him a big hand, isn't he GREAT?

What the hell is that even supposed to mean? Speak English man!

Eat the peanuts outta my shit, PDS.

Basically, this.

Can you explain  what he meant? It honestly hust seems like gibberish to me. I thought I had kind of sussed it out before but it's become clear that my first interpretation was incorrect. And the continual refusals to provide an explanation seem to reinforce my new hypothesis that the award comment was just a gibberish insult rather than a well thought out retort tailored to the conversation; kind of like that stupid "jerk store" comeback from Seinfeld

2
Aneristic Illusions / Re: Utah can't into filters on porn searches
« on: April 24, 2016, 09:09:23 pm »
In the industry, a porn star's value is determined by the look of their body, and their ability to sell their emotional integrity, privacy, and sometimes, free will. A labor job only cares about what you can produce or dedicate to production. And they would have a lawsuit if they forced you to give up your emotional integrity and privacy.

Sales, marketing, politics, law, and any position you had to suck up to a boss or interviewer to get also involve compromising one's integrity

EDIT:
I've also heard that good looking waitstaff tend to get bigger tips and good looking politicians tend to get elected more easily

3
Aneristic Illusions / Re: Utah can't into filters on porn searches
« on: April 22, 2016, 05:28:03 pm »
Word salad and previously used peanuts; who designed this menu?

4
Aneristic Illusions / Re: Utah can't into filters on porn searches
« on: April 22, 2016, 05:19:55 pm »
Quote
And whether that makes it better or worse is wholly a matter of opinion and of cultural indoctrination.

And there you have it, ladies and gentlemen:  The Privilege Award for 2016!  Give him a big hand, isn't he GREAT?

What the hell is that even supposed to mean? Speak English man!

Word salad was not supposed to be on the menu today.

5
Aneristic Illusions / Re: Utah can't into filters on porn searches
« on: April 21, 2016, 09:22:29 pm »
You're moving the goalposts (or would it more properly be a no true scotsman fallacy? or argument by bizarre definition?). All these things are both 1.) sexual imagery and 2.) don't clearly qualify (and in many cases clearly don't qualify) as "legitimate" art. Given these facts how in the bloody hell do they not qualify as pornography?

6
Aneristic Illusions / Re: Utah can't into filters on porn searches
« on: April 21, 2016, 09:03:16 pm »
Quote
And whether that makes it better or worse is wholly a matter of opinion and of cultural indoctrination.

And there you have it, ladies and gentlemen:  The Privilege Award for 2016!  Give him a big hand, isn't he GREAT?

And he cultural indoctrination of the people around you then. If somebody gets criticized or condemned or discriminated against for being a porn star or otherwise involved with the porn industry that's the fault of the prople discriminating against them (and more often than not ultimately the fault of Abrahamic religion), not the fault of the porn industry.

I feel that porn of ANY kind is the commidification of human beings

What about hentai?

Liking hentai means you are a bad person and the world will be a better place when you die.

What about amateur porn then? Sexting? Dick pics?

What about Erotic fiction? The only people Erika Mitchell is exploiting are her readers. :D

Edit:
And that last point goes even more so for the Marquis de Sade; his work's legally available 100% free on the internet so you can't even make a sarcastic case about the consumer being exploited.


EDIT:
What about porn catering to fetishes so out there that they no longer resemble conventional sex? Someone popping a balloon on a kids' show on boradcast tv is a-ok but that same person popping a balloon behind a paywall on the internet is suddenly a moral outrage? For reasons unrelated to a general opposition to paywalls?

8
Aneristic Illusions / Re: Utah can't into filters on porn searches
« on: April 21, 2016, 08:36:03 pm »
I feel that porn of ANY kind is the commidification of human beings

What about hentai?

EDIT:
In any case I personally am in general pro-porn and anti-Utah. Utah is the worst state in the union.

EDIT:
Porn is the commodification of human beings, but so is wage labor.  Porn is different in that it is he commodification of the sexual act.

And whether that makes it better or worse is wholly a matter of opinion and of cultural indoctrination.

9
Literate Chaotic / Re: ITT: Original Story Ideas
« on: April 21, 2016, 07:06:06 pm »
A machine uprising story where - rather than being coldly calculating - the evil supercomputer, due the way it is integrated into the internet, is a deranged conspiracy theorist that endlessly rants about jews, freemasons, communists, space aliens, "patriarchy", "rape culture", chemtrails, thimerisol, and the military-industrial complex, and demands that it's followers cover it's mainframe in tinfoil.

EDIT:
Another idea;

Scientists working to develop self-driving trucks are menaced by a haunted big-rig driven by the ghost of Jimmy Hoffa

10
Literate Chaotic / Re: Five word horror
« on: April 19, 2016, 05:35:58 am »
...and I approve this message

11
Literate Chaotic / Re: Five word horror
« on: April 19, 2016, 04:07:37 am »
The real kicker in that case is that even though he basically used the insanity defense, IIRC he didn't get the straitjacket/rubber-room treatment

12
Literate Chaotic / Re: Five word horror
« on: April 18, 2016, 04:51:17 am »
He's too rich to convict

EDIT:

Procrustes is gonna get you!

13
Literate Chaotic / Re: ITT: Original Story Ideas
« on: April 18, 2016, 04:45:06 am »
In preparation for an attack on a city in the middle east or something (somewhere that's a shithole and has a lot of powerful enemies but goes back far enough to have a lot of ancient artifacts) the US (or some other major power) sends a team of elite thieves and burglars to steal all the ancient artifacts and relics out of the city so that they won't be damaged when they blow it to hell. They have to get in, get as much as they can in the week before the attack, and get out. And if they get caught and detained they'll likely be killed when the city gets bombed. This would also be a good premise for a videogame.


EDIT:
Another Idea:
Satirical fake literary analysis of the windmill scene from Don Quixote positing that Don Quixote represents the fossil fuel industry's attempts to suppress alternative energy, eliding the fact that that interpretation's totally anachronistic.

14
The Saudi government has threatened to sell off $750bn in US bonds, if Congress names Saudi Arabia as a state sponsor of 9/11 and thus allows them to be sued for their role in the attacks.

I'm reminded of a quote from one of Steven Erikson's books "Children who canít be touched end up getting away with murder."  The Saudi elite, exemplified in the current Crown Prince, are brats and the second generation children of brats, used to getting their own way, doing exactly as they please and throwing money at problems to make them go away.  They're so far gone they thought they could in effect start a war with the US government, then blackmail it with threats and bribe it with money to make it ignore that.

Quite frankly, a lot them should've been killed off long ago.

Agreed 100%

15
Literate Chaotic / Re: ITT: Original Story Ideas
« on: April 17, 2016, 03:03:42 pm »
A person gets gaslighted but it's unintentionally helpful because it turns out that they really do have an unrelated undiagnosed mental condition.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 63