Principia Discordia

Principia Discordia => Aneristic Illusions => Topic started by: Eartha-ly Delights on August 10, 2011, 01:24:34 AM

Title: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Eartha-ly Delights on August 10, 2011, 01:24:34 AM
I've come to realise of late that I have had some trouble getting the more nitpicky definitions of certain terminolgy straight in my head.

"Political Protesters" are burning shit that sits on land underneath which are found vast oil supplies, gold mines, diamonds or rare earth minerals, which are currently under the control of a politician or politicians who won't pander to the whims of the IMF and S&P.

And rioters are burning shit in areas in which the London and International Olympic Committees wish soon to see a load of well heeled, ticket holding tourists accommodated in stylishly appointed medium density housing which will lend itself nicely to "gentrification" type schemes after the event.

Silly me.

And here I thought a lot of educationally and socially disadvantaged people had got sick of watching the neighbours gunned down in cold blood by a violent and inherently corrupt Police Force. And lacking the luxury of an erudite and literate leadership (or any leadership at all in fact) which might express their justified anger in words to the general public (which may in turn have taken enough note of it to ask that the Met make at least a show of investigating the shooting) they acted out in self destructive and powerless rage. ie: They smashed some shit up.

Which at first small scale smashing of shit, the authorities deliberately allowed to escalate into utter chaos and then degenerate into a frenzy of looting by opportunistic criminal elements (and quite possibly agent provocatuers).


Of course it had to be done. Unpleasant though it may look. This is a necessary first step in the all important Pauper Relocation Program, so essential for the smooth progress of preparations for the world's biggest (and most profitable) sports carnival next year.

A brilliant scheme in fact. Conceived of by the geniuses in the Property Development Sector and the Olympics Administration, engineered by the social policies of a morally bankrupt coalition govt and orchestrated by their jack booted and murderously inclined lackeys in the London Constabulary.

You watch them clean out Stratford et. al after the smoke has cleared. There won't be a Council Estate left in inner London with it's residents unscattered to the far corners of England.

It's a GEOPOLITICAL fucking issue, innit? Location. location, location is all that matters to the definition of such esoteric labels as "Political Protester" or "Social Justice Campaigner" ....and the more pedestrian "Rioter"....aka "violent little gobshite".

Silly me.

:argh!:

Check that first link...they knew...the cunts knew it was about to go tits up..."Something may happen around 7pm"...yeah...that's what it said on Blackberry Messaging as the call went out to come and party...Guy Fawkes Night has come early. Parades and bonfires in the street.

They weren't exactly surrepfuckingtitious about their plans.

.....so why weren't the Filth waiting in force to quell it?
No... they granted all the riot squad boys a reprieve...and forbade the fire brigade to enter the worst affected areas.

They wanted it to happen. Risk to life and property was not their primary concern, it would seem. The need for a swift demolition phase to an urban renewal program would appear to have taken precedence over any sort of lily livered bleeding heart preoccupations with protecting the populace.

http://www.wharf.co.uk/tag/stratford

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/aug/07/police-attack-london-burns

http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2011/08/08/police-shooting-leads-to-massive-riots-looting-in-london/




Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 10, 2011, 01:49:08 AM
You have Anarchy, then.

The absence of the rule of law.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 10, 2011, 02:13:27 AM
Does this mean BH is gonna move to Tottenham?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Eartha-ly Delights on August 10, 2011, 03:11:39 AM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 10, 2011, 01:49:08 AM
You have Anarchy, then.

The absence of the rule of law.

What rule of law?  Whose law for that matter? Are they to be allowed to shoot people in the streets..unarmed people it appears now...with mental health issues...and not be questioned as to why??

As for their role in the riot escalating...
They didn't even try to quell it...that's my point...if the law is supposed to protect the great mass of us, it has done a very poor job of it here..

The "rule of law" didn't do the poor buggers in Tottenham and Camden much good in the last 4 days did it?
The filth  sat on their fat arses and watched it burn.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 10, 2011, 03:18:22 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 10, 2011, 03:11:39 AM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 10, 2011, 01:49:08 AM
You have Anarchy, then.

The absence of the rule of law.

What rule of law?  Whose law for that matter? Are they to be allowed to shoot people in the streets..unarmed people it appears now...with mental health issues...and not be questioned as to why??

As for their role in the riot escalating...
They didn't even try to quell it...that's my point...if the law is supposed to protect the great mass of us, it has done a very poor job of it here..

The "rule of law" didn't do the poor buggers in Tottenham and Camden much good in the last 4 days did it?
The filth  sat on their fat arses and watched it burn.

Cops on a rampage is NOT the rule of law.

I don't know why I expected that distinction to be obvious.

Dok,
Hopelessly fucking optimistic, apparently.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Eartha-ly Delights on August 10, 2011, 03:57:55 AM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 10, 2011, 01:49:08 AM
You have Anarchy, then.

The absence of the rule of law.

Well I did begin the post by letting you know I am a little dense when it comes to nuances of language...


Possibly had you been a tad more verbose; I dunno...maybe even given one of your sentences a subjective clause or summat, providing context or reference points for the apparent use of the term "anarchy" as an epithet,  I may have been able to better discern the precise direction in which you were headed with that thought.

Instead  my callow interloper self, ill used to being bathed in the glory that  I'm sure is to be found in the myriad wisdoms of the good doktor, it was a little confusing.

I know brevity is the soul of wit and all, but you must admit, you don't give a stranger a lot to work with in terms of divining your precise meaning, oftentimes.

Just sayin'.



NB:I hope me Vindaloo isn't still disagreeing with you. Sorry if it is. I was told you liked a bit of spice.


Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Epimetheus on August 10, 2011, 04:11:20 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 10, 2011, 03:57:55 AM
Instead  my callow interloper self, ill used to being bathed in the glory that  I'm sure is to be found in the myriad wisdoms of the good doktor, it was a little confusing.

Why do they all do this, Dok? Why?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 10, 2011, 04:14:28 AM
Quote from: Epimetheus on August 10, 2011, 04:11:20 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 10, 2011, 03:57:55 AM
Instead  my callow interloper self, ill used to being bathed in the glory that  I'm sure is to be found in the myriad wisdoms of the good doktor, it was a little confusing.

Why do they all do this, Dok? Why?

Because I am a freak magnet.  I swear to fucking God.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Eartha-ly Delights on August 10, 2011, 04:20:08 AM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 10, 2011, 04:14:28 AM
Quote from: Epimetheus on August 10, 2011, 04:11:20 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 10, 2011, 03:57:55 AM
Instead  my callow interloper self, ill used to being bathed in the glory that  I'm sure is to be found in the myriad wisdoms of the good doktor, it was a little confusing.

Why do they all do this, Dok? Why?

Because I am a freak magnet.  I swear to fucking God.


Nah. I'm not even stalking you.

I'm stalking Charley. He's lovely.

Sorry I can't include you in my calendar. I'm sure you'd be a right offensive old bastard a lot of fun to be around. but I'm just a one guru at a time obsessive fan type of girl, innit?.

:wink:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Epimetheus on August 10, 2011, 04:24:47 AM
The day Dok becomes a guru, I am fleeing, along with anyone who knows what's good for them. I will, however, be tuning into the news often, to hear of the...exploits...of the Howlites.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 10, 2011, 04:52:08 AM
Quote from: Epimetheus on August 10, 2011, 04:24:47 AM
The day Dok becomes a guru, I am fleeing, along with anyone who knows what's good for them. I will, however, be tuning into the news often, to hear of the...exploits...of the Howlites.

The day I become a fucking guru, I shall have my testicles nailed to the floor.

And that's all the Howling you'll ever need to hear.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Epimetheus on August 10, 2011, 04:54:07 AM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 10, 2011, 04:52:08 AM
Quote from: Epimetheus on August 10, 2011, 04:24:47 AM
The day Dok becomes a guru, I am fleeing, along with anyone who knows what's good for them. I will, however, be tuning into the news often, to hear of the...exploits...of the Howlites.

The day I become a fucking guru, I shall have my testicles nailed to the floor.

And that's all the Howling you'll ever need to hear.

:lulz:

But what a martyrdom for the followers. It will stop nothing.

eta: I am really tempted to design a symbol for a religion based on a testicle-to-floor-nailing.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 10, 2011, 04:56:17 AM
Quote from: Epimetheus on August 10, 2011, 04:54:07 AM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 10, 2011, 04:52:08 AM
Quote from: Epimetheus on August 10, 2011, 04:24:47 AM
The day Dok becomes a guru, I am fleeing, along with anyone who knows what's good for them. I will, however, be tuning into the news often, to hear of the...exploits...of the Howlites.

The day I become a fucking guru, I shall have my testicles nailed to the floor.

And that's all the Howling you'll ever need to hear.

:lulz:

But what a martyrdom for the followers. It will stop nothing.

Anyone who actually lets me tell them what to do deserves whatever they get.

I mean, it's not like I don't TELL people I hate them and want bad things to happen to them, is it?  I'm obviously the PERFECT person to take instructions from or just stalk.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 10, 2011, 04:56:43 AM
Quote from: Epimetheus on August 10, 2011, 04:54:07 AM

eta: I am really tempted to design a symbol for a religion based on a testicle-to-floor-nailing.

I command you to do this thing.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 10, 2011, 04:57:10 AM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 10, 2011, 02:13:27 AM
Does this mean BH is gonna move to Tottenham?

Great, now I've got cold peppermint tea in my nose.

Quote from: Epimetheus on August 10, 2011, 04:54:07 AM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 10, 2011, 04:52:08 AM
Quote from: Epimetheus on August 10, 2011, 04:24:47 AM
The day Dok becomes a guru, I am fleeing, along with anyone who knows what's good for them. I will, however, be tuning into the news often, to hear of the...exploits...of the Howlites.

The day I become a fucking guru, I shall have my testicles nailed to the floor.

And that's all the Howling you'll ever need to hear.

:lulz:

But what a martyrdom for the followers. It will stop nothing.

eta: I am really tempted to design a symbol for a religion based on a testicle-to-floor-nailing.

Do it. It surpasses WHAT JESUS DID.  :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Epimetheus on August 10, 2011, 05:08:59 AM
I'm already scribbling some prayers of the religion. :D
And Dok, I gotta apologize for not yet completing the best-burger Holy Quest. I have eaten several burger places, but none too great. I know I have to venture into wilder places to find the Grail of this quest. I just have yet to do that.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 10, 2011, 08:28:48 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 10, 2011, 03:57:55 AM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 10, 2011, 01:49:08 AM
You have Anarchy, then.

The absence of the rule of law.

Well I did begin the post by letting you know I am a little dense when it comes to nuances of language...


Possibly had you been a tad more verbose; I dunno...maybe even given one of your sentences a subjective clause or summat, providing context or reference points for the apparent use of the term "anarchy" as an epithet,  I may have been able to better discern the precise direction in which you were headed with that thought.

Instead  my callow interloper self, ill used to being bathed in the glory that  I'm sure is to be found in the myriad wisdoms of the good doktor, it was a little confusing.

I know brevity is the soul of wit and all, but you must admit, you don't give a stranger a lot to work with in terms of divining your precise meaning, oftentimes.

Just sayin'.



NB:I hope me Vindaloo isn't still disagreeing with you. Sorry if it is. I was told you liked a bit of spice.




Jesus Fuckwarbling Christ.

:facepalm:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on August 10, 2011, 08:36:02 AM
It helps if you become temporarily illiterate whenever you come to an Eartha-ly Delight post.  For srs, you can get on with your life, because there's just no point to talking to it.


I mean, I tried to read it, and after a second or two my brain just went "bzzzzzzzzt" and replaced the letters with squiggles that had no meaning to me.



In before a "LOL UR JUST TOO STUPID" post from ED.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 10, 2011, 08:44:57 AM
That one was nonsensical.

She's been ok at EBG. Well, except for the thing with Jenne...OH SNAP.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Cain on August 10, 2011, 11:52:28 AM
London was going to be cleared regardless.  Welfare to help with rent payments stops in London at the start of next year.  On top of other benefit cuts, 40,000 people are expected to be made homeless, with around double that number (at least) expected to move from London.

You don't need a riot to do that.  Oh, but I forgot, every world event is part of the nefarious conspiring of the powers that be, right?

As for the police being unable to stop the riots, the fact the police force was gutted by spending cuts (20% across the board) probably had nothing to do with that, right?  Not to mention the only "riots" police have faced in recent years is environmental activists, anemic University students and spineless liberals clutching their permits and worried about breaking the law.  They definitely cannot handle some of the kids from the rougher parts of London, and they've known that for years.  The thing is, now those kids also know it.

And what does the first link prove?  There had been protests that had turned violent from the 7th.  Sunday night.  Yeah, they knew something was up.  But they'd called in police from every other part of London to try and contain Tottenham.  Something to do with lacking manpower due to cuts in police funding.

:roll:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: P3nT4gR4m on August 10, 2011, 01:08:03 PM
Quote from: Cain on August 10, 2011, 11:52:28 AM
London was going to be cleared regardless.  Welfare to help with rent payments stops in London at the start of next year.  On top of other benefit cuts, 40,000 people are expected to be made homeless, with around double that number (at least) expected to move from London.

You don't need a riot to do that.  Oh, but I forgot, every world event is part of the nefarious conspiring of the powers that be, right?

As for the police being unable to stop the riots, the fact the police force was gutted by spending cuts (20% across the board) probably had nothing to do with that, right?  Not to mention the only "riots" police have faced in recent years is environmental activists, anemic University students and spineless liberals clutching their permits and worried about breaking the law.  They definitely cannot handle some of the kids from the rougher parts of London, and they've known that for years.  The thing is, now those kids also know it.

And what does the first link prove?  There had been protests that had turned violent from the 7th.  Sunday night.  Yeah, they knew something was up.  But they'd called in police from every other part of London to try and contain Tottenham.  Something to do with lacking manpower due to cuts in police funding.

:roll:

Message is spreading. :popcorn:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Eartha-ly Delights on August 10, 2011, 11:21:49 PM
Quote from: Cain on August 10, 2011, 11:52:28 AM
London was going to be cleared regardless.  Welfare to help with rent payments stops in London at the start of next year.  On top of other benefit cuts, 40,000 people are expected to be made homeless, with around double that number (at least) expected to move from London.

You don't need a riot to do that.  Oh, but I forgot, every world event is part of the nefarious conspiring of the powers that be, right?

As for the police being unable to stop the riots, the fact the police force was gutted by spending cuts (20% across the board) probably had nothing to do with that, right?  Not to mention the only "riots" police have faced in recent years is environmental activists, anemic University students and spineless liberals clutching their permits and worried about breaking the law.  They definitely cannot handle some of the kids from the rougher parts of London, and they've known that for years.  The thing is, now those kids also know it.

And what does the first link prove?  There had been protests that had turned violent from the 7th.  Sunday night.  Yeah, they knew something was up.  But they'd called in police from every other part of London to try and contain Tottenham.  Something to do with lacking manpower due to cuts in police funding.

:roll:

Oh the poor police. So under equipped... with riot gear and horses to run down protesters. With water cannon and tazers and sharp shooters on roofs.

And the announcement this morning that anyone living in a Council House whose child has been convicted of looting will be evicted...the whole family...for the crimes of a 13 year old member of it....that is not going to help the clearing out along I suppose?

You people like to style yourselves as radical thinkers. Don'take me fucking laugh. Discordianism my arse. You're just a pack of middle class apologists for the status quo. So many of you so heavily invested in or aspiring to a lifestyle of property deals and stock options, health plans and holiday brochures that the notion of real and meaningful change in the social hierarchy makes you all shit your britches.

Go on; exchange your dirty jokes and naughty pictures. Pat one another on the back and tell each other how gifted, how insightful, how erudite and well read, how essentially superior you all are to anyone who isn't part of the inner circle on your sad little forum for pseudo intellectual posturing.

It's about all any of you have the ticker for.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: iarmit on August 10, 2011, 11:46:17 PM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 10, 2011, 11:21:49 PM
Oh the poor police. So under equipped... with riot gear and horses to run down protesters. With water cannon and tazers and sharp shooters on roofs.

And the announcement this morning that anyone living in a Council House whose child has been convicted of looting will be evicted...the whole family...for the crimes of a 13 year old member of it....that is not going to help the clearing out along I suppose?

You people like to style yourselves as radical thinkers. Don'take me fucking laugh. Discordianism my arse. You're just a pack of middle class apologists for the status quo. So many of you so heavily invested in or aspiring to a lifestyle of property deals and stock options, health plans and holiday brochures that the notion of real and meaningful change in the social hierarchy makes you all shit your britches.

Go on; exchange your dirty jokes and naughty pictures. Pat one another on the back and tell each other how gifted, how insightful, how erudite and well read, how essentially superior you all are to anyone who isn't part of the inner circle on your sad little forum for pseudo intellectual posturing.

It's about all any of you have the ticker for.

it may be that i am speaking without knowing, but if i may draw your attention to the bolded text:

surely it may be that it is due to my recent rereading of BIP, but it seems (if only to me), Eartha,
that you have made the same mistake as Golden Rod from the Parable of the Gong in confusing
Discord with Anarchy (and in so doing, have attempt to condemn those that spoke before me of
not being Real Discordians).

again, i may have misread, but it did not seem to me that (most) of the commenters thus far have
spoken against the riots, but only seem to think your claims that it is all some fuzzy minded gov't
conspiracy are, well... fuzzy minded.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: PopeTom on August 11, 2011, 12:09:16 AM
When considering how likely a conspiracy is the first question to ask yourself is 'How many people would it take to pull this off'.
Then remember that then President of the USA William Clinton couldn't keep getting a blowjob under wraps and all that requires is that two people keep it to themselves.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 12:43:56 AM
Possibly there is another school of thought within Discordianism.....maybe even more than one other... which diverges from your own narrowly defined conception of the thing.

Perhaps in some of those anarchy is very much a central concern. Though I suspect that should you lot ever come across such a school of thought, or any of those who espouse its philosophies you'd flame and belittle them too.

I've come to the conclusion that the problem with this particular group for my purposes is that its far too Americentrist to be of interest.
Your understanding of and curiosity about geopolitics on pd seems to vacillate only throughout the regions sandwiched between Tijuana and Toronto.

But I'm quite confident that popular opinion on pd will be that I'm wrong about that too.
Popular opinion here seeming to be the only thing that resonates.

Funny that, for a group who claim to pride themselves on liking a bit of disharmony....atonal elements aren't really welcome  are they?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 11, 2011, 01:12:31 AM
Atonal elements are more than welcome.

Moronic elements who lack basic reading comprehension skills, however, not so much.

I'm pretty sure that if we took a poll, the majority of posters ITT would come out in favor of the rioters.

And I don't know if you've noticed but not only are you verbally sharting about what is or isn't "really real discordianism" (hint: there's no such thing) but you're doing it in a thread where half of the posters live in the UK and a fair amount of the rest aren't American.

but hey, keep telling Cain and Pent and Pix that they're too "Americentric".

Retard. :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Phox on August 11, 2011, 01:18:38 AM
Quote from: Epimetheus on August 10, 2011, 04:24:47 AM
The day Dok becomes a guru, I am fleeing, along with anyone who knows what's good for them. I will, however, be tuning into the news often, to hear of the...exploits...of the Howlites.
Nah, I'm just gonna assassinate him. Save the world, and all that jazz.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Phox on August 11, 2011, 01:24:10 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 12:43:56 AM
Possibly there is another school of thought within Discordianism.....maybe even more than one other... which diverges from your own narrowly defined conception of the thing.

Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 10, 2011, 11:21:49 PM
Discordianism my arse. You're just a pack of middle class apologists for the status quo.
Does it hurt much?  :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 11, 2011, 02:16:11 AM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 11, 2011, 01:12:31 AM
Atonal elements are more than welcome.

Moronic elements who lack basic reading comprehension skills, however, not so much.

I'm pretty sure that if we took a poll, the majority of posters ITT would come out in favor of the rioters.

And I don't know if you've noticed but not only are you verbally sharting about what is or isn't "really real discordianism" (hint: there's no such thing) but you're doing it in a thread where half of the posters live in the UK and a fair amount of the rest aren't American.

but hey, keep telling Cain and Pent and Pix that they're too "Americentric".

Retard. :lulz:

THIS.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 11, 2011, 03:11:24 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 12:43:56 AM
Possibly there is another school of thought within Discordianism.....maybe even more than one other... which diverges from your own narrowly defined conception of the thing.

Perhaps in some of those anarchy is very much a central concern. Though I suspect that should you lot ever come across such a school of thought, or any of those who espouse its philosophies you'd flame and belittle them too.

I've come to the conclusion that the problem with this particular group for my purposes is that its far too Americentrist to be of interest.
Your understanding of and curiosity about geopolitics on pd seems to vacillate only throughout the regions sandwiched between Tijuana and Toronto.

But I'm quite confident that popular opinion on pd will be that I'm wrong about that too.
Popular opinion here seeming to be the only thing that resonates.

Funny that, for a group who claim to pride themselves on liking a bit of disharmony....atonal elements aren't really welcome  are they?

Care to enlighten us who/what the fuck you're alluding to?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Phox on August 11, 2011, 03:30:45 AM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 11, 2011, 03:11:24 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 12:43:56 AM
Possibly there is another school of thought within Discordianism.....maybe even more than one other... which diverges from your own narrowly defined conception of the thing.

Perhaps in some of those anarchy is very much a central concern. Though I suspect that should you lot ever come across such a school of thought, or any of those who espouse its philosophies you'd flame and belittle them too.

I've come to the conclusion that the problem with this particular group for my purposes is that its far too Americentrist to be of interest.
Your understanding of and curiosity about geopolitics on pd seems to vacillate only throughout the regions sandwiched between Tijuana and Toronto.

But I'm quite confident that popular opinion on pd will be that I'm wrong about that too.
Popular opinion here seeming to be the only thing that resonates.

Funny that, for a group who claim to pride themselves on liking a bit of disharmony....atonal elements aren't really welcome  are they?

Care to enlighten us who/what the fuck you're alluding to?
No.  :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Epimetheus on August 11, 2011, 03:37:03 AM
(http://i55.tinypic.com/33xbtqv.jpg)
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: The Johnny on August 11, 2011, 03:49:56 AM

WEll, theres a lot of articles about the USA, but even I as a foreigner find them interesting, for most of them concern or are symptomatic of what is happening in the world.

Its really a matter of time-frames and what-is-happening-right-now, some weeks its Asia, some others are Europe, and then some other Arabia... theres a lot of talk of everywhere, except pretty much south america...
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Phox on August 11, 2011, 03:55:55 AM
Quote from: Joh'Nyx on August 11, 2011, 03:49:56 AM
theres a lot of talk of everywhere, except pretty much south america...
That's patently untrue, I here about Texas and Florida and stuff all the time!
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 04:26:25 AM
Amerocentrist is not a term which means being an American. Nor does it mean one necessarily resides within America.

It is a term which means focusing primarily on the issues and events which are central to American politics and American military and economic interests.

And this site is most certainly that.

The board may well have lit up with talk of London now. But I waited 4 days to hear something insightful said on the matter here and it hadn't rated more than a passing mention.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Epimetheus on August 11, 2011, 04:40:30 AM
 :monkeydance:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 04:51:29 AM
Quote from: Epimetheus on August 11, 2011, 04:40:30 AM
:monkeydance:

Yes . Extremely articulate. My ego is mortally wounded by that rapier like thrust of wit. Rush me to the burns unit will you? I haven't felt pain like this since year 9 when Alice Freeman said I was flat chested.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: The Johnny on August 11, 2011, 04:53:39 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 04:26:25 AM
Amerocentrist is not a term which means being an American. Nor does it mean one necessarily resides within America.

It is a term which means focusing primarily on the issues and events which are central to American politics and American military and economic interests.

And this site is most certainly that.

The board may well have lit up with talk of London now. But I waited 4 days to hear something insightful said on the matter here and it hadn't rated more than a passing mention.

9 pages of discussions doesnt seem to me like a passing mention.

Its not the boards fault your degree of interest dont coincide with your own - and on that same matter, is it a lack of interest? or is it a lack of controversy on the subject? The thread isnt that long because there seems to be consensus on its meaning, if there were opposing viewpoints, it would be more heated.

And like i said, theres a lot of USA things discussed here, but due to the subjectiveness of it, you might consider it Americentrist, while i dont think so. So go where u feel the issues you are interested in are met more satisfactorily.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Epimetheus on August 11, 2011, 04:57:45 AM
much love, earthaly ~~~ energies~~~
think about it this way, if you think to post bout london, wat are u really doing, just posting as a conduit of some kind of energy, well we r all in this together,

I am a Businessman

and I can only say I am in it to make the world better...some new posters are clearly not my target audience :)

but we are all in the world - ~ ~ -

Respect
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 05:02:55 AM
If there had been opposing viewpoints they would have been inundated with shit like this one has been...dancing monkeys and pathetically overt attempts to change the topic to how much Dok isn't a guru . Like it always goes here...Discord seems somewhat confused with popular acclaim on this forum. Let's all agree to be discordant ...but only in the same way, innit?

Odd really as I would have thought the oxynmoronic qualities of that stand were fairly obvious.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on August 11, 2011, 05:04:58 AM
Hey, did you ever think that you're getting flac because you're being a stupid bitch?  Because you are.

"If you've been divorced nine times, maybe it's you."
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on August 11, 2011, 05:05:17 AM
Quote from: Epimetheus on August 11, 2011, 05:04:34 AM
I just


feel



so



:monkeydance:
:lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Epimetheus on August 11, 2011, 05:06:36 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 05:02:55 AM
If there had been opposing viewpoints they would have been inundated with shit like this one has been...dancing monkeys and pathetically overt attempts to change the topic to how much Dok isn't a guru . Like it always goes here...Discord seems somewhat confused with popular acclaim on this forum. Let's all agree to be discordant ...but only in the same way, innit?

Odd really as I would have thought the oxynmoronic qualities of that stand were fairly obvious.

:monkeydance:, :monkeydance::monkeydance::monkeydance:...:monkeydance: :monkeydance: :monkeydance: :monkeydance:      :monkeydance::monkeydance::monkeydance:, :monkeydance: :monkeydance: :monkeydance: :monkeydance:; :monkeydance:.

:monkeydance: :monkeydance: :monkeydance:! :monkeydance: :monkeydance:.

:monkeydance::monkeydance::monkeydance:, :monkeydance::monkeydance::monkeydance::monkeydance::monkeydance::monkeydance::monkeydance:.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Epimetheus on August 11, 2011, 05:07:59 AM
Ah shit, deleted my previous post. Someone reinstate it, and quick! There are leaks forming! It's all I can do to keep this monkey-dam from falling apart completely!
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 11, 2011, 05:11:19 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 05:02:55 AM
If there had been opposing viewpoints they would have been inundated with shit like this one has been...dancing monkeys and pathetically overt attempts to change the topic to how much Dok isn't a guru . Like it always goes here...Discord seems somewhat confused with popular acclaim on this forum. Let's all agree to be discordant ...but only in the same way, innit?

Odd really as I would have thought the oxynmoronic qualities of that stand were fairly obvious.

(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110621180842/icarly/images/5/52/Animated_dance_monkey_dance.gif)
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Epimetheus on August 11, 2011, 05:13:11 AM
Quote from: Epimetheus on January 07, 2011, 02:59:14 AM
On second thought, let's not go to Anarchy. 'Tis a silly place.
\
              (http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/NewAvatars/avatar_6728.png)
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Phox on August 11, 2011, 05:18:49 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 05:02:55 AM
If there had been opposing viewpoints they would have been inundated with shit like this one has been...dancing monkeys and pathetically overt attempts to change the topic to how much Dok isn't a guru . Like it always goes here...Discord seems somewhat confused with popular acclaim on this forum. Let's all agree to be discordant ...but only in the same way, innit?

Odd really as I would have thought the oxynmoronic qualities of that stand were fairly obvious.

Do read what you type or do you just string words together and hit post?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on August 11, 2011, 05:21:19 AM
I think she's mostly angry that no one was all like "You're right!  Whatever you were blathering about in the OP makes so much sense to me now!"


Cain's posts were really insightful, though, even the sarcastic ones.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: The Johnny on August 11, 2011, 05:22:49 AM
Im not RL friends with people here, so i can, without personal interest, say that you making remarks about stalking Charley, and taunting Dok, arent good grounds for a serious discussion.

Also, Cain is pretty much a professional in regards to politics and i would suggest you reevaluate on what he mentions are weak arguments.

Bear in thought that you then went on to paint a picture of us as middle class apologists, all of us, so we take that as an insult.

So yeah, reevaluate all this and think on why people are acting the way they are.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on August 11, 2011, 05:24:02 AM
Quote from: Joh'Nyx on August 11, 2011, 05:22:49 AM
Im not RL friends with people here, so i can, without personal interest, say that you making remarks about stalking Charley, and taunting Dok, arent good grounds for a serious discussion.

Also, Cain is pretty much a professional in regards to politics and i would suggest you reevaluate on what he mentions are weak arguments.

Bear in thought that you then went on to paint a picture of us as middle class apologists, all of us, so we take that as an insult.

