A discordian take on this please...

[The Johnny]

Something about cooking and smelling it.

Wrestling is sooo like softcore-porn for teenage girls.

[Phox]

Something about cooking and smelling it.

Wrestling is sooo like softcore-porn for teenage girls.

Quiet you. 

[The Johnny]

But i dont blame them, way better than those Jonas Bro fags OR OH the lesbian ennacter Bieber.

[Phox]

But i dont blame them, way better than those Jonas Bro fags OR OH the lesbian ennacter Bieber.

Ok... long as we agree on THAT point. 

[The Johnny]

To which theres only one conclusion: female Bieber fans are really closet lesbians.

[the last yatto]

Timmy also didn't park the OKC bomb next to the building like his handlers ordered him too.

[Disco Pickle]

A quick googling has informed me that jet fuel burns well warm enough to anneal steel.

Yes, but that's not the point.  No fire has ever collapsed a high rise.  Never mind that no high rise fire has ever been started with a fuel load of fuel from a 757, and no high rise fire has involved the torque generated by having 25% of the windows missing.

Never mind any of that, "folks", and just shut the fuck up and listen to what Mr Jones has to tell you.  It's important shit, far more important than any social life you may have enjoyed prior to learning the horrible secret about Dick Cheney and the Mossad.

So get out there and screech.  If your friends and family - or total strangers, for that matter - won't listen, it's because you're not screeching loud enough.

You like sarcasm a lot; don't you?
Hey, can we still be friends?

im -169% sure this is pop tart.  

pop tart was funny and didn't beg.

Also, you meant "isn't", right?

just walked back in on this one FYI

but no..  I believe I worded that correctly, if a bit strangely..

being negatively sure of something means being positively sure of it's impossibility.

If I was 169% sure he isn't, I could be -169% sure he is..

forgive the fuck who has to use numbers all day to describe things to computers. 

[Freeky]

A quick googling has informed me that jet fuel burns well warm enough to anneal steel.

Yes, but that's not the point.  No fire has ever collapsed a high rise.  Never mind that no high rise fire has ever been started with a fuel load of fuel from a 757, and no high rise fire has involved the torque generated by having 25% of the windows missing.

Never mind any of that, "folks", and just shut the fuck up and listen to what Mr Jones has to tell you.  It's important shit, far more important than any social life you may have enjoyed prior to learning the horrible secret about Dick Cheney and the Mossad.

So get out there and screech.  If your friends and family - or total strangers, for that matter - won't listen, it's because you're not screeching loud enough.

You like sarcasm a lot; don't you?
Hey, can we still be friends?

im -169% sure this is pop tart.  

pop tart was funny and didn't beg.

Also, you meant "isn't", right?

just walked back in on this one FYI

but no..  I believe I worded that correctly, if a bit strangely..

being negatively sure of something means being positively sure of it's impossibility.

If I was 169% sure he isn't, I could be -169% sure he is..

forgive the fuck who has to use numbers all day to describe things to computers. 

I understood, though it took me a second.

[Disco Pickle]

A quick googling has informed me that jet fuel burns well warm enough to anneal steel.

Yes, but that's not the point.  No fire has ever collapsed a high rise.  Never mind that no high rise fire has ever been started with a fuel load of fuel from a 757, and no high rise fire has involved the torque generated by having 25% of the windows missing.

Never mind any of that, "folks", and just shut the fuck up and listen to what Mr Jones has to tell you.  It's important shit, far more important than any social life you may have enjoyed prior to learning the horrible secret about Dick Cheney and the Mossad.

So get out there and screech.  If your friends and family - or total strangers, for that matter - won't listen, it's because you're not screeching loud enough.

You like sarcasm a lot; don't you?
Hey, can we still be friends?

im -169% sure this is pop tart.  

pop tart was funny and didn't beg.

Also, you meant "isn't", right?

just walked back in on this one FYI

but no..  I believe I worded that correctly, if a bit strangely..

being negatively sure of something means being positively sure of it's impossibility.

