The First Church of the Wrath of Baby Jesus and Open Bar™

[The Good Reverend Roger]

I was talking to Twid actually.

Sorry.  Thought you were finding your nads.

It's sweet that you are concerned about my anatomical health, but at the same time it is a bit creepy.


Please stop.


Thank You.

Naw, go fuck yourself.  You were going to say something, then lost your nads.  I'm not concerned about YOU, but it may cause a slipping hazard for people with very small feet.

[Anna Mae Bollocks]

So, yeah, a person who has been a friend of mine for more than 7 years just decided to walk away from that friendship because she apparently wasn't listening when I told her about a change of plans.  She wound up where we were supposed to meet, I wasn't there (as I had told her I wouldn't be).  She blew the hell up on FB and told me we were through, without bothering to, you know, ask what happened.

It occurs to me, though, that someone who would dump a 7 year friendship over something like that isn't really someone I want to be friends with, anyway.

That's incredibly lame.

Surprise?  It was Sister Gothique, of all people.  There's some very special irony in this, but it's a long story and I'm up past bedtime.  Will post tomorrow.

Wow WTF?

We had a thing on Sundays.  Gaming stuff.  I tell her at her Birthday party (two weeks ago) that the Sunday group is moving from the shop up to my house.

She either didn't listen or forgot, and showed up at the shop, which is about a 10 minute drive from her place.  We weren't there.  She goes home, gets on FB, and tells me that because I have spoken disrespectfully to/about her guy (years ago, literally, before he matured a bit and went to school and got a steady job...We get along fine now), and because I blew her off (didn't), and because of "odds and ends" (???), she's done.

And I suppose she's right about the being done part, because apparently I don't know her, hell, never MET her, because the person I knew wouldn't drop a 7 year friendship over a misunderstanding, with no prior conversation.  Nor would she say anything that hurtful just to vent.

In any case, nothing lasts forever, everything eventually ends.

I've always heard that if people are going to show their ass, they usually do it about 6 months after you start hanging around with them.
I've also heard that it takes 5 years to "really get to know a person". After 5 years, you theoretically know "everything".

Both are total bullshit.

[Anna Mae Bollocks]

Check out What's the Meaning of Stonehenge.

I love that one even more than What The Fox Say.

Further, I had to watch an actual serious video about Stonehenge for school, and it made me laugh through the whole thing.

"How could they raise the stones so high,
Completely without the technolog-eye?"

[Anna Mae Bollocks]

That's just made my entire month 

Sure, given that booze is directly marketed to kids.

PREVENTIONISM:  NOT JUST A SHILL FOR THE LIQUOR COMPANIES.  HONEST.  NO, REALLY.

 

[Anna Mae Bollocks]

My shoes have decided to finally bite the dust. I'm left with a pair of flip-flops and a pair of sandals.
There is supposed to be a cold front coming. I shall now be the person wearing sandals with socks (because unless you have those toe socks it's not possible to do with flips).

Sure it is. Push the socks between your big toe and second toe.

Better to just buy shoes, though. 

[Anna Mae Bollocks]

I can't take their support at all.  But I can hook them up with people who can.

Youse and us, ehhhhh, youse know, we can't be seen together. It would raise too many questions. But I know a guy. I'll let 'im know to help youse out.

More or less.

It must be liberating to have no principles at all.

He does appear to be stunningly, completely morally bankrupt.

Well i wouldnt say its morally bankrupt. Im looking for another word. Illogical is the best i can come up with now. The worst of my cold seems to have passed but after being at work for a few hours while still recovering has left me a bit hazy. 
Blight
Has another hour to go but all the free tea he can have.

Nah. He's morally bankrupt. Completely and utterly.

[Pope Pixie Pickle]

I'd be like radical feminists collaborating with fundies on anti-porn stuff... Just... NO.

[Nephew Twiddleton]

I'd be like radical feminists collaborating with fundies on anti-porn stuff... Just... NO.

That's actually a really good analogy.

