Excuse me while I vomit.- Trigger Warning for Rape and Rape Culture.

[Anna Mae Bollocks]

U R RONG AND PUA ISN'T BAD I MEAN NOT PUA BUT SOMETHING ELSE THAT IS NOT PUA AND PUSHING BOUNDARIES ISN'T DISRESPECTFUL NO I MEAN NOT PUSHING BOUNDARIES BUT BEING STRAIGHTFORWARD AND DIRECT

NOW THAT YOU HAVE DISMANTLED MY ARGUMENTS I AM NOT RILLY DISAGREEING WITH YOU I AM DISAGREEING WITH SOMETHING TOTALLY DIFFRENT.


Logical consistency, have you heard of it? 

We haven't been talking about the same things this entire time.  I blame it on a failure to define terms. Or me.  This is something i'd like to discuss but we can't move forward like this.

ALL TERMS HAVE BEEN DEFINED AND CLARIFIED.
RE-READ THREAD. S-L-O-W-L-Y.
Because if you have a learning disability or cognitive disorder, maybe this all makes sense. Otherwise, you're a fuckwad.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

"a failure to define terms"

[Anna Mae Bollocks]

"a failure to define terms"

He's trying to OVERCOME YOUR RESISTANCE, Nigel. 

[Pope Lecherous]

Are you even reading the posts before deciding to "disagree" with them? Because you are backpedaling like a motherfucker.

I'm not backpedaling.  When i attempt to convey an idea you attack beliefs i don't hold. And i agree with you.  When i attempt to address the few things i disagree with you about, you attack beliefs you think i hold.  We need to establish understanding first.  Stop trying to win.  Start trying to understand like you are (it seems) in your last post i read.

[Anna Mae Bollocks]

Are you even reading the posts before deciding to "disagree" with them? Because you are backpedaling like a motherfucker.

I'm not backpedaling.  When i attempt to convey an idea you attack beliefs i don't hold. And i agree with you.  When i attempt to address the few things i disagree with you about, you attack beliefs you think i hold.  We need to establish understanding first.  Stop trying to win.  Start trying to understand like you are (it seems) in your last post i read.

Oh how cute - he's NEGGING.

[Juana]

I still want an explanation for how ignoring a person's boundaries by pushing for sex is not an implication of violence.

[Pope Lecherous]

Are you even reading the posts before deciding to "disagree" with them? Because you are backpedaling like a motherfucker.

I'm not backpedaling.  When i attempt to convey an idea you attack beliefs i don't hold. And i agree with you.  When i attempt to address the few things i disagree with you about, you attack beliefs you think i hold.  We need to establish understanding first.  Stop trying to win.  Start trying to understand like you are (it seems) in your last post i read.

Oh how cute - he's NEGGING.

It's not an insult.  It's the situation as i see it.  You are like a fucking clown in the background going OOOHHHHH and making all kinds of noise when people are trying to settle something.  Nigel is expressing herself well but i don't think she's understanding me 100% and it may be because she's tired of trying, or trying and not able because of me. Whatever. 

You aren't bringing shit to the discussion.  You are condemning rapists and people who abuse women like it's a unique, brave and novel position and then willfully not listening to others.  oh and talking all kinds of shit about someone you haven't the vaguest idea of.  Stop being so fucking negative.

[East Coast Hustle]

Blackfoot, your inability to convey your ideas in a manner that other people understand is nobody's problem but yours.

[Pope Lecherous]

I still want an explanation for how ignoring a person's boundaries by pushing for sex is not an implication of violence.

Is this an attempt to discuss something.  Or are you begging the question and simultaneously and deliberately misrepresenting my beliefs.  Or did you genuinely think i meant that?  These are serious questions.  I can't tell, but that's why i am asking you.

[Pope Lecherous]

Blackfoot, your inability to convey your ideas in a manner that other people understand is nobody's problem but yours.

Youre right.  If someone wants to participate in a discussion they should make an effort to understand what is being said so a discussion can take place, that's the way i'd have it.  Or they can, you know... choose not to. idk man.

[East Coast Hustle]

Blackfoot, your inability to convey your ideas in a manner that other people understand is nobody's problem but yours.

Youre right.  If someone wants to participate in a discussion they should make an effort to understand what is being said so a discussion can take place, that's the way i'd have it.  Or they can, you know... choose not to. idk man.

I think you have it backward. If someone wants to participate in a discussion, they SHOULD do their best to make sure that the idea they're trying to get across matches what they're saying/typing. Blaming everyone else for not understanding what you're saying is an asshole move.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

Blackfoot, your inability to convey your ideas in a manner that other people understand is nobody's problem but yours.

Youre right.  If someone wants to participate in a discussion they should make an effort to understand what is being said so a discussion can take place, that's the way i'd have it.  Or they can, you know... choose not to. idk man.

I think you have it backward. If someone wants to participate in a discussion, they SHOULD do their best to make sure that the idea they're trying to get across matches what they're saying/typing. Blaming everyone else for not understanding what you're saying is an asshole move.

This.

[Pope Lecherous]

I think you have it backward. If someone wants to participate in a discussion, they SHOULD do their best to make sure that the idea they're trying to get across matches what they're saying/typing. Blaming everyone else for not understanding what you're saying is an asshole move.

Of course I should make my best effort.  I am.  It's still a two-way street. I'm not blaming them for not understanding me.  I'm blaming them for the apparent lack of effort to try to understand.

This.

^^This.

ETA: I don't know if this behavior i'm talking about is intentional or just a bad habit.  It hurts the site.  Especially with the pseudo-hierarchy we have

[East Coast Hustle]

Also, the irony of having this conversation with someone who used to call themselves "Pope Lecherous".

[East Coast Hustle]

I think you have it backward. If someone wants to participate in a discussion, they SHOULD do their best to make sure that the idea they're trying to get across matches what they're saying/typing. Blaming everyone else for not understanding what you're saying is an asshole move.

Of course I should make my best effort.  I am.  It's still a two-way street. I'm not blaming them for not understanding me.  I'm blaming them for the apparent lack of effort to try to understand.

This.

^^This.

I think it's more that we tried, failed, and decided that if you can't be bothered to figure out how to say what you're trying to say then we can't be bothered to keep trying to decipher it.