So yeah, reevaluate all this and think on why people are acting the way they are.

Even Johnny gets it, and he's never around anymore. :lulz:

How you been, man?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 05:32:24 AM
Quote from: Joh'Nyx on August 11, 2011, 05:22:49 AM
Im not RL friends with people here, so i can, without personal interest, say that you making remarks about stalking Charley, and taunting Dok, arent good grounds for a serious discussion.

Also, Cain is pretty much a professional in regards to politics and i would suggest you reevaluate on what he mentions are weak arguments.

Bear in thought that you then went on to paint a picture of us as middle class apologists, all of us, so we take that as an insult.

So yeah, reevaluate all this and think on why people are acting the way they are.

Charley has adopted me as his pet stalker in fact. He even connected to me on facebook. I didn't connect to him...He uite likes me. I guess you'll try to put paid to that, but I have a feeling that Charley has a mind of his own and might make that decision for himself.

and taunting DOK??....fuck off. I have appeared on fewer than a dozen posts where he even was involved in the discussion and apart from this debacle here have interacted directly with him once. When I tried to subtly point out to Jenkem whatsherface that cayenne pepper is not considered an authentic Indian spice in India...and they got all butt hurt about it

Have I threatened poor old Dok now? Will he need to ban me in case I leap out a cupboard and attack him with a limp naan bread?
What a softcock he must be if he has to call in the troops every time some loud mouthed Aussie slapper gives him a bit of cheek.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: The Johnny on August 11, 2011, 05:33:00 AM
Quote from: Jenkem and SPACE/TIME on August 11, 2011, 05:24:02 AM
Quote from: Joh'Nyx on August 11, 2011, 05:22:49 AM
Im not RL friends with people here, so i can, without personal interest, say that you making remarks about stalking Charley, and taunting Dok, arent good grounds for a serious discussion.

Also, Cain is pretty much a professional in regards to politics and i would suggest you reevaluate on what he mentions are weak arguments.

Bear in thought that you then went on to paint a picture of us as middle class apologists, all of us, so we take that as an insult.

So yeah, reevaluate all this and think on why people are acting the way they are.

Even Johnny gets it, and he's never around anymore. :lulz:

How you been, man?

Lurking, but im here ^^, school and fieldwork doesnt give much time for writing (im on vacations right now)
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Epimetheus on August 11, 2011, 05:37:00 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 05:32:24 AM
Charley has adopted me as his pet stalker in fact. He even connected to me on facebook.
YUP CUZ THATS WUT THAT IS.

Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 05:32:24 AM[the rest of the post]

Ooh la la! Très   :monkeydance:!
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Salty on August 11, 2011, 05:38:31 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 05:32:24 AM
Quote from: Joh'Nyx on August 11, 2011, 05:22:49 AM
Im not RL friends with people here, so i can, without personal interest, say that you making remarks about stalking Charley, and taunting Dok, arent good grounds for a serious discussion.

Also, Cain is pretty much a professional in regards to politics and i would suggest you reevaluate on what he mentions are weak arguments.

Bear in thought that you then went on to paint a picture of us as middle class apologists, all of us, so we take that as an insult.

So yeah, reevaluate all this and think on why people are acting the way they are.

Charley has adopted me as his pet stalker in fact. He even connected to me on facebook. I didn't connect to him...He uite likes me. I guess you'll try to put paid to that, but I have a feeling that Charley has a mind of his own and might make that decision for himself.

and taunting DOK??....fuck off. I have appeared on fewer than a dozen posts where he even was involved in the discussion and apart from this debacle here have interacted directly with him once. When I tried to subtly point out to Jenkem whatsherface that cayenne pepper is not considered an authentic Indian spice in India...and they got all butt hurt about it

Have I threatened poor old Dok now? Will he need to ban me in case I leap out a cupboard and attack him with a limp naan bread?
What a softcock he must be if he has to call in the troops every time some loud mouthed Aussie slapper gives him a bit of cheek.

I'm sure the above is Very Interesting but I'm too busy being a middle-class apologist to read it. Anarchy is awesome, right? Someone set me to rights here.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on August 11, 2011, 05:39:26 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 05:32:24 AM


Charley has adopted me as his pet stalker in fact. He even connected to me on facebook. I didn't connect to him...He uite likes me. I guess you'll try to put paid to that, but I have a feeling that Charley has a mind of his own and might make that decision for himself.

and taunting DOK??....fuck off. I have appeared on fewer than a dozen posts where he even was involved in the discussion and apart from this debacle here have interacted directly with him once. When I tried to subtly point out to Jenkem whatsherface that cayenne pepper is not considered an authentic Indian spice in India...and they got all butt hurt about it

Have I threatened poor old Dok now? Will he need to ban me in case I leap out a cupboard and attack him with a limp naan bread?
What a softcock he must be if he has to call in the troops every time some loud mouthed Aussie slapper gives him a bit of cheek.

What an aspie. :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Epimetheus on August 11, 2011, 05:39:42 AM
I am a middle-class apologizer, though: Sorry about the middle class.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Salty on August 11, 2011, 05:40:04 AM
It's just silly because in an Anarchist Society (lol) there wouldn't be an underclass to wash the spaces between my toes and who wants THAT?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on August 11, 2011, 05:42:37 AM
Quote from: Alty on August 11, 2011, 05:40:04 AM
It's just silly because in an Anarchist Society (lol) there wouldn't be an underclass to wash the spaces between my toes and who wants THAT?

Nobody, for sure.


I guess if I'm an apologist, I should probably start apologizing for stuff, right?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: The Johnny on August 11, 2011, 05:43:58 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 05:32:24 AM
Charley has adopted me as his pet stalker in fact. He even connected to me on facebook. I didn't connect to him...He uite likes me. I guess you'll try to put paid to that, but I have a feeling that Charley has a mind of his own and might make that decision for himself.

and taunting DOK??....fuck off. I have appeared on fewer than a dozen posts where he even was involved in the discussion and apart from this debacle here have interacted directly with him once. When I tried to subtly point out to Jenkem whatsherface that cayenne pepper is not considered an authentic Indian spice in India...and they got all butt hurt about it

Have I threatened poor old Dok now? Will he need to ban me in case I leap out a cupboard and attack him with a limp naan bread?
What a softcock he must be if he has to call in the troops every time some loud mouthed Aussie slapper gives him a bit of cheek.

Im solely talking of stuff within this thread and the other london one...

For us a bit out of the loop, the Charley remark sounded creepy, didnt know you were his friend.

Some of your remarks might unintentionally come off as snobish, for example, you pointing out what "Americentrist" is, is an assumption that we dont know what it means, and that that ignorance is the consequence of our "faulty" arguments.

I never said anything about threatening Dok, i only said "taunt" - and we dont ban people (except for some undecent things), thats why we have the existance of multiple 50 page butthurt threads.

Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 11, 2011, 05:44:06 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 04:26:25 AM
Amerocentrist is not a term which means being an American. Nor does it mean one necessarily resides within America.

It is a term which means focusing primarily on the issues and events which are central to American politics and American military and economic interests.

And this site is most certainly that.

The board may well have lit up with talk of London now. But I waited 4 days to hear something insightful said on the matter here and it hadn't rated more than a passing mention.

this may not have occurred to you since you seem a bit of an idiot, but events that are central to American politics and interests tend to be central to global politics and interests. Like it or not, the USA is the only country around that has that much influence on the rest of the world.

Oh, and how hard did you look for posts about the riots? I mean, they only started almost immediately after the riots did.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Salty on August 11, 2011, 05:45:38 AM
I'm sorry for the twelve luxus SUV's standing outside my trailer. I'm sorry I can only afford insurance on five of them. I'm sorry the rest are used as storage units for my collection of ceramic kittens.

I'm sorry ceramic kittens.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 11, 2011, 05:47:08 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 05:02:55 AM
If there had been opposing viewpoints they would have been inundated with shit like this one has been...dancing monkeys and pathetically overt attempts to change the topic to how much Dok isn't a guru . Like it always goes here...Discord seems somewhat confused with popular acclaim on this forum. Let's all agree to be discordant ...but only in the same way, innit?

Odd really as I would have thought the oxynmoronic qualities of that stand were fairly obvious.

So you're mad because pretty much everyone ITT is taking the side of the rioters?

Because you think we should, instead, be taking the side of the rioters?

:lulz:

Reading comprehension. You lack it.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 11, 2011, 05:47:53 AM
I'm sorry we're not doing discord the right way. :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on August 11, 2011, 05:50:19 AM
I'm sorry too, kittens. :cry:

I'm sorry that I live in a two-story house who's back yard faces onto the tenth hole, and drive THREE jeeps.  All at once.

Sorry, jeeps.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: The Johnny on August 11, 2011, 05:52:47 AM

Yes, im sorry for living on the luxury of canned beans and vegetables.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Epimetheus on August 11, 2011, 05:53:05 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 05:02:55 AM
If there had been opposing viewpoints they would have been inundated with shit like this one has been...dancing monkeys and pathetically overt attempts to change the topic to how much Dok isn't a guru .

I am HONORED to be the subject of a newbie gripe! I think this is my first time! I'd like to thank God, family and nation.
Oh, and I couldn't have done it without :monkeydance:.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on August 11, 2011, 05:53:29 AM
Also, I am sorry that Erec-ly Defathead has access to internets, because that's totally middle-class white, and nobody should be that.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on August 11, 2011, 05:54:23 AM
Quote from: Joh'Nyx on August 11, 2011, 05:52:47 AM

Yes, im sorry for living on the luxury of canned beans and vegetables.

I'm sorry that I can afford to buy some meat every month.  I'm a bad person. :cry:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Phox on August 11, 2011, 05:55:56 AM
Y'all can go fuck yourselves, my only means of transportation died yesterday.

Phox,
Lower class, unemployed, and not sorry about it.  :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on August 11, 2011, 05:56:10 AM
Poor baby ran away from us mean old doin'-it-wrong discordians.

We're bad people. :cry:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on August 11, 2011, 05:57:12 AM
Quote from: Doktor Phox on August 11, 2011, 05:55:56 AM
Y'all can go fuck yourselves, my only means of transportation died yesterday.

Phox,
Lower class, unemployed, and not sorry about it.  :lulz:

LIES!  You are on the internet and don't agree with ED, so you are OBVIOUSLY a middle-class apologist.

C'mon, Phox, get with the program. :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: PopeTom on August 11, 2011, 05:58:19 AM
Quote from: Doktor Phox on August 11, 2011, 05:55:56 AM
Y'all can go fuck yourselves, my only means of transportation died yesterday.

Phox,
Lower class, unemployed, and not sorry about it.  :lulz:

I'm sorry to hear about your mom.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Phox on August 11, 2011, 05:59:04 AM
Quote from: Jenkem and SPACE/TIME on August 11, 2011, 05:57:12 AM
Quote from: Doktor Phox on August 11, 2011, 05:55:56 AM
Y'all can go fuck yourselves, my only means of transportation died yesterday.

Phox,
Lower class, unemployed, and not sorry about it.  :lulz:

LIES!  You are on the internet and don't agree with ED, so you are OBVIOUSLY a middle-class apologist.

C'mon, Phox, get with the program. :lulz:
Hmm. This is true. And I do technically live in a two-story house.... YOU'RE RIGHT! I'M SORRY!  :x
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Phox on August 11, 2011, 05:59:44 AM
Quote from: PopeTom on August 11, 2011, 05:58:19 AM
Quote from: Doktor Phox on August 11, 2011, 05:55:56 AM
Y'all can go fuck yourselves, my only means of transportation died yesterday.

Phox,
Lower class, unemployed, and not sorry about it.  :lulz:

I'm sorry to hear about your mom.
Asshole.  :lulz:

She broke an ankle, so I had to put her down.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Salty on August 11, 2011, 06:02:34 AM
Quote from: Jenkem and SPACE/TIME on August 11, 2011, 05:56:10 AM
Poor baby ran away from us mean old doin'-it-wrong discordians.

We're bad people. :cry:

Maybe someday a REALLY REAL teacher will come along and show us how to be the kind of Discordians who get along and are nice and agree with those rioters.

Until then I'M VERY VERY SORRY BUT I CAN'T HEAR YOU OVER THE SOUND OF MY MASSIVE AMERICENTRIST STEREO SYSTEM.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 11, 2011, 06:06:40 AM
Quote from: Doktor Phox on August 11, 2011, 05:55:56 AM
Y'all can go fuck yourselves, my only means of transportation died yesterday.

Phox,
Lower class, unemployed, and not sorry about it.  :lulz:

Your feet fell off?

I'm sorry about your feet.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Phox on August 11, 2011, 06:08:40 AM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 11, 2011, 06:06:40 AM
Quote from: Doktor Phox on August 11, 2011, 05:55:56 AM
Y'all can go fuck yourselves, my only means of transportation died yesterday.

Phox,
Lower class, unemployed, and not sorry about it.  :lulz:

Your feet fell off?

I'm sorry about your feet.
:lulz:

I still live 20 miles from nowhere. My feet will fall off as soon as I need to gt anything aside from basic groceries.  :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 11, 2011, 06:51:01 AM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 11, 2011, 05:47:08 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 05:02:55 AM
If there had been opposing viewpoints they would have been inundated with shit like this one has been...dancing monkeys and pathetically overt attempts to change the topic to how much Dok isn't a guru . Like it always goes here...Discord seems somewhat confused with popular acclaim on this forum. Let's all agree to be discordant ...but only in the same way, innit?

Odd really as I would have thought the oxynmoronic qualities of that stand were fairly obvious.

So you're mad because pretty much everyone ITT is taking the side of the rioters?

Because you think we should, instead, be taking the side of the rioters?

:lulz:

Reading comprehension. You lack it.

She went off on Jenne for using the word "illegal" here http://www.erisbarandgrill.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=11211&page=6
Like Jenne is some kind of xenophobe.
I told her Jenne wasn't like that and I let it ride, because she was still new. Guess that was a mistake on my part.

But she's not new anymore.  :evil:

And I'm somewhat insulted at the implication that we like Roger because he TELLS US WUT TO THINK and not because he's good people as long as you're making an effort to walk on your hind legs.

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

Fuck you, Earthaly.

:jihaad:

Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Don Coyote on August 11, 2011, 08:31:06 AM
what the fuck is this shit. :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 11, 2011, 09:11:01 AM
Fuckery as usual.  :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: P3nT4gR4m on August 11, 2011, 09:26:06 AM
here's the thing. Discordianism is not some idealistic morality trip. I never was told I had to renounce all my earthly belongings. The Buddhists did tell me that so I told them to shove their religion up their fat ass. I'm a smart motherfucker, I got tons of good shit. Some people got more, some got less. Aint my bitch. Right? Wrong? I don't see it that way. That's easy-reader mentality. Shit is complicated, people are stupid, the lulz are endless but if you're hung up on this whole right/wrong trip you're in for a miserable century :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Pæs on August 11, 2011, 10:48:35 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 05:32:24 AM
Charley has adopted me as his pet stalker in fact. He even connected to me on facebook. I didn't connect to him...He uite likes me. I guess you'll try to put paid to that, but I have a feeling that Charley has a mind of his own and might make that decision for himself.

and taunting DOK??....fuck off. I have appeared on fewer than a dozen posts where he even was involved in the discussion and apart from this debacle here have interacted directly with him once. When I tried to subtly point out to Jenkem whatsherface that cayenne pepper is not considered an authentic Indian spice in India...and they got all butt hurt about it

Have I threatened poor old Dok now? Will he need to ban me in case I leap out a cupboard and attack him with a limp naan bread?
What a softcock he must be if he has to call in the troops every time some loud mouthed Aussie slapper gives him a bit of cheek.
This is what this thread is about.

Responses that address the dumb shit you are saying are being ignored in favour of bitching about how the Discordians have let you down by by not thinking for themselves (read: entirely agreeing with you). Yadda, yadda, circle jerk, here's what's wrong with YOU PEOPLE, blah blah, pretention in a can, immediately attack Dok weakly enough that you can deny it and cry about mind lasers and the PDCOM modus operandi when we give the standard "Oh, this bullshit again."

Fuck off.



Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Fast Eddy on August 11, 2011, 11:32:21 AM
ED: Christ on a bike, step the fuck back and reread everyone's posts. Most of us are sympathetic to the rioters or whatever the fuck you want to insist on calling them. And quit making silly and stupid assumptions about the positions of everyone.

Everyone thinks you're a fucking Looney Tune because you insist there's some deliberate conspiracy to provoke the riots and get the poor out of London for the Olympics. Cain explained well enough why that isn't true. The poor are still getting fucked, but not as part of a dark conspiracy, just because everyone likes shitting on the poor.

Also, if you can't understand what Dok meant with the anarchy comment, just fucking ask him to elaborate. Don't start in with some goddamn silly purple prose and verbal kowtowing. Keep it simple, stupid.

Dok: I didn't quite understand what your post was referring to. Could you elaborate a bit?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Disco Pickle on August 11, 2011, 02:39:15 PM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 10, 2011, 11:21:49 PM
Quote from: Cain on August 10, 2011, 11:52:28 AM
London was going to be cleared regardless.  Welfare to help with rent payments stops in London at the start of next year.  On top of other benefit cuts, 40,000 people are expected to be made homeless, with around double that number (at least) expected to move from London.

You don't need a riot to do that.  Oh, but I forgot, every world event is part of the nefarious conspiring of the powers that be, right?

As for the police being unable to stop the riots, the fact the police force was gutted by spending cuts (20% across the board) probably had nothing to do with that, right?  Not to mention the only "riots" police have faced in recent years is environmental activists, anemic University students and spineless liberals clutching their permits and worried about breaking the law.  They definitely cannot handle some of the kids from the rougher parts of London, and they've known that for years.  The thing is, now those kids also know it.

And what does the first link prove?  There had been protests that had turned violent from the 7th.  Sunday night.  Yeah, they knew something was up.  But they'd called in police from every other part of London to try and contain Tottenham.  Something to do with lacking manpower due to cuts in police funding.

:roll:

Oh the poor police. So under equipped... with riot gear and horses to run down protesters. With water cannon and tazers and sharp shooters on roofs.

And the announcement this morning that anyone living in a Council House whose child has been convicted of looting will be evicted...the whole family...for the crimes of a 13 year old member of it....that is not going to help the clearing out along I suppose?

You people like to style yourselves as radical thinkers. Don'take me fucking laugh. Discordianism my arse. You're just a pack of middle class apologists for the status quo. So many of you so heavily invested in or aspiring to a lifestyle of property deals and stock options, health plans and holiday brochures that the notion of real and meaningful change in the social hierarchy makes you all shit your britches.

Go on; exchange your dirty jokes and naughty pictures. Pat one another on the back and tell each other how gifted, how insightful, how erudite and well read, how essentially superior you all are to anyone who isn't part of the inner circle on your sad little forum for pseudo intellectual posturing.

It's about all any of you have the ticker for.

:lulz: Anarchy

I've stayed out of this thread except to follow it because I would definitely have some opinions that run counter to the majority and have been too busy to keep up with the inevitable "conversation" that would ensue.  

You seem to be thinking there's some sort of homogenized, leftist-centric, human poverty-centric view of discordia.  

The "Everyone must think alike and the alike way to think is the way I think" religions are always accepting new members.  Perhaps you'd be more comfortable in one of them?  

New people coming here and telling the old hats there is only one way to do discordianism and they're doing it wrong is a running gag here.  

For the sake of conversation and the hopes that I might learn something from you (something more than every tired, trite, lefty-anarchist talking point used over the last half century) I'll address a few of your points with some of my own.  And believe me, I'm far from a voice of the majority here.

QuoteOh the poor police. So under equipped... with riot gear and horses to run down protesters. With water cannon and tazers and sharp shooters on roofs.

So you'd rather have a "fair fight" between the POLICE, and a rioting mob of humans?  Have you ever actually BEEN part of a riot yourself?  Please do yourself a favor and follow this to it's logical conclusion.  I can help you visualize the outcome if you're having trouble.

QuoteAnd the announcement this morning that anyone living in a Council House whose child has been convicted of looting will be evicted...the whole family...for the crimes of a 13 year old member of it....that is not going to help the clearing out along I suppose?

Apologists for bad parenting of children are some of my favorite people.  I'm sure we're going to get along great.  Ignoring the bit about a conspiracy because it sounds fucking crazy, and has already been covered by others here.

QuoteYou people like to style yourselves as radical thinkers. Don'take me fucking laugh. Discordianism my arse. You're just a pack of middle class apologists for the status quo. So many of you so heavily invested in or aspiring to a lifestyle of property deals and stock options, health plans and holiday brochures that the notion of real and meaningful change in the social hierarchy makes you all shit your britches.

Clearly you've lurked for some time.  This place is just dripping with middle class apologists for the status quo.  And some of us aren't aspiring to that lifestyle, some of us are doing it because that's what we want to fucking do.  Some of us don't like the system and are constantly looking for ways to break it.  Some of us have looked at the system and decided to find ways to hack it to our advantage.  Some of us just don't give a shit either way.  Some of us think there's a real possibility of
Quotereal and meaningful change in the social hierarchy
and some of us like to laugh at that idea.  

I looked at the poverty around me growing up and decided I didn't want to fucking live that way.  So I found ways to get out of it.  Yes, I own stock.  Yes, I have owned property and plan to again.  Yes, I take international vacations, but you won't find them in brochures.  I won't fucking apologize for it.  The "status quo" has been stable enough for me to find ways to benefit from it.  I won't fucking apologize to anyone who hasn't bothered to learn themselves.

What the fuck does meaningful change in the social hierarchy even mean? What does it mean to you?  That a bunch of people (children, at that) who think burning down their own fucking city are the sorts of people you'd want to elevate above the ones who DON'T go start shit on fire and rob their own neighbors?

I bet you're one of those types who actually thinks poverty can be eradicated.  Usually by taking all of the money from the people who have it and giving it to the people who don't, innit the truth?

:lulz:

If you're going to be an anarchist don't tap dance around the fucking thing.  Jump in with your boots (doc martins, right?) on and swim in that shit.  Own it.  Be prepared to defend it.  Someone here, possibly a few, will try and tear it down to it's individual ideas.  Don't shy away from changing what you think about any bit of it.  But also don't shy away from defending what you honestly believe to be right.

THIS. IS. DISCORDIA!  We don't all think alike and ain't that the glory of it.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: LMNO on August 11, 2011, 02:49:20 PM
I'm a middle-class, white-collar, property-owning, white-skinned, trust-funded, boarding-schooled winner of the genetic and social lottery.



No, that's not an apology.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Adios on August 11, 2011, 02:50:38 PM
WYF? This thread went to hell didn't it?

Yes, ED is my friend. You all all wrong about her politics though, she is more socialist/communist than anything. She doesn't hold back much either, says what's on her mind.

She is doing some amazing writing in Life Stories/Blogs at EB&G.

Personally I hope she sticks around.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: P3nT4gR4m on August 11, 2011, 03:07:36 PM
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on August 11, 2011, 02:49:20 PM
I'm a middle-class, white-collar, property-owning, white-skinned, trust-funded, boarding-schooled winner of the genetic and social lottery.



No, that's not an apology.

I'm a middle-class, white-collar, property-owning, white-skinned, vicious bastard that dragged himself out the gutter cos it fucking stank in there and has no sympathy for anyone who doesn't. Why the fuck would you want to stay in a gutter? Retarded!



No, that's not an apology either.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 11, 2011, 05:55:44 PM
I just like watching things burn.

That's DEFINITELY not an apology.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 11, 2011, 06:13:40 PM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 10, 2011, 11:21:49 PM
Quote from: Cain on August 10, 2011, 11:52:28 AM
London was going to be cleared regardless.  Welfare to help with rent payments stops in London at the start of next year.  On top of other benefit cuts, 40,000 people are expected to be made homeless, with around double that number (at least) expected to move from London.

You don't need a riot to do that.  Oh, but I forgot, every world event is part of the nefarious conspiring of the powers that be, right?

As for the police being unable to stop the riots, the fact the police force was gutted by spending cuts (20% across the board) probably had nothing to do with that, right?  Not to mention the only "riots" police have faced in recent years is environmental activists, anemic University students and spineless liberals clutching their permits and worried about breaking the law.  They definitely cannot handle some of the kids from the rougher parts of London, and they've known that for years.  The thing is, now those kids also know it.

And what does the first link prove?  There had been protests that had turned violent from the 7th.  Sunday night.  Yeah, they knew something was up.  But they'd called in police from every other part of London to try and contain Tottenham.  Something to do with lacking manpower due to cuts in police funding.

:roll:

Oh the poor police. So under equipped... with riot gear and horses to run down protesters. With water cannon and tazers and sharp shooters on roofs.

And the announcement this morning that anyone living in a Council House whose child has been convicted of looting will be evicted...the whole family...for the crimes of a 13 year old member of it....that is not going to help the clearing out along I suppose?

You people like to style yourselves as radical thinkers. Don'take me fucking laugh. Discordianism my arse. You're just a pack of middle class apologists for the status quo. So many of you so heavily invested in or aspiring to a lifestyle of property deals and stock options, health plans and holiday brochures that the notion of real and meaningful change in the social hierarchy makes you all shit your britches.

Go on; exchange your dirty jokes and naughty pictures. Pat one another on the back and tell each other how gifted, how insightful, how erudite and well read, how essentially superior you all are to anyone who isn't part of the inner circle on your sad little forum for pseudo intellectual posturing.

It's about all any of you have the ticker for.

Oh good. Someone being a total dick to EVERYONE ON THIS FORUM because someone disagreed with her.

You know what, Eartha? FUCK YOU, TOO.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 11, 2011, 06:24:37 PM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 05:32:24 AM
Quote from: Joh'Nyx on August 11, 2011, 05:22:49 AM
Im not RL friends with people here, so i can, without personal interest, say that you making remarks about stalking Charley, and taunting Dok, arent good grounds for a serious discussion.

Also, Cain is pretty much a professional in regards to politics and i would suggest you reevaluate on what he mentions are weak arguments.

Bear in thought that you then went on to paint a picture of us as middle class apologists, all of us, so we take that as an insult.

So yeah, reevaluate all this and think on why people are acting the way they are.

Charley has adopted me as his pet stalker in fact. He even connected to me on facebook. I didn't connect to him...He uite likes me. I guess you'll try to put paid to that, but I have a feeling that Charley has a mind of his own and might make that decision for himself.

and taunting DOK??....fuck off. I have appeared on fewer than a dozen posts where he even was involved in the discussion and apart from this debacle here have interacted directly with him once. When I tried to subtly point out to Jenkem whatsherface that cayenne pepper is not considered an authentic Indian spice in India...and they got all butt hurt about it

Have I threatened poor old Dok now? Will he need to ban me in case I leap out a cupboard and attack him with a limp naan bread?
What a softcock he must be if he has to call in the troops every time some loud mouthed Aussie slapper gives him a bit of cheek.

Shut your ignorant facecunt, retard. All capsicums are New World, so by your moronic logic NO peppers are "authentic" to Indian cooking. Nitpicking the variety of pepper for "authenticity" makes as much sense as omitting potatoes from all Indian cooking because they're "not authentic".

Jesus fuck, take a history lesson or read something sometimes before trying to pass on your dimwitted misinformation as "schooling". For fuck sake. If you're going to try to act the know-it-all, at least research it first before launching yourself into dramatic wrongness, hero.


Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 11, 2011, 06:31:01 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 11, 2011, 02:50:38 PM
WYF? This thread went to hell didn't it?

Yes, ED is my friend. You all all wrong about her politics though, she is more socialist/communist than anything. She doesn't hold back much either, says what's on her mind.

She is doing some amazing writing in Life Stories/Blogs at EB&G.

Personally I hope she sticks around.

If she could refrain from treating everyone on the board like a single entity and hurling insults at us indiscriminately while totally failing to actually read and understand what's going on on this board, I'd welcome her. Her story about her dad is amazing.

But she's being a total stupid cunt and needs to apologize.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 11, 2011, 06:33:28 PM
Oh, Eartha, cabbage and potatoes isn't "authentic" Polish food, either. Nor is anything with tomatoes in it "authentic" Italian food. And don't get me started on "Hungarian" paprika... a total farce.

You under-educated hipster bint.

:lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: PopeTom on August 11, 2011, 06:39:43 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 11, 2011, 06:31:01 PM

If she could refrain from treating everyone on the board like a single entity ...

Didn't you get the memo brain-slug.  We are a single entity.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 11, 2011, 06:44:13 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 11, 2011, 06:31:01 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 11, 2011, 02:50:38 PM
WYF? This thread went to hell didn't it?

Yes, ED is my friend. You all all wrong about her politics though, she is more socialist/communist than anything. She doesn't hold back much either, says what's on her mind.

She is doing some amazing writing in Life Stories/Blogs at EB&G.

Personally I hope she sticks around.

If she could refrain from treating everyone on the board like a single entity and hurling insults at us indiscriminately while totally failing to actually read and understand what's going on on this board, I'd welcome her. Her story about her dad is amazing.

But she's being a total stupid cunt and needs to apologize.

THIS.