[Nephew Twiddleton]

However, if we're considering RWHN's situation, it would be like the fundie not being able to work with the radical feminist or vice versa, due to cred damage, so one points the other in the direction of mysterious third group. I dunno, the clothing industry?

[Pope Pixie Pickle]

However, if we're considering RWHN's situation, it would be like the fundie not being able to work with the radical feminist or vice versa, due to cred damage, so one points the other in the direction of mysterious third group. I dunno, the clothing industry?

Probably a parenting lobby in that case.

it's still working against your own integrity and interests in the long run.

[Nephew Twiddleton]

However, if we're considering RWHN's situation, it would be like the fundie not being able to work with the radical feminist or vice versa, due to cred damage, so one points the other in the direction of mysterious third group. I dunno, the clothing industry?

Probably a parenting lobby in that case.

it's still working against your own integrity and interests in the long run.

For the most part I agree. But RWHN is an occasional customer of the liquor industry. Granted he doesn't pump nearly as much money into it as I or others do, but he still supports the industry. I dunno. Seems like his position is that kids should have neither porn, nor sex toys, but adults should be able to occasionally indulge in porn, but sex toys should remain illegal, because sex toys being legal would increase a kid's accessibility to them. I'm still looking for the word, but I think illogical is sufficient.

[Ben Shapiro]

However, if we're considering RWHN's situation, it would be like the fundie not being able to work with the radical feminist or vice versa, due to cred damage, so one points the other in the direction of mysterious third group. I dunno, the clothing industry?

Probably a parenting lobby in that case.

it's still working against your own integrity and interests in the long run.

For the most part I agree. But RWHN is an occasional customer of the liquor industry. Granted he doesn't pump nearly as much money into it as I or others do, but he still supports the industry. I dunno. Seems like his position is that kids should have neither porn, nor sex toys, but adults should be able to occasionally indulge in porn, but sex toys should remain illegal, because sex toys being legal would increase a kid's accessibility to them. I'm still looking for the word, but I think illogical is sufficient.

Privileged ?

[Pope Pixie Pickle]

well, yea, but i think the aNALOGY IS GETTING STRETCHED LOL.

I'm more of a educate about porn and consent femininja, and stop that abstinence only excuse for sex ed shit.

My housemate was a volunteer for Scarleteen (a sex and relationship ed forum/site) and they are pretty horrified by the results of "just keep it in your pants forever"

[Pope Pixie Pickle]

However, if we're considering RWHN's situation, it would be like the fundie not being able to work with the radical feminist or vice versa, due to cred damage, so one points the other in the direction of mysterious third group. I dunno, the clothing industry?

Probably a parenting lobby in that case.

it's still working against your own integrity and interests in the long run.

For the most part I agree. But RWHN is an occasional customer of the liquor industry. Granted he doesn't pump nearly as much money into it as I or others do, but he still supports the industry. I dunno. Seems like his position is that kids should have neither porn, nor sex toys, but adults should be able to occasionally indulge in porn, but sex toys should remain illegal, because sex toys being legal would increase a kid's accessibility to them. I'm still looking for the word, but I think illogical is sufficient.

Privileged ?

Wut?

[Ben Shapiro]

However, if we're considering RWHN's situation, it would be like the fundie not being able to work with the radical feminist or vice versa, due to cred damage, so one points the other in the direction of mysterious third group. I dunno, the clothing industry?

Probably a parenting lobby in that case.

it's still working against your own integrity and interests in the long run.

For the most part I agree. But RWHN is an occasional customer of the liquor industry. Granted he doesn't pump nearly as much money into it as I or others do, but he still supports the industry. I dunno. Seems like his position is that kids should have neither porn, nor sex toys, but adults should be able to occasionally indulge in porn, but sex toys should remain illegal, because sex toys being legal would increase a kid's accessibility to them. I'm still looking for the word, but I think illogical is sufficient.

Privileged ?

Wut?

The RWHNs of the world are the only ones capable of using sex toys responsibly.