WHAT KIND OF MONSTERS

[Cardinal Pizza Deliverance.]

You know, testicle implants because you lost a nut to cancer is one thing.

COSMETIC TESTICLE IMPLANTS

BECAUSE YOUR UGLY, WRINKLY, HAIRY NUTSACK ISN'T BIG ENOUGH

DOKTOR!!!! I NEED MORE MANLINESS!!!

ACHTUNG!!!! ALLOW ME TO SURGICALLY IMPLANT ZEE LARGER TESTICLES IN TO YOUR SACK!!!! ALZO I GIVES YOU TWO MORE BALLS!!!!!

MAN WITH FOUR BALLS IS AUTOMATICALLY TWICE AS MANLY AS MAN WITH ONLY TWO BALLS!

Side-effects include ED, but your handy after-surgery prescription of Viagra^* will cure that shit right up.

Google says so.

* Which is covered by your health insurance where-as preventative care visits for women and birth control are not.

[Richter]

 
As we speak, some shady backroom corner of the bod-mod community is busy slicing open their sacs in less-than sterile conditions to load their ball-bags with teflon spheres, factory second ball-bearings, and stainless steel hardware off the shelf form "Lowes"

[Don Coyote]

As we speak, some shady backroom corner of the bod-mod community is busy slicing open their sacs in less-than sterile conditions to load their ball-bags with teflon spheres, factory second ball-bearings, and stainless steel hardware off the shelf form "Lowes"

And I believe it.

[Aucoq]

Dave Chappelle used to have a great joke about how, when he's insanely rich/popular, he wants to get botox injected into his balls to make them perfectly smooth.  Now it looks like it's not only possible but it's becoming more and more popular.  I love it when such outlandish, zany jokes end up becoming reality.  It really shows how utterly stupid wonderful the world is. 

[Suu]

I just stared at a page of clits to find problems, and did not.

Okay, women look...you're fine. If you're paying that much attention to the size/shape of your VAGINA, you have worse problems than getting thee to a cosmetic surgeon. If you have a legit deformity, sure. But...just...NO.

AND FOR FUCK'S SAKE STOP TRYING TO PUT SCENTED SHIT INTO AN AUTO-CLEANING ORIFICE. My mom told me to douche after I came back from my first biopsy last year, and I was like, "ARE YOU FUCKING CRAZY?!"

I also think she grew up in a different generation, though. Women have been practically forced to be be discreet and nice-smelling and pleasing to their husbands since Eve. Hence the wacky Lysol douche ads from the 20s.

"Your husband won't sleep with you because your clam smells. Here, make it worse by squirting hazardous chemicals into your beef wallet."

[ñͤͣ̄ͦ̌̑͗͊͛͂͗ ̸̨̨̣̺̼̣̜͙͈͕̮̊̈́̈͂͛̽͊ͭ̓͆ͅé ̰̓̓́ͯ́́͞]

I like this guy and the idea behind his Great Wall of Vaginas:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27w3wR7ofl4

P.S. - The American Flag of Dickheads is also awesome.

[Elder Iptuous]

while i can fully get behind the sentiment that actively marketing this stuff (i.e. sending the "Your junk is ugly!" msg out to everyone) is pretty low, and harmful to our collective psyche,  i would have to disagree with the parallel sentiment i'm seeing here which is universal genital aesthetic equality.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

while i can fully get behind the sentiment that actively marketing this stuff (i.e. sending the "Your junk is ugly!" msg out to everyone) is pretty low, and harmful to our collective psyche,  i would have to disagree with the parallel sentiment i'm seeing here which is universal genital aesthetic equality.

Yeah, but it's subjective. A look you find aesthetically unappealing may be a huge turn on for someone else. Basically, normal genitals are normal, and there's no good reason to try to make them look like someone else's normal genitalia.

Some guys love big labia.

Some women love dangly balls.

[Elder Iptuous]

Yeah, but it's subjective. A look you find aesthetically unappealing may be a huge turn on for someone else. Basically, normal genitals are normal, and there's no good reason to try to make them look like someone else's normal genitalia.

Some guys love big labia.

Some women love dangly balls.

the above doesn't seem consistent to me.
ears stick out more on some people, less on others.  it's all normal, doesn't effect performance, and what is attractive is subjective.  i had a friend in high school with ears that stuck out a pretty fair amount. (more than Perot)  He went under the knife, and had them set to what he thought more attractive.  was this understandable?  i would think it a fairly small minority that would find this type of cosmetic surgery questionable.
i see little difference to the question at hand, but it seems to get people emotional because it's genitals.