Writing talent =/= license to insult people I like for no goddam reason.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Dysfunctional Cunt on August 11, 2011, 07:50:07 PM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 11, 2011, 06:44:13 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 11, 2011, 06:31:01 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 11, 2011, 02:50:38 PM
WYF? This thread went to hell didn't it?

Yes, ED is my friend. You all all wrong about her politics though, she is more socialist/communist than anything. She doesn't hold back much either, says what's on her mind.

She is doing some amazing writing in Life Stories/Blogs at EB&G.

Personally I hope she sticks around.

If she could refrain from treating everyone on the board like a single entity and hurling insults at us indiscriminately while totally failing to actually read and understand what's going on on this board, I'd welcome her. Her story about her dad is amazing.

But she's being a total stupid cunt and needs to apologize.

THIS.

Writing talent =/= license to insult people I like for no goddam reason.

:mittens:

I had a run in at EB&G with her during the CU debacle.  I've pretty much ignored her since.  I'm not a child.  I am not going to be nice to people who treat me as such
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Phox on August 11, 2011, 08:45:44 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 11, 2011, 02:50:38 PM
WYF? This thread went to hell didn't it?

Yes, ED is my friend. You all all wrong about her politics though, she is more socialist/communist than anything. She doesn't hold back much either, says what's on her mind.

She is doing some amazing writing in Life Stories/Blogs at EB&G.

Personally I hope she sticks around.
Sorry, Charley. But just because she's your friend doesn't mean she can be a stupid fucking cunt. I mean, I'd get the same treatment if I did the she's doing (umm, and I did).

For me, it isn't her politics, it's her completely shit attitude. Especially her hypocritical "NONE OF YOU ARE REALLY REAL DISCORDIANS" immediately followed by "BAAAAAAWWWWWWWW SOME DISCORDIANS ARE DIFFERENT!"

So, I don't care if she sticks around or not, but you know that ain't nobody exempt from a good hateshitting when they deserve it.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 11, 2011, 08:46:31 PM
You know someone's really a twatwaffle when they give Anarchists a bad name.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 11, 2011, 08:49:43 PM
Seems to me she's become accustomed to looking down on others for not being as bright as she is, and now she's trapped in a mindset that assumes her superiority over others without bothering to check in to reality to verify her assumption.

Maybe in bumfuck Australia that's a reasonable default, but it doesn't fly on the internets.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: P3nT4gR4m on August 11, 2011, 08:54:01 PM
ATTN: Ertha - you are no longer the smartest motherfucker in the room. Cain is.  :D
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 11, 2011, 09:02:40 PM
She tars everybody with the same fucked up brush and goes after people for no damn reason. I thought the Jenne thing was a fluke or misunderstanding, but it's a repeating pattern. Now we're all supposed to be mindless, elitist followers of Roger, who's supposed to be fucked up somehow.

WARNING FLAG DING DING DING WEEEEEEEEEEEEEOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO this person's motivations SUCK.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 11, 2011, 09:09:12 PM
Quote from: P3nT4gR4m on August 11, 2011, 08:54:01 PM
ATTN: Ertha - you are no longer the smartest motherfucker in the room. Cain is.  :D

Also, THIS.

Cheese popcorn or regular?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 11, 2011, 09:23:27 PM
It pisses me off that she regards my FRIEND as some kind of guru leader that I mindlessly follow. I mean, duh, I agree with and admire him on a lot of bases, but THAT'S WHY WE'RE FRIENDS, DUH.

I'm not a dog following a master. That's so beyond insulting it's disgusting. I will follow this flapping facecunt and slap her down everywhere she goes for that.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 11, 2011, 09:25:19 PM
We're probably not supposed to HAVE friends who aren't her. *cue theme from Twilight Zone*
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 09:41:50 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 11, 2011, 02:50:38 PM
WYF? This thread went to hell didn't it?

Yes, ED is my friend. You all all wrong about her politics though, she is more socialist/communist than anything. She doesn't hold back much either, says what's on her mind.

She is doing some amazing writing in Life Stories/Blogs at EB&G.

Personally I hope she sticks around.

Oh no sweety. I am a dyed in the wool anarchist. My family were communist/socialist. They hated the anarchy thing too. These people think they can name call? Hell they never been to one of my family party political debates.

But it has been edifying to find out why Nigel suddenly didn't think that Lost Things was a post she needed her name attached to.... well not when she'd told a fucktard cuntfaced idiot that it was beautifully told and incredibly well written, eh?

As I said Charley....don't worry about it. I think it's all vastly amusing, except that it's seemed to upset you. I just want you to get well.

I am however really chuffed that they kept going at it for hours after I logged off and got on with an actual life. Nice to know you've made an impact, innit?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 11, 2011, 09:41:54 PM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 11, 2011, 09:25:19 PM
We're probably not supposed to HAVE friends who aren't her. *cue theme from Twilight Zone*

:hitlerbanjo:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 11, 2011, 09:46:49 PM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 09:41:50 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 11, 2011, 02:50:38 PM
WYF? This thread went to hell didn't it?

Yes, ED is my friend. You all all wrong about her politics though, she is more socialist/communist than anything. She doesn't hold back much either, says what's on her mind.

She is doing some amazing writing in Life Stories/Blogs at EB&G.

Personally I hope she sticks around.

Oh no sweety. I am a dyed in the wool anarchist. My family were communist/socialist. They hated the anarchy thing too. These people think they can name call? Hell they never been to one of my family party political debates.

But it has been edifying to find out why Nigel suddenly didn't think that Lost Things was a post she needed her name attached to.... well not when she'd told a fucktard cuntfaced idiot that it was beautifully told and incredibly well written, eh?

As I said Charley....don't worry about it. I think it's all vastly amusing, except that it's seemed to upset you. I just want you to get well.

I am however really chuffed that they kept going at it for hours after I logged off and got on with an actual life. Nice to know you've made an impact, innit?

:? I didn't delete anything from that thread. It is a beautifully written, moving story... it's just that it turns out you're a stupid twat who likes to put people down and flaps her faceslit about things she's blatantly ignorant about.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 11, 2011, 09:48:12 PM
Shallow, shallow, shallow, that pool. It's unfortunate.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 11, 2011, 09:49:36 PM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 09:41:50 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 11, 2011, 02:50:38 PM
WYF? This thread went to hell didn't it?

Yes, ED is my friend. You all all wrong about her politics though, she is more socialist/communist than anything. She doesn't hold back much either, says what's on her mind.

She is doing some amazing writing in Life Stories/Blogs at EB&G.

Personally I hope she sticks around.

Oh no sweety. I am a dyed in the wool anarchist. My family were communist/socialist. They hated the anarchy thing too. These people think they can name call? Hell they never been to one of my family party political debates.

But it has been edifying to find out why Nigel suddenly didn't think that Lost Things was a post she needed her name attached to.... well not when she'd told a fucktard cuntfaced idiot that it was beautifully told and incredibly well written, eh?

As I said Charley....don't worry about it. I think it's all vastly amusing, except that it's seemed to upset you. I just want you to get well.

I am however really chuffed that they kept going at it for hours after I logged off and got on with an actual life. Nice to know you've made an impact, innit?

I assume that by "got on with an actual life" you mean "frothing for a few hours about WHY THESE PEOPLE JUST DONT SEE IT YOUR WAY"

I mean, what does an anarchist do in Australia, for fuck's sake? how does one fight the power in the most benign western democracy going?

C'MON YOU BLOODY DINGOS, I'VE CUT ANOTHER HOLE IN THE FENCE!
\
:lord:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: BabylonHoruv on August 11, 2011, 10:05:00 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 11, 2011, 09:49:36 PM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 09:41:50 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 11, 2011, 02:50:38 PM
WYF? This thread went to hell didn't it?

Yes, ED is my friend. You all all wrong about her politics though, she is more socialist/communist than anything. She doesn't hold back much either, says what's on her mind.

She is doing some amazing writing in Life Stories/Blogs at EB&G.

Personally I hope she sticks around.

Oh no sweety. I am a dyed in the wool anarchist. My family were communist/socialist. They hated the anarchy thing too. These people think they can name call? Hell they never been to one of my family party political debates.

But it has been edifying to find out why Nigel suddenly didn't think that Lost Things was a post she needed her name attached to.... well not when she'd told a fucktard cuntfaced idiot that it was beautifully told and incredibly well written, eh?

As I said Charley....don't worry about it. I think it's all vastly amusing, except that it's seemed to upset you. I just want you to get well.

I am however really chuffed that they kept going at it for hours after I logged off and got on with an actual life. Nice to know you've made an impact, innit?

I assume that by "got on with an actual life" you mean "frothing for a few hours about WHY THESE PEOPLE JUST DONT SEE IT YOUR WAY"

I mean, what does an anarchist do in Australia, for fuck's sake? how does one fight the power in the most benign western democracy going?

C'MON YOU BLOODY DINGOS, I'VE CUT ANOTHER HOLE IN THE FENCE!
\
:lord:

Australia has some of the most repressive internet laws of any democracy, there's also just about as much income inequality there as any other capitalist country.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 10:08:37 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 11, 2011, 09:49:36 PM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 09:41:50 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 11, 2011, 02:50:38 PM
WYF? This thread went to hell didn't it?

Yes, ED is my friend. You all all wrong about her politics though, she is more socialist/communist than anything. She doesn't hold back much either, says what's on her mind.

She is doing some amazing writing in Life Stories/Blogs at EB&G.

Personally I hope she sticks around.

Oh no sweety. I am a dyed in the wool anarchist. My family were communist/socialist. They hated the anarchy thing too. These people think they can name call? Hell they never been to one of my family party political debates.

But it has been edifying to find out why Nigel suddenly didn't think that Lost Things was a post she needed her name attached to.... well not when she'd told a fucktard cuntfaced idiot that it was beautifully told and incredibly well written, eh?

As I said Charley....don't worry about it. I think it's all vastly amusing, except that it's seemed to upset you. I just want you to get well.

I am however really chuffed that they kept going at it for hours after I logged off and got on with an actual life. Nice to know you've made an impact, innit?

I assume that by "got on with an actual life" you mean "frothing for a few hours about WHY THESE PEOPLE JUST DONT SEE IT YOUR WAY"

I mean, what does an anarchist do in Australia, for fuck's sake? how does one fight the power in the most benign western democracy going?

C'MON YOU BLOODY DINGOS, I'VE CUT ANOTHER HOLE IN THE FENCE!
\
:lord:

Well I laughed at one point till a little bit of pee came out, if that counts as frothing.

And anyone who can describe Australia as one of the most benign democracies in the western world has never seen inside one of the detention centres where children sew their lips together in desperate attempts to have the populace see how they are silenced. Where mentally ill inmates are left to self harm and jump from roofs. Where child molesters are held side by side with unaccompanied children.

Or spent time in an Indigenous Community, beset by alcohol and drug abuse, systemic child sexual assault, petrol sniffing, domestic violence and malnutrition. Where they have 300 school age kids and a school equipped to handle fewer than 50 students. No running water. No electricity. No sewerage system or garbage collection services. Where there are infant mortality rates akin to those in Central Africa and where life expectancy is 20 years lower than it is in the white community beside it.

See....Amerrocentrism once again. We're really nice to the Yank tourists and are keen to send our armies off in support of your own so we must be okay.

And who did remove that post then Nigel? Charley doesn't seem to know either, and it is his board...so surely if a Mod had done it he would have been informed?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 11, 2011, 10:14:33 PM
It was in the other thread, you dipshit. And it's still there.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Phox on August 11, 2011, 10:18:04 PM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 10:08:37 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 11, 2011, 09:49:36 PM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 09:41:50 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 11, 2011, 02:50:38 PM
WYF? This thread went to hell didn't it?

Yes, ED is my friend. You all all wrong about her politics though, she is more socialist/communist than anything. She doesn't hold back much either, says what's on her mind.

She is doing some amazing writing in Life Stories/Blogs at EB&G.

Personally I hope she sticks around.

Oh no sweety. I am a dyed in the wool anarchist. My family were communist/socialist. They hated the anarchy thing too. These people think they can name call? Hell they never been to one of my family party political debates.

But it has been edifying to find out why Nigel suddenly didn't think that Lost Things was a post she needed her name attached to.... well not when she'd told a fucktard cuntfaced idiot that it was beautifully told and incredibly well written, eh?

As I said Charley....don't worry about it. I think it's all vastly amusing, except that it's seemed to upset you. I just want you to get well.

I am however really chuffed that they kept going at it for hours after I logged off and got on with an actual life. Nice to know you've made an impact, innit?

I assume that by "got on with an actual life" you mean "frothing for a few hours about WHY THESE PEOPLE JUST DONT SEE IT YOUR WAY"

I mean, what does an anarchist do in Australia, for fuck's sake? how does one fight the power in the most benign western democracy going?

C'MON YOU BLOODY DINGOS, I'VE CUT ANOTHER HOLE IN THE FENCE!
\
:lord:
BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW.

Seriously?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 11, 2011, 10:22:44 PM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 10:08:37 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 11, 2011, 09:49:36 PM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 09:41:50 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 11, 2011, 02:50:38 PM
WYF? This thread went to hell didn't it?

Yes, ED is my friend. You all all wrong about her politics though, she is more socialist/communist than anything. She doesn't hold back much either, says what's on her mind.

She is doing some amazing writing in Life Stories/Blogs at EB&G.

Personally I hope she sticks around.

Oh no sweety. I am a dyed in the wool anarchist. My family were communist/socialist. They hated the anarchy thing too. These people think they can name call? Hell they never been to one of my family party political debates.

But it has been edifying to find out why Nigel suddenly didn't think that Lost Things was a post she needed her name attached to.... well not when she'd told a fucktard cuntfaced idiot that it was beautifully told and incredibly well written, eh?

As I said Charley....don't worry about it. I think it's all vastly amusing, except that it's seemed to upset you. I just want you to get well.

I am however really chuffed that they kept going at it for hours after I logged off and got on with an actual life. Nice to know you've made an impact, innit?

I assume that by "got on with an actual life" you mean "frothing for a few hours about WHY THESE PEOPLE JUST DONT SEE IT YOUR WAY"

I mean, what does an anarchist do in Australia, for fuck's sake? how does one fight the power in the most benign western democracy going?

C'MON YOU BLOODY DINGOS, I'VE CUT ANOTHER HOLE IN THE FENCE!
\
:lord:

Well I laughed at one point till a little bit of pee came out, if that counts as frothing.

And anyone who can describe Australia as one of the most benign democracies in the western world has never seen inside one of the detention centres where children sew their lips together in desperate attempts to have the populace see how they are silenced. Where mentally ill inmates are left to self harm and jump from roofs. Where child molesters are held side by side with unaccompanied children.

Or spent time in an Indigenous Community, beset by alcohol and drug abuse, systemic child sexual assault, petrol sniffing, domestic violence and malnutrition. Where they have 300 school age kids and a school equipped to handle fewer than 50 students. No running water. No electricity. No sewerage system or garbage collection services. Where there are infant mortality rates akin to those in Central Africa and where life expectancy is 20 years lower than it is in the white community beside it.

See....Amerrocentrism once again. We're really nice to the Yank tourists and are keen to send our armies off in support of your own so we must be okay.

And who did remove that post then Nigel? Charley doesn't seem to know either, and it is his board...so surely if a Mod had done it he would have been informed?

http://www.erisbarandgrill.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=11248&page=3
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 11, 2011, 10:26:04 PM
Post #44
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on August 11, 2011, 11:26:19 PM
So, mulling it over, it does seem like this ED is pretty much going to keep on yapping her stupid maw without trying to see where she can improve herself.  It's what dumb people do, after all. 

And then she pulled out the "Sorry you had to see this, Charlie, i just want you to get better" five year old IT IS THEIR FAULT shenanigans, too.

What a... a nothing.  A true greyface. 

Congrats, Greyface!  You almost fooled us. :)
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 11, 2011, 11:27:26 PM
BTW, the mod panel shows that  the only two deleted posts this month were in the Bar Of Doom thread.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 11, 2011, 11:33:53 PM
Names and IP's cropped, but you get the idea.

(http://i524.photobucket.com/albums/cc322/fennario99/mod2.jpg)

So much for the insinuation that it must have been one of us who "deleted" the post THAT'S STILL THERE.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 11, 2011, 11:45:59 PM
By the way, Ms. Derpomatic (highly talented writer though I certainly praise you as being) I AM an indigenous person, and yeah, you don't have to tell your high-horse tales. If you'd searched the forum at all you would have seen that I've heaped excoriation upon Australia for its brutal indigenous and exploitative social policies. Maybe use your noggin for a minute or two and stop forcing every user here into a uniform ignorance box of your own preconceptions.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 11, 2011, 11:53:22 PM
Derpo has to lie.
It's really all she's got for whatever she's trying to pull.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Eartha-ly Delights on August 12, 2011, 12:09:10 AM
Quote from: Nigel on August 11, 2011, 10:14:33 PM
It was in the other thread, you dipshit. And it's still there.

Well then Nigel I humbly submit to you that there is something I have said in this thread that was unjust, uncalled for and needs an apology made for it.

I am sorry.

Just the one though.
:lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Phox on August 12, 2011, 12:19:08 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 12, 2011, 12:09:10 AM
Quote from: Nigel on August 11, 2011, 10:14:33 PM
It was in the other thread, you dipshit. And it's still there.

Well then Nigel I humbly submit to you that there is something I have said in this thread that was unjust, uncalled for and needs an apology made for it.

I am sorry.

Just the one though.
:lulz:
You're a fucknugget. Also, evidently, your intellect is on par with that of an average high school student. Not that there is anything wrong with that, of course, but please do try to know what you are talking about before you say things about other people. It makes you look rather poor when you say things that you so clearly have not takn the time to research. kthxbai.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 12, 2011, 12:26:55 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 12, 2011, 12:09:10 AM
Quote from: Nigel on August 11, 2011, 10:14:33 PM
It was in the other thread, you dipshit. And it's still there.

Well then Nigel I humbly submit to you that there is something I have said in this thread that was unjust, uncalled for and needs an apology made for it.

I am sorry.

Just the one though.
:lulz:

Whatever. That was the least of what you owe apologies for.

ENJOY YOUR STAY.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 12:43:35 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 12, 2011, 12:09:10 AM
Quote from: Nigel on August 11, 2011, 10:14:33 PM
It was in the other thread, you dipshit. And it's still there.

Well then Nigel I humbly submit to you that there is something I have said in this thread that was unjust, uncalled for and needs an apology made for it.

I am sorry.

Just the one though.
:lulz:

And only because you were caught.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Eartha-ly Delights on August 12, 2011, 12:54:45 AM
I was mistaken...and I was corrected...not caught.

Caught implies that I had meant to misrepresent the facts. I did not. I stated the facts as I believed them to be. When I had verified that I was in error I made haste to correct that mistake.

Lying and being mistaken are two quite different things...unless you're on pd and people with limited vocabularies and hyper sensitive egos are searching for epithets to fling at you, apparently.

Why would I have lied about something which Nigel posting a link to EBG would have shown up?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 12, 2011, 01:06:53 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 10:08:37 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 11, 2011, 09:49:36 PM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 11, 2011, 09:41:50 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 11, 2011, 02:50:38 PM
WYF? This thread went to hell didn't it?

Yes, ED is my friend. You all all wrong about her politics though, she is more socialist/communist than anything. She doesn't hold back much either, says what's on her mind.

She is doing some amazing writing in Life Stories/Blogs at EB&G.

Personally I hope she sticks around.

Oh no sweety. I am a dyed in the wool anarchist. My family were communist/socialist. They hated the anarchy thing too. These people think they can name call? Hell they never been to one of my family party political debates.

But it has been edifying to find out why Nigel suddenly didn't think that Lost Things was a post she needed her name attached to.... well not when she'd told a fucktard cuntfaced idiot that it was beautifully told and incredibly well written, eh?

As I said Charley....don't worry about it. I think it's all vastly amusing, except that it's seemed to upset you. I just want you to get well.

I am however really chuffed that they kept going at it for hours after I logged off and got on with an actual life. Nice to know you've made an impact, innit?

I assume that by "got on with an actual life" you mean "frothing for a few hours about WHY THESE PEOPLE JUST DONT SEE IT YOUR WAY"

I mean, what does an anarchist do in Australia, for fuck's sake? how does one fight the power in the most benign western democracy going?

C'MON YOU BLOODY DINGOS, I'VE CUT ANOTHER HOLE IN THE FENCE!
\
:lord:

Well I laughed at one point till a little bit of pee came out, if that counts as frothing.

And anyone who can describe Australia as one of the most benign democracies in the western world has never seen inside one of the detention centres where children sew their lips together in desperate attempts to have the populace see how they are silenced. Where mentally ill inmates are left to self harm and jump from roofs. Where child molesters are held side by side with unaccompanied children.

Or spent time in an Indigenous Community, beset by alcohol and drug abuse, systemic child sexual assault, petrol sniffing, domestic violence and malnutrition. Where they have 300 school age kids and a school equipped to handle fewer than 50 students. No running water. No electricity. No sewerage system or garbage collection services. Where there are infant mortality rates akin to those in Central Africa and where life expectancy is 20 years lower than it is in the white community beside it.

See....Amerrocentrism once again. We're really nice to the Yank tourists and are keen to send our armies off in support of your own so we must be okay.

I don't think you get it. We know about all that, and it's still better than it is in the US, which has 12 times the population and is at least twice as awful to their lower classes. And you wanna talk about horrors perpetrated on the indigenous population? I can drive out to the Yakima res and within 15 minutes I'll see an 8 year old kid smoking meth from a lightbulb. When it comes to being evil, you guys just don't measure up.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Phox on August 12, 2011, 01:08:36 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 12, 2011, 12:54:45 AM
I was mistaken...and I was corrected...not caught.

Caught implies that I had meant to misrepresent the facts. I did not. I stated the facts as I believed them to be. When I had verified that I was in error I made haste to correct that mistake.

Lying and being mistaken are two quite different things...unless you're on pd and people with limited vocabularies and hyper sensitive egos are searching for epithets to fling at you, apparently.

Why would I have lied about something which Nigel posting a link to EBG would have shown up?

Because you lack intellectual integrity.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 12, 2011, 01:09:27 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 12, 2011, 12:54:45 AM
I was mistaken...and I was corrected...not caught.

Caught implies that I had meant to misrepresent the facts. I did not. I stated the facts as I believed them to be. When I had verified that I was in error I made haste to correct that mistake.

Lying and being mistaken are two quite different things...unless you're on pd and people with limited vocabularies and hyper sensitive egos are searching for epithets to fling at you, apparently.

Why would I have lied about something which Nigel posting a link to EBG would have shown up?


I'm gonna go with: because you're not very bright at all, but you THINK you're quite clever and really can't wrap your head around the idea that right now you're the dumbest kid in the room.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 01:19:06 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 10, 2011, 11:21:49 PM

Go on; exchange your dirty jokes and naughty pictures. Pat one another on the back and tell each other how gifted, how insightful, how erudite and well read, how essentially superior you all are to anyone who isn't part of the inner circle on your sad little forum for pseudo intellectual posturing.

It's about all any of you have the ticker for.

Okay.

There was other stuff in your post, but your butthurt sort of made me forget what it was.  Out of your whole thread, the above is the only signal that now gets through.

Nicely played, dumbshit, nicely played.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 01:27:49 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 12, 2011, 12:54:45 AM
I was mistaken...and I was corrected...not caught.

Caught implies that I had meant to misrepresent the facts. I did not. I stated the facts as I believed them to be. When I had verified that I was in error I made haste to correct that mistake.

Lying and being mistaken are two quite different things...unless you're on pd and people with limited vocabularies and hyper sensitive egos are searching for epithets to fling at you, apparently.

Why would I have lied about something which Nigel posting a link to EBG would have shown up?


That may be.

But in the context of you trying to smear people, going all the way back to the implication that Jenne's a racist xenophobe, and through the stupid libelous crap in this thread, I don't believe it.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 12, 2011, 01:34:49 AM
Dippy is so used to being  the smartest in her subdivision that she forgot that "above average" leaves a lot of room for play.

She can write like a motherfucker, I won't deny that. Her bio of her dad and her memoirs are fucking brilliant and incredibly compelling. But her reading comprehension and ability to interact with people of her intellectual equal or better is extremely stunted.

I feel bad for her, from the perspective that it most likely is a reflection of living her entire life without true peers, or ever being intellectually challenged.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on August 12, 2011, 01:35:05 AM
Because chronic liars and sociopaths can't help themselves?  Which makes them no less dispicable?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Don Coyote on August 12, 2011, 01:40:28 AM
Shit like this is why I am glad I know I'm stupider than the norm here.



ETA: By that I mean derpy and it's delusions being deluded and derp.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 12, 2011, 01:44:36 AM
My guess is that she has put a lot of her self-esteem into being the brightest person around, and is too threatened by other intelligent people to avoid falling into the easy trap of categorizing and dismissing them.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 12, 2011, 01:45:14 AM
Quote from: COL Coyote on August 12, 2011, 01:40:28 AM
Shit like this is why I am glad I know I'm stupider than the norm here.



ETA: By that I mean derpy and it's delusions being deluded and derp.

Awe Coyote. :) It's always cute to be modest.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Don Coyote on August 12, 2011, 01:48:19 AM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 01:45:14 AM
Quote from: COL Coyote on August 12, 2011, 01:40:28 AM
Shit like this is why I am glad I know I'm stupider than the norm here.



ETA: By that I mean derpy and it's delusions being deluded and derp.

Awe Coyote. :) It's always cute to be modest.

I am surround by below-average to average people all day, if I didn't I would develop too much of a "hurr hurr I r genius" complex.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Jenne on August 12, 2011, 01:59:07 AM
Pissing in the wind, People.

I tried to warn ED a while ago when she went after me.  She has an ego the size of the cosmos.

I knew inevitably that if she went after MY ass (and boy howdy did she, which I trolled with a bit, yes, but damn, that was a shock) at EB&G, it'd be only a matter of time before her e-peenage would insert itself.

Alas and alack...she is yet again found wanting.

ED, dude, take a hint and give it a rest already.  Or not.  I guess some people like getting their noses bloodied on a daily basis.

*shrug*
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Phox on August 12, 2011, 01:59:53 AM
Quote from: COL Coyote on August 12, 2011, 01:40:28 AM
Shit like this is why I am glad I know I'm stupider than the norm here.



ETA: By that I mean derpy and it's delusions being deluded and derp.
Yup yup. I'm a smart motherfucker, but in terms of PD, I'd say I rate a 4 of 10 at best.  :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Don Coyote on August 12, 2011, 02:08:57 AM
Quote from: Doktor Phox on August 12, 2011, 01:59:53 AM
Quote from: COL Coyote on August 12, 2011, 01:40:28 AM
Shit like this is why I am glad I know I'm stupider than the norm here.



ETA: By that I mean derpy and it's delusions being deluded and derp.
Yup yup. I'm a smart motherfucker, but in terms of PD, I'd say I rate a 4 of 10 at best.  :lulz:

Coyote, 1 out of 10 :emo:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 02:13:48 AM
I think both sides here are missing the crucial point that perfectly smart people can still act really fucking stupid.  Which we are all guilty of, at one point or another, and get smarter by realizing it.

I'd also appreciate if everyone stopped using words like "we" and "us" as though attempting to convey the greater PD mood whenever a few people get into arguments.  It's just as poor a choice as when some fuckwad comes in here saying "you all" in reference to what amounts to a small percentage of our members.

Oh and one more thing:

:fuckmittens: and :kiss:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Don Coyote on August 12, 2011, 02:17:29 AM
Quote from: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 02:13:48 AM
I think both sides here are missing the crucial point that perfectly smart people can still act really fucking stupid.  Which we are all guilty of, at one point or another, and get smarter by realizing it.

I'd also appreciate if everyone stopped using words like "we" and "us" as though attempting to convey the greater PD mood whenever a few people get into arguments.  It's just as poor a choice as when some fuckwad comes in here saying "you all" in reference to what amounts to a small percentage of our members.

Oh and one more thing:

:fuckmittens: and :kiss:

We do not appreciate you all's tone of voice in this here thread. :argh!:


Also
:mittens:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Phox on August 12, 2011, 02:23:19 AM
Quote from: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 02:13:48 AM
I think both sides here are missing the crucial point that perfectly smart people can still act really fucking stupid.  Which we are all guilty of, at one point or another, and get smarter by realizing it.

I'd also appreciate if everyone stopped using words like "we" and "us" as though attempting to convey the greater PD mood whenever a few people get into arguments.  It's just as poor a choice as when some fuckwad comes in here saying "you all" in reference to what amounts to a small percentage of our members.

Oh and one more thing:

:fuckmittens: and :kiss:
Good points. But you have shown your true colors. You are part of the Rebel Alliance and a traitor!  :argh!:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 02:36:30 AM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 01:44:36 AM
My guess is that she has put a lot of her self-esteem into being the brightest person around, and is too threatened by other intelligent people to avoid falling into the easy trap of categorizing and dismissing them.

Yep.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 12, 2011, 02:47:21 AM
Quote from: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 02:13:48 AM
I think both sides here are missing the crucial point that perfectly smart people can still act really fucking stupid.  Which we are all guilty of, at one point or another, and get smarter by realizing it.