If I was 169% sure he isn't, I could be -169% sure he is..

forgive the fuck who has to use numbers all day to describe things to computers. 

I understood, though it took me a second.

Im just glad it wasn't as stupid as it sounded in my head, even knowing it was correct logically.

[Payne]

SO! Who's winning?

Is it pies? Is the Mighty Pie defeating Dread Cake?

~~~Payne: Loooooves the pie.

[Kai]

In summary,

- 9/11 continues to be one of those conspiracy theories that just will not die.

- Bombs are unneeded to bring down a building when you have massive amounts of jetfuel. Seriously, it's cheaper, easier to use and so much more effective. Burns so hot it anneals steel, which with the wind at that height, the loss of windows and the weight of the building above would cause the beams to buckle, pancaking the floors and collapsing the whole building to the ground.

-Lyingtruth is an idiot.

[Adios]

Good grief.

Like Dok said, extreme heat anneals metal. Remove the tempering, apply force and it shatters.

Also remove 25% of the structure and things are going to collapse. It's physics.

Let's remove 25% of the structure of a bridge, anneal the buttresses, and let LT drive a semi over it.

[AFK]

In summary,

- 9/11 continues to be one of those conspiracy theories that just will not die.

- Bombs are unneeded to bring down a building when you have massive amounts of jetfuel. Seriously, it's cheaper, easier to use and so much more effective. Burns so hot it anneals steel, which with the wind at that height, the loss of windows and the weight of the building above would cause the beams to buckle, pancaking the floors and collapsing the whole building to the ground.

-Lyingtruth is an idiot.

Yeah, there's a reason jets originating out of Boston were used to smash into those buildings as opposed to jets originating out of, say, Los Angeles.  These guys obviously did their homework, figured out that a huge-ass payload of jet fuel was going to fuck up those buildings good.  The way the building crumbled down looked pretty "natural" for me.  Granted, I'm no engineering genius, nor have I seen tons of planes crash into buildings, but fuck, when you got something that massive, that tall, when the thing starts to pancake down as it crumbles, it makes perfect sense it disintegrated the way it did. 

[Payne]

In summary,

- 9/11 continues to be one of those conspiracy theories that just will not die.

- Bombs are unneeded to bring down a building when you have massive amounts of jetfuel. Seriously, it's cheaper, easier to use and so much more effective. Burns so hot it anneals steel, which with the wind at that height, the loss of windows and the weight of the building above would cause the beams to buckle, pancaking the floors and collapsing the whole building to the ground.

-Lyingtruth is an idiot.

Yeah, there's a reason jets originating out of Boston were used to smash into those buildings as opposed to jets originating out of, say, Los Angeles.  These guys obviously did their homework, figured out that a huge-ass payload of jet fuel was going to fuck up those buildings good.  The way the building crumbled down looked pretty "natural" for me.  Granted, I'm no engineering genius, nor have I seen tons of planes crash into buildings, but fuck, when you got something that massive, that tall, when the thing starts to pancake down as it crumbles, it makes perfect sense it disintegrated the way it did. 

To be honest, I think the reason they used planes out of Boston had more to do with there being less time for anyone to do anything about it, but enough time that the hi-jackers could do their thing, than the large amount of fuel on board.

If they were after large amounts of fuel they would have taken very long-haul trans-atlantic flights. As it was, of course, using trans-American flights provided them with enough to "do the job".

All of the above my opinion, no evidence.

[Cain]

Trans-Atlantic flights also have greater security.  European airports and planes have been targeted for decades and it is entirely possible that European security demands would've made it more likely that they would be caught or barred from getting on the planes (French intelligence were sniffing around Al-Qaeda financial backers in America at that time, too).

Anyway, that aside I do find it amusing that truthers tend to believe that no-one has ever actually researched their claims and then decided they were bunk.  You either haven't studied the evidence, are too stupid to understand the evidence or are a paid disinfo agent.  No exceptions.  In that sense, it's like religion, you will eventually either become illuminated, are unworthy of illumination or are an agent of the evil ones.