You've been ignoring from the start the fact that marijuana is an impairing substance, with regards to workplace safety (aka people not being impaired and turning people into jelly with heavy machinery) and the legal status is a moot point. I've tried like 3 different ways to get you to acknowledge it but you refuse to even address the point.
I'm sorry? I completely admit that MJ is imparing, when you're high. Your posts make you appear to think that if you show up positive on a pee test for pot, you're high.
What you're ignoring is that the test is not an accurate measurement of impairment.
WHICH IS MY ENTIRE POINT RIGHT NOW.
What
you're ignoring is that the test is not an accurate measurement of impairment.
What
you're ignoring is that the test is not an accurate measurement of impairment.
What
you're ignoring is that the test is not an accurate measurement of impairment.
What
you're ignoring is that the test is not an accurate measurement of impairment.
What
you're ignoring is that the test is not an accurate measurement of impairment.
What
you're ignoring is that the test is not an accurate measurement of impairment.
What
you're ignoring is that the test is not an accurate measurement of impairment.
What
you're ignoring is that the test is not an accurate measurement of impairment.
What
you're ignoring is that the test is not an accurate measurement of impairment.
What
you're ignoring is that the test is not an accurate measurement of impairment.
Repetition often helps messages be remembered.
added:
And that one hit of weed will impair you for at least 10 days.
Some employers are dicks. Employers in an 'at-will' state can fire you for looking at them the wrong way. An even-handed employer would look at the test along with the rest of the picture, If you tested positive, but have been a model employee, productive, timely, etc., you are very likely not going to get fired.
But, employers should have tools available to them to catch the ones who are coming impaired and posing a risk to others. Do you disagree with that notion? If so, why?
If you can't tell if someone is impaired then you are fucked anyway. There are 5000 ways to be impaired, focussing the attention on these tests is stupid. test for reaction time or something.