I'd also appreciate if everyone stopped using words like "we" and "us" as though attempting to convey the greater PD mood whenever a few people get into arguments.  It's just as poor a choice as when some fuckwad comes in here saying "you all" in reference to what amounts to a small percentage of our members.

Oh and one more thing:

:fuckmittens: and :kiss:

As soon as somebody decides to lump "us" together, I am perfectly comfortable lashing out at them as an "us". It was their choice, after all.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 02:50:55 AM
Quote from: COL Coyote on August 12, 2011, 02:08:57 AM
Quote from: Doktor Phox on August 12, 2011, 01:59:53 AM
Quote from: COL Coyote on August 12, 2011, 01:40:28 AM
Shit like this is why I am glad I know I'm stupider than the norm here.



ETA: By that I mean derpy and it's delusions being deluded and derp.
Yup yup. I'm a smart motherfucker, but in terms of PD, I'd say I rate a 4 of 10 at best.  :lulz:

Coyote, 1 out of 10 :emo:

Stella, knows more shit than anybody in town and is essentially the Coal Miner's Daughter here.
"WHAT'S HORNY, DOO?"
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Phox on August 12, 2011, 02:52:03 AM
Thinking about it, I didn't even take anyone's post to be using "we" in the sense of PD as whole, as much as it meant the few people who were involved in the argument.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 02:57:14 AM
Quote from: Jenne on August 12, 2011, 01:59:07 AM
Pissing in the wind, People.

I tried to warn ED a while ago when she went after me.  She has an ego the size of the cosmos.

I knew inevitably that if she went after MY ass (and boy howdy did she, which I trolled with a bit, yes, but damn, that was a shock) at EB&G, it'd be only a matter of time before her e-peenage would insert itself.

Alas and alack...she is yet again found wanting.

ED, dude, take a hint and give it a rest already.  Or not.  I guess some people like getting their noses bloodied on a daily basis.

*shrug*

CU is kind of like that.  :lulz:

Probably should've paid more attention then but you were handling yourself admirably. I think it spilled into another thread...
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 02:59:46 AM
Quote from: Doktor Phox on August 12, 2011, 02:52:03 AM
Thinking about it, I didn't even take anyone's post to be using "we" in the sense of PD as whole, as much as it meant the few people who were involved in the argument.

Of course not. We're not the fucking Borg, in spite of what Derpaly's trying to imply.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 03:01:34 AM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 02:47:21 AM
Quote from: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 02:13:48 AM
I think both sides here are missing the crucial point that perfectly smart people can still act really fucking stupid.  Which we are all guilty of, at one point or another, and get smarter by realizing it.

I'd also appreciate if everyone stopped using words like "we" and "us" as though attempting to convey the greater PD mood whenever a few people get into arguments.  It's just as poor a choice as when some fuckwad comes in here saying "you all" in reference to what amounts to a small percentage of our members.

Oh and one more thing:

:fuckmittens: and :kiss:

As soon as somebody decides to lump "us" together, I am perfectly comfortable lashing out at them as an "us". It was their choice, after all.

Fucking this.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 03:14:38 AM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 02:47:21 AM
As soon as somebody decides to lump "us" together, I am perfectly comfortable lashing out at them as an "us". It was their choice, after all.

LOL @ "she started it"
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 12, 2011, 03:25:24 AM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 01:27:49 AM
But in the context of you trying to smear people, going all the way back to the implication that Jenne's a racist xenophobe, and through the stupid libelous crap in this thread, I don't believe it.

Wait, WHAT?!?

:lulz:

Jesus, that's even dumber than painting Cain as an Americentrist!

How deep does this rabbit-hole of DERP go?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on August 12, 2011, 03:35:03 AM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 12, 2011, 03:25:24 AM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 01:27:49 AM
But in the context of you trying to smear people, going all the way back to the implication that Jenne's a racist xenophobe, and through the stupid libelous crap in this thread, I don't believe it.

Wait, WHAT?!?

:lulz:

Jesus, that's even dumber than painting Cain as an Americentrist!

How deep does this rabbit-hole of DERP go?

About halfway down to what we've discovered so far.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 04:03:55 AM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 12, 2011, 03:25:24 AM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 01:27:49 AM
But in the context of you trying to smear people, going all the way back to the implication that Jenne's a racist xenophobe, and through the stupid libelous crap in this thread, I don't believe it.

Wait, WHAT?!?

:lulz:

Jesus, that's even dumber than painting Cain as an Americentrist!

How deep does this rabbit-hole of DERP go?

Mmmmm-hmmmm.
http://www.erisbarandgrill.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=11211&page=6

Painted Jenne as an ignorant racist for using the common parlance  "illegals".

It isn't the best of terms, but FFS.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Jenne on August 12, 2011, 05:55:22 AM
Sad thing was I was pretty much taking the piss at that point. I sorta gave up pretense of making sense, or being heard. I just ignore her mostly.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 06:01:27 AM
Yeah, she was fucking with you the whole thread.
But it went WAAAAAAAAAAAAY off the rails there. Plowed into deep left field and barrel-assed into Crazytown.  :lol:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 12, 2011, 07:07:44 AM
Quote from: Jenne on August 12, 2011, 01:59:07 AM
Pissing in the wind, People.

I tried to warn ED a while ago when she went after me.  She has an ego the size of the cosmos.

I knew inevitably that if she went after MY ass (and boy howdy did she, which I trolled with a bit, yes, but damn, that was a shock) at EB&G, it'd be only a matter of time before her e-peenage would insert itself.

Alas and alack...she is yet again found wanting.

ED, dude, take a hint and give it a rest already.  Or not.  I guess some people like getting their noses bloodied on a daily basis.

*shrug*

Her reading comprehension is for crap. I read that thread and she somehow managed to get the exact opposite of your meaning out of it there, and did the same thing here.

If she was able to just go, oh shit I misread, that would be fine. Nobody expects perfection. But she's so sure she's the smartest guy in the room that she can't admit to being wrong, and instead tries to cover her gaffes by attacking. Her attacks on you and Freeky were especially egregious, because it's fairly obvious that she was under the mistaken impression that you were uninformed or easy targets. It's weak, stupid, and transparent.

One of the things I LOVE about PD and EB&G is NOT BEING THE SMARTEST GUY IN THE ROOM. It means I get to learn stuff, but only if I shut the fuck up and pay attention. Some people aren't able to do that because they fear their identity would collapse if they admitted having gaps in their knowledge and understanding.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 12, 2011, 07:13:12 AM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 04:03:55 AM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 12, 2011, 03:25:24 AM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 01:27:49 AM
But in the context of you trying to smear people, going all the way back to the implication that Jenne's a racist xenophobe, and through the stupid libelous crap in this thread, I don't believe it.

Wait, WHAT?!?

:lulz:

Jesus, that's even dumber than painting Cain as an Americentrist!

How deep does this rabbit-hole of DERP go?

Mmmmm-hmmmm.
http://www.erisbarandgrill.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=11211&page=6

Painted Jenne as an ignorant racist for using the common parlance  "illegals".

It isn't the best of terms, but FFS.

I don't like the term either, but the fact of the matter is that the US government has created a historically new (for us) status of immigrant by rendering the formerly-called "undocumented" (which term I prefer) immigrants against the law. Hence "Illegal". I hate it, but the term is accurate, technically speaking, and using it does not make someone racist or anti-immigrant, and if ANYONE WITH A BRAIN paid any attention at all to Jenne's writings it would be obvious as fuck that she doesn't support criminalizing undocumented immigration.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 08:52:35 AM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 07:13:12 AM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 04:03:55 AM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 12, 2011, 03:25:24 AM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 01:27:49 AM
But in the context of you trying to smear people, going all the way back to the implication that Jenne's a racist xenophobe, and through the stupid libelous crap in this thread, I don't believe it.

Wait, WHAT?!?

:lulz:

Jesus, that's even dumber than painting Cain as an Americentrist!

How deep does this rabbit-hole of DERP go?

Mmmmm-hmmmm.
http://www.erisbarandgrill.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=11211&page=6

Painted Jenne as an ignorant racist for using the common parlance  "illegals".

It isn't the best of terms, but FFS.

I don't like the term either, but the fact of the matter is that the US government has created a historically new (for us) status of immigrant by rendering the formerly-called "undocumented" (which term I prefer) immigrants against the law. Hence "Illegal". I hate it, but the term is accurate, technically speaking, and using it does not make someone racist or anti-immigrant, and if ANYONE WITH A BRAIN paid any attention at all to Jenne's writings it would be obvious as fuck that she doesn't support criminalizing undocumented immigration.

I think in The World According To Eartha-ly we're ALL wealthy Americentrists just waiting for somebody to invent virtual Mexicans so we can call immigration on the housekeeper and the gardener.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 12, 2011, 12:08:58 PM
I've got $5 that says if she ever actually saw a Papuan running through her garden, she'd turn them in. :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Disco Pickle on August 12, 2011, 01:03:17 PM
Dipped into that thread at EB&G to see what the fuss was about between you and Jenn.  The bit where you get  :mad: about the word "illegals" is pretty damn funny.

The term, while often used as a pejorative by some on the right, will apply in any country in which a visa is overstayed by a person who doesn't hold citizenship or by someone who crosses the border without acquiring a visa.  What, you think Mexico doesn't call Americans who overstay their visas "illegals?"

The Federales can stop you any time and ask to see your visa.  If it has expired, they deport your ass.  You're lucky if you get the chance to go get your shit and tell any of your friends good bye.  It happened to at least 2 people I know, and they weren't even working down there.  Every country in the world does it the same way.

Now don't get me wrong, I all for open borders and free movement of people and labor.  I think it's healthier in the long run.  But that's a pipe dream. 

Using the term "illegal" in the manner she did was absolutely correct.  It was direct and you immediately knew she meant migrants without a visa, no matter the country. 

The fact that it got your feathers ruffled IS pretty telling and noted for future reference that you take yourself and the world around you too damn seriously.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 01:59:29 PM
Quote from: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 03:14:38 AM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 02:47:21 AM
As soon as somebody decides to lump "us" together, I am perfectly comfortable lashing out at them as an "us". It was their choice, after all.

LOL @ "she started it"

Oh, sorry we don't live up to your standards.

:shortbus: <--- Feel free to throw anyone you like under this.  Thanks.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: LMNO on August 12, 2011, 02:26:01 PM
Ok, I'm just gonna come out and say it.


I am the smartest person in the room.











(http://www.threadbombing.com/data/media/1/Come-at-me-bro.jpg)
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 02:28:57 PM
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on August 12, 2011, 02:26:01 PM
Ok, I'm just gonna come out and say it.


I am the smartest person in the room.


YEW LEAVE THE THINKIN' TO THEM WHAT CAN DO IT!
\
:mullet:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 03:55:46 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 01:59:29 PM
Quote from: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 03:14:38 AM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 02:47:21 AM
As soon as somebody decides to lump "us" together, I am perfectly comfortable lashing out at them as an "us". It was their choice, after all.

LOL @ "she started it"

Oh, sorry we don't live up to your standards.

:shortbus: <--- Feel free to throw anyone you like under this.  Thanks.

I'll make sure to be in complete agreement in the future.  You know, so I don't rock the boat.  I know how we all like things peaceable here.   :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Adios on August 12, 2011, 03:58:32 PM
Quote from: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 03:55:46 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 01:59:29 PM
Quote from: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 03:14:38 AM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 02:47:21 AM
As soon as somebody decides to lump "us" together, I am perfectly comfortable lashing out at them as an "us". It was their choice, after all.

LOL @ "she started it"

Oh, sorry we don't live up to your standards.

:shortbus: <--- Feel free to throw anyone you like under this.  Thanks.

I'll make sure to be in complete agreement in the future.  You know, so I don't rock the boat.  I know how we all like things peaceable here.   :lulz:

Yeah, time for another PD break for me.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 04:04:34 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 12, 2011, 03:58:32 PM
Quote from: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 03:55:46 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 01:59:29 PM
Quote from: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 03:14:38 AM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 02:47:21 AM
As soon as somebody decides to lump "us" together, I am perfectly comfortable lashing out at them as an "us". It was their choice, after all.

LOL @ "she started it"

Oh, sorry we don't live up to your standards.

:shortbus: <--- Feel free to throw anyone you like under this.  Thanks.

I'll make sure to be in complete agreement in the future.  You know, so I don't rock the boat.  I know how we all like things peaceable here.   :lulz:

Yeah, time for another PD break for me.

:?


PS.  I just realized that the above emote was shortbus, and I've been thinking about the change in meaning of "throwing someone under the short bus" for a few minutes now.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 04:25:02 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 12, 2011, 03:58:32 PM
Quote from: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 03:55:46 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 01:59:29 PM
Quote from: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 03:14:38 AM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 02:47:21 AM
As soon as somebody decides to lump "us" together, I am perfectly comfortable lashing out at them as an "us". It was their choice, after all.

LOL @ "she started it"

Oh, sorry we don't live up to your standards.

:shortbus: <--- Feel free to throw anyone you like under this.  Thanks.

I'll make sure to be in complete agreement in the future.  You know, so I don't rock the boat.  I know how we all like things peaceable here.   :lulz:

Yeah, time for another PD break for me.

Well, fuck it then.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 04:26:19 PM
Quote from: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 04:04:34 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 12, 2011, 03:58:32 PM
Quote from: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 03:55:46 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 01:59:29 PM
Quote from: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 03:14:38 AM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 02:47:21 AM
As soon as somebody decides to lump "us" together, I am perfectly comfortable lashing out at them as an "us". It was their choice, after all.

LOL @ "she started it"

Oh, sorry we don't live up to your standards.

:shortbus: <--- Feel free to throw anyone you like under this.  Thanks.

I'll make sure to be in complete agreement in the future.  You know, so I don't rock the boat.  I know how we all like things peaceable here.   :lulz:

Yeah, time for another PD break for me.

:?


PS.  I just realized that the above emote was shortbus, and I've been thinking about the change in meaning of "throwing someone under the short bus" for a few minutes now.

Yeah, that was intentional.  But there's no room for fucking humor, here.

I'll see you guys whenever I see you.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 04:32:18 PM
Well I seem to have just turned Christmas into dildoes.

Sorry everyone.   :sad:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 04:55:15 PM
Quote from: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 04:32:18 PM
Well I seem to have just turned Christmas into dildoes.

Sorry everyone.   :sad:

1.  No, you're not.

2.  It wasn't about you.  I get your message, "I don't have anyone's back", perfectly clearly.  It's not a big shock, and I also understand that you have a problem understanding pronouns.  It's about yet ANOTHER AKK, this time in the form of some Australian Dunning/Krueger whackjob that can't communicate worth a fuck.  The fact that you felt the need to senselessly chop people off at the knees in favor of said AKK-clone is secondary at best.

In any case, for the next little while, I'm here to read Cain's take on the riots, perform admin functions as necessary, and not much else. 
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 05:02:19 PM
Hello everyone, I'm EoC and I'm here to testify to the effectiveness of the Dok Howl method.

Before the Dok Howl method, I didn't know how I actually felt about a subject.  Now that he can just tell me how I feel, it's much simpler.  It turns out I wasn't sorry at all, that I was just saying it because, uhm, well that part isn't clear but I only said it.

Before the Dok Howl method, I didn't know that by disagreeing with one or two people meant I was automatically agreeing with some shitneck that they were arguing with.  Now that's perfectly clear.  My allegiances were already determined for me and it didn't really matter what I posted!  What a relief!
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 05:06:13 PM
Quote from: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 05:02:19 PM
Hello everyone, I'm EoC and I'm here to testify to the effectiveness of the Dok Howl method.

Before the Dok Howl method, I didn't know how I actually felt about a subject.  Now that he can just tell me how I feel, it's much simpler.  It turns out I wasn't sorry at all, that I was just saying it because, uhm, well that part isn't clear but I only said it.

Before the Dok Howl method, I didn't know that by disagreeing with one or two people meant I was automatically agreeing with some shitneck that they were arguing with.  Now that's perfectly clear.  My allegiances were already determined for me and it didn't really matter what I posted!  What a relief!

Sorry, I'm just trying out the EoC method, where "We" automatically includes every member of the board.  From now on, I will simply list every person I'm referring to by name, and I suggest that method to Nigel, LMNO, Richter, Suu, Freeky, TGG, Squiddy, CPD, Barum, Cain, ECH, Faust, Trip, Fred...Whoa.  This is going to be more difficult than it looked.  Maybe I can just cut and paste the board membership and then delete the ones I'm not referring to.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 05:09:17 PM
Also, check PMs.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Dysfunctional Cunt on August 12, 2011, 05:15:48 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 05:06:13 PM
Quote from: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 05:02:19 PM
Hello everyone, I'm EoC and I'm here to testify to the effectiveness of the Dok Howl method.

Before the Dok Howl method, I didn't know how I actually felt about a subject.  Now that he can just tell me how I feel, it's much simpler.  It turns out I wasn't sorry at all, that I was just saying it because, uhm, well that part isn't clear but I only said it.

Before the Dok Howl method, I didn't know that by disagreeing with one or two people meant I was automatically agreeing with some shitneck that they were arguing with.  Now that's perfectly clear.  My allegiances were already determined for me and it didn't really matter what I posted!  What a relief!

Sorry, I'm just trying out the EoC method, where "We" automatically includes every member of the board.  From now on, I will simply list every person I'm referring to by name, and I suggest that method to Nigel, LMNO, Richter, Suu, Freeky, TGG, Squiddy, CPD, Barum, Cain, ECH, Faust, Trip, Fred...Whoa.  This is going to be more difficult than it looked.  Maybe I can just cut and paste the board membership and then delete the ones I'm not referring to.

Inserting the obligatory butthurt comment.......  I'm not on your list!   :cry:

I'm sorry, I couldn't help myself.  You know someone was gonna do it right?

In all seriousness, I rarely get butthurt when I'm included in a "we, them or us" thing.  We are a group here.  One big disfunctional family. 
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Salty on August 12, 2011, 05:23:48 PM
HEY!

1. Yes everyone is stupid sometimes. YES it is OUR OWN responsibility to account for, recognize and amend our own stupid.
2. PD at large, generally, has had a lot of stupid, and there is little that keeps people from bouncing back as ling as they do the above.
3. If ED is going to call US Middle class apologists, than when I use the term WE and US I am doing so facetiously to mock her incredible stupidity.
4. I cannot see any point in the arguing ITT because the OP apears to be an irredeemable shitneck, an opinion that for me will not change until see #1.

Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 05:26:19 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 05:15:48 PM
We are a group here.  One big disfunctional family. 

I thought that was the case.

Apparently, I was mistaken.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 05:27:20 PM
Quote from: Alty on August 12, 2011, 05:23:48 PM
HEY!

1. Yes everyone is stupid sometimes. YES it is OUR OWN responsibility to account for, recognize and amend our own stupid.
2. PD at large, generally, has had a lot of stupid, and there is little that keeps people from bouncing back as ling as they do the above.
3. If ED is going to call US Middle class apologists, than when I use the term WE and US I am doing so facetiously to mock her incredible stupidity.
4. I cannot see any point in the arguing ITT because the OP apears to be an irredeemable shitneck, an opinion that for me will not change until see #1.



ED is another AKK.  Nothing she says has any value whatsoever, so I'm not letting it get under my skin any further.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 05:35:40 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 04:55:15 PM
Quote from: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 04:32:18 PM
Well I seem to have just turned Christmas into dildoes.

Sorry everyone.   :sad:

1.  No, you're not.

2.  It wasn't about you.  I get your message, "I don't have anyone's back", perfectly clearly.  It's not a big shock, and I also understand that you have a problem understanding pronouns.  It's about yet ANOTHER AKK, this time in the form of some Australian Dunning/Krueger whackjob that can't communicate worth a fuck.  The fact that you felt the need to senselessly chop people off at the knees in favor of said AKK-clone is secondary at best.

In any case, for the next little while, I'm here to read Cain's take on the riots, perform admin functions as necessary, and not much else. 

:sad:   :sad:  :sad:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 05:38:04 PM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 05:35:40 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 04:55:15 PM
Quote from: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 04:32:18 PM
Well I seem to have just turned Christmas into dildoes.

Sorry everyone.   :sad:

1.  No, you're not.

2.  It wasn't about you.  I get your message, "I don't have anyone's back", perfectly clearly.  It's not a big shock, and I also understand that you have a problem understanding pronouns.  It's about yet ANOTHER AKK, this time in the form of some Australian Dunning/Krueger whackjob that can't communicate worth a fuck.  The fact that you felt the need to senselessly chop people off at the knees in favor of said AKK-clone is secondary at best.

In any case, for the next little while, I'm here to read Cain's take on the riots, perform admin functions as necessary, and not much else. 

:sad:   :sad:  :sad:

*shrug*

Nobody's reading content right now, anyway.  The board right now basically consists of 3 things:

1.  Cain & Pix putting up some good shit about the riots.
2.  ANOTHER fucking brawl over ANOTHER fucked up noob, and
3.  Fluff.  Nothing wrong with fluff, there's just A LOT of it right now.

Also, pronouns are apparently bad, and it's hard to write without them.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Dysfunctional Cunt on August 12, 2011, 05:40:37 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 05:26:19 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 05:15:48 PM
We are a group here.  One big disfunctional family. 

I thought that was the case.

Apparently, I was mistaken.

:cry:

But y'all are the only family I have that I like.....  well except for the kids and a couple of siblings.

:sad:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 12, 2011, 05:42:20 PM
I think you guys all just need a big hug. :)
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 05:43:38 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 05:40:37 PM

But y'all

There's that pronoun shit again.  You have to learn to think about other peoples' feelings.  There may be a poster from 2004 or some shit that doesn't agree, and here you are, dragging that person into this against their wishes.

And THAT, I am told, puts you on the same level as some fucking retard who doesn't know the difference between "the rule of law" and "police as armed thugs".

I don't know HOW that works, Khara, I am just told that it does.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 05:44:58 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 12, 2011, 05:42:20 PM
I think you guys all just need a big hug. :)

The above use of pronouns would indicate that IANAR, for example, is included.

Is that the desired result, here?

:vom:

Dok,
New convert to this new version of e-prime.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Dysfunctional Cunt on August 12, 2011, 05:45:37 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 05:43:38 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 05:40:37 PM

But y'all

There's that pronoun shit again.  You have to learn to think about other peoples' feelings.  There may be a poster from 2004 or some shit that doesn't agree, and here you are, dragging that person into this against their wishes.

And THAT, I am told, puts you on the same level as some fucking retard who doesn't know the difference between "the rule of law" and "police as armed thugs".

I don't know HOW that works, Khara, I am just told that it does.

Well fuck me sideways thats some shit ain't it?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 05:50:01 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 05:38:04 PM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 05:35:40 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 04:55:15 PM
Quote from: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 04:32:18 PM
Well I seem to have just turned Christmas into dildoes.

Sorry everyone.   :sad:

1.  No, you're not.

2.  It wasn't about you.  I get your message, "I don't have anyone's back", perfectly clearly.  It's not a big shock, and I also understand that you have a problem understanding pronouns.  It's about yet ANOTHER AKK, this time in the form of some Australian Dunning/Krueger whackjob that can't communicate worth a fuck.  The fact that you felt the need to senselessly chop people off at the knees in favor of said AKK-clone is secondary at best.

In any case, for the next little while, I'm here to read Cain's take on the riots, perform admin functions as necessary, and not much else. 

:sad:   :sad:  :sad:

*shrug*

Nobody's reading content right now, anyway.  The board right now basically consists of 3 things:

1.  Cain & Pix putting up some good shit about the riots.
2.  ANOTHER fucking brawl over ANOTHER fucked up noob, and
3.  Fluff.  Nothing wrong with fluff, there's just A LOT of it right now.

Also, pronouns are apparently bad, and it's hard to write without them.


The riot stuff IS great. This place is one of the better news outlets on the net.  :horrormirth:

Also  I, you, he, she, it, they, we, me, you, him, her, it, us, them. Fuck it.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 05:56:28 PM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 05:50:01 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 05:38:04 PM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 05:35:40 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 04:55:15 PM
Quote from: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 04:32:18 PM
Well I seem to have just turned Christmas into dildoes.

Sorry everyone.   :sad:

1.  No, you're not.

2.  It wasn't about you.  I get your message, "I don't have anyone's back", perfectly clearly.  It's not a big shock, and I also understand that you have a problem understanding pronouns.  It's about yet ANOTHER AKK, this time in the form of some Australian Dunning/Krueger whackjob that can't communicate worth a fuck.  The fact that you felt the need to senselessly chop people off at the knees in favor of said AKK-clone is secondary at best.

In any case, for the next little while, I'm here to read Cain's take on the riots, perform admin functions as necessary, and not much else. 

:sad:   :sad:  :sad:

*shrug*

Nobody's reading content right now, anyway.  The board right now basically consists of 3 things:

1.  Cain & Pix putting up some good shit about the riots.
2.  ANOTHER fucking brawl over ANOTHER fucked up noob, and
3.  Fluff.  Nothing wrong with fluff, there's just A LOT of it right now.

Also, pronouns are apparently bad, and it's hard to write without them.


The riot stuff IS great. This place is one of the better news outlets on the net.  :horrormirth:

Also  I, you, he, she, it, they, we, me, you, him, her, it, us, them. Fuck it.


See, now you've dragged Velvet Jesus into this, and she hasn't posted since 2003.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 05:58:03 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 05:45:37 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 05:43:38 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 05:40:37 PM

But y'all

There's that pronoun shit again.  You have to learn to think about other peoples' feelings.  There may be a poster from 2004 or some shit that doesn't agree, and here you are, dragging that person into this against their wishes.

And THAT, I am told, puts you on the same level as some fucking retard who doesn't know the difference between "the rule of law" and "police as armed thugs".

I don't know HOW that works, Khara, I am just told that it does.

Well fuck me sideways thats some shit ain't it?

Whose shit?   :lord:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Dysfunctional Cunt on August 12, 2011, 05:58:58 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 05:56:28 PM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 05:50:01 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 05:38:04 PM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 05:35:40 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 04:55:15 PM
Quote from: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 04:32:18 PM
Well I seem to have just turned Christmas into dildoes.

Sorry everyone.   :sad:

1.  No, you're not.

2.  It wasn't about you.  I get your message, "I don't have anyone's back", perfectly clearly.  It's not a big shock, and I also understand that you have a problem understanding pronouns.  It's about yet ANOTHER AKK, this time in the form of some Australian Dunning/Krueger whackjob that can't communicate worth a fuck.  The fact that you felt the need to senselessly chop people off at the knees in favor of said AKK-clone is secondary at best.

In any case, for the next little while, I'm here to read Cain's take on the riots, perform admin functions as necessary, and not much else. 

:sad:   :sad:  :sad:

*shrug*

Nobody's reading content right now, anyway.  The board right now basically consists of 3 things:

1.  Cain & Pix putting up some good shit about the riots.
2.  ANOTHER fucking brawl over ANOTHER fucked up noob, and
3.  Fluff.  Nothing wrong with fluff, there's just A LOT of it right now.

Also, pronouns are apparently bad, and it's hard to write without them.


The riot stuff IS great. This place is one of the better news outlets on the net.  :horrormirth:

Also  I, you, he, she, it, they, we, me, you, him, her, it, us, them. Fuck it.


See, now you've dragged Velvet Jesus into this, and she hasn't posted since 2003.

Oh shit.  I think I may be hiding in the sewers till she passes by  :tinfoilhat:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 06:00:45 PM
I'll be hiding behind the pool house that Earthaly assumes we all have.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 06:04:31 PM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 06:00:45 PM
I'll be hiding behind the pool house that Earthaly assumes we all have.

That was the funny bit.  She's the classic example of the limosine liberal.

Projection always gets me laughing.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Dysfunctional Cunt on August 12, 2011, 06:08:28 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 05:58:03 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 05:45:37 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 05:43:38 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 05:40:37 PM

But y'all

There's that pronoun shit again.  You have to learn to think about other peoples' feelings.  There may be a poster from 2004 or some shit that doesn't agree, and here you are, dragging that person into this against their wishes.

And THAT, I am told, puts you on the same level as some fucking retard who doesn't know the difference between "the rule of law" and "police as armed thugs".

I don't know HOW that works, Khara, I am just told that it does.

Well fuck me sideways thats some shit ain't it?

Whose shit?   :lord:

Jack or Dip's I'm not quite sure and I don't want to get too close if I can help it.  :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Pope Pixie Pickle on August 12, 2011, 06:11:47 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 05:38:04 PM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 05:35:40 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 04:55:15 PM
Quote from: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 04:32:18 PM
Well I seem to have just turned Christmas into dildoes.

Sorry everyone.   :sad:

1.  No, you're not.

2.  It wasn't about you.  I get your message, "I don't have anyone's back", perfectly clearly.  It's not a big shock, and I also understand that you have a problem understanding pronouns.  It's about yet ANOTHER AKK, this time in the form of some Australian Dunning/Krueger whackjob that can't communicate worth a fuck.  The fact that you felt the need to senselessly chop people off at the knees in favor of said AKK-clone is secondary at best.