[LMNO]

The problem here is that your ears aren't connected to the best sensations you can have without being on drugs.

To me, having bits of your genitals cut off for aesthetic reasons is like having an eye removed as a fashion choice.

[Elder Iptuous]

there is some validity to that concern, however, i don't believe it is the root of the emotional reaction here.
the analogy is dramatic hyperbole, from where i'm sitting.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

there is some validity to that concern, however, i don't believe it is the root of the emotional reaction here.
the analogy is dramatic hyperbole, from where i'm sitting.

I'm kinda tired, so I'm going to ask a couple of questions:

1.  Are you suggesting the members here expressing disgust are engaging in dramatic hyperbole, and

2.  Are you suggesting that mutilating your genitals to make them look different is an okay thing?  Not whether or not it should be legal, but okay as in terms of not batshit crazy?

[Elder Iptuous]

there is some validity to that concern, however, i don't believe it is the root of the emotional reaction here.
the analogy is dramatic hyperbole, from where i'm sitting.

I'm kinda tired, so I'm going to ask a couple of questions:

1.  Are you suggesting the members here expressing disgust are engaging in dramatic hyperbole, and

2.  Are you suggesting that mutilating your genitals to make them look different is an okay thing?  Not whether or not it should be legal, but okay as in terms of not batshit crazy?

1 - not entirely.  mass marketing to convince people that their genitals are ugly is, in fact, disgusting.  the procedure itself seems to be having this emotion transferred to it, however, and that i find odd. saying that "having bits of your genitals cut off for aesthetic reasons is like having an eye removed as a fashion choice" is hyperbole.  in fact, i would say that it isn't just an emotional exaggeration, it is a completely broken analogy because the one doesn't inherently impact functionality, whereas the later does.
2 - i'm suggesting that the emotions that would cause you to use the word 'mutilate' is more interesting than what would cause someone to have some part of their body altered for cosmetic purposes.  for the record, i've got nothing against any form of body modification, regardless of how unattractive i find it personally.  i knew a guy in austin that i would use the word 'mutilate' to describe what he did to his junk (in fact he used the same term), but i wouldn't consider him batshit crazy.  just.... odd.  (and attention craving) nice enough guy, though.  legality?  not even thinking about that.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

there is some validity to that concern, however, i don't believe it is the root of the emotional reaction here.
the analogy is dramatic hyperbole, from where i'm sitting.

I'm kinda tired, so I'm going to ask a couple of questions:

1.  Are you suggesting the members here expressing disgust are engaging in dramatic hyperbole, and

2.  Are you suggesting that mutilating your genitals to make them look different is an okay thing?  Not whether or not it should be legal, but okay as in terms of not batshit crazy?

1 - not entirely.  mass marketing to convince people that their genitals are ugly is, in fact, disgusting.  the procedure itself seems to be having this emotion transferred to it, however, and that i find odd. saying that "having bits of your genitals cut off for aesthetic reasons is like having an eye removed as a fashion choice" is hyperbole.  in fact, i would say that it isn't just an emotional exaggeration, it is a completely broken analogy because the one doesn't inherently impact functionality, whereas the later does.
2 - i'm suggesting that the emotions that would cause you to use the word 'mutilate' is more interesting than what would cause someone to have some part of their body altered for cosmetic purposes.  for the record, i've got nothing against any form of body modification, regardless of how unattractive i find it personally.  i knew a guy in austin that i would use the word 'mutilate' to describe what he did to his junk (in fact he used the same term), but i wouldn't consider him batshit crazy.  just.... odd.  (and attention craving) nice enough guy, though.  legality?  not even thinking about that.

Mutilate is the correct verb for the situation.

And I think this should be legal, for adults.  I do not, however, think that it is acceptable...The distinction being that while I find this sort of thing disgusting, my opinion should not dictate the behavior of other adults.

Lastly, hacking off bits of a clitoris DOES affect its function, so LMNO's point stands.

[Cain]

The problem here is that your ears aren't connected to the best sensations you can have without being on drugs.

To me, having bits of your genitals cut off for aesthetic reasons is like having an eye removed as a fashion choice.

But having an eyepatch is pretty badass, you must concede.