In any case, for the next little while, I'm here to read Cain's take on the riots, perform admin functions as necessary, and not much else. 

:sad:   :sad:  :sad:

*shrug*

Nobody's reading content right now, anyway.  The board right now basically consists of 3 things:

1.  Cain & Pix putting up some good shit about the riots.
2.  ANOTHER fucking brawl over ANOTHER fucked up noob, and
3.  Fluff.  Nothing wrong with fluff, there's just A LOT of it right now.

Also, pronouns are apparently bad, and it's hard to write without them.


ive never been accused of putting up content before! :P
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: P3nT4gR4m on August 12, 2011, 06:27:32 PM
From now on I'm going to jump in with a collective "Hell yeah!" whenever anyone invokes the PD "We" or "us". Even if Especially if and when both sides in an argument do it.


This may or may not be an amusing troll
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 06:28:32 PM
Quote from: P3nT4gR4m on August 12, 2011, 06:27:32 PM
From now on I'm going to jump in with a collective "Hell yeah!" whenever anyone invokes the PD "We" or "us". Even if Especially if and when both sides in an argument do it.


This may or may not be an amusing troll

I am from now on assuming that ANY use of "We" or "Us" on this board is meant to imply ALL users of this board.

Anything less would be "stupid".
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: LMNO on August 12, 2011, 06:31:12 PM
We agree.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 06:31:34 PM
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on August 12, 2011, 06:31:12 PM
We agree.

HAVE YOU CALLED POIB TO CHECK?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Dysfunctional Cunt on August 12, 2011, 06:31:45 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 06:28:32 PM
Quote from: P3nT4gR4m on August 12, 2011, 06:27:32 PM
From now on I'm going to jump in with a collective "Hell yeah!" whenever anyone invokes the PD "We" or "us". Even if Especially if and when both sides in an argument do it.


This may or may not be an amusing troll

I am from now on assuming that ANY use of "We" or "Us" on this board is meant to imply ALL users of this board.

Anything less would be "stupid".

Well I am going to assume that you both are assuming that when I say "We are going to go on a pub crawl" you understand that you need to be here in the Lou ASAP!!

Wait, that is off topic right.

Then I'm just going to assume the best of everyone and be surprised.  :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Pope Pixie Pickle on August 12, 2011, 06:32:44 PM
this fread needed some jacking IMHO, Khara.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 06:33:36 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 06:31:45 PM
Then I'm just going to assume the best of everyone and be surprised.  :lulz:

I have it all worked out.  

If someone comes into a thread and shits on people, that's "for the best".

If anyone responds, that person is "telling other people how they REALLY feel".

Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 06:34:07 PM
Quote from: Pixie on August 12, 2011, 06:32:44 PM
this fread needed some jacking IMHO, Khara.

It needed jacking on page 1.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Pope Pixie Pickle on August 12, 2011, 06:36:51 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 06:34:07 PM
Quote from: Pixie on August 12, 2011, 06:32:44 PM
this fread needed some jacking IMHO, Khara.

It needed jacking on page 1.

:mittens:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 06:39:28 PM
Quote from: Pixie on August 12, 2011, 06:36:51 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 06:34:07 PM
Quote from: Pixie on August 12, 2011, 06:32:44 PM
this fread needed some jacking IMHO, Khara.

It needed jacking on page 1.

:mittens:

See, that's a bad attitude.  That's because you sit around your pool house looking down your nose at the revolutionary heroes, while lil Ms Aussiepance is IN THE THICK OF IT IN TOTTINGHAM or whatever the hell it is.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 06:41:54 PM
Because she IS a revolutionary and totally not a Starbucks armchair anarchist!

:bunny:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Triple Zero on August 12, 2011, 06:47:33 PM
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on August 12, 2011, 06:31:12 PM
We agree.

We're a toolbox.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Dysfunctional Cunt on August 12, 2011, 06:48:43 PM
Someone stole my pool house.  I'm stuck sitting on my back stoop drinking cheap beer.  :cry:

I fail!!!
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 06:49:48 PM
Quote from: Triple Zero on August 12, 2011, 06:47:33 PM
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on August 12, 2011, 06:31:12 PM
We agree.

We're a toolbox.

I know I am.

A decent person would have held ED's hand and dried her tears, and told her what a black flag revolutionary she is, while at the same time admitting that we're all a bunch of middle class brats, which she herself totally isn't.

But I'm not a decent person.  I am a tool.

I am okay with this.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 06:50:28 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 06:48:43 PM
Someone stole my pool house.  I'm stuck sitting on my back stoop drinking cheap beer.  :cry:

I fail!!!

You're still too posh to be taken seriously.

Unlike our Glorious Heroine, ED, righter of wrongs.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 06:55:46 PM
Yep. She's paid more dues than Ringo Starr.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 06:59:15 PM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 06:55:46 PM
Yep. She's paid more dues than Ringo Starr.

:lulz:

Or even Bono!

Or those guys in Midnight Oil.  Wait.  She's in Australia, living on STOLEN LAND!

How can she justify that?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 07:05:17 PM
Apparently, she's too drunk to publicly respond, having spent the night with some random guy.

Or so I am told.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Dysfunctional Cunt on August 12, 2011, 07:09:25 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 07:05:17 PM
Apparently, she's too drunk to publicly respond, having spent the night with some random guy.

Or so I am told.

Damn, just another thing to be blamed for right?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 07:11:17 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 07:09:25 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 07:05:17 PM
Apparently, she's too drunk to publicly respond, having spent the night with some random guy.

Or so I am told.

Damn, just another thing to be blamed for right?

Obviously my fault.  For being middle class.

:lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 07:12:59 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 07:11:17 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 07:09:25 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 07:05:17 PM
Apparently, she's too drunk to publicly respond, having spent the night with some random guy.

Or so I am told.

Damn, just another thing to be blamed for right?

Obviously my fault.  For being middle class.

:lulz:

No harm done. That gardener needed to earn his keep anyway.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 07:14:14 PM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 07:12:59 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 07:11:17 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 07:09:25 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 07:05:17 PM
Apparently, she's too drunk to publicly respond, having spent the night with some random guy.

Or so I am told.

Damn, just another thing to be blamed for right?

Obviously my fault.  For being middle class.

:lulz:

No harm done. That gardener needed to earn his keep anyway.

I'm getting GLORIOUS hate PMs out of this, btw, for a one line PM sent out.

So do carry on.  Her butthurt levels are approaching critical mass.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Dysfunctional Cunt on August 12, 2011, 07:15:45 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 07:11:17 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 07:09:25 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 07:05:17 PM
Apparently, she's too drunk to publicly respond, having spent the night with some random guy.

Or so I am told.

Damn, just another thing to be blamed for right?

Obviously my fault.  For being middle class.

:lulz:

Isn't there a halfway decent country song about this?

I don't know, personally "All my rowdy friends have settled down" soooo..... drunken promiscuity is not something I come in contact with these days.  

Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 07:18:25 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 07:15:45 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 07:11:17 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 07:09:25 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 07:05:17 PM
Apparently, she's too drunk to publicly respond, having spent the night with some random guy.

Or so I am told.

Damn, just another thing to be blamed for right?

Obviously my fault.  For being middle class.

:lulz:

Isn't there a halfway decent country song about this?

I don't know, personally "All my rowdy friends have settled down" soooo..... drunken promiscuity is not something I come in contact with these days.  



I don't know that she was promiscious, she didn't mention sex, thank God.

She doesn't like it when it's pointed out that she's fat, though.  Gets right up her ass.

Dok,
Took a shot in the dark.  :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Dysfunctional Cunt on August 12, 2011, 07:21:34 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 07:18:25 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 07:15:45 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 07:11:17 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 07:09:25 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 07:05:17 PM
Apparently, she's too drunk to publicly respond, having spent the night with some random guy.

Or so I am told.

Damn, just another thing to be blamed for right?

Obviously my fault.  For being middle class.

:lulz:

Isn't there a halfway decent country song about this?

I don't know, personally "All my rowdy friends have settled down" soooo..... drunken promiscuity is not something I come in contact with these days.  



I don't know that she was promiscious, she didn't mention sex, thank God.

She doesn't like it when it's pointed out that she's fat, though.  Gets right up her ass.

Dok,
Took a shot in the dark.  :lulz:

I must have misunderstood the "too drunk to publicly respond, having spent the night with some random guy"?

Be that as it may, I find that a lot of fat people have a hard time being told they are fat.  I presume it is because they are not trying to do anything to change that.  I know I was fat.  Damn I was huge, but look at me now yanno?  It's a matter of self perspective.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 07:26:16 PM
Still getting hate mail.   :lulz:

What a payoff.  One single line nastygram, and it's the Niagara Falls of butthurt!   

Eventually, she'll reach down and grab her pock-marked ovaries, and gain the guts to post openly, but I assume that will have to wait until she sobers up.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Dysfunctional Cunt on August 12, 2011, 07:30:23 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 07:26:16 PM
Still getting hate mail.   :lulz:

What a payoff.  One single line nastygram, and it's the Niagara Falls of butthurt!   

Eventually, she'll reach down and grab her pock-marked ovaries, and gain the guts to post openly, but I assume that will have to wait until she sobers up.

Dok, you're just the guy they love to hate.  What can you do, it's a both a curse and a gift.....

Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 12, 2011, 07:31:20 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 07:26:16 PM
Still getting hate mail.   :lulz:

What a payoff.  One single line nastygram, and it's the Niagara Falls of butthurt!   

Eventually, she'll reach down and grab her pock-marked ovaries, and gain the guts to post openly, but I assume that will have to wait until she sobers up.

Holy fuck. :lulz: Priceless!

Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 07:32:31 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 07:30:23 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 07:26:16 PM
Still getting hate mail.   :lulz:

What a payoff.  One single line nastygram, and it's the Niagara Falls of butthurt!   

Eventually, she'll reach down and grab her pock-marked ovaries, and gain the guts to post openly, but I assume that will have to wait until she sobers up.

Dok, you're just the guy they love to hate.  What can you do, it's a both a curse and a gift.....



Did Victor Frankenstien ever have days like this?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 07:32:54 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 07:31:20 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 07:26:16 PM
Still getting hate mail.   :lulz:

What a payoff.  One single line nastygram, and it's the Niagara Falls of butthurt!   

Eventually, she'll reach down and grab her pock-marked ovaries, and gain the guts to post openly, but I assume that will have to wait until she sobers up.

Holy fuck. :lulz: Priceless!



:hammer:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 07:33:44 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 07:26:16 PM
Still getting hate mail.   :lulz:

What a payoff.  One single line nastygram, and it's the Niagara Falls of butthurt!   

Eventually, she'll reach down and grab her pock-marked ovaries, and gain the guts to post openly, but I assume that will have to wait until she sobers up.

Maybe this will flush her out:

HEY! LARDASS!!!!!
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: LMNO on August 12, 2011, 07:34:20 PM
You are a selfless man, Roger, for absorbing all the crazyness into your orbit and sparing us the flying batshit.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 07:36:56 PM
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on August 12, 2011, 07:34:20 PM
You are a selfless man, Roger, for absorbing all the crazyness into your orbit and sparing us the flying batshit.

Heh.

Now I'm being told that she's refraining from defending her earlier hilarity For Charley's Sake, and that we're all killing him or some shit, by virtue of calling her on her bullshit.

This just went from amusing to disgusting.  ED is a fucking vulture.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on August 12, 2011, 07:40:42 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 07:36:56 PM
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on August 12, 2011, 07:34:20 PM
You are a selfless man, Roger, for absorbing all the crazyness into your orbit and sparing us the flying batshit.

Heh.

Now I'm being told that she's refraining from defending her earlier hilarity For Charley's Sake, and that we're all killing him or some shit, by virtue of calling her on her bullshit.

This just went from amusing to disgusting.  ED is a fucking vulture.

I figured that out pages ago, with the whole "I'm sorry Charlie that you have to see all this, I just want you to get better!" 

What a greyfaced pig.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 07:41:46 PM
Yeah, that was the plan all along. Hence the sucking up to Charley.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 07:42:01 PM
Quote from: Jenkem and SPACE/TIME on August 12, 2011, 07:40:42 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 07:36:56 PM
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on August 12, 2011, 07:34:20 PM
You are a selfless man, Roger, for absorbing all the crazyness into your orbit and sparing us the flying batshit.

Heh.

Now I'm being told that she's refraining from defending her earlier hilarity For Charley's Sake, and that we're all killing him or some shit, by virtue of calling her on her bullshit.

This just went from amusing to disgusting.  ED is a fucking vulture.

I figured that out pages ago, with the whole "I'm sorry Charlie that you have to see all this, I just want you to get better!" 

What a greyfaced pig.

Yep.  Now the pig is whining at me nonstop about how I'm killing Charley, or some shit.

What a disgusting piece of filth she is.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: LMNO on August 12, 2011, 07:43:42 PM
ROGER, STOP KILLING CHARLEY WITH YOUR LAZORS!

(http://www.musicandrambling.com/gif/americas_next_top_model_tyra_banks_rage_lazer.gif)
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: ñͤͣ̄ͦ̌̑͗͊͛͂͗ ̸̨̨̣̺̼̣̜͙͈͕̮̊̈́̈͂͛̽͊ͭ̓͆ͅé ̰̓̓́ͯ́́͞ on August 12, 2011, 07:45:13 PM
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on August 12, 2011, 07:43:42 PM
ROGER, STOP KILLING CHARLEY WITH YOUR LAZORS!

(http://www.musicandrambling.com/gif/americas_next_top_model_tyra_banks_rage_lazer.gif)

:lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on August 12, 2011, 07:46:47 PM
I just saw over the back fence one of the country club's gardener's working.  He's pretty brown.  I bet he's an illegal!

Care to tell us about illegals, Piggy?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 07:49:19 PM
Now we're back to not being up to her expectations.   :lulz:

I guess the ghoul approach didn't work out the way she planned.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: LMNO on August 12, 2011, 07:51:09 PM
People need to realize that the majority of the testimonials in the newsfeed are accurate.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on August 12, 2011, 07:51:31 PM
Meh.  She ought to just get lost then, she's boring me right now.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 07:59:55 PM
I think she likes the abuse. Like CU.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:01:02 PM
NOW we're back to "why don't you guys get out more like I do"...Which is odd, because wasn't she just shitting on everyone for being "middle class"?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 12, 2011, 08:02:32 PM
The drunkness explains her problems with reading comprehension, as well as her conviction that I had praised a post of hers which hadn't even been posted yet when I complimented her in a different thread.

:lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Dysfunctional Cunt on August 12, 2011, 08:02:53 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:01:02 PM
NOW we're back to "why don't you guys get out more like I do"...Which is odd, because wasn't she just shitting on everyone for being "middle class"?

christ on a crutch is she to drunk to stick with the same butthurt?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Phox on August 12, 2011, 08:03:20 PM
Ladies and gentlemen, I feel it is my duty to inform you that the pronoun "you" is indeed plural. Please refrain from using it. English has a lovely secnd person singular pronoun, "thou", that never gets used, largely because of people's self-centered attitude that makes all other people look the same. This is, of course, objective fact. Dok, thou should know better. Shame on thee.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 12, 2011, 08:05:01 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:01:02 PM
NOW we're back to "why don't you guys get out more like I do"...Which is odd, because wasn't she just shitting on everyone for being "middle class"?

Why does she think we don't get out?  :?

Oh wait, I know. It's because to her we're (ATTN EoC: BY "WE" I MEAN THE ACTIVE REGULAR USERS ON PD.COM) all basically a single entity, and since at least one of us is here posting at any given time, in her head that means Roger never leaves the house.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 12, 2011, 08:05:49 PM
Quote from: Doktor Phox on August 12, 2011, 08:03:20 PM
Ladies and gentlemen, I feel it is my duty to inform you that the pronoun "you" is indeed plural. Please refrain from using it. English has a lovely secnd person singular pronoun, "thou", that never gets used, largely because of people's self-centered attitude that makes all other people look the same. This is, of course, objective fact. Dok, thou should know better. Shame on thee.

Oh shit.  :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Dysfunctional Cunt on August 12, 2011, 08:06:20 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 08:05:01 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:01:02 PM
NOW we're back to "why don't you guys get out more like I do"...Which is odd, because wasn't she just shitting on everyone for being "middle class"?

Why does she think we don't get out?  :?

Oh wait, I know. It's because to her we're (ATTN EoC: BY "WE" I MEAN THE ACTIVE REGULAR USERS ON PD.COM) all basically a single entity, and since at least one of us is here posting at any given time, in her head that means Roger never leaves the house.

Wait, does this mean it was my week to get out?

goddammit!! :argh!:


:lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:06:34 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 08:05:01 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:01:02 PM
NOW we're back to "why don't you guys get out more like I do"...Which is odd, because wasn't she just shitting on everyone for being "middle class"?

Why does she think we don't get out?  :?

Oh wait, I know. It's because to her we're (ATTN EoC: BY "WE" I MEAN THE ACTIVE REGULAR USERS ON PD.COM) all basically a single entity, and since at least one of us is here posting at any given time, in her head that means Roger never leaves the house.

That's what I assume she meant.

Also, :lol: to you & Phox.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: BabylonHoruv on August 12, 2011, 08:07:57 PM
Quote from: Doktor Phox on August 12, 2011, 08:03:20 PM
Ladies and gentlemen, I feel it is my duty to inform you that the pronoun "you" is indeed plural. Please refrain from using it. English has a lovely secnd person singular pronoun, "thou", that never gets used, largely because of people's self-centered attitude that makes all other people look the same. This is, of course, objective fact. Dok, thou should know better. Shame on thee.

Isn't the conjugation of should for thou shouldest? (or shouldst maybe)
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:09:50 PM
I must report that the argument that my penis resembles a gummy worm1 has utterly refuted all of my prior points.2



1  Must be a drunken Aussie term of some kind.

2  Is this bozo related to Lies?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: BabylonHoruv on August 12, 2011, 08:10:35 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:09:50 PM
I must report that the argument that my penis resembles a gummy worm1 has utterly refuted all of my prior points.2



1  Must be a drunken Aussie term of some kind.

2  Is this bozo related to Lies?

I'd take that to mean she wants to put it in her mouth.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:11:39 PM
Quote from: BabylonHoruv on August 12, 2011, 08:10:35 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:09:50 PM
I must report that the argument that my penis resembles a gummy worm1 has utterly refuted all of my prior points.2



1  Must be a drunken Aussie term of some kind.

2  Is this bozo related to Lies?

I'd take that to mean she wants to put it in her mouth.

No thanks.  Aussie STDs are incompatible with my own.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Dysfunctional Cunt on August 12, 2011, 08:14:56 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:09:50 PM
I must report that the argument that my penis resembles a gummy worm1 has utterly refuted all of my prior points.2



1  Must be a drunken Aussie term of some kind.

2  Is this bozo related to Lies?

Wait a minute. How did your penis even come into the conversation? 

 
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Adios on August 12, 2011, 08:15:07 PM
I prefer to be left out of this, thanks.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: LMNO on August 12, 2011, 08:15:50 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 08:14:56 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:09:50 PM
I must report that the argument that my penis resembles a gummy worm1 has utterly refuted all of my prior points.2



1  Must be a drunken Aussie term of some kind.

2  Is this bozo related to Lies?

Wait a minute. How did your penis even come into the conversation?  

 

If it's as limp as a gummy worm, then with much difficulty.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 12, 2011, 08:16:09 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:09:50 PM
I must report that the argument that my penis resembles a gummy worm1 has utterly refuted all of my prior points.2



1  Must be a drunken Aussie term of some kind.

2  Is this bozo related to Lies?

:lulz: Wow, now there's an intellectual powerhouse.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:20:01 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 12, 2011, 08:15:07 PM
I prefer to be left out of this, thanks.

Tell her that.  She's the one excusing her bad behavior by taking your name in vain.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Phox on August 12, 2011, 08:21:33 PM
Quote from: BabylonHoruv on August 12, 2011, 08:07:57 PM
Quote from: Doktor Phox on August 12, 2011, 08:03:20 PM
Ladies and gentlemen, I feel it is my duty to inform you that the pronoun "you" is indeed plural. Please refrain from using it. English has a lovely secnd person singular pronoun, "thou", that never gets used, largely because of people's self-centered attitude that makes all other people look the same. This is, of course, objective fact. Dok, thou should know better. Shame on thee.

Isn't the conjugation of should for thou shouldest? (or shouldst maybe)
Well, yes, it's the second person conjugation, but we no longer have inflected verbs. Only inflected pronouns.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:22:29 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 08:14:56 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:09:50 PM
I must report that the argument that my penis resembles a gummy worm1 has utterly refuted all of my prior points.2



1  Must be a drunken Aussie term of some kind.

2  Is this bozo related to Lies?

Wait a minute. How did your penis even come into the conversation? 

 

Apparently, "YOU HAVE A DICK LIKE A GUMMY WORM" is considered the height of rational discourse in some parts of Australia.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:23:39 PM
She DOES get pretention points for writing with an accent, though.   :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 08:25:55 PM
I'm sure she knows all about that gummy shit. Takes her teeth out and all.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:33:06 PM
I'm now getting PMs from her screaming that she's gone.   :?

THEN WHO'S WRITING TO ME?  :shudder:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on August 12, 2011, 08:33:51 PM
OMG PD IS HAUNTED
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Phox on August 12, 2011, 08:37:41 PM
 :scared:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Dysfunctional Cunt on August 12, 2011, 08:38:39 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:33:06 PM
I'm now getting PMs from her screaming that she's gone.   :?

THEN WHO'S WRITING TO ME?  :shudder:
Quote from: Jenkem and SPACE/TIME on August 12, 2011, 08:33:51 PM
OMG PD IS HAUNTED
Quote from: Doktor Phox on August 12, 2011, 08:37:41 PM
:scared:

We must perform an excorcism......  Who knows where we hid that last virgin???
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:42:41 PM
Her last post DOES look like demonic possession.

Utter gibberish sprinkled with obscenities.  Made no sense at all.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on August 12, 2011, 08:44:21 PM
Who used to be a Catholic?  Do the holy water thing and say some Latin over her profile, quick!
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 12, 2011, 08:45:37 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:42:41 PM
Her last post DOES look like demonic possession.

Utter gibberish sprinkled with obscenities.  Made no sense at all.

Over at EBG she apparently thinks I spent my whole day composing a two-sentence post with a list of New World foods I copied and pasted from a wiki page. :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:45:50 PM
Quote from: Jenkem and SPACE/TIME on August 12, 2011, 08:44:21 PM
Who used to be a Catholic?  Do the holy water thing and say some Latin over her profile, quick!

No can do.  They don't let Catholics into Australia.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Eater of Clowns on August 12, 2011, 08:45:55 PM
You (plural) fuckers are taking this too far.  All I'm asking is that when you (all) use pronouns you have some awareness of their (the pronouns) broad meaning.  When I say "we" you (all) can't be sure if I'm talking about PD members or Americentric middle class apologists, unless I'm confused and those are actually both the same.

I did some thinking when I went to get a coffee.  I was mistaken before.  I don't merely dislike being implicated in situations like this.  I do, in fact, hate all pronouns.  If you use pronouns, you are my enemy, period, because it means, by extension, that you're talking shit about my mom.  For those of you who feel similarly, I invite you to join EoC's Crusade Really Against Pronouns.  You'll still be allowed to use them, but I'm using the honor system that you'll self flagellate as penance.  Because I don't understand them all that well though, I'm going to go do that for a solid half hour or so now.  I'll check back for EoC's CRAP members later.  Joining means other EoC's CRAP members will be specified in use of further pronouns.

For instance:  I hate you miserable bastards (except Charley) infinitely.

Enjoy EoC's CRAP, assholes.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:46:14 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 08:45:37 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:42:41 PM
Her last post DOES look like demonic possession.

Utter gibberish sprinkled with obscenities.  Made no sense at all.

Over at EBG she apparently thinks I spent my whole day composing a two-sentence post with a list of New World foods I copied and pasted from a wiki page. :lulz:

Saw that.  :lol:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on August 12, 2011, 08:51:15 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:45:50 PM
Quote from: Jenkem and SPACE/TIME on August 12, 2011, 08:44:21 PM
Who used to be a Catholic?  Do the holy water thing and say some Latin over her profile, quick!

No can do.  They don't let Catholics into Australia.

She's fucked forever. :cry:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 12, 2011, 08:53:49 PM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 12, 2011, 12:54:45 AM
I was mistaken...and I was corrected...not caught.

Caught implies that I had meant to misrepresent the facts. I did not. I stated the facts as I believed them to be. When I had verified that I was in error I made haste to correct that mistake.

Lying and being mistaken are two quite different things...unless you're on pd and people with limited vocabularies and hyper sensitive egos are searching for epithets to fling at you, apparently.

Why would I have lied about something which Nigel posting a link to EBG would have shown up?


:lulz: What's really fucking funny about this is that when I looked at the date on the thread she accused me of deleting my comment from, it was started TWO DAYS AFTER I posted my comment in the original thread.

I mean, confusion is understandable, but that's some EPIC confusion.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 12, 2011, 08:54:38 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:22:29 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 08:14:56 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:09:50 PM
I must report that the argument that my penis resembles a gummy worm1 has utterly refuted all of my prior points.2



1  Must be a drunken Aussie term of some kind.

2  Is this bozo related to Lies?

Wait a minute. How did your penis even come into the conversation?  

 

Apparently, "YOU HAVE A DICK LIKE A GUMMY WORM" is considered the height of rational discourse in some parts of Australia.

I bet she's from Kalgoorlie. Which would explain both why she's used to being the smartest kid in the room in spite of her inferior intellect and also why she's got more chins than teeth.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:54:58 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 08:53:49 PM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 12, 2011, 12:54:45 AM
I was mistaken...and I was corrected...not caught.

Caught implies that I had meant to misrepresent the facts. I did not. I stated the facts as I believed them to be. When I had verified that I was in error I made haste to correct that mistake.

Lying and being mistaken are two quite different things...unless you're on pd and people with limited vocabularies and hyper sensitive egos are searching for epithets to fling at you, apparently.

Why would I have lied about something which Nigel posting a link to EBG would have shown up?


:lulz: What's really fucking funny about this is that when I looked at the date on the thread she accused me of deleting my comment from, it was started TWO DAYS AFTER I posted my comment in the original thread.

I mean, confusion is understandable, but that's some EPIC confusion.

Well, you pickle yourself, that sort of thing happens.

Did you know, by the way, that I am responsible for this whole mess?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:55:32 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 12, 2011, 08:54:38 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:22:29 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 08:14:56 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:09:50 PM
I must report that the argument that my penis resembles a gummy worm1 has utterly refuted all of my prior points.2



1  Must be a drunken Aussie term of some kind.

2  Is this bozo related to Lies?

Wait a minute. How did your penis even come into the conversation?  

 

Apparently, "YOU HAVE A DICK LIKE A GUMMY WORM" is considered the height of rational discourse in some parts of Australia.

I bet she's from Kalgoorlie. Which would explain both why she's used to being the smartest kid in the room in spite of her inferior intellect and also why she's got more chins than teeth.

That sounds like Corner Brook in Newfoundland.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 12, 2011, 08:56:33 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:54:58 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 08:53:49 PM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 12, 2011, 12:54:45 AM
I was mistaken...and I was corrected...not caught.

Caught implies that I had meant to misrepresent the facts. I did not. I stated the facts as I believed them to be. When I had verified that I was in error I made haste to correct that mistake.

Lying and being mistaken are two quite different things...unless you're on pd and people with limited vocabularies and hyper sensitive egos are searching for epithets to fling at you, apparently.

Why would I have lied about something which Nigel posting a link to EBG would have shown up?


:lulz: What's really fucking funny about this is that when I looked at the date on the thread she accused me of deleting my comment from, it was started TWO DAYS AFTER I posted my comment in the original thread.

I mean, confusion is understandable, but that's some EPIC confusion.

Well, you pickle yourself, that sort of thing happens.

Did you know, by the way, that I am responsible for this whole mess?

Well of course you are, who else's fault could it possibly be?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on August 12, 2011, 08:57:13 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:54:58 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 08:53:49 PM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 12, 2011, 12:54:45 AM
I was mistaken...and I was corrected...not caught.

Caught implies that I had meant to misrepresent the facts. I did not. I stated the facts as I believed them to be. When I had verified that I was in error I made haste to correct that mistake.

Lying and being mistaken are two quite different things...unless you're on pd and people with limited vocabularies and hyper sensitive egos are searching for epithets to fling at you, apparently.

Why would I have lied about something which Nigel posting a link to EBG would have shown up?


:lulz: What's really fucking funny about this is that when I looked at the date on the thread she accused me of deleting my comment from, it was started TWO DAYS AFTER I posted my comment in the original thread.

I mean, confusion is understandable, but that's some EPIC confusion.

Well, you pickle yourself, that sort of thing happens.

Did you know, by the way, that I am responsible for this whole mess?

No way.  If anything, me getting snippy about her attempting to hijack my thread is what started it here.

Also, she's an asshole, so it would have eventually come to this anyway.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:58:19 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 08:56:33 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:54:58 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 08:53:49 PM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 12, 2011, 12:54:45 AM
I was mistaken...and I was corrected...not caught.

Caught implies that I had meant to misrepresent the facts. I did not. I stated the facts as I believed them to be. When I had verified that I was in error I made haste to correct that mistake.

Lying and being mistaken are two quite different things...unless you're on pd and people with limited vocabularies and hyper sensitive egos are searching for epithets to fling at you, apparently.

Why would I have lied about something which Nigel posting a link to EBG would have shown up?


:lulz: What's really fucking funny about this is that when I looked at the date on the thread she accused me of deleting my comment from, it was started TWO DAYS AFTER I posted my comment in the original thread.

I mean, confusion is understandable, but that's some EPIC confusion.

Well, you pickle yourself, that sort of thing happens.

Did you know, by the way, that I am responsible for this whole mess?

Well of course you are, who else's fault could it possibly be?

Nobody's.  I MAKE people do this shit.

Dok Carnacki,
Muhaha!
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 12, 2011, 09:00:23 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:58:19 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 08:56:33 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:54:58 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 08:53:49 PM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 12, 2011, 12:54:45 AM
I was mistaken...and I was corrected...not caught.

Caught implies that I had meant to misrepresent the facts. I did not. I stated the facts as I believed them to be. When I had verified that I was in error I made haste to correct that mistake.

Lying and being mistaken are two quite different things...unless you're on pd and people with limited vocabularies and hyper sensitive egos are searching for epithets to fling at you, apparently.

Why would I have lied about something which Nigel posting a link to EBG would have shown up?


:lulz: What's really fucking funny about this is that when I looked at the date on the thread she accused me of deleting my comment from, it was started TWO DAYS AFTER I posted my comment in the original thread.

I mean, confusion is understandable, but that's some EPIC confusion.

Well, you pickle yourself, that sort of thing happens.

Did you know, by the way, that I am responsible for this whole mess?

Well of course you are, who else's fault could it possibly be?

Nobody's.  I MAKE people do this shit.

Dok Carnacki,
Muhaha!

WITH YOUR MIND LAZORS YOU CONTROL THE WHOLE PEE DEE!
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 12, 2011, 09:01:17 PM
Quote from: Jenkem and SPACE/TIME on August 12, 2011, 08:57:13 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:54:58 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 08:53:49 PM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 12, 2011, 12:54:45 AM
I was mistaken...and I was corrected...not caught.

Caught implies that I had meant to misrepresent the facts. I did not. I stated the facts as I believed them to be. When I had verified that I was in error I made haste to correct that mistake.

Lying and being mistaken are two quite different things...unless you're on pd and people with limited vocabularies and hyper sensitive egos are searching for epithets to fling at you, apparently.

Why would I have lied about something which Nigel posting a link to EBG would have shown up?


:lulz: What's really fucking funny about this is that when I looked at the date on the thread she accused me of deleting my comment from, it was started TWO DAYS AFTER I posted my comment in the original thread.

I mean, confusion is understandable, but that's some EPIC confusion.

Well, you pickle yourself, that sort of thing happens.

Did you know, by the way, that I am responsible for this whole mess?

No way.  If anything, me getting snippy about her attempting to hijack my thread is what started it here.

Also, she's an asshole, so it would have eventually come to this anyway.

Yeah, she's a total dick, not in a good way.

Also she should drink less, she would make more sense and maybe even have friends.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 09:04:24 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 09:01:17 PM
and maybe even have friends.

Let's not get all crazy, now.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Adios on August 12, 2011, 09:05:15 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 09:04:24 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 09:01:17 PM
and maybe even have friends.

Let's not get all crazy, now.

I count her a friend.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 09:06:32 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 12, 2011, 09:05:15 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 09:04:24 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 09:01:17 PM
and maybe even have friends.

Let's not get all crazy, now.

I count her a friend.

Well, I gave her more than a fair shake, Charley.  Nobody can say I didn't.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Adios on August 12, 2011, 09:07:46 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 09:06:32 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 12, 2011, 09:05:15 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 09:04:24 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 09:01:17 PM
and maybe even have friends.

Let's not get all crazy, now.

I count her a friend.

Well, I gave her more than a fair shake, Charley.  Nobody can say I didn't.

I wasn't judging, just saying.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 09:08:32 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:58:19 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 08:56:33 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:54:58 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 08:53:49 PM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 12, 2011, 12:54:45 AM
I was mistaken...and I was corrected...not caught.

Caught implies that I had meant to misrepresent the facts. I did not. I stated the facts as I believed them to be. When I had verified that I was in error I made haste to correct that mistake.

Lying and being mistaken are two quite different things...unless you're on pd and people with limited vocabularies and hyper sensitive egos are searching for epithets to fling at you, apparently.

Why would I have lied about something which Nigel posting a link to EBG would have shown up?


:lulz: What's really fucking funny about this is that when I looked at the date on the thread she accused me of deleting my comment from, it was started TWO DAYS AFTER I posted my comment in the original thread.

I mean, confusion is understandable, but that's some EPIC confusion.

Well, you pickle yourself, that sort of thing happens.

Did you know, by the way, that I am responsible for this whole mess?

Well of course you are, who else's fault could it possibly be?

Nobody's.  I MAKE people do this shit.

Dok Carnacki,
Muhaha!
QUICK, somebody WOMP Dok's face on Rev. Moon!
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 12, 2011, 09:17:53 PM
I just did a little digging.

I'm not 100% sure, but I've got a reasonable suspicion that this isn't actually ED at all.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 09:18:48 PM
 :?

Splain?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 09:19:05 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 12, 2011, 09:17:53 PM
I just did a little digging.

I'm not 100% sure, but I've got a reasonable suspicion that this isn't actually ED at all.

Oh, I think it is.  I just think there might be more to it.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 12, 2011, 09:22:44 PM
Copypasting her pointless assholery from Freeky's vindaloo thread, for lulz & hate:

Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on July 25, 2011, 09:45:27 PM
This is a traditional Goan Vindaloo. I got taught how to make it years and years ago by my Kasmati neighbour. Beware though...it's the real deal and you may begin to hear the ghost of Johnny Cash on your morning visit to the ablutions room.

<recipe elided for space>

Quote from: Jenkem and SPACE/TIME on July 26, 2011, 01:34:16 AM
You could have just posted this in a new thread, you know.

Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on July 26, 2011, 08:17:48 PM
Quote from: Jenkem and SPACE/TIME on July 26, 2011, 01:34:16 AM
You could have just posted this in a new thread, you know.

Oh sorry. I didn't realise I'd invaded your kitchen. I just thought that as the people here seemed to like a Vindaloo they might like to try an authentic regional version ...and a new Vindaloo thread seemed somewhat redundant. I'll replace any of your spices I used and clean up where I appear to have shit on your rug, shall I?

(It was at this moment that I first thought "WTF, what a bitch" but then I forgot about it)

Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on July 26, 2011, 09:48:58 PM
I make a bloody good Beef Rendang too, if it'll stop you being quite so pissed off with me.

:lulz:

Quote from: Jenkem and SPACE/TIME on July 27, 2011, 03:43:06 AM
Do what you like, I have more important things to worry about than a stupid internet fight in an even more stupid recipe thread.

Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on July 27, 2011, 05:43:20 AM
Quote from: Jenkem and SPACE/TIME on July 27, 2011, 03:43:06 AM
Do what you like, I have more important things to worry about than a stupid internet fight in an even more stupid recipe thread.

I wasn't aware there was a dispute.  You seem to be the one gettin' all upset sweety. You declared a vindaloo   competition and then as soon as someone postsw a second recipe you tell them to fuck off and get their own thread.
:?

I mean I was burned...haven't been told I was sittin' on someone else's seat in the playground since high school.And I apologise. I sincerely do. I didn't realise it meant so much to you to be Queen of the Curry Party.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Salty on August 12, 2011, 09:24:40 PM
What a twat.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 12, 2011, 09:24:47 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 12, 2011, 09:17:53 PM
I just did a little digging.

I'm not 100% sure, but I've got a reasonable suspicion that this isn't actually ED at all.

Not the same as on EBG? Because the one over there acknowledged the goings-on here.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 12, 2011, 09:26:02 PM
:lulz: @ the irony of calling someone out on the authenticity of their indian food recipe and then claiming that you have an awesome indian recipe that uses beef.

Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Salty on August 12, 2011, 09:26:43 PM
Whoever it is has so far attacked Jenne, Freeky and EVERY SINGLE OTHER POSTER ON PD WITHOUT EXCEPTION.*

I declare this asshole a fucking asshole.




* :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 12, 2011, 09:27:55 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 09:24:47 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 12, 2011, 09:17:53 PM
I just did a little digging.

I'm not 100% sure, but I've got a reasonable suspicion that this isn't actually ED at all.

Not the same as on EBG? Because the one over there acknowledged the goings-on here.

that could just mean that the one over there isn't authentic either.

I do know that there's something VERY fishy going on with that poster, whoever it is.

And I'm not talking about the smell wafting out of her jeans.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Adios on August 12, 2011, 09:28:50 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 12, 2011, 09:27:55 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 09:24:47 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 12, 2011, 09:17:53 PM
I just did a little digging.

I'm not 100% sure, but I've got a reasonable suspicion that this isn't actually ED at all.

Not the same as on EBG? Because the one over there acknowledged the goings-on here.

that could just mean that the one over there isn't authentic either.

I do know that there's something VERY fishy going on with that poster, whoever it is.

And I'm not talking about the smell wafting out of her jeans.

Explain please. I am getting emails from her as well.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 09:29:00 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 12, 2011, 09:26:02 PM
:lulz: @ the irony of calling someone out on the authenticity of their indian food recipe and then claiming that you have an awesome indian recipe that uses beef.



:spittake:

Missed that one.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 09:29:53 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 12, 2011, 09:28:50 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 12, 2011, 09:27:55 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 09:24:47 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 12, 2011, 09:17:53 PM
I just did a little digging.

I'm not 100% sure, but I've got a reasonable suspicion that this isn't actually ED at all.

Not the same as on EBG? Because the one over there acknowledged the goings-on here.

that could just mean that the one over there isn't authentic either.

I do know that there's something VERY fishy going on with that poster, whoever it is.

And I'm not talking about the smell wafting out of her jeans.

Explain please. I am getting emails from her as well.

WEIRD IP results.

I'll run it through the proper engine at home, in about 90 minutes.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 12, 2011, 09:31:42 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 12, 2011, 09:26:02 PM
:lulz: @ the irony of calling someone out on the authenticity of their indian food recipe and then claiming that you have an awesome indian recipe that uses beef.



So totally this. :lulz:

I also loved the implication that there is a traditional or untraditional kind of chilies to use in Vindaloo. And the implication that Vindaloo isn't a mutable dish when if there's one thing it's famous for, it's having a million variations.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 12, 2011, 09:33:25 PM
Her reaction to Freeky in the other thread was insane. Literally. Even though Freeky was obviously irritated, she was completely polite about it. So if this ain't the real deal, I'm calling CU.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 09:35:35 PM
Paranoid brain says some kind of mole looking for anarchists or some shit. Shit-as-usual brain says yeah...CU.  :fap:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Adios on August 12, 2011, 09:48:12 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 12, 2011, 09:26:02 PM
:lulz: @ the irony of calling someone out on the authenticity of their indian food recipe and then claiming that you have an awesome indian recipe that uses beef.



Indians don't eat beef? Oh, shit, right, disregard the brain fart. They worship cows or some shit like that, right?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 09:52:29 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 12, 2011, 09:48:12 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 12, 2011, 09:26:02 PM
:lulz: @ the irony of calling someone out on the authenticity of their indian food recipe and then claiming that you have an awesome indian recipe that uses beef.



Indians don't eat beef? Oh, shit, right, disregard the brain fart. They worship cows or some shit like that, right?

From what I understand, they hold them sacred but don't worship them.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Dysfunctional Cunt on August 12, 2011, 09:53:12 PM
Wait, are we thinking CU has hacked ED's account???
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Adios on August 12, 2011, 09:53:49 PM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 09:52:29 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 12, 2011, 09:48:12 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 12, 2011, 09:26:02 PM
:lulz: @ the irony of calling someone out on the authenticity of their indian food recipe and then claiming that you have an awesome indian recipe that uses beef.



Indians don't eat beef? Oh, shit, right, disregard the brain fart. They worship cows or some shit like that, right?

From what I understand, they hold them sacred but don't worship them.

I will never be a part of any religion that lowers my status on the food chain.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Adios on August 12, 2011, 09:54:38 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 09:53:12 PM
Wait, are we thinking CU has hacked ED's account???

If that has happened i will drag my crippled ass to Canada and put him out of my misery for once and all.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Dysfunctional Cunt on August 12, 2011, 09:55:01 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 12, 2011, 09:53:49 PM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 09:52:29 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 12, 2011, 09:48:12 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 12, 2011, 09:26:02 PM
:lulz: @ the irony of calling someone out on the authenticity of their indian food recipe and then claiming that you have an awesome indian recipe that uses beef.



Indians don't eat beef? Oh, shit, right, disregard the brain fart. They worship cows or some shit like that, right?

From what I understand, they hold them sacred but don't worship them.

I will never be a part of any religion that lowers my status on the food chain.

Or one that says you can't eat delicious animals....
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Adios on August 12, 2011, 09:58:22 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 09:55:01 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 12, 2011, 09:53:49 PM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 09:52:29 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 12, 2011, 09:48:12 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 12, 2011, 09:26:02 PM
:lulz: @ the irony of calling someone out on the authenticity of their indian food recipe and then claiming that you have an awesome indian recipe that uses beef.



Indians don't eat beef? Oh, shit, right, disregard the brain fart. They worship cows or some shit like that, right?

From what I understand, they hold them sacred but don't worship them.

I will never be a part of any religion that lowers my status on the food chain.

Or one that says you can't eat delicious animals....

One in the same babe, one in the same.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 09:59:07 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 12, 2011, 09:54:38 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 09:53:12 PM
Wait, are we thinking CU has hacked ED's account???

If that has happened i will drag my crippled ass to Canada and put him out of my misery for once and all.

The irrational hate-obsession with Roger fits.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Adios on August 12, 2011, 10:01:41 PM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 09:59:07 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 12, 2011, 09:54:38 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 09:53:12 PM
Wait, are we thinking CU has hacked ED's account???

If that has happened i will drag my crippled ass to Canada and put him out of my misery for once and all.

The irrational hate-obsession with Roger fits.

He's not that good, by now he would have started 3 threads about why Roger can't read an IP search program correctly.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 12, 2011, 10:03:51 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 12, 2011, 10:01:41 PM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 09:59:07 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 12, 2011, 09:54:38 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 09:53:12 PM
Wait, are we thinking CU has hacked ED's account???

If that has happened i will drag my crippled ass to Canada and put him out of my misery for once and all.

The irrational hate-obsession with Roger fits.

He's not that good, by now he would have started 3 threads about why Roger can't read an IP search program correctly.

Point.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 10:06:08 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 10:03:51 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 12, 2011, 10:01:41 PM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 09:59:07 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 12, 2011, 09:54:38 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 09:53:12 PM
Wait, are we thinking CU has hacked ED's account???

If that has happened i will drag my crippled ass to Canada and put him out of my misery for once and all.

The irrational hate-obsession with Roger fits.

He's not that good, by now he would have started 3 threads about why Roger can't read an IP search program correctly.

Point.

They could still be in cahoots. Birds of a feather and all that.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Triple Zero on August 12, 2011, 10:08:42 PM
Quote from: Jenkem and SPACE/TIME on August 12, 2011, 08:51:15 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:45:50 PM
Quote from: Jenkem and SPACE/TIME on August 12, 2011, 08:44:21 PM
Who used to be a Catholic?  Do the holy water thing and say some Latin over her profile, quick!

No can do.  They don't let Catholics into Australia.

She's fucked forever. :cry:

But we're all popes, right? I holify water whenever I feel like it.

Latin's easy too.

AQUA EST DEUSSI

MAL SPIRITUM EX TROLLOLOLO
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Phox on August 12, 2011, 10:11:33 PM
Quote from: Triple Zero on August 12, 2011, 10:08:42 PM
Quote from: Jenkem and SPACE/TIME on August 12, 2011, 08:51:15 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:45:50 PM
Quote from: Jenkem and SPACE/TIME on August 12, 2011, 08:44:21 PM
Who used to be a Catholic?  Do the holy water thing and say some Latin over her profile, quick!

No can do.  They don't let Catholics into Australia.

She's fucked forever. :cry:

But we're all popes, right? I holify water whenever I feel like it.

Latin's easy too.

AQUA EST DEUSSI

MAL SPIRITUM EX TROLLOLOLO
:lulz: :lulz: :lulz: :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 12, 2011, 10:12:52 PM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 10:06:08 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 10:03:51 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 12, 2011, 10:01:41 PM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 09:59:07 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 12, 2011, 09:54:38 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 09:53:12 PM
Wait, are we thinking CU has hacked ED's account???

If that has happened i will drag my crippled ass to Canada and put him out of my misery for once and all.

The irrational hate-obsession with Roger fits.

He's not that good, by now he would have started 3 threads about why Roger can't read an IP search program correctly.

Point.

They could still be in cahoots. Birds of a feather and all that.

If the real Eartha is Charley's friend she wouldn't fuck him over like that.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Adios on August 12, 2011, 10:14:21 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 10:12:52 PM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 10:06:08 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 10:03:51 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 12, 2011, 10:01:41 PM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 09:59:07 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 12, 2011, 09:54:38 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 09:53:12 PM
Wait, are we thinking CU has hacked ED's account???

If that has happened i will drag my crippled ass to Canada and put him out of my misery for once and all.

The irrational hate-obsession with Roger fits.

He's not that good, by now he would have started 3 threads about why Roger can't read an IP search program correctly.

Point.

They could still be in cahoots. Birds of a feather and all that.

If the real Eartha is Charley's friend she wouldn't fuck him over like that.

I agree.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 10:16:52 PM
Quote from: Triple Zero on August 12, 2011, 10:08:42 PM
Quote from: Jenkem and SPACE/TIME on August 12, 2011, 08:51:15 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 08:45:50 PM
Quote from: Jenkem and SPACE/TIME on August 12, 2011, 08:44:21 PM
Who used to be a Catholic?  Do the holy water thing and say some Latin over her profile, quick!

No can do.  They don't let Catholics into Australia.

She's fucked forever. :cry:

But we're all popes, right? I holify water whenever I feel like it.

Latin's easy too.

AQUA EST DEUSSI

MAL SPIRITUM EX TROLLOLOLO

In nomen resurrectio Abbas , Filius quod Sanctus Buttvulnero. Or something like that.

Also, what Nigel said.

Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Adios on August 12, 2011, 10:17:35 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 10:12:52 PM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 10:06:08 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 12, 2011, 10:03:51 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 12, 2011, 10:01:41 PM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 09:59:07 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 12, 2011, 09:54:38 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 09:53:12 PM
Wait, are we thinking CU has hacked ED's account???

If that has happened i will drag my crippled ass to Canada and put him out of my misery for once and all.

The irrational hate-obsession with Roger fits.

He's not that good, by now he would have started 3 threads about why Roger can't read an IP search program correctly.

Point.

They could still be in cahoots. Birds of a feather and all that.

If the real Eartha is Charley's friend she wouldn't fuck him over like that.

I had 2 friends in school that fucking hated each other, but they always wanted to hang out with me. In 2 years they only got in one fight and I jumped between those damn giants and they quit fighting rather than hit me. I never knew if it was because they were friends or because they knew I was fucking crazy.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Triple Zero on August 12, 2011, 10:19:51 PM
Can't you call or email Eartha to find out what's going on?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Adios on August 12, 2011, 10:21:17 PM
Quote from: Triple Zero on August 12, 2011, 10:19:51 PM
Can't you call or email Eartha to find out what's going on?

I have been in email contact with her several times today. I don't have her number and also have no clue what it costs to call down under.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Dysfunctional Cunt on August 12, 2011, 10:24:15 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 12, 2011, 10:21:17 PM
Quote from: Triple Zero on August 12, 2011, 10:19:51 PM
Can't you call or email Eartha to find out what's going on?

I have been in email contact with her several times today. I don't have her number and also have no clue what it costs to call down under.

So do you think it is her from her emails???

Don't call, it costs a fortune!
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: BabylonHoruv on August 12, 2011, 10:24:40 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 12, 2011, 10:21:17 PM
Quote from: Triple Zero on August 12, 2011, 10:19:51 PM
Can't you call or email Eartha to find out what's going on?

I have been in email contact with her several times today. I don't have her number and also have no clue what it costs to call down under.

on regular telephone, an arm and a leg,  however there are calling cards available that cost about 10 cents a minute, and skype costs about 2 cents a minute.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Adios on August 12, 2011, 10:27:58 PM
Quote from: Khara on August 12, 2011, 10:24:15 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 12, 2011, 10:21:17 PM
Quote from: Triple Zero on August 12, 2011, 10:19:51 PM
Can't you call or email Eartha to find out what's going on?

I have been in email contact with her several times today. I don't have her number and also have no clue what it costs to call down under.

So do you think it is her from her emails???

Don't call, it costs a fortune!

Everything seems pretty normal, same writing style and everything.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Adios on August 12, 2011, 10:32:22 PM
I hope the surgery didn't numb my suspicion gland along with all the other stuff I can no longer feel. That would make me cry.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 12, 2011, 10:44:08 PM
I think it's her. Whoever "she" is.

I'm guessing she might not be in Australia, though, and there's going to be some weird connection to something fucked.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Triple Zero on August 12, 2011, 11:12:22 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on August 12, 2011, 10:21:17 PM
Quote from: Triple Zero on August 12, 2011, 10:19:51 PM
Can't you call or email Eartha to find out what's going on?

I have been in email contact with her several times today. I don't have her number and also have no clue what it costs to call down under.

oh, yeah. forgot about her being in Australia. nvm then
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Cain on August 12, 2011, 11:14:57 PM
Eartha is probably just derp-tarded.

Easiest explanation, fits all the available evidence.  I'm going with the derp.  Which is just more proof of my middle class, Americancentric, Eurocentric, Patriarchal, Statist, Ethnocentrist, Enlightenment-Absolutist-Rationalist heterosexual white male bias.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 11:15:38 PM
Okay, something stinks.

I ran the IP through The Monster, and came up in an empty patch of desert 30Km from the nearest podunk town.

 
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Cain on August 12, 2011, 11:16:50 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 11:15:38 PM
Okay, something stinks.

I ran the IP through The Monster, and came up in an empty patch of desert 30Km from the nearest podunk town.

 

That would be most of rural Australia.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 11:19:31 PM
Quote from: Cain on August 12, 2011, 11:16:50 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 11:15:38 PM
Okay, something stinks.

I ran the IP through The Monster, and came up in an empty patch of desert 30Km from the nearest podunk town.

 

That would be most of rural Australia.

Yep.  It isn't my prime suspect (wrong state).  But I google Earthed it just for fun, and there's nothing there.  Nada.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Cain on August 12, 2011, 11:26:44 PM
She's dense enough to affect the laws of physics in parts of Australia?  That's all I got.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 11:27:05 PM
BINGO.

The original IP address she used when she started at EB&G was in Sydney.

The IP address she uses now is a repeater operated by the Pukatja Homeland.

Something is rotten in Denmark Australia.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Cain on August 12, 2011, 11:33:42 PM
That's a fairly massive geographical divergence.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 12, 2011, 11:40:40 PM
Quote from: Cain on August 12, 2011, 11:33:42 PM
That's a fairly massive geographical divergence.

Yep.  Not sure it means anything.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 13, 2011, 12:19:08 AM
I noticed that the IP for my mobile web isn't where I am, it's maybe forty miles off.
But not the distance from Sydney to Pukatja.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Phox on August 13, 2011, 12:38:02 AM
I think the last IP my phone had said it was from Boston, MA.  :lulz:

That's a fairly significant geographic divergence.  Don't know about Australia's geography thoguh, so it might not measure up.

ETA: clarifying.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Golden Applesauce on August 13, 2011, 01:07:56 AM
Given the choice between a cross-continental conspiracy to replace a person (to the point of fooling friends) for the purpose of trolling us, or IP addresses just being fucking weird... what real Discordian believe?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Cain on August 13, 2011, 01:11:22 AM
I still think it's her and she's derp-tarded.

But it has piqued my interest, I must admit.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 13, 2011, 01:44:12 AM
I was just googling mileage calculators to see what the distance was, and Pukatja isn't even recognized.

No, it's not a cross-continental conspiracy. But it's fucking weird.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Phox on August 13, 2011, 01:46:53 AM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 13, 2011, 01:44:12 AM
I was just googling mileage calculators to see what the distance was, and Pukatja isn't even recognized.

No, it's not a cross-continental conspiracy. But it's fucking weird.

I did it with Pukatja Homeland and it come out to 2586 km.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: BadBeast on August 13, 2011, 02:17:18 AM
Eartha's my friend, I've known her for years, she *is* who she says she is, and you're all being paranoid.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Phox on August 13, 2011, 02:42:25 AM
Quote from: BadBeast on August 13, 2011, 02:17:18 AM
Eartha's my friend, I've known her for years, she *is* who she says she is, and you're all being paranoid.

Oh, so it's YOUR fault, you anarchocommunist bastard! GET HIM, CAIN!  :argh!:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 13, 2011, 02:45:32 AM
Quote from: BadBeast on August 13, 2011, 02:17:18 AM
Eartha's my friend, I've known her for years, she *is* who she says she is, and you're all being paranoid.

Your friend is a stupid, drunk, shitlicking sow with delusions of intellect.

Sorry.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 13, 2011, 03:46:10 AM
Quote from: BadBeast on August 13, 2011, 02:17:18 AM
Eartha's my friend, I've known her for years, she *is* who she says she is, and you're all being paranoid.

Has she always talked to people like crap for no apparent reason?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 13, 2011, 04:56:35 AM
Quote from: BadBeast on August 13, 2011, 02:17:18 AM
Eartha's my friend, I've known her for years, she *is* who she says she is, and you're all being paranoid.

You say that like it's a bad thing.   :lulz:



Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 13, 2011, 04:58:04 AM
Quote from: Nigel on August 13, 2011, 02:45:32 AM
Quote from: BadBeast on August 13, 2011, 02:17:18 AM
Eartha's my friend, I've known her for years, she *is* who she says she is, and you're all being paranoid.

Your friend is a stupid, drunk, shitlicking sow with delusions of intellect.

Sorry.

That part doesn't even bother me.

The senseless shitting on everyone who attempts - or doesn't attempt - to have a conversation with her is the part that bothers me.

Maybe Badbeast knows her better than we do.  I can understand that.  Thing is, the way she behaves, I don't want to know her better.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 13, 2011, 04:59:25 AM
Quote from: Doktor Phox on August 13, 2011, 12:38:02 AM
I think the last IP my phone had said it was from Boston, MA.  :lulz:

That's a fairly significant geographic divergence.  Don't know about Australia's geography thoguh, so it might not measure up.

ETA: clarifying.

Frankly, I don't know enough about how phones interact with the internet.  If she's using a phone, for all I know, that's the explanation.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Phox on August 13, 2011, 05:00:40 AM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 13, 2011, 04:59:25 AM
Quote from: Doktor Phox on August 13, 2011, 12:38:02 AM
I think the last IP my phone had said it was from Boston, MA.  :lulz:

That's a fairly significant geographic divergence.  Don't know about Australia's geography thoguh, so it might not measure up.

ETA: clarifying.

Frankly, I don't know enough about how phones interact with the internet.  If she's using a phone, for all I know, that's the explanation.
Could be. I don't really know about it either.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 13, 2011, 05:03:37 AM
Quote from: Doktor Phox on August 13, 2011, 05:00:40 AM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 13, 2011, 04:59:25 AM
Quote from: Doktor Phox on August 13, 2011, 12:38:02 AM
I think the last IP my phone had said it was from Boston, MA.  :lulz:

That's a fairly significant geographic divergence.  Don't know about Australia's geography thoguh, so it might not measure up.

ETA: clarifying.

Frankly, I don't know enough about how phones interact with the internet.  If she's using a phone, for all I know, that's the explanation.
Could be. I don't really know about it either.

Won't stop me from being a paranoid asshole, though.  I gotta be me.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 13, 2011, 05:08:30 AM
Paranoia's got a pretty good track record. I trust it more and more.  :horrormirth:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 13, 2011, 05:22:00 AM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 13, 2011, 05:08:30 AM
Paranoia's got a pretty good track record. I trust it more and more.  :horrormirth:

"A paranoid is merely someone in possession of all the facts."
- Richter Von Tater, 1895
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 13, 2011, 05:46:20 AM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 13, 2011, 05:22:00 AM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 13, 2011, 05:08:30 AM
Paranoia's got a pretty good track record. I trust it more and more.  :horrormirth:

"A paranoid is merely someone in possession of all the facts."
- Richter Von Tater, 1895

Yes. THIS. :mittens:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Cain on August 13, 2011, 05:49:21 AM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 13, 2011, 05:22:00 AM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 13, 2011, 05:08:30 AM
Paranoia's got a pretty good track record. I trust it more and more.  :horrormirth:

"A paranoid is merely someone in possession of all the facts."
- Richter Von Tater, 1895

Paranoia is a state of heightened awareness. Most people are persecuted beyond their wildest delusions.
- psychoanalyst Claude Steiner
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 13, 2011, 05:49:52 AM
Quote from: Cain on August 13, 2011, 05:49:21 AM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 13, 2011, 05:22:00 AM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 13, 2011, 05:08:30 AM
Paranoia's got a pretty good track record. I trust it more and more.  :horrormirth:

"A paranoid is merely someone in possession of all the facts."
- Richter Von Tater, 1895

Paranoia is a state of heightened awareness. Most people are persecuted beyond their wildest delusions.
- psychoanalyst Claude Steiner

Oh, that'll do nicely.   :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 13, 2011, 06:35:47 AM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 13, 2011, 03:46:10 AM
Quote from: BadBeast on August 13, 2011, 02:17:18 AM
Eartha's my friend, I've known her for years, she *is* who she says she is, and you're all being paranoid.

Has she always talked to people like crap for no apparent reason?

The shitting on Freeky for no reason at all... Freeky, who is even polite and classy when she's justifiably pissed off, and who really needs to be shat on like a pretty blooming daffodil needs to be trampled by pigs... that was not OK.

The rest of the shitting could be explained by alcohol-induced reading errors and hangover aggression. But that bit was inexcusable.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Salty on August 13, 2011, 07:05:19 AM
Yeah, calling out Jenne for being a racist xenophobe is STUPID beyond all reason, which is kind of funny in its own way.

But fucking with Freeky is one sure way to PISS THIS GUY
<-------- THE FUCK OFF.

I like Freeky. And I don't care who this fuckface is friends with, she is a shit-stain to me.

E/O/S.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: ñͤͣ̄ͦ̌̑͗͊͛͂͗ ̸̨̨̣̺̼̣̜͙͈͕̮̊̈́̈͂͛̽͊ͭ̓͆ͅé ̰̓̓́ͯ́́͞ on August 13, 2011, 08:51:50 AM
Quote from: BadBeast on August 13, 2011, 02:17:18 AM
Eartha's my friend, I've known her for years, she *is* who she says she is, and you're all being paranoid.

(http://i.imgur.com/sxJ8P.gif)
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: P3nT4gR4m on August 13, 2011, 01:08:46 PM
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on August 12, 2011, 07:51:09 PM
People need to realize that the majority of the testimonials in the newsfeed are accurate.

...needs to be on the newsfeed  :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 13, 2011, 01:58:12 PM
So I've received enough testimonials on her behalf from people who I trust not to lead me astray that I'm satisfied that she is, in fact, Eartha and not some account hijacker or something weird like that.

Of course, the fact that she shared a PM I sent to her with another poster for whom it wasn't intended pretty much negates any and all slack I would ever have been willing to cut her.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 13, 2011, 05:41:15 PM
Dear, dear. MUST these loonies always share/post/read pm's?  :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Cain on August 13, 2011, 05:42:42 PM
What kind of PM did she pass on?  I'm curious as to her motives for doing so.  I mean, if it was you mocking her, and her going to someone else "OMG look at ECH being mean", then that's hilariously tragic. 
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 13, 2011, 05:59:42 PM
In the interest of giving this a chance to die, I'm going to put that line of discussion on hold for now pending a private conversation with ED.

I never forget, but I can on occasion be convinced to think about forgiving. Enough people who I have lots of respect for have asked me to try reason in favor of vitriol that I feel compelled to oblige for now.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Cain on August 13, 2011, 06:05:45 PM
Fair enough.  I suspect this wont work and we'll be back to square one in two months, but I'm willing to be proven wrong.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 13, 2011, 06:10:09 PM
You're a kinder and more forgiving man than I, ECH. Unless she sobers up and apologizes, that diarrhea-stain of an alcoholic bitch is on my permanent shit list.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 13, 2011, 06:19:46 PM
Yeah, an apology is definitely called for here.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Jenne on August 14, 2011, 12:35:20 AM
Um... PISSING. IN. THE. WIND.

Cain's got the right of it and how...
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 14, 2011, 12:58:06 AM
I doubt it'll even take that long.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 14, 2011, 05:56:05 AM
Quote from: Cain on August 13, 2011, 06:05:45 PM
Fair enough.  I suspect this wont work and we'll be back to square one in two months, but I'm willing to be proven wrong.

More like half a day, but I had to try out of respect for mutual friends.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Eartha-ly Delights on August 14, 2011, 06:14:36 AM
Well I have had people butt hurt by that Vindaloo in the past, but never quite in this fashion.

I would like to clarify a few things on the subject of India, Cows, Chilis and Faith. Oh and some basic geography and world history lessons need to be taken first.. Just Junior High Stuff...nothing too challenging.


Now I foolishly thought that the title of a thread being VINDALOO CONTEST denoted some kind of invitation for people to enter different versions of a similar recipe and see whose was hottest. I was so wrong. Freaky obviously meant it was a competition to see who could lick her arse hardest about what a master chef she is.

Equally vain was my expectation that at least a few of you had heard of Goa or knew something of basic European Colonial History. No one does apparently. Not even Cain or One Eye...and at first glance they seemed half bright.. How sad for you all that your Laureates turn out to be wanting.

Now One Eye, so erudite and well informed yet he apparently doesn't know that Goa, on the Northernmost coastal tip of India, was colonised by the Portuguese in the 15th Century. Its population are as a result, primarily Muslim and Christian. Both of which faith groups eat beef. I think you'll all agree, that point about religious demographics is germane to refuting many of the criticisms I received on the beef issue.

Very few Hindus live in the region....they are by way of being quite the tiny minority. Many of them have relocated from the South....  public servants and Military administrators etc...There are quite a few of them there, but they tend to leave again after retirement and go home. So with a two generation Hindu presence (Just those Admin workers and their wives and children) the Hindu population and cultural influence in Goa is small and pocketed.

Being in Northern India the region can be somewhat volatile, though it is cushioned from a lot of strife by a strong regional culture of tolerance, good agriculture and tourism, which has made it quite prosperous. Its cities are very clean and far less crowded than one finds in the South. They are famous for their cooking. Goan food is renowned as sublime and they give cookery lessons in many of the better hotels, just so tourists can experience real Goan cuisine and gain knowledge about Goan culture and history by doing so.

It obviously was $150 well spent for me, as I seem to know ever so much more about the region than any of you.

So no, One Eye...they don't "worship cows or some shit". They do however, eat quite a bit of beef there. From my experiences in the region, I found that they do indeed regard the partaking of dead cow and chili to be quite a traditional element to their lives.

The chili you see, was brought to India when the Portuguese dropped off the first lot of colonists...so again, approx 500 years or more. Now I hope you all do see that 500 years of eating a thing makes it quite the tradition...well in most cultures anyway.

Now should you go, any of you, to Goa (as if) and attempt to tell those people that they worship cows and chili is not a traditional food, I suspect they would have words to say back on the issue.

In fact, please try it. I dare ya. I double dare ya!
Esp. Dok. I'd like to see him say that to a Goan chef. But I hope he can fucken run.

And Cain. This is just for you dear: The powder you buy "all over India" is hotter than fuck and is NOT cayenne based. Cayenne is one of the many varieties of chili that did NOT make it to India with the Portuguese.

The most popular form of chilli in India is the Jwala. A long, slender chili which when unripe has a deep green colour and turns to red as it ripens. Jwala means "Volcano" in Hindi and is extremely pungent.

But the chili which is most often dried and powdered in India, sometimes smoked and dried, and which may look like Cayenne powder but is many times hotter than it, comes from the birdseye, or Dhani chili. As I said. It is not cayenne powder you "find all over India" for the simple reason that cayenne is a pussy's chili...far too mild for the Indian palate. Dhani are also called "Devils Chilis" after their fiery pungency.

Both of these varieties of chili are far hotter than the Cayenne. I know this not due to the miracles of superficial web research, (thank you Nigel for the short lesson at EBG on New World Foods)  but because I learned to cook Indian food from Indian people. From Sikhs and Hindus, Muslims and Christians, Jains and Buddhists. Its a very mufti faith society,  innit?? And multi cuisined as well. (yes I know cuisined is not a word, but it ought to be)

I am sure Cain, you would know that though...being so perceptive and devastatingly bright as you are...and so sensitive to cultural mores and all...had you been to India yourself, rather than relying on gastronomic reports from those of your associates who appear to be more adventurous than you in their choice of holiday destination.

So back we go to my suspicion that this joint might be just the tiniest bit Amerocentrist , innit? For even people with a Eurocentrist view of the world, would have had some high school level knowledge of the culture and religions in former Portuguese colonies such as Goa...being that it's, well you know, a reasonably important period of world history.

And those with an even more inclusive world view might have known, somewhere deep deep down, that not all 1 billion Indians are Hindus.

Now how on earth did I have the temerity to suggest you're all a pack of xenophobic dumb cunts?


Thank you for the patience and courtesy vitriolic abuse, adolescent name calling and paranoid ravings with which I am sure this information will be received.




And no I am sorry, but no matter how hard I try I simply cannot go fuck myself.
I only wish I could. It would have saved me listening to men snore over the years.


(NB: The conspiracy theory shit was comedy gold btw...thanks for that...the Indian-IP-address-inspired-panic section of the skit was especially entertaining.)
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Cain on August 14, 2011, 06:23:58 AM
Someone has never heard of Lal Mirch, then  :lol:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Disco Pickle on August 14, 2011, 06:24:47 AM
tl;df

I do like some goa trance on occasion.

Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on August 14, 2011, 06:28:21 AM
I'm sorry.  I don't speak "long-winded yapping."
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Cain on August 14, 2011, 06:29:44 AM
You know, there is a study I read, a long time ago, in which people managed to make themselves look very smart by asking questions about random facts that only they knew. Apparently the onlookers only noticed that the askers knew and the answerers didn't, and failed to adjust for the unfairness of the underlying game.

But I'm sure Eartha-ly isn't trying to change the topic from her earlier hilariously ill-informed conspiracy theorizing to ground she feels safer on in order to try and prove her superior intellect.

And besides, everyone knows science is bourgeoise, and Eurocentric.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Cain on August 14, 2011, 06:30:40 AM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 14, 2011, 05:56:05 AM
Quote from: Cain on August 13, 2011, 06:05:45 PM
Fair enough.  I suspect this wont work and we'll be back to square one in two months, but I'm willing to be proven wrong.

More like half a day, but I had to try out of respect for mutual friends.

Yeah, I guess I was being overly generous.  Oh well.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on August 14, 2011, 06:32:21 AM
Quote from: Cain on August 14, 2011, 06:29:44 AM
You know, there is a study I read, a long time ago, in which people managed to make themselves look very smart by asking questions about random facts that only they knew. Apparently the onlookers only noticed that the askers knew and the answerers didn't, and failed to adjust for the unfairness of the underlying game.

But I'm sure Eartha-ly isn't trying to change the topic from her earlier hilariously ill-informed conspiracy theorizing to ground she feels safer on in order to try and prove her superior intellect.

And besides, everyone knows science is bourgeoise, and Eurocentric.

Totally!  :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on August 14, 2011, 06:34:18 AM
Holy Christ, is she still going on about the fucking vindaloo thread?  Jesus Fuck.

What part of "stupid recipe thread isn't worth my time to get upset over" do you not understand, you stupid mouthy bitch?  Do I have to fucking type slower?  :lol:  Christ.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 14, 2011, 06:38:13 AM
Oh look, the dog-cunt spoke up to justify her attacks on one of the nicest people on the board, and ignored the specific details about the criticisms about her

how convenient

She must be loaded up on booze again and ready to fire.

BUT SHE CAN JUSTIFY HOW BEEF IS TOTALLY LEGIT IN INDONESIAN COOKING. DERP.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 14, 2011, 06:39:28 AM
She is a fat, stupid, ignorant twat inclined to feel superior because she exists in an environment of fat, stupid, ignorant twats.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on August 14, 2011, 06:41:34 AM
Quote from: Nigel on August 14, 2011, 06:38:13 AM
Oh look, the dog-cunt spoke up to justify her attacks on one of the nicest people on the board, and ignored the specific details about the criticisms about her

how convenient

She must be loaded up on booze again and ready to fire.

BUT SHE CAN JUSTIFY HOW BEEF IS TOTALLY LEGIT IN INDONESIAN COOKING. DERP.

To be totally fair, I'm not as nice as I was when I first got here.  For starters, I enjoy dumping on fat, stupid, mouthy bitches who run their yaps too long.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 14, 2011, 06:54:43 AM
Fuck her. I tried to be reasonable and even borderline-conciliatory and she spit right in my face.

Even accused me of publishing her PI and then deleting it. And then, predictably, went on some bizarre anti-Roger diatribe, as though it was my job to play thought-police on the rest of the posters here.

Dear ED: How exactly do you reconcile your self-professed "anarchism" with your obvious burning need to make sure everybody thinks and acts in a manner that you feel is the correct one?

Shouldn't you start referring to yourself as an "Orthodox Iconoclast" instead?

Oh, and I'm pretty sure almost everybody here knows at least a bit about the history of Goa and the cultural genesis of their cuisine and why it differs so much from the milieu of "indian" food (which is really comprised of 7 or 8 different mother cuisines depending on how you count it).

I'm pretty sure everyone also knows how predictable you are and how easy it is to wind you up and watch you go. It's almost irresistably fun. You're like one of those pull-string dolls, only when we pull your string you stuff your head up your own ass and start screeching some muffled screed about identity politics.

Funny, isn't it, how the people who make the most noise about things like "equality" are the quickest to resort to language and thought processes that, essentially, serve no purpose but to delineate the most superficial of differences.

Nobody here cares what color your skin is, or what you have dangling from your crotch, or who you vote for.

For most of us, there are only two categories of mostly-hairless primates:

Are you a biped who knows what it means to walk upright? Or are you not?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Pæs on August 14, 2011, 06:55:50 AM
Isn't this thread about anarchy anymore?
:x

I can't keep up.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 14, 2011, 06:57:15 AM
Indeed it is. The post I just made contains all of the insight into "anarchy" that anyone over the age of 5 should need. :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Eartha-ly Delights on August 14, 2011, 07:04:23 AM
Quote from: Cain on August 14, 2011, 06:29:44 AM
You know, there is a study I read, a long time ago, in which people managed to make themselves look very smart by asking questions about random facts that only they knew. Apparently the onlookers only noticed that the askers knew and the answerers didn't, and failed to adjust for the unfairness of the underlying game.

But I'm sure Eartha-ly isn't trying to change the topic from her earlier hilariously ill-informed conspiracy theorizing to ground she feels safer on in order to try and prove her superior intellect.

And besides, everyone knows science is bourgeoise, and Eurocentric.

I stand by my conspiracy theories you arrogant little arsewipe.....mine have at least more basis in fact than the awe inspiringly paranoid ones disseminated here in the last 24-36 hours. The Great Eartha/Capt Utopia Sub Continental Take Over Conspiracy...remember that one?

Christ it sounded like a meeting of Paranoid Delusionals Anonymous.

And I will also point out that there are a great deal more than a tiny number of people who are bright enough to know that not all Indians are Hindu...but that most of them do traditionally eat chili.....Such people are just not often found on pd apparently.

Oh and the reason why I seemed to hate Dok as much as that Utopia dude did is simple...Dok is really good at inspiring hatred. Seems to be one of his few natural talents.

Spoofing pagan porn fiction is certainly not one of them.

**Yawns** Even he got bored with it.

Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Salty on August 14, 2011, 07:06:26 AM
With no clear idea of who ED was I totally expected this thread to turn this way from the title alone. Okay, maybe not exactly this way. There was no way to anticipate ED's severe and irredeemable stupidity.

It was inevitable and should be sticked for future reference.

Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Pæs on August 14, 2011, 07:12:01 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 14, 2011, 07:04:23 AM
The Great Eartha/Capt Utopia Sub Continental Take Over Conspiracy...remember that one?

Christ it sounded like a meeting of Paranoid Delusionals Anonymous.
What you fail to realise is that these conspiracy theories are born out of a blind optimism most of the posters taking part will deny possessing.
It's easier to handle the return of a previous troll, deliberately being a fuckwit to upset, than to acknowledge the existence of more than one such character. It makes me sad to consider that both you and CU exist. When you were both CU, I could more easily dismiss the fuckwittery as anomalous and keep my palm off my face.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Cain on August 14, 2011, 07:12:30 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 14, 2011, 07:04:23 AM
I stand by my conspiracy theories you arrogant little arsewipe.....

Yeah.  Well...yeah.  I wouldn't expect anything less.  Doesn't make them any less retarded, though  :lol:

Quotemine have at least more basis in fact than the awe inspiringly paranoid ones disseminated here in the last 24-36 hours. The Great Eartha/Capt Utopia Sub Continental Take Over Conspiracy...remember that one?

Except there was an actual anomaly noted, and a concern made....oh yes, and no-one is still vainly clutching to such a theory, claiming that it is still right and those who disagree are "arrogant little arsewipes".

QuoteChrist it sounded like a meeting of Paranoid Delusionals Anonymous.

Meanwhile, suspecting the riots were a false-flag op because, after a day of rioting, some people warned there may be riots in their area, is proof of a sound, functioning mind, right?

Also, no clever reply concerning Lal Mirch, I notice.   :lol:

But please, do go on.  You're providing excellent comic relief from this essay I'm writing.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 14, 2011, 07:22:14 AM
I've got $5 that says we're wasting our time with a raging alcoholic who can't get over her "glory days" of sticking it to The Man back in the 80's by trading pirated cassette tapes.

I hope that wagering in USD doesn't expose my Americentrism.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Cain on August 14, 2011, 07:26:43 AM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 14, 2011, 07:22:14 AM
I've got $5 that says we're wasting our time with a raging alcoholic who can't get over her "glory days" of sticking it to The Man back in the 80's by trading pirated cassette tapes.

I hope that wagering in USD doesn't expose my Americentrism.

By betting in dollars, you are only perpetuating US economic hegemony over the former, so-called "Third World" and denying, in a very material sense, the worth of their contributions to the global economy.

I'm going to have to do this as a troll, at some point.  See, this thread wasn't entirely worthless.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Triple Zero on August 14, 2011, 11:59:19 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 14, 2011, 06:14:36 AMNow One Eye, so erudite and well informed yet he apparently doesn't know that Goa, on the Northernmost coastal tip of India

Ummmmm

Goa is located in South West India, and unless your map is upside-down, India doesn't even have a Northern coast, unless Pakistan and Nepal sunk into the ocean since last time I checked.

Quotewas colonised by the Portuguese in the 15th Century. Its population are as a result, primarily Muslim and Christian.

65% Hindu, 26% Christian and 6% Muslim, actually.

QuoteBoth of which faith groups eat beef. I think you'll all agree, that point about religious demographics is germane to refuting many of the criticisms I received on the beef issue.

How the fuck is it traditional if the Portuguese imported it?! :lol:

QuoteThe chili you see, was brought to India when the Portuguese dropped off the first lot of colonists...so again, approx 500 years or more. Now I hope you all do see that 500 years of eating a thing makes it quite the tradition...well in most cultures anyway.

If you ignore the other 9500 years of their history, sure!

Maybe if you're an "Americentric" middle-class white person, then yes, 300 years must seem like quite a tradition to you :lulz:

QuoteNow should you go, any of you, to Goa (as if) and attempt to tell those people that they worship cows and chili is not a traditional food, I suspect they would have words to say back on the issue.

Everybody knows that all the people in Goa are continuously fucked up on shrooms and LSD, dancing to repetitive beats and wonderfully twisted melody lines and that you shouldn't trust their words any further than a machine-elf can throw a glow stick.

It's quite the tradition, you know.


QuoteFor even people with a Eurocentrist view of the world, would have had some high school level knowledge of the culture and religions in former Portuguese colonies such as Goa...being that it's, well you know, a reasonably important period of world history.

:lulz:

That's a kinda .. ummm "Portu-goa-centrist" [as long as we insist on making up words] worldview.

You know why the period was reasonably important in world history? Because everybody was colonizing shit all over the fucking place causing multitudes of cultural upheavals every fucking where.

So, during my terribly Dutch-o-centric highschool education, when it came to colonial times, I mostly learned about these tiny green bits (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/ff/Dutch_Empire35.PNG) and not about who specifically brought beef and chilis to where.

QuoteNow how on earth did I have the temerity to suggest you're all a pack of xenophobic dumb cunts?

Because you're an idiot?

QuoteThank you for the patience and courtesy vitriolic abuse, adolescent name calling and paranoid ravings with which I am sure this information will be received.

SHIT POOP BUTT FART LOL YOU STINK

AND YOUR UGLY

AND A MORAN

MY GOD WHAT IS THAT SMELL IT'S LIKE ALL OF INDIA CONCENTRATED IN ONE PERSON*




(* that's not xenophobic, it actually does stink in India )
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Triple Zero on August 14, 2011, 12:06:47 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 14, 2011, 06:54:43 AM
Oh, and I'm pretty sure almost everybody here knows at least a bit about the history of Goa and the cultural genesis of their cuisine and why it differs so much from the milieu of "indian" food (which is really comprised of 7 or 8 different mother cuisines depending on how you count it).

I MOST CERTAINLY DID NOT

BECAUSE I'M TRIPLE ZEROCENTRIC

BEEF
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: P3nT4gR4m on August 14, 2011, 12:22:28 PM
Can we get back to anarchy, pls? I mean this retarded curry-based thing is funny, yeah, especially trip's reply but "anarchy is teh gud" is miles better
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 14, 2011, 01:24:39 PM
The best part of all this is that it will probably never sink in for ED that if she got her way and the world became one big anarchist utopia...

...it would just be full of people like us.

:lulz:


PD.com: Giving the people what they demand since 2006
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Triple Zero on August 14, 2011, 01:49:06 PM
Quote from: P3nT4gR4m on August 14, 2011, 12:22:28 PM
Can we get back to anarchy, pls? I mean this retarded curry-based thing is funny, yeah, especially trip's reply but "anarchy is teh gud" is miles better

You're so Anarchocentric!! :argh!:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Cainad (dec.) on August 14, 2011, 03:56:50 PM
Quote from: Triple Zero on August 14, 2011, 01:49:06 PM
Quote from: P3nT4gR4m on August 14, 2011, 12:22:28 PM
Can we get back to anarchy, pls? I mean this retarded curry-based thing is funny, yeah, especially trip's reply but "anarchy is teh gud" is miles better

You're so Anarchocentric!! :argh!:

I've noticed your arguments have a tendency towards Centrocentrism.

Care to fucking explain yourself, mister??
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Adios on August 14, 2011, 03:59:40 PM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 14, 2011, 07:04:23 AM
Quote from: Cain on August 14, 2011, 06:29:44 AM
You know, there is a study I read, a long time ago, in which people managed to make themselves look very smart by asking questions about random facts that only they knew. Apparently the onlookers only noticed that the askers knew and the answerers didn't, and failed to adjust for the unfairness of the underlying game.

But I'm sure Eartha-ly isn't trying to change the topic from her earlier hilariously ill-informed conspiracy theorizing to ground she feels safer on in order to try and prove her superior intellect.

And besides, everyone knows science is bourgeoise, and Eurocentric.

I stand by my conspiracy theories you arrogant little arsewipe.....mine have at least more basis in fact than the awe inspiringly paranoid ones disseminated here in the last 24-36 hours. The Great Eartha/Capt Utopia Sub Continental Take Over Conspiracy...remember that one?

Christ it sounded like a meeting of Paranoid Delusionals Anonymous.

And I will also point out that there are a great deal more than a tiny number of people who are bright enough to know that not all Indians are Hindu...but that most of them do traditionally eat chili.....Such people are just not often found on pd apparently.

Oh and the reason why I seemed to hate Dok as much as that Utopia dude did is simple...Dok is really good at inspiring hatred. Seems to be one of his few natural talents.

Spoofing pagan porn fiction is certainly not one of them.

**Yawns** Even he got bored with it.



Damn ED, I stood up for you here. We're still friends, but swallowing a little pride and moving on would have made a far less thorny bed for you.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Don Coyote on August 14, 2011, 04:38:55 PM
DAMNIT TRIP I LAUGHED SO HARD I HAVE TO POOMP!!!!!!!!!!!! :argh!: :argh!: :argh!: :argh!: :argh!: :argh!: :argh!: :argh!: :argh!: :lulz: :lulz: :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 14, 2011, 05:30:43 PM
Quote from: Signor Paesior on August 14, 2011, 07:12:01 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 14, 2011, 07:04:23 AM
The Great Eartha/Capt Utopia Sub Continental Take Over Conspiracy...remember that one?

Christ it sounded like a meeting of Paranoid Delusionals Anonymous.
What you fail to realise is that these conspiracy theories are born out of a blind optimism most of the posters taking part will deny possessing.
It's easier to handle the return of a previous troll, deliberately being a fuckwit to upset, than to acknowledge the existence of more than one such character. It makes me sad to consider that both you and CU exist. When you were both CU, I could more easily dismiss the fuckwittery as anomalous and keep my palm off my face.

This. Not to mention the flickering hope that someone professing to be a friend of Charley and Badbeast wasn't actually such a shitstain.

Also, again, her reading comprehension is ASTONISHINGLY bad; I wasn't claiming Indians don't eat peppers, I was pointing out that, as chili peppers are a New World food, it's absurd to criticize an Old World recipe for using "untraditional" peppers.
:lulz:

Also, I don't think she knows what cayenne pepper IS. She clearly doesn't know much about either the botany or history of chili peppers in Old World cooking, which makes it extra funny that she's trying to act all superior about it.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 14, 2011, 05:32:09 PM
Quote from: Cain on August 14, 2011, 06:23:58 AM
Someone has never heard of Lal Mirch, then  :lol:

:lulz:

Well, she's an Australian who used to have a neighbor from Indonesia, which makes her an expert, and if she's never heard of it, IT DOESN'T EXIST.  :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 14, 2011, 06:55:07 PM
In the strings of PMs I have exchanged with her she has both attacked me for posts that were actually made by other people and complained to me about horrible things Dok has said to her that were actually said by me.

Like I said, I've got five amerocentric dollars on "raging alcoholic".
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 14, 2011, 07:09:41 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 14, 2011, 06:55:07 PM
In the strings of PMs I have exchanged with her she has both attacked me for posts that were actually made by other people and complained to me about horrible things Dok has said to her that were actually said by me.

Like I said, I've got five amerocentric dollars on "raging alcoholic".

Yep, her inability to understand what's being written, or to keep track of who wrote it and when it was written, kinda points to "drunk most of the time and fucked-up hungover the rest".
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Cain on August 14, 2011, 07:12:58 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 14, 2011, 05:32:09 PM
Quote from: Cain on August 14, 2011, 06:23:58 AM
Someone has never heard of Lal Mirch, then  :lol:

:lulz:

Well, she's an Australian who used to have a neighbor from Indonesia, which makes her an expert, and if she's never heard of it, IT DOESN'T EXIST.  :lulz:

Well, you know, Indonesia, India...all those countries starting with I are pretty much the same.  And of course, her neighbour's testimony counts for a lot more than my friends (who backpacked around India for a year) because, er, it does.  No, it DOES. Shut up, it's TOTALLY more credible. 

Also, nice catch by Trip.  Can't believe I missed that blatant mistake about Goa...I'm going to put it down to Eartha-ly's stupidity being too painful to read in depth.  Or I was tired.  One or the other.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on August 14, 2011, 07:14:08 PM
Quote from: Cain on August 14, 2011, 07:12:58 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 14, 2011, 05:32:09 PM
Quote from: Cain on August 14, 2011, 06:23:58 AM
Someone has never heard of Lal Mirch, then  :lol:

:lulz:

Well, she's an Australian who used to have a neighbor from Indonesia, which makes her an expert, and if she's never heard of it, IT DOESN'T EXIST.  :lulz:

Well, you know, Indonesia, India...all those countries starting with I are pretty much the same.  And of course, her neighbour's testimony counts for a lot more than my friends (who backpacked around India for a year) because, er, it does.  No, it DOES. Shut up, it's TOTALLY more credible. 

Also, nice catch by Trip.  Can't believe I missed that blatant mistake about Goa...I'm going to put it down to Eartha-ly's stupidity being too painful to read in depth.  Or I was tired.  One or the other.

Possibly both, and more of the first one. :lol:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Cainad (dec.) on August 14, 2011, 07:53:15 PM
Quote from: Cain on August 14, 2011, 07:12:58 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 14, 2011, 05:32:09 PM
Quote from: Cain on August 14, 2011, 06:23:58 AM
Someone has never heard of Lal Mirch, then  :lol:

:lulz:

Well, she's an Australian who used to have a neighbor from Indonesia, which makes her an expert, and if she's never heard of it, IT DOESN'T EXIST.  :lulz:

Well, you know, Indonesia, India...all those countries starting with I are pretty much the same.  And of course, her neighbour's testimony counts for a lot more than my friends (who backpacked around India for a year) because, er, it does.  No, it DOES. Shut up, it's TOTALLY more credible. 

Also, nice catch by Trip.  Can't believe I missed that blatant mistake about Goa...I'm going to put it down to Eartha-ly's stupidity being too painful to read in depth.  Or I was tired.  One or the other.

Yeah, same here. I remember being vaguely aware of something wrong when I read that from ED, but I think it was so skullfuckingly stupid that I mentally filtered it out and did not take the opportunity for mockery.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Triple Zero on August 14, 2011, 08:04:40 PM
So, what's the connection with Indonesia now, then? Because they don't make vindaloo there. And they didn't get colonized by the Portuguese but by us (wasn't very nice of us btw), and we didn't bring our cuisine over there, but we took their cuisine to over here, which was a much better idea cause Dutch cuisine was kinda boring at the time.
(see it's actually true what I said with my Dutch-o-centric history lessons, I know this from the top of my head but I had to look up the Portugal/Goa connection)
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Cain on August 14, 2011, 08:11:44 PM
All non-European countries starting with an I are exactly the same.  India, Iran, Indonesia, Israel...spicy food and nuclear weapons and funny religions and brown people.  All of them.

Stop being so Americancentric, Trip.

(seriously though, while Indonesia and India do have a lot of shared culture and history, it doesn't mean someone from Indonesia is necessarily up on what Indians are using in their cooking )
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 14, 2011, 08:27:59 PM
Especially since Indonesian cuisine is most heavily influenced by the Chinese and Malay traders that have been active in the region for a few hundred years, whereas "Indian" cuisine (again, this consists of 7 or 8 sometimes wildly differing mother cuisines) is, for the most part, pretty indigenous with the notable exception of Goan cuisine.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Cain on August 14, 2011, 08:43:24 PM
Indeed.

In the case of Indonesia, I was mostly think of Sumatran dishes having some overlap with India (and the Middle East), but even there a lot of Malaysian influences can be readily seen. 

This thread is reminding me I was going to learn Indonesian as well.  I should get on with that. 
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 14, 2011, 08:57:03 PM
One of the starkest differences is that though both regions rely heavily on curries (an extremely broad term to begin with), Indian curries tend to be made from dried/roasted/ground spices while Malay/Thai/Indonesian curries tend to use fresh ingredients ground into a wet paste.

Also I have never seen galangal used in any Indian curries while it is a staple in very nearly every SE Asian curry I know of, whereas Fenugreek is completely absent from those but present in many if not most Indian curries.

(waiting for ED to pop in and tell me I'm wrong because of all the coconut and galangal-based curries to be found on the Kashmiri coast.)
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 14, 2011, 08:59:17 PM
Of course, since this thread is about anarchy I probably shouldn't be talking about culinary traditions that border on being RULES. :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 14, 2011, 09:00:17 PM
I don't actually recall if she said her neighbor was Indonesian, I just threw that into the logic-salad of nonsense she was spouting because I didn't feel like going back and looking it up again.

Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 14, 2011, 09:01:43 PM
Oh, and didn't she throw something in there about having taken a cooking class once?  During which, she apparently learned that the Portuguese didn't import Capsicum Annuum to India. :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Cain on August 14, 2011, 09:02:40 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 14, 2011, 09:00:17 PM
I don't actually recall if she said her neighbor was Indonesian, I just threw that into the logic-salad of nonsense she was spouting because I didn't feel like going back and looking it up again.

Well, I can perfectly understand that sentiment.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Cain on August 14, 2011, 09:06:36 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 14, 2011, 08:57:03 PM
One of the starkest differences is that though both regions rely heavily on curries (an extremely broad term to begin with), Indian curries tend to be made from dried/roasted/ground spices while Malay/Thai/Indonesian curries tend to use fresh ingredients ground into a wet paste.

Also I have never seen galangal used in any Indian curries while it is a staple in very nearly every SE Asian curry I know of, whereas Fenugreek is completely absent from those but present in many if not most Indian curries.

(waiting for ED to pop in and tell me I'm wrong because of all the coconut and galangal-based curries to be found on the Kashmiri coast.)

Also you'll be criticized for bringing up Kashmir in a topic about Indian food.  Because of your Americancentric hatred of the rights of the Kashmiri population to join with their Pakistani bretheren.  You are privileging a chauvinistic Indian-nationalist discourse simply by mentioning them in such a context.

(I can't think why it never occured to me to use post-structuralist/postcolonial jargon as part of a troll before.  I mean, most people who use such terminology are professional trolls anyway).
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Cain on August 14, 2011, 09:09:01 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 14, 2011, 09:01:43 PM
Oh, and didn't she throw something in there about having taken a cooking class once?  

Well, if that is the basis of her authority, myself and ECH have her beaten hands down already.  I really hope that is the case  :lol:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: East Coast Hustle on August 14, 2011, 11:03:58 PM
Right? If "taking a cooking class" is her claim to a base of knowledge in the subject, you're basically Alain Ducasse and I'm like a culinary Deep Blue. :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: President Television on August 15, 2011, 04:56:19 AM
This thread makes my head hurt in the most wonderful way.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on August 15, 2011, 04:58:00 AM
 :drama1:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Salty on August 15, 2011, 05:11:14 AM
The best part is she's just going to get shitfaced again and set us all straight on all manner of subjects. It's a like a gum-ball machine that keeps sticking money in itself.

Except the money is booze and gum is also booze.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Bu🤠ns on August 15, 2011, 05:25:03 AM
OH HEY folks...whats u----

...oh....

I see.....


well....


This schtick again.  :penis:
:tgrr::1fap:

PRAISE "BOB!"

ALL HAIL DISCORDIA!


Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Cain on August 15, 2011, 06:14:19 AM
It's like a slinky.

A slinky of stupid, which goes "derp" as it goes down each step of the stairs.

Only in this case, the stairs are endless.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Salty on August 15, 2011, 06:16:51 AM
Everybody loves a slinky.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 15, 2011, 06:53:06 AM
Quote from: Alty on August 15, 2011, 05:11:14 AM
The best part is she's just going to get shitfaced again and set us all straight on all manner of subjects. It's a like a gum-ball machine that keeps sticking money in itself.

Except the money is booze and gum is also booze.

:lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 15, 2011, 06:57:58 AM
Quote from: Cain on August 15, 2011, 06:14:19 AM
It's like a slinky.

A slinky of stupid, which goes "derp" as it goes down each step of the stairs.

Only in this case, the stairs are endless.

:lulz: :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Pæs on August 15, 2011, 07:24:20 AM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 14, 2011, 06:14:36 AM
I would like to clarify a few things on the subject of India.
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 14, 2011, 06:14:36 AM
Oh and some basic geography and world history lessons need to be taken first.. Just Junior High Stuff...nothing too challenging.

I seem to know ever so much more about the region than any of you.

So no, One Eye...they don't "worship cows or some shit".

(NB: The conspiracy theory shit was comedy gold btw...thanks for that...the Indian-IP-address-inspired-panic section of the skit was especially entertaining.)


Did anyone actually accuse ED of being from India?

Because otherwise I'd expect someone with such a detailed understanding of India, Indonesia and Indiana to know that Pukatja Homeland isn't in India at all. Further, I'd expect a learned Australian (OXYMORON LOLOL! OBLIGATORY INSULT FROM A KIWI, INNIT?) to perhaps recognise it as being one of the main Aboriginal communities in their own backyard. Perhaps we can excuse this oversight as being symptomatic of her alchocentricism.

And in response to the italics above:

Quote from: Charley Brown on August 12, 2011, 09:48:12 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 12, 2011, 09:26:02 PM
:lulz: @ the irony of calling someone out on the authenticity of their indian food recipe and then claiming that you have an awesome indian recipe that uses beef.
Indians don't eat beef? Oh, shit, right, disregard the brain fart. They worship cows or some shit like that, right?
Leave Charley alone, you horrible boozy fuck. What did he do to draw the attention of your wild, slurred wrath?

Now I'd appreciate you clearing up some of your terms, because I'm not sure what you mean by some of the labels you're putting on the posters here. Without using "middle class apologists for the status quo" explain exactly which behaviours this theory allows us to display and which would be evidence of your hypothesis being flawed.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Cain on August 15, 2011, 07:43:40 AM
:mittens:

It's painful to read some her posts, but they really are lulz-mines.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 15, 2011, 11:49:12 AM
There's an LOLCOW joke in here somewhere.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 15, 2011, 05:44:15 PM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 14, 2011, 07:04:23 AM
Oh and the reason why I seemed to hate Dok as much as that Utopia dude did is simple...Dok is really good at inspiring hatred. Seems to be one of his few natural talents.

The other one is sucking cigarette smoke into my mouth, and having it leak out of my tear ducts.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 15, 2011, 05:46:16 PM
Quote from: Eartha-ly Delights on August 14, 2011, 06:14:36 AM
Well I have had people butt hurt by that Vindaloo in the past, but never quite in this fashion.

I would like to clarify a few things on the subject of India, Cows, Chilis and Faith. Oh and some basic geography and world history lessons need to be taken first.. Just Junior High Stuff...nothing too challenging.


Now I foolishly thought that the title of a thread being VINDALOO CONTEST denoted some kind of invitation for people to enter different versions of a similar recipe and see whose was hottest. I was so wrong. Freaky obviously meant it was a competition to see who could lick her arse hardest about what a master chef she is.

Equally vain was my expectation that at least a few of you had heard of Goa or knew something of basic European Colonial History. No one does apparently. Not even Cain or One Eye...and at first glance they seemed half bright.. How sad for you all that your Laureates turn out to be wanting.

Now One Eye, so erudite and well informed yet he apparently doesn't know that Goa, on the Northernmost coastal tip of India, was colonised by the Portuguese in the 15th Century. Its population are as a result, primarily Muslim and Christian. Both of which faith groups eat beef. I think you'll all agree, that point about religious demographics is germane to refuting many of the criticisms I received on the beef issue.

Very few Hindus live in the region....they are by way of being quite the tiny minority. Many of them have relocated from the South....  public servants and Military administrators etc...There are quite a few of them there, but they tend to leave again after retirement and go home. So with a two generation Hindu presence (Just those Admin workers and their wives and children) the Hindu population and cultural influence in Goa is small and pocketed.

Being in Northern India the region can be somewhat volatile, though it is cushioned from a lot of strife by a strong regional culture of tolerance, good agriculture and tourism, which has made it quite prosperous. Its cities are very clean and far less crowded than one finds in the South. They are famous for their cooking. Goan food is renowned as sublime and they give cookery lessons in many of the better hotels, just so tourists can experience real Goan cuisine and gain knowledge about Goan culture and history by doing so.

It obviously was $150 well spent for me, as I seem to know ever so much more about the region than any of you.

So no, One Eye...they don't "worship cows or some shit". They do however, eat quite a bit of beef there. From my experiences in the region, I found that they do indeed regard the partaking of dead cow and chili to be quite a traditional element to their lives.

The chili you see, was brought to India when the Portuguese dropped off the first lot of colonists...so again, approx 500 years or more. Now I hope you all do see that 500 years of eating a thing makes it quite the tradition...well in most cultures anyway.

Now should you go, any of you, to Goa (as if) and attempt to tell those people that they worship cows and chili is not a traditional food, I suspect they would have words to say back on the issue.

In fact, please try it. I dare ya. I double dare ya!
Esp. Dok. I'd like to see him say that to a Goan chef. But I hope he can fucken run.

And Cain. This is just for you dear: The powder you buy "all over India" is hotter than fuck and is NOT cayenne based. Cayenne is one of the many varieties of chili that did NOT make it to India with the Portuguese.

The most popular form of chilli in India is the Jwala. A long, slender chili which when unripe has a deep green colour and turns to red as it ripens. Jwala means "Volcano" in Hindi and is extremely pungent.

But the chili which is most often dried and powdered in India, sometimes smoked and dried, and which may look like Cayenne powder but is many times hotter than it, comes from the birdseye, or Dhani chili. As I said. It is not cayenne powder you "find all over India" for the simple reason that cayenne is a pussy's chili...far too mild for the Indian palate. Dhani are also called "Devils Chilis" after their fiery pungency.

Both of these varieties of chili are far hotter than the Cayenne. I know this not due to the miracles of superficial web research, (thank you Nigel for the short lesson at EBG on New World Foods)  but because I learned to cook Indian food from Indian people. From Sikhs and Hindus, Muslims and Christians, Jains and Buddhists. Its a very mufti faith society,  innit?? And multi cuisined as well. (yes I know cuisined is not a word, but it ought to be)

I am sure Cain, you would know that though...being so perceptive and devastatingly bright as you are...and so sensitive to cultural mores and all...had you been to India yourself, rather than relying on gastronomic reports from those of your associates who appear to be more adventurous than you in their choice of holiday destination.

So back we go to my suspicion that this joint might be just the tiniest bit Amerocentrist , innit? For even people with a Eurocentrist view of the world, would have had some high school level knowledge of the culture and religions in former Portuguese colonies such as Goa...being that it's, well you know, a reasonably important period of world history.

And those with an even more inclusive world view might have known, somewhere deep deep down, that not all 1 billion Indians are Hindus.

Now how on earth did I have the temerity to suggest you're all a pack of xenophobic dumb cunts?


Thank you for the patience and courtesy vitriolic abuse, adolescent name calling and paranoid ravings with which I am sure this information will be received.




And no I am sorry, but no matter how hard I try I simply cannot go fuck myself.
I only wish I could. It would have saved me listening to men snore over the years.


(NB: The conspiracy theory shit was comedy gold btw...thanks for that...the Indian-IP-address-inspired-panic section of the skit was especially entertaining.)


Wow.

2.5 tons of pure butthurt (that's 7 kilometers for you metric spags).

Best shipment since Bhode.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 15, 2011, 05:47:04 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 14, 2011, 06:55:07 PM
In the strings of PMs I have exchanged with her she has both attacked me for posts that were actually made by other people and complained to me about horrible things Dok has said to her that were actually said by me.

Like I said, I've got five amerocentric dollars on "raging alcoholic".

Well, obviously, I MADE you say that shit.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: ñͤͣ̄ͦ̌̑͗͊͛͂͗ ̸̨̨̣̺̼̣̜͙͈͕̮̊̈́̈͂͛̽͊ͭ̓͆ͅé ̰̓̓́ͯ́́͞ on August 15, 2011, 06:19:33 PM
Hey guys, I learned the entirety of Indian cookery in a druggy tourist trap,

Your argument is invalid.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 15, 2011, 06:46:06 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 15, 2011, 05:47:04 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 14, 2011, 06:55:07 PM
In the strings of PMs I have exchanged with her she has both attacked me for posts that were actually made by other people and complained to me about horrible things Dok has said to her that were actually said by me.

Like I said, I've got five amerocentric dollars on "raging alcoholic".

Well, obviously, I MADE you say that shit.

WIT YOUR MIND-LAZORS.  :lulz:

All the amazingly erroriffic factual errors would make me think she was trolling, if she weren't a friend of Charley and Badbeast. Because, seriously, being a complete uptight self-righteous cunt and condescendingly correcting people while simultaneously presenting completely erroneous information that is easily checked does make for a superb troll.

It's kind of mind-boggling that she's not, and that all this butthurt and misinformation is sincere. :lulz:.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 15, 2011, 06:48:26 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 15, 2011, 06:46:06 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 15, 2011, 05:47:04 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on August 14, 2011, 06:55:07 PM
In the strings of PMs I have exchanged with her she has both attacked me for posts that were actually made by other people and complained to me about horrible things Dok has said to her that were actually said by me.

Like I said, I've got five amerocentric dollars on "raging alcoholic".

Well, obviously, I MADE you say that shit.

WIT YOUR MIND-LAZORS.  :lulz:

All the amazingly erroriffic factual errors would make me think she was trolling, if she weren't a friend of Charley and Badbeast. Because, seriously, being a complete uptight self-righteous cunt and condescendingly correcting people while simultaneously presenting completely erroneous information that is easily checked does make for a superb troll.

It's kind of mind-boggling that she's not, and that all this butthurt and misinformation is sincere. :lulz:.

It is bad to be sincere, if you also happen to be stupid.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 15, 2011, 06:55:03 PM
Between placing Goa on the "northernmost coastal tip of India" and claiming that "cayenne didn't make it to India with the Portuguese", that "Hindus are a tiny minority" there, and how cayenne is "a pussy pepper", and then going off about how the most popular pepper variety there is Jwala (which is a varietal of cayenne pepper), drunkfuck here has performed some of the most massive self-ownage I've ever seen online.

:lulz:

It's like art, only stupider.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: LMNO on August 15, 2011, 07:05:00 PM
I'd just like to pause a minute here and recognize
Quote from: Signor Paesior on August 15, 2011, 07:24:20 AM
alchocentricism
As extremely mitten-worthy.

:mittens:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 15, 2011, 07:05:22 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 15, 2011, 06:55:03 PM
Between placing Goa on the "northernmost coastal tip of India" and claiming that "cayenne didn't make it to India with the Portuguese", that "Hindus are a tiny minority" there, and how cayenne is "a pussy pepper", and then going off about how the most popular pepper variety there is Jwala (which is a varietal of cayenne pepper), drunkfuck here has performed some of the most massive self-ownage I've ever seen online.

:lulz:

It's like art, only stupider.


Who says stupidity can't be a form of art?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 15, 2011, 07:34:13 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 15, 2011, 07:05:22 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 15, 2011, 06:55:03 PM
Between placing Goa on the "northernmost coastal tip of India" and claiming that "cayenne didn't make it to India with the Portuguese", that "Hindus are a tiny minority" there, and how cayenne is "a pussy pepper", and then going off about how the most popular pepper variety there is Jwala (which is a varietal of cayenne pepper), drunkfuck here has performed some of the most massive self-ownage I've ever seen online.

:lulz:

It's like art, only stupider.


Who says stupidity can't be a form of art?

If it is, Eartha is a MASTER.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on August 15, 2011, 07:37:24 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 15, 2011, 07:34:13 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 15, 2011, 07:05:22 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 15, 2011, 06:55:03 PM
Between placing Goa on the "northernmost coastal tip of India" and claiming that "cayenne didn't make it to India with the Portuguese", that "Hindus are a tiny minority" there, and how cayenne is "a pussy pepper", and then going off about how the most popular pepper variety there is Jwala (which is a varietal of cayenne pepper), drunkfuck here has performed some of the most massive self-ownage I've ever seen online.

:lulz:

It's like art, only stupider.


Who says stupidity can't be a form of art?

If it is, Eartha is a MASTER.

She is the Michaelangelo of Derp.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on August 15, 2011, 07:47:09 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 15, 2011, 07:37:24 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 15, 2011, 07:34:13 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 15, 2011, 07:05:22 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 15, 2011, 06:55:03 PM
Between placing Goa on the "northernmost coastal tip of India" and claiming that "cayenne didn't make it to India with the Portuguese", that "Hindus are a tiny minority" there, and how cayenne is "a pussy pepper", and then going off about how the most popular pepper variety there is Jwala (which is a varietal of cayenne pepper), drunkfuck here has performed some of the most massive self-ownage I've ever seen online.

:lulz:

It's like art, only stupider.


Who says stupidity can't be a form of art?

If it is, Eartha is a MASTER.

She is the Michaelangelo of Derp.

:lulz: :lulz: :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Pæs on August 15, 2011, 08:15:49 PM
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on August 15, 2011, 07:05:00 PM
I'd just like to pause a minute here and recognize
Quote from: Signor Paesior on August 15, 2011, 07:24:20 AM
alchocentricism
As extremely mitten-worthy.

:mittens:
:thanks:

Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 15, 2011, 07:37:24 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 15, 2011, 07:34:13 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on August 15, 2011, 07:05:22 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 15, 2011, 06:55:03 PM
Between placing Goa on the "northernmost coastal tip of India" and claiming that "cayenne didn't make it to India with the Portuguese", that "Hindus are a tiny minority" there, and how cayenne is "a pussy pepper", and then going off about how the most popular pepper variety there is Jwala (which is a varietal of cayenne pepper), drunkfuck here has performed some of the most massive self-ownage I've ever seen online.

:lulz:

It's like art, only stupider.


Who says stupidity can't be a form of art?

If it is, Eartha is a MASTER.

She is the Michaelangelo of Derp.
:lol:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Triple Zero on August 15, 2011, 08:56:09 PM
Derpatello?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Anna Mae Bollocks on August 15, 2011, 09:36:46 PM
Derpatardo da Pinche.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Pæs on October 04, 2011, 11:05:30 AM
TOO SOON TO BUMP?

FUCK Y'ALL, THIS THREAD IS BOOTIFUL.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Jenne on October 04, 2011, 04:14:31 PM
Paes, you old shit-stirrer you.  :lulz:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on October 04, 2011, 09:39:25 PM
Oh, shit. Good times! :lulz:

Whatever happened to old Eartha, anyway? She seems to have skulked off with her hail between her legs.

Maybe she's just too drunk to use the internet.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Cain on October 04, 2011, 09:57:30 PM
She still logs on frequently.

However, the lail has all but dried up  :sad:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on October 04, 2011, 10:09:55 PM
Quote from: Cain on October 04, 2011, 09:57:30 PM
She still logs on frequently.

However, the lail has all but dried up  :sad:

How can we woo her into posting again?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on October 04, 2011, 10:19:39 PM
Quote from: Nigel on October 04, 2011, 10:09:55 PM
Quote from: Cain on October 04, 2011, 09:57:30 PM
She still logs on frequently.

However, the lail has all but dried up  :sad:

How can we woo her into posting again?

Perhaps make up your own version of some food thing, wherein she will post an "authentic recipe" to correct you in a passive aggressive manner, and when you get irritated, PROFIT!
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on October 04, 2011, 10:44:00 PM
Quote from: Science me, babby on October 04, 2011, 10:19:39 PM
Quote from: Nigel on October 04, 2011, 10:09:55 PM
Quote from: Cain on October 04, 2011, 09:57:30 PM
She still logs on frequently.

However, the lail has all but dried up  :sad:

How can we woo her into posting again?

Perhaps make up your own version of some food thing, wherein she will post an "authentic recipe" to correct you in a passive aggressive manner, and when you get irritated, PROFIT!

(http://www.labworkz.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/business-plan.jpg)
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on October 04, 2011, 10:52:18 PM
Precisely!
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Cain on October 06, 2011, 04:26:10 PM
Turns out Eartha is running with kids more her speed: namely, the dopes at TCC
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on October 06, 2011, 04:44:13 PM
Quote from: Cain on October 06, 2011, 04:26:10 PM
Turns out Eartha is running with kids more her speed: namely, the dopes at TCC

OMG, that's perfect! :lulz:

If only I wasn't banned!
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on October 06, 2011, 05:33:08 PM
Quote from: Cain on October 06, 2011, 04:26:10 PM
Turns out Eartha is running with kids more her speed: namely, the dopes at TCC
:lulz:  She's fitting in well, I trust.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Doktor Howl on October 06, 2011, 05:50:33 PM
She's here all the time, PMing with Badbeast.

I don't feel the need to fuck with her, though, so long as she doesn't speak to me.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Cain on April 24, 2012, 03:43:18 PM
Quote from: Cain on August 10, 2011, 11:52:28 AM
London was going to be cleared regardless.  Welfare to help with rent payments stops in London at the start of next year.  On top of other benefit cuts, 40,000 people are expected to be made homeless, with around double that number (at least) expected to move from London.

You don't need a riot to do that. 

A WINNER IS ME

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-17821018

QuoteThe government has defended its housing benefit cap after it emerged London's Newham council was trying to find homes for some families 160 miles away.

The council has been accused of "social cleansing", but its mayor said the benefit cap had pushed people out of expensive parts of London to Newham which did not have enough homes.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Phox on April 24, 2012, 03:55:21 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 11, 2011, 06:24:37 PM
Shut your ignorant facecunt, retard.
It is phrases like this that make me love Nigel.  :lulz:

Also, good call, Cain. I am unsure of how I feel about this whole situation though. What a fucking mess.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on April 24, 2012, 04:54:47 PM
Quote from: Doktor M. Phox0 on April 24, 2012, 03:55:21 PM
Quote from: Nigel on August 11, 2011, 06:24:37 PM
Shut your ignorant facecunt, retard.
It is phrases like this that make me love Nigel.  :lulz:

Also, good call, Cain. I am unsure of how I feel about this whole situation though. What a fucking mess.

:thanks:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on April 26, 2012, 02:48:35 AM
Quote from: Cain on April 24, 2012, 03:43:18 PM
Quote from: Cain on August 10, 2011, 11:52:28 AM
London was going to be cleared regardless.  Welfare to help with rent payments stops in London at the start of next year.  On top of other benefit cuts, 40,000 people are expected to be made homeless, with around double that number (at least) expected to move from London.

You don't need a riot to do that. 

A WINNER IS ME

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-17821018

QuoteThe government has defended its housing benefit cap after it emerged London's Newham council was trying to find homes for some families 160 miles away.

The council has been accused of "social cleansing", but its mayor said the benefit cap had pushed people out of expensive parts of London to Newham which did not have enough homes.

It's like some horrible game where when you win, thousands of people lose!  :horrormirth:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: inode_buddha on April 26, 2012, 03:14:55 AM
WTF is a "vindaloo" anyhow? Is it a vindictive loo? Must be some british-ism. All I know is that I tries Indian food once, just to be polite. Everytime I see that word, it makes me think of explosive diarrhea. Dunno, you tell me. :roll:
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on April 26, 2012, 03:17:12 AM
Quote from: inode_buddha on April 26, 2012, 03:14:55 AM
WTF is a "vindaloo" anyhow? Is it a vindictive loo? Must be some british-ism. All I know is that I tries Indian food once, just to be polite. Everytime I see that word, it makes me think of explosive diarrhea. Dunno, you tell me. :roll:

It's delicious.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Don Coyote on April 26, 2012, 04:16:05 AM
Quote from: inode_buddha on April 26, 2012, 03:14:55 AM
WTF is a "vindaloo" anyhow? Is it a vindictive loo? Must be some british-ism. All I know is that I tries Indian food once, just to be polite. Everytime I see that word, it makes me think of explosive diarrhea. Dunno, you tell me. :roll:

The name refers to some of the key ingrediants. That being the Vin which is pain and ALOOOOOO which is the sound you make as it cleanses your system with fire from the inside.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Cain on April 26, 2012, 05:18:12 AM
Quote from: The Freeky of SCIENCE! on April 26, 2012, 02:48:35 AM
Quote from: Cain on April 24, 2012, 03:43:18 PM
Quote from: Cain on August 10, 2011, 11:52:28 AM
London was going to be cleared regardless.  Welfare to help with rent payments stops in London at the start of next year.  On top of other benefit cuts, 40,000 people are expected to be made homeless, with around double that number (at least) expected to move from London.

You don't need a riot to do that. 

A WINNER IS ME

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-17821018

QuoteThe government has defended its housing benefit cap after it emerged London's Newham council was trying to find homes for some families 160 miles away.

The council has been accused of "social cleansing", but its mayor said the benefit cap had pushed people out of expensive parts of London to Newham which did not have enough homes.

It's like some horrible game where when you win, thousands of people lose!  :horrormirth:

I like to think of it as zero-sum bingo
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on April 26, 2012, 07:30:29 AM
Quote from: Cain on April 26, 2012, 05:18:12 AM
Quote from: The Freeky of SCIENCE! on April 26, 2012, 02:48:35 AM
Quote from: Cain on April 24, 2012, 03:43:18 PM
Quote from: Cain on August 10, 2011, 11:52:28 AM
London was going to be cleared regardless.  Welfare to help with rent payments stops in London at the start of next year.  On top of other benefit cuts, 40,000 people are expected to be made homeless, with around double that number (at least) expected to move from London.

You don't need a riot to do that. 

A WINNER IS ME

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-17821018

QuoteThe government has defended its housing benefit cap after it emerged London's Newham council was trying to find homes for some families 160 miles away.

The council has been accused of "social cleansing", but its mayor said the benefit cap had pushed people out of expensive parts of London to Newham which did not have enough homes.

It's like some horrible game where when you win, thousands of people lose!  :horrormirth:

I like to think of it as zero-sum bingo

Is the center square trade shows pointless wars?
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: P3nT4gR4m on April 26, 2012, 01:15:51 PM
They're only pointless if you're one of the poor naive schmucks who believe wars should only be fought for the reasons your government tells you they're being fought.
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on April 26, 2012, 03:35:37 PM
Quote from: inode_buddha on April 26, 2012, 03:14:55 AM
WTF is a "vindaloo" anyhow? Is it a vindictive loo? Must be some british-ism. All I know is that I tries Indian food once, just to be polite. Everytime I see that word, it makes me think of explosive diarrhea. Dunno, you tell me. :roll:

Here ya go: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=vindaloo
Title: Re: Insight Into Anarchy's Subtle Nuances. London. 2011.
Post by: Freeky on April 26, 2012, 04:18:36 PM
Quote from: Nigel on April 26, 2012, 03:35:37 PM
Quote from: inode_buddha on April 26, 2012, 03:14:55 AM
WTF is a "vindaloo" anyhow? Is it a vindictive loo? Must be some british-ism. All I know is that I tries Indian food once, just to be polite. Everytime I see that word, it makes me think of explosive diarrhea. Dunno, you tell me. :roll:

Here ya go: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=vindaloo

:lulz: