(http://cdn2.static.mporatrons.com/site/whitelines/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/DC-Chimp-Sheep-Snowboard-Review-2012-2013.jpg)
Okay, I quit. You win.
You're a fucking asshole, RWHN.
For making a funny? Yeesh, who pissed on your Wheaties this morning?
How's it funny? I don't see it. All I see is you being a fucking asshole.
Ewe - You, it's a pun. Remember me, I'm the guy that does puns. I've kinda been doing them a lot here for the past 7 years.
When I google imaged "ewes" I saw this funny (yet distrubing) picture of a monkey-ewe.
I dunno why you guys are getting all offended by it, other than looking for a reason to be offended.
If it makes you feel any better, I was going to do a riff on New as well (new - gnu) but thought it might be too much.
But I will put the minds of you sensitive flowers at ease.
IT WAS JUST A STUPID JOKE!
You now may return to whatever it was you were doing.
Your title directly parodies the title of a thread by Dok, therefore it likely to taking that your OP is meant as a comentary on his OP. To me it looks like you are calling Dok a screaming monkey.
Quote
IT WAS JUST A STUPID JOKE!
No it damn well wasn't, you useless, passive aggressive piece of shit. Go to hell.
Really? Really, RWHN? Are you still at PD for some reason OTHER than to cause grief?
It'd be one thing if you'd, I dunno, put some sort of CONTENT into this thread, but ganking someone's thread title for... what reason? A lame pun and unfunny picture? When there have been several times in the past when you, personally, were involved in shitstorms regarding the "parodying", or whatever you want to call it, of other people's threads which contained content?
Is the idea to provoke this reaction, or you just that forgetful and short-sighted? Posted while I was typing, so...
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 09:00:20 PM
Ewe - You, it's a pun. Remember me, I'm the guy that does puns. I've kinda been doing them a lot here for the past 7 years.
When I google imaged "ewes" I saw this funny (yet distrubing) picture of a monkey-ewe.
I dunno why you guys are getting all offended by it, other than looking for a reason to be offended.
If it makes you feel any better, I was going to do a riff on New as well (new - gnu) but thought it might be too much.
But I will put the minds of you sensitive flowers at ease.
IT WAS JUST A STUPID JOKE!
You now may return to whatever it was you were doing.
Okay, the Gnu one would probably have been funnier, and less likely to annoy people, since, A) I've never had a fight with you before over this sort of thing, and 2) That thread was a stupid joke as well.
See also:
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 26, 2012, 09:03:12 PM
Your title directly parodies the title of a thread by Dok, therefore it likely to taking that your OP is meant as a comentary on his OP. To me it looks like you are calling Dok a screaming monkey.
Quote from: Doktor M. Phox0 on April 26, 2012, 09:04:34 PM
Really? Really, RWHN? Are you still at PD for some reason OTHER than to cause grief?
It'd be one thing if you'd, I dunno, put some sort of CONTENT into this thread, but ganking someone's thread title for... what reason? A lame pun and unfunny picture? When there have been several times in the past when you, personally, were involved in shitstorms regarding the "parodying", or whatever you want to call it, of other people's threads which contained content?
Is the idea to provoke this reaction, or you just that forgetful and short-sighted?
Posted while I was typing, so...
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 09:00:20 PM
Ewe - You, it's a pun. Remember me, I'm the guy that does puns. I've kinda been doing them a lot here for the past 7 years.
When I google imaged "ewes" I saw this funny (yet distrubing) picture of a monkey-ewe.
I dunno why you guys are getting all offended by it, other than looking for a reason to be offended.
If it makes you feel any better, I was going to do a riff on New as well (new - gnu) but thought it might be too much.
But I will put the minds of you sensitive flowers at ease.
IT WAS JUST A STUPID JOKE!
You now may return to whatever it was you were doing.
Okay, the Gnu one would probably have been funnier, and less likely to annoy people, since, A) I've never had a fight with you before over this sort of thing, and 2) That thread was a stupid joke as well.
See also:
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 26, 2012, 09:03:12 PM
Your title directly parodies the title of a thread by Dok, therefore it likely to taking that your OP is meant as a comentary on his OP. To me it looks like you are calling Dok a screaming monkey.
DAMN WHY DO MY WORDS LOOK ALL STUPID MAKIN???????
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 26, 2012, 09:03:12 PM
Your title directly parodies the title of a thread by Dok, therefore it likely to taking that your OP is meant as a comentary on his OP. To me it looks like you are calling Dok a screaming monkey.
:lulz:
Yeah, that's it. You win!!!!
IT WAS A FUCKING PUN!
It's not a goddamned commentary on any fucking thing.
It's a fucking pun!
RWHN -- PUN! (Does that feel like a familiar connection?)
Jeebus, you guys need to go out for a walk and get some fresh air or something.
I know I will be once this clock mercifully reaches the bottom of the hour thus freeing me from my desk.
Quote from: The Freeky of SCIENCE! on April 26, 2012, 09:03:55 PM
Quote
IT WAS JUST A STUPID JOKE!
No it damn well wasn't, you useless, passive aggressive piece of shit. Go to hell.
Law of Fives. You are seeing what you want to see.
Frankly, I don't care.
Quote from: Doktor M. Phox0 on April 26, 2012, 09:04:34 PM
Okay, the Gnu one would probably have been funnier, and less likely to annoy people, since, A) I've never had a fight with you before over this sort of thing, and 2) That thread was a stupid joke as well.
Nah, that one would've been lame too.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 09:07:51 PM
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 26, 2012, 09:03:12 PM
Your title directly parodies the title of a thread by Dok, therefore it likely to taking that your OP is meant as a comentary on his OP. To me it looks like you are calling Dok a screaming monkey.
:lulz:
Yeah, that's it. You win!!!!
IT WAS A FUCKING PUN!
It's not a goddamned commentary on any fucking thing.
It's a fucking pun!
RWHN -- PUN! (Does that feel like a familiar connection?)
Jeebus, you guys need to go out for a walk and get some fresh air or something.
I know I will be once this clock mercifully reaches the bottom of the hour thus freeing me from my desk.
I think you read the first part of my statement and then stopped.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 09:12:22 PM
Quote from: Doktor M. Phox0 on April 26, 2012, 09:04:34 PM
Okay, the Gnu one would probably have been funnier, and less likely to annoy people, since, A) I've never had a fight with you before over this sort of thing, and 2) That thread was a stupid joke as well.
Nah, that one would've been lame too.
Less lame than this one, if only for the fact that it's novel. :lulz:
It wasn't JUST a pun. You have been constantly and purposely getting under Dok's skin for ages, and this was another poke at him.
I don't buy the "I also considered 'gnu' " for a damn second.
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 26, 2012, 09:12:57 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 09:07:51 PM
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 26, 2012, 09:03:12 PM
Your title directly parodies the title of a thread by Dok, therefore it likely to taking that your OP is meant as a comentary on his OP. To me it looks like you are calling Dok a screaming monkey.
:lulz:
Yeah, that's it. You win!!!!
IT WAS A FUCKING PUN!
It's not a goddamned commentary on any fucking thing.
It's a fucking pun!
RWHN -- PUN! (Does that feel like a familiar connection?)
Jeebus, you guys need to go out for a walk and get some fresh air or something.
I know I will be once this clock mercifully reaches the bottom of the hour thus freeing me from my desk.
I think you read the first part of my statement and then stopped.
No, I read that part too. My response was to your entire theory. Including what is now the gigantic underlined phrase.
Quote from: Doktor M. Phox0 on April 26, 2012, 09:13:14 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 09:12:22 PM
Quote from: Doktor M. Phox0 on April 26, 2012, 09:04:34 PM
Okay, the Gnu one would probably have been funnier, and less likely to annoy people, since, A) I've never had a fight with you before over this sort of thing, and 2) That thread was a stupid joke as well.
Nah, that one would've been lame too.
Less lame than this one, if only for the fact that it's novel. :lulz:
Are you saying that Gnus are novel but Ewes are not? Sounds a little prejudicial there man.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 09:16:56 PM
Quote from: Doktor M. Phox0 on April 26, 2012, 09:13:14 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 09:12:22 PM
Quote from: Doktor M. Phox0 on April 26, 2012, 09:04:34 PM
Okay, the Gnu one would probably have been funnier, and less likely to annoy people, since, A) I've never had a fight with you before over this sort of thing, and 2) That thread was a stupid joke as well.
Nah, that one would've been lame too.
Less lame than this one, if only for the fact that it's novel. :lulz:
Are you saying that Gnus are novel but Ewes are not? Sounds a little prejudicial there man.
Oh. Oh my. :tgrr:
Quote from: The Freeky of SCIENCE! on April 26, 2012, 09:13:34 PM
It wasn't JUST a pun. You have been constantly and purposely getting under Dok's skin for ages, and this was another poke at him.
Meh, that's been a two way street.
QuoteI don't buy the "I also considered 'gnu' " for a damn second.
I don't care.
Quote from: Doktor M. Phox0 on April 26, 2012, 09:18:26 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 09:16:56 PM
Quote from: Doktor M. Phox0 on April 26, 2012, 09:13:14 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 09:12:22 PM
Quote from: Doktor M. Phox0 on April 26, 2012, 09:04:34 PM
Okay, the Gnu one would probably have been funnier, and less likely to annoy people, since, A) I've never had a fight with you before over this sort of thing, and 2) That thread was a stupid joke as well.
Nah, that one would've been lame too.
Less lame than this one, if only for the fact that it's novel. :lulz:
Are you saying that Gnus are novel but Ewes are not? Sounds a little prejudicial there man.
Oh. Oh my. :tgrr:
S'Alright, your secret is safe with me. ;)
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 09:15:51 PM
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 26, 2012, 09:12:57 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 09:07:51 PM
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 26, 2012, 09:03:12 PM
Your title directly parodies the title of a thread by Dok, therefore it likely to taking that your OP is meant as a comentary on his OP. To me it looks like you are calling Dok a screaming monkey.
:lulz:
Yeah, that's it. You win!!!!
IT WAS A FUCKING PUN!
It's not a goddamned commentary on any fucking thing.
It's a fucking pun!
RWHN -- PUN! (Does that feel like a familiar connection?)
Jeebus, you guys need to go out for a walk and get some fresh air or something.
I know I will be once this clock mercifully reaches the bottom of the hour thus freeing me from my desk.
I think you read the first part of my statement and then stopped.
No, I read that part too. My response was to your entire theory. Including what is now the gigantic underlined phrase.
Well I also think you are being a dick in that you, being a punster and an educated man, already have an idea how people will take things you posts, especially certain people on this board. I doubt that your post was innocent, just like your actions in this thread are innocent. First you post a thread titled similarilary to Dok's. Then you include a picture of a sheep chimp hybrid, but most importantly you get upset that people did not take your joke. Basically everyone else is stupid for not likeing your joke. It is Dok's problem that he took offense to your joke. The fault all lays with him.
Or atleast that is how your follow up leads to me.
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 26, 2012, 09:22:42 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 09:15:51 PM
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 26, 2012, 09:12:57 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 09:07:51 PM
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 26, 2012, 09:03:12 PM
Your title directly parodies the title of a thread by Dok, therefore it likely to taking that your OP is meant as a comentary on his OP. To me it looks like you are calling Dok a screaming monkey.
:lulz:
Yeah, that's it. You win!!!!
IT WAS A FUCKING PUN!
It's not a goddamned commentary on any fucking thing.
It's a fucking pun!
RWHN -- PUN! (Does that feel like a familiar connection?)
Jeebus, you guys need to go out for a walk and get some fresh air or something.
I know I will be once this clock mercifully reaches the bottom of the hour thus freeing me from my desk.
I think you read the first part of my statement and then stopped.
No, I read that part too. My response was to your entire theory. Including what is now the gigantic underlined phrase.
Well I also think you are being a dick in that you, being a punster and an educated man, already have an idea how people will take things you posts, especially certain people on this board. I doubt that your post was innocent, just like your actions in this thread are innocent. First you post a thread titled similarilary to Dok's. Then you include a picture of a sheep chimp hybrid, but most importantly you get upset that people did not take your joke. Basically everyone else is stupid for not likeing your joke. It is Dok's problem that he took offense to your joke. The fault all lays with him.
Or atleast that is how your follow up leads to me.
You are completely wrong. I'm not mad at all!
A little bewildered by the response, but I'm not angry.
I'm actually pretty happy now cause it's quitting time!
Good Day everyone!
So, I guess I shouldn't start a "Few People" thread after the other rhyming topics.
Quote from: Chairman Risus on April 26, 2012, 09:38:08 PM
So, I guess I shouldn't start a "Few People" thread after the other rhyming topics.
"Eww, people"?
Quote from: Chairman Risus on April 26, 2012, 09:38:08 PM
So, I guess I shouldn't start a "Few People" thread after the other rhyming topics.
Depends, will it have some content to it? And have you done something similar that resulted in backlash before?
Quote from: Doktor M. Phox0 on April 26, 2012, 09:39:27 PM
Quote from: Chairman Risus on April 26, 2012, 09:38:08 PM
So, I guess I shouldn't start a "Few People" thread after the other rhyming topics.
Depends, will it have some content to it? And have you done something similar, real or imagined, that resulted in backlash before?
fixed.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 10:23:07 PM
Quote from: Doktor M. Phox0 on April 26, 2012, 09:39:27 PM
Quote from: Chairman Risus on April 26, 2012, 09:38:08 PM
So, I guess I shouldn't start a "Few People" thread after the other rhyming topics.
Depends, will it have some content to it? And have you done something similar, real or imagined, that resulted in backlash before?
fixed.
LOOK PASSIVE-AGGRESSION!!!!!!!!
ATTN: Boo people
ATTN: Due people
ATTN: A Few people
ATTN: Goo people
ATTN: Hu people
ATTN: Jew people
ATTN: Aung Sun Kyui's people
ATTN: Loo people
ATTN: Ooo people
ATTN: Poo people
ATTN: Roo people
ATTN: Suu's people
ATTN: Two people
ATTN: Check out this view, people
ATTN: Who's people?
ATTN: You people
Now all of you have no choice but to get angry at me instead.
COME AT ME, BRO.
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 26, 2012, 10:26:26 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 10:23:07 PM
Quote from: Doktor M. Phox0 on April 26, 2012, 09:39:27 PM
Quote from: Chairman Risus on April 26, 2012, 09:38:08 PM
So, I guess I shouldn't start a "Few People" thread after the other rhyming topics.
Depends, will it have some content to it? And have you done something similar, real or imagined, that resulted in backlash before?
fixed.
LOOK PASSIVE-AGGRESSION!!!!!!!!
Sorry, in Aggressive-Aggression it translates into: "Y'all are fucking nuts!"
Of course, I don't mean clinically. Just want to head that one off.
Quote from: Cain on April 26, 2012, 10:36:27 PM
ATTN: Boo people
ATTN: Due people
ATTN: A Few people
ATTN: Goo people
ATTN: Hu people
ATTN: Jew people
ATTN: Aung Sun Kyui's people
ATTN: Loo people
ATTN: Ooo people
ATTN: Poo people
ATTN: Roo people
ATTN: Suu's people
ATTN: Two people
ATTN: Check out this view, people
ATTN: Who's people?
ATTN: You people
Now all of you have no choice but to get angry at me instead.
COME AT ME, BRO.
No, me me me!
ATTN: Dew people
ATTN: Crew people
ATTN: Can you tell me where to find the loo, people?
and and and...
um, shit. I ran out. Phooey.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 09:18:37 PM
Quote from: The Freeky of SCIENCE! on April 26, 2012, 09:13:34 PM
It wasn't JUST a pun. You have been constantly and purposely getting under Dok's skin for ages, and this was another poke at him.
Meh, that's been a two way street.
Has it, then? Granted, I have reacted to you, but I have made a point of not
starting shit with you, whereas you have taken every opportunity to snipe at me that has come along, ever since you got into it with ECH and Nigel better than a year ago.
Why, RWHN? What drives you to fuck with me?
Yeah, it has. You've accused me of bullshit that I didn't do. Like stealing content from Nigel, all because I decided to write a mirthy thread when there was a board-wide conversation going on about focusing more on mirth. Right after you complained because, due to limited amounts of free time, I said I was here more for entertainment. So I go ahead and write something and you unquestioningly jump in with Nigel to accuse me of bullshit.
You accused me of talking shit about one of her relationships or something when it was someone else.
You have called me out in threads as an example of "doing it wrong"
If I'm ever in a verbal tussle with Nigel, you unquestioningly jump in and side with her. And you want to talk to me about sniping? You give as good as you get in that category sir.
I mean, I've just always got the gist you weren't a big fan of mine, from the way you've interacted with me over the years. So I honestly don't know why you give a fuck how I think of you.
All that said, I'm sorry my joke offended you. But it was just a stupid pun riff on the attn threads. That's it.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 10:57:48 PM
I mean, I've just always got the gist you weren't a big fan of mine, from the way you've interacted with me over the years.
Actually, until the last year, you were one of my favorite people here.
Well, maybe not saying shit like "if you get your tongue out of your governor's asshole" will help.
Yes, I'm proud do the work I do, because I'm pretty damned good at what I do, but I'm nobody's bitch.
Also, don't assume every time I disagree with you it is some kind of personal shot or is linked to some past argument or occurrence.
Seriously, if I'm actually pissed off at you, I mean genuinely mad at you, or anyone else, about something, I WILL, let you know.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 11:17:13 PM
Well, maybe not saying shit like "if you get your tongue out of your governor's asshole" will help.
Well, perhaps a solid year of sniping had something to do with that response.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 10:57:48 PM
Yeah, it has. You've accused me of bullshit that I didn't do. Like stealing content from Nigel, all because I decided to write a mirthy thread when there was a board-wide conversation going on about focusing more on mirth. Right after you complained because, due to limited amounts of free time, I said I was here more for entertainment. So I go ahead and write something and you unquestioningly jump in with Nigel to accuse me of bullshit.
You accused me of talking shit about one of her relationships or something when it was someone else.
You have called me out in threads as an example of "doing it wrong"
If I'm ever in a verbal tussle with Nigel, you unquestioningly jump in and side with her. And you want to talk to me about sniping? You give as good as you get in that category sir.
I mean, I've just always got the gist you weren't a big fan of mine, from the way you've interacted with me over the years. So I honestly don't know why you give a fuck how I think of you.
All that said, I'm sorry my joke offended you. But it was just a stupid pun riff on the attn threads. That's it.
You know what? You are completely and totally in the right. Roger doesn't like you because he is just fucking stupid and not right in the head, and everyone else just goes along with it out of pity leave poor poor misunderstood RWHN out in the cold.
OR maybe you are full of shit, and like I said before, are not so dumb as to have no idea what-so-ever of the reactions you will get with your little jokes. And this wasn't even a very good pun. I was giving your benefit of the doubt, which means nothing to you because I am firmly on the side of Roger in your asshat behavior. Because I could see another possible point behind your OP BUT given your past behavior it seemed much more likely that your intent was inflammatory. You already had one poster get pissed at you for riffing on her thread title/topic. You already knew that Nigel and Rog are friends and will come to eachother's defense, but what seems to be lost on you and everyone else in the Roger/Nigel are EVIL bunch is that they, and most of the rest of us, don't just blindly jump into the defense of a friend over slights, real or imagined.
In short you wanted this kind of shit to happen, probably because no one really gives your drug shit that much business anymore, but for some reason you want to stir up shit with people that don't agree with you.
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 26, 2012, 10:26:26 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 10:23:07 PM
Quote from: Doktor M. Phox0 on April 26, 2012, 09:39:27 PM
Quote from: Chairman Risus on April 26, 2012, 09:38:08 PM
So, I guess I shouldn't start a "Few People" thread after the other rhyming topics.
Depends, will it have some content to it? And have you done something similar, real or imagined, that resulted in backlash before?
fixed.
LOOK PASSIVE-AGGRESSION!!!!!!!!
Of course. If it wasn't, I'm sure he could have come up with "Hey Ewe" or just about anything else.
After all, he's the pun guy. :x
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 26, 2012, 11:18:13 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 11:17:13 PM
Well, maybe not saying shit like "if you get your tongue out of your governor's asshole" will help.
Well, perhaps a solid year of sniping had something to do with that response.
Many more years of being dragged through the mud in all of the drug threads has not compelled me to lash out in that manner. Not even at Nigel, who, yes, I do not like. Yeah, I know I questioned the opinion of her friend, but I'm pretty sure I didn't describe her in a manner as you described me above.
Totally what coyote said.
Also, regarding the lo5 thing, four people, two of whom are not especially close to Dok, immediately thought that you were stirring shit with him. So either you're full of shit or it's closer to the truth than you want to admit.
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 26, 2012, 11:20:22 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 10:57:48 PM
Yeah, it has. You've accused me of bullshit that I didn't do. Like stealing content from Nigel, all because I decided to write a mirthy thread when there was a board-wide conversation going on about focusing more on mirth. Right after you complained because, due to limited amounts of free time, I said I was here more for entertainment. So I go ahead and write something and you unquestioningly jump in with Nigel to accuse me of bullshit.
You accused me of talking shit about one of her relationships or something when it was someone else.
You have called me out in threads as an example of "doing it wrong"
If I'm ever in a verbal tussle with Nigel, you unquestioningly jump in and side with her. And you want to talk to me about sniping? You give as good as you get in that category sir.
I mean, I've just always got the gist you weren't a big fan of mine, from the way you've interacted with me over the years. So I honestly don't know why you give a fuck how I think of you.
All that said, I'm sorry my joke offended you. But it was just a stupid pun riff on the attn threads. That's it.
You know what? You are completely and totally in the right. Roger doesn't like you because he is just fucking stupid and not right in the head, and everyone else just goes along with it out of pity leave poor poor misunderstood RWHN out in the cold.
OR maybe you are full of shit, and like I said before, are not so dumb as to have no idea what-so-ever of the reactions you will get with your little jokes. And this wasn't even a very good pun. I was giving your benefit of the doubt, which means nothing to you because I am firmly on the side of Roger in your asshat behavior. Because I could see another possible point behind your OP BUT given your past behavior it seemed much more likely that your intent was inflammatory. You already had one poster get pissed at you for riffing on her thread title/topic. You already knew that Nigel and Rog are friends and will come to eachother's defense, but what seems to be lost on you and everyone else in the Roger/Nigel are EVIL bunch is that they, and most of the rest of us, don't just blindly jump into the defense of a friend over slights, real or imagined.
In short you wanted this kind of shit to happen, probably because no one really gives your drug shit that much business anymore, but for some reason you want to stir up shit with people that don't agree with you.
Who switched PD with Survivor?
I just want everyone to know, I'm angry and offended.
Not for any particular reason. I just saw how much fun everyone else was having with it.
Quote from: The Freeky of SCIENCE! on April 26, 2012, 11:30:05 PM
Totally what coyote said.
Also, regarding the lo5 thing, four people, two of whom are not especially close to Dok, immediately thought that you were stirring shit with him. So either you're full of shit or it's closer to the truth than you want to admit.
Holy fuck four! That totally creates a strong confidence interval!
Quote from: Placid Dingo on April 26, 2012, 11:33:02 PM
I just want everyone to know, I'm angry and offended.
Not for any particular reason. I just saw how much fun everyone else was having with it.
I'm bloated and gassy. That's what happens when I have to fend for myself for dinner.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 11:29:36 PM
Many more years of being dragged through the mud in all of the drug threads has not compelled me to lash out in that manner.
Well, except for your behavior towards me in the last year, even though it wasn't me that questioned your credentials.
I think we're through here, we're just going in circles. It's been patently obvious for the last year or so that you hate my guts, and I've given up waiting for you to cut it the fuck out and/or come around...Now I just consider you to be irretrievably hostile. You do what the fuck you want, post what the fuck you want, but keep in mind that I won't be reading it or reacting to it, so you'll be wasting your fucking time with this vendetta. I have stopped giving a shit.
Quote from: Placid Dingo on April 26, 2012, 11:33:02 PM
I just want everyone to know, I'm angry and offended.
Not for any particular reason. I just saw how much fun everyone else was having with it.
Okay. We can have lots of fun.
Quote from: Placid Dingo on April 26, 2012, 11:33:02 PM
I just want everyone to know, I'm angry and offended.
Not for any particular reason. I just saw how much fun everyone else was having with it.
So I just learned something cool today. Making light other people's problems with each other is cool.
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 26, 2012, 11:39:24 PM
Quote from: Placid Dingo on April 26, 2012, 11:33:02 PM
I just want everyone to know, I'm angry and offended.
Not for any particular reason. I just saw how much fun everyone else was having with it.
So I just learned something cool today. Making light other people's problems with each other is cool.
Not as cool as something I just thought of. :lulz:
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 26, 2012, 11:39:24 PM
Quote from: Placid Dingo on April 26, 2012, 11:33:02 PM
I just want everyone to know, I'm angry and offended.
Not for any particular reason. I just saw how much fun everyone else was having with it.
So I just learned something cool today. Making light other people's problems with each other is cool.
Sorry. Didn't realise an Internet argument over a monkey-sheep was actualy serious business.
Quote from: Placid Dingo on April 26, 2012, 11:42:31 PM
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 26, 2012, 11:39:24 PM
Quote from: Placid Dingo on April 26, 2012, 11:33:02 PM
I just want everyone to know, I'm angry and offended.
Not for any particular reason. I just saw how much fun everyone else was having with it.
So I just learned something cool today. Making light other people's problems with each other is cool.
Sorry. Didn't realise an Internet argument over a monkey-sheep was actualy serious business.
Hey, man...Action/reaction. How the fuck else did you think the universe works? You decide to be a funny guy about other people's problems, and then you get shat on for weeks or months.
Can't see how you thought it would be any different.
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 26, 2012, 11:37:09 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 11:29:36 PM
Many more years of being dragged through the mud in all of the drug threads has not compelled me to lash out in that manner.
Well, except for your behavior towards me in the last year, even though it wasn't me that questioned your credentials.
I think we're through here, we're just going in circles. It's been patently obvious for the last year or so that you hate my guts, and I've given up waiting for you to cut it the fuck out and/or come around...Now I just consider you to be irretrievably hostile. You do what the fuck you want, post what the fuck you want, but keep in mind that I won't be reading it or reacting to it, so you'll be wasting your fucking time with this vendetta. I have stopped giving a shit.
Ah. That's what he was doing at EBG.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 11:29:36 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 26, 2012, 11:18:13 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 11:17:13 PM
Well, maybe not saying shit like "if you get your tongue out of your governor's asshole" will help.
Well, perhaps a solid year of sniping had something to do with that response.
Many more years of being dragged through the mud in all of the drug threads has not compelled me to lash out in that manner. Not even at Nigel, who, yes, I do not like. Yeah, I know I questioned the opinion of her friend, but I'm pretty sure I didn't describe her in a manner as you described me above.
If he snarked at you for something in a drug thread, he obviously saw something that he thought was bullshit.
Sooooo...you look at it. And either go, "Wow, that's right, I fucked up" or argue your point.
What you don't do is internalize a bunch of butthurt and post monkey sheep.
Lame.
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 26, 2012, 11:44:24 PM
Quote from: Placid Dingo on April 26, 2012, 11:42:31 PM
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 26, 2012, 11:39:24 PM
Quote from: Placid Dingo on April 26, 2012, 11:33:02 PM
I just want everyone to know, I'm angry and offended.
Not for any particular reason. I just saw how much fun everyone else was having with it.
So I just learned something cool today. Making light other people's problems with each other is cool.
Sorry. Didn't realise an Internet argument over a monkey-sheep was actualy serious business.
Hey, man...Action/reaction. How the fuck else did you think the universe works? You decide to be a funny guy about other people's problems, and then you get shat on for weeks or months.
Can't see how you thought it would be any different.
Remember everyone. It's not YOUR fault. It is HIS. It is his THING. He has PROBLEMS, and it not your fault when he does anything to you. You didn't bring it upon yourself. It's not like he has FEELINGS or anything.
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on April 26, 2012, 11:52:35 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 26, 2012, 11:37:09 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 11:29:36 PM
Many more years of being dragged through the mud in all of the drug threads has not compelled me to lash out in that manner.
Well, except for your behavior towards me in the last year, even though it wasn't me that questioned your credentials.
I think we're through here, we're just going in circles. It's been patently obvious for the last year or so that you hate my guts, and I've given up waiting for you to cut it the fuck out and/or come around...Now I just consider you to be irretrievably hostile. You do what the fuck you want, post what the fuck you want, but keep in mind that I won't be reading it or reacting to it, so you'll be wasting your fucking time with this vendetta. I have stopped giving a shit.
Ah. That's what he was doing at EBG.
Well, sure. I was in an argument with 3 people, so he had to go show how reasonable everyone (ie, him) could be. Also, just letting me know where I stood, sort of like with that Insanity dude today.
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 26, 2012, 11:53:15 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 26, 2012, 11:44:24 PM
Quote from: Placid Dingo on April 26, 2012, 11:42:31 PM
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 26, 2012, 11:39:24 PM
Quote from: Placid Dingo on April 26, 2012, 11:33:02 PM
I just want everyone to know, I'm angry and offended.
Not for any particular reason. I just saw how much fun everyone else was having with it.
So I just learned something cool today. Making light other people's problems with each other is cool.
Sorry. Didn't realise an Internet argument over a monkey-sheep was actualy serious business.
Hey, man...Action/reaction. How the fuck else did you think the universe works? You decide to be a funny guy about other people's problems, and then you get shat on for weeks or months.
Can't see how you thought it would be any different.
Remember everyone. It's not YOUR fault. It is HIS. It is his THING. He has PROBLEMS, and it not your fault when he does anything to you. You didn't bring it upon yourself. It's not like he has FEELINGS or anything.
I am a machine. A big hairy machine.
DOK IS A ROBOT PROGRAMMED TO ENJOY ABUSE. NO TROLL.
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 26, 2012, 09:03:12 PM
Your title directly parodies the title of a thread by Dok, therefore it likely to taking that your OP is meant as a comentary on his OP. To me it looks like you are calling Dok a screaming monkey.
It's what he does. Jabs at people and then says "it was just a joke!"
Kinda wonder sometimes how his interpersonal relationships fare with that.
Quote from: Nigel on April 27, 2012, 12:05:18 AM
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 26, 2012, 09:03:12 PM
Your title directly parodies the title of a thread by Dok, therefore it likely to taking that your OP is meant as a comentary on his OP. To me it looks like you are calling Dok a screaming monkey.
It's what he does. Jabs at people and then says "it was just a joke!"
Kinda wonder sometimes how his interpersonal relationships fare with that.
Hell, I can already tell you THAT.
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 12:05:43 AM
Quote from: Nigel on April 27, 2012, 12:05:18 AM
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 26, 2012, 09:03:12 PM
Your title directly parodies the title of a thread by Dok, therefore it likely to taking that your OP is meant as a comentary on his OP. To me it looks like you are calling Dok a screaming monkey.
It's what he does. Jabs at people and then says "it was just a joke!"
Kinda wonder sometimes how his interpersonal relationships fare with that.
Hell, I can already tell you THAT.
I wonder how his clients fare with that.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 10:40:39 PM
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 26, 2012, 10:26:26 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 10:23:07 PM
Quote from: Doktor M. Phox0 on April 26, 2012, 09:39:27 PM
Quote from: Chairman Risus on April 26, 2012, 09:38:08 PM
So, I guess I shouldn't start a "Few People" thread after the other rhyming topics.
Depends, will it have some content to it? And have you done something similar, real or imagined, that resulted in backlash before?
fixed.
LOOK PASSIVE-AGGRESSION!!!!!!!!
Sorry, in Aggressive-Aggression it translates into: "Y'all are fucking nuts!"
Of course, I don't mean clinically. Just want to head that one off.
Yeah, it can't be you, it must be
everybody else. No need to apologize.
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on April 27, 2012, 12:08:08 AM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 12:05:43 AM
Quote from: Nigel on April 27, 2012, 12:05:18 AM
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 26, 2012, 09:03:12 PM
Your title directly parodies the title of a thread by Dok, therefore it likely to taking that your OP is meant as a comentary on his OP. To me it looks like you are calling Dok a screaming monkey.
It's what he does. Jabs at people and then says "it was just a joke!"
Kinda wonder sometimes how his interpersonal relationships fare with that.
Hell, I can already tell you THAT.
I wonder how his clients fare with that.
Actually, I'd be amazed if he was unprofessional with his clients. Doesn't fit.
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 12:09:18 AM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on April 27, 2012, 12:08:08 AM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 12:05:43 AM
Quote from: Nigel on April 27, 2012, 12:05:18 AM
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 26, 2012, 09:03:12 PM
Your title directly parodies the title of a thread by Dok, therefore it likely to taking that your OP is meant as a comentary on his OP. To me it looks like you are calling Dok a screaming monkey.
It's what he does. Jabs at people and then says "it was just a joke!"
Kinda wonder sometimes how his interpersonal relationships fare with that.
Hell, I can already tell you THAT.
I wonder how his clients fare with that.
Actually, I'd be amazed if he was unprofessional with his clients. Doesn't fit.
Ah. This is what he does when he's not mouthing the Party Line
TM.
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 12:05:43 AM
Quote from: Nigel on April 27, 2012, 12:05:18 AM
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 26, 2012, 09:03:12 PM
Your title directly parodies the title of a thread by Dok, therefore it likely to taking that your OP is meant as a comentary on his OP. To me it looks like you are calling Dok a screaming monkey.
It's what he does. Jabs at people and then says "it was just a joke!"
Kinda wonder sometimes how his interpersonal relationships fare with that.
Hell, I can already tell you THAT.
Yeah, I suspect it has something to do with why he's been shitting all over people ('specially uppity wimmin) on the boards for the last year or so.
Quote from: Nigel on April 27, 2012, 12:15:40 AM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 12:05:43 AM
Quote from: Nigel on April 27, 2012, 12:05:18 AM
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 26, 2012, 09:03:12 PM
Your title directly parodies the title of a thread by Dok, therefore it likely to taking that your OP is meant as a comentary on his OP. To me it looks like you are calling Dok a screaming monkey.
It's what he does. Jabs at people and then says "it was just a joke!"
Kinda wonder sometimes how his interpersonal relationships fare with that.
Hell, I can already tell you THAT.
Yeah, I suspect it has something to do with why he's been shitting all over people ('specially uppity wimmin) on the boards for the last year or so.
Yep.
Before I go down this road, I'd like to ask RWHN just exactly how much he wants to continue or escalate his vendetta.
RWHN? We gonna get nasty, or are we going to calm down?
I leave it entirely up to you.
You and Nigel have already cracked open the door in the last two posts. You guys are really going to go down the road of calling me a sexist racist over a stupid picture of a monkey-sheep?
You guys are really going to go there?
Plain and simple, you overreact, and you are self-centered. You take any statement that isn't 100% lock step with you as some kind of stupid vendetta. Get over it.
I don't see where they said you were racist.
Stay tuned for Roger's rebuttal - he'll be back in about an hour and a half. This has nothing to do with racism or sexism.
Quote from: The Freeky of SCIENCE! on April 27, 2012, 12:32:07 AM
I don't see where they said you were racist.
"specially uppity wimmin"
It sure looks like a step in that direction to me.
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on April 27, 2012, 12:08:08 AM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 12:05:43 AM
Quote from: Nigel on April 27, 2012, 12:05:18 AM
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 26, 2012, 09:03:12 PM
Your title directly parodies the title of a thread by Dok, therefore it likely to taking that your OP is meant as a comentary on his OP. To me it looks like you are calling Dok a screaming monkey.
It's what he does. Jabs at people and then says "it was just a joke!"
Kinda wonder sometimes how his interpersonal relationships fare with that.
Hell, I can already tell you THAT.
I wonder how his clients fare with that.
I don't have clients. I'm a preventionist, not a counselor. Do keep up.
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 26, 2012, 11:37:09 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 11:29:36 PM
Many more years of being dragged through the mud in all of the drug threads has not compelled me to lash out in that manner.
Well, except for your behavior towards me in the last year, even though it wasn't me that questioned your credentials.
I think we're through here, we're just going in circles. It's been patently obvious for the last year or so that you hate my guts, and I've given up waiting for you to cut it the fuck out and/or come around...Now I just consider you to be irretrievably hostile. You do what the fuck you want, post what the fuck you want, but keep in mind that I won't be reading it or reacting to it, so you'll be wasting your fucking time with this vendetta. I have stopped giving a shit.
You're conveniently ignoring all of the other issues I laid out earlier. If you don't want to own up to your shit, so be it, but spare me your hollow sanctimony.
FWIW, I don't believe the OP was intended as an intentional dig at Dok. I know how a punner's mind works, and similar ideas pop into my head often enough as well. However I also know that starting a thread with a title punning on another thread, usually is not appreciated by whoever wrote the original thread (regardless of whether that person is Dok or not). Exceptions are if it is a particularly stupid thread*, OR if you're very certain the person in question will take it in good humour** or possibly if the thread in question never was serious. Neither of these was the case, so I do believe it was a pretty bad call to start it (as RWHN by now must have undoubtedly realized).
I mean, it's happened before (including both parody and pun) and at least 2 out of 3 were not well-received.
* in which case it is explicitly a dig, but you're purposefully going there.
** even then, say I did that to a thread started by Cram or Twid (to randomly name some) and they put some effort in the OP, they might not be mad, but still a bit miffed about it. Understandably. If you did it to a thread that I wrote with some effort (as opposed to just quoting an interesting article or something), so might I.
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 26, 2012, 11:54:23 PM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on April 26, 2012, 11:52:35 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 26, 2012, 11:37:09 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 11:29:36 PM
Many more years of being dragged through the mud in all of the drug threads has not compelled me to lash out in that manner.
Well, except for your behavior towards me in the last year, even though it wasn't me that questioned your credentials.
I think we're through here, we're just going in circles. It's been patently obvious for the last year or so that you hate my guts, and I've given up waiting for you to cut it the fuck out and/or come around...Now I just consider you to be irretrievably hostile. You do what the fuck you want, post what the fuck you want, but keep in mind that I won't be reading it or reacting to it, so you'll be wasting your fucking time with this vendetta. I have stopped giving a shit.
Ah. That's what he was doing at EBG.
Well, sure. I was in an argument with 3 people, so he had to go show how reasonable everyone (ie, him) could be. Also, just letting me know where I stood, sort of like with that Insanity dude today.
Heyyooo I'm a celebrity now.
Sorry for barging in on your serious conversation, Carry on.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 12:30:00 AM
You and Nigel have already cracked open the door in the last two posts. You guys are really going to go down the road of calling me a sexist racist over a stupid picture of a monkey-sheep?
You guys are really going to go there?
Plain and simple, you overreact, and you are self-centered. You take any statement that isn't 100% lock step with you as some kind of stupid vendetta. Get over it.
1. Nope. I don't think you have a racist or sexist bone in your body, to be perfectly honest with you. Don't get ahead of the class.
2. No, RWHN, I take a solid year of passive-aggressive HAW HAW ONLY JOKING bullshit as a vendetta.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 12:54:32 AM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 26, 2012, 11:37:09 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 26, 2012, 11:29:36 PM
Many more years of being dragged through the mud in all of the drug threads has not compelled me to lash out in that manner.
Well, except for your behavior towards me in the last year, even though it wasn't me that questioned your credentials.
I think we're through here, we're just going in circles. It's been patently obvious for the last year or so that you hate my guts, and I've given up waiting for you to cut it the fuck out and/or come around...Now I just consider you to be irretrievably hostile. You do what the fuck you want, post what the fuck you want, but keep in mind that I won't be reading it or reacting to it, so you'll be wasting your fucking time with this vendetta. I have stopped giving a shit.
You're conveniently ignoring all of the other issues I laid out earlier. If you don't want to own up to your shit, so be it, but spare me your hollow sanctimony.
Look, you treat someone like dirt, they're going to shit back on you. I feel no need to apologize for reacting to your shit, and I feel no inclination to NOT side with Nigel, given that she doesn't do shit like trash threads for no fucking reason other than PD has become your therapy/bop bag/anger vent.
Nope, she sticks to trashing reputations, like she did with me, like she did with Cram, like she did with TTM, like she did with PurpleEris, anyone she doesn't like. She doesn't get threads, she gets personal. Good on you for sticking up for that.
I'm done with you, think what you want. I won't lose any sleep over it.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:08:33 AM
Nope, she sticks to trashing reputations, like she did with me, like she did with Cram, like she did with TTM, like she did with PurpleEris, anyone she doesn't like. She doesn't get threads, she gets personal. Good on you for sticking up for that.
I'm done with you, think what you want. I won't lose any sleep over it.
Even if that were accurate, it beats some shitneck who waits for someone to post threads, and then does his level best to trash them. I spent the last week writing. You, with some help from QG, killed damn near every thread I made.
So what you're here for is to fight. It's all you've been here for, for at least a year.
I wonder why that is, RWHN?
Also, I gotta ask you, RWHN...You want to keep this up? I mean, if I know that each and everything I write is going to get chewed up by RWHN's butthurt, I'll just say fuck it, and go at it with you hammer and tongs.
So, I'm gonna ask you one more time...How far do you want to go down this road?
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:08:33 AM
Nope, she sticks to trashing reputations, like she did with me, like she did with Cram, like she did with TTM, like she did with PurpleEris, anyone she doesn't like. She doesn't get threads, she gets personal. Good on you for sticking up for that.
I'm done with you, think what you want. I won't lose any sleep over it.
Dude, you're coming off like Khara's pet parrot.
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on April 27, 2012, 03:32:37 AM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:08:33 AM
Nope, she sticks to trashing reputations, like she did with me, like she did with Cram, like she did with TTM, like she did with PurpleEris, anyone she doesn't like. She doesn't get threads, she gets personal. Good on you for sticking up for that.
I'm done with you, think what you want. I won't lose any sleep over it.
Dude, you're coming off like Khara's pet parrot.
Well, everyone knows that Nigel is the root of all evil, and I am her henchman.
Muhaha, and all that shit.
Thing is, after this week, I see no reason to write anything at least until this shit is put to bed. So it's all-brawling, all day, until this shit gets resolved. I have no intention of sweating out another rant just so he can shit on it.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:08:33 AM
Nope, she sticks to trashing reputations, like she did with me, like she did with Cram, like she did with TTM, like she did with PurpleEris, anyone she doesn't like. She doesn't get threads, she gets personal. Good on you for sticking up for that.
I'm done with you, think what you want. I won't lose any sleep over it.
I questioned your credentials, which is certainly no less than you did with my friend. You refused to so much as say what degree you have, and yet, even so, I opted to take Kai's word for it when he said you have a degree that qualifies you to be an expert in drug prevention. Cram? I called him on two things he actually did and said. I showed where he did the one thing and said the other. He had the option of saying "Yeah, that's not cool and I'll be more concientious", but instead he bailed without addressing it.
And TTM :lulz:
He called me a slut, among other things, and vowed to drive me off the board. For no reason that I can recall other than that I bored him. You really want to align yourself with that? Go for it. I think you're a fairly shitty human being already, it's not like you can go much lower. It's gotta be a pretty lonely life, being you.
Oh, and Purple Eris... what reputation? :?
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 03:38:01 AM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on April 27, 2012, 03:32:37 AM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:08:33 AM
Nope, she sticks to trashing reputations, like she did with me, like she did with Cram, like she did with TTM, like she did with PurpleEris, anyone she doesn't like. She doesn't get threads, she gets personal. Good on you for sticking up for that.
I'm done with you, think what you want. I won't lose any sleep over it.
Dude, you're coming off like Khara's pet parrot.
Well, everyone knows that Nigel is the root of all evil, and I am her henchman.
Muhaha, and all that shit.
Thing is, after this week, I see no reason to write anything at least until this shit is put to bed. So it's all-brawling, all day, until this shit gets resolved. I have no intention of sweating out another rant just so he can shit on it.
I AM A TERRIBLE PERSON
AND ROGER DOES MY BIDDING AND USES HIS MIND-LAZORS TO MAKE BAD THINGS HAPPEN
OR SOMETHING. :lulz:
There's no way any two people can agree on stuff without it being some kind of nefarious conspiracy
hell, ECH and 000 and Cain are probably in on it. Just because. I mean, they're Terrible People too, aren't they?
Terrible People with Bad Judgement who have been hoodwinked by my abrasively seductive personality and irritating habit of contradicting them into working for the forces of EVUL just because. Of. Um. My powerful charm-rays?
Yes. Yes, that's it! I am so clearly terribly wrong about everything and everyone, and I have tricked people into agreeing with me with my CHARM RAYS! They're homeopathic; it's actually just an extremely diluted version of annoyance rays.
Quote from: Nigel on April 27, 2012, 04:06:05 AM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 03:38:01 AM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on April 27, 2012, 03:32:37 AM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:08:33 AM
Nope, she sticks to trashing reputations, like she did with me, like she did with Cram, like she did with TTM, like she did with PurpleEris, anyone she doesn't like. She doesn't get threads, she gets personal. Good on you for sticking up for that.
I'm done with you, think what you want. I won't lose any sleep over it.
Dude, you're coming off like Khara's pet parrot.
Well, everyone knows that Nigel is the root of all evil, and I am her henchman.
Muhaha, and all that shit.
Thing is, after this week, I see no reason to write anything at least until this shit is put to bed. So it's all-brawling, all day, until this shit gets resolved. I have no intention of sweating out another rant just so he can shit on it.
I AM A TERRIBLE PERSON
AND ROGER DOES MY BIDDING AND USES HIS MIND-LAZORS TO MAKE BAD THINGS HAPPEN
OR SOMETHING. :lulz:
There's no way any two people can agree on stuff without it being some kind of nefarious conspiracy
hell, ECH and 000 and Cain are probably in on it. Just because. I mean, they're Terrible People too, aren't they?
Terrible People with Bad Judgement who have been hoodwinked by my abrasively seductive personality and irritating habit of contradicting them into working for the forces of EVUL just because. Of. Um. My powerful charm-rays?
Yes. Yes, that's it! I am so clearly terribly wrong about everything and everyone, and I have tricked people into agreeing with me with my CHARM RAYS! They're homeopathic; it's actually just an extremely diluted version of annoyance rays.
Personally, I have been a helpless & willing slave of Nigelcorp since she came down to visit. It's the pheremones, see, they DIG INTO THE FRONTAL LOBES OF YOUR BRAIN and you CAN'T HELP YOURSELF.
I AM NIGEL. I AM LEGION.
It's all the contradicting. It lulls people into merging with The Nigel.
Quote from: Nigel on April 27, 2012, 04:13:23 AM
It's all the contradicting. It lulls people into merging with The Nigel.
Didn't take right, though. My boobs grew out of my knees. I keep tripping on my bra.
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 04:15:47 AM
Quote from: Nigel on April 27, 2012, 04:13:23 AM
It's all the contradicting. It lulls people into merging with The Nigel.
Didn't take right, though. My boobs grew out of my knees. I keep tripping on my bra.
It's more convenient for feeding toddlers, though. You should crank a few out.
NIGEL IS THE MASTERMIND WHO CONTROLS DOK, AND DOK CONTROLS THE CULT OF ROGER
WHEN WE AGREE WITH EITHER OF THEM OR CEDE A POINT WE WERE TRYING TO MAKE, IS IT BECAUSE THEY WERE CORRECT?
BECAUSE THEY SOMEHOW PROVOKED US TO SEE A SITUATION FROM ANOTHER ANGLE, OR POINTED OUT A FLAW IN OUR LOGIC, OR PROVIDED SOME FRESH INFORMATION?
OH HO, FOOLISH CABBAGES! HOW YOU HAVE BEEN DECEIVED! IT'S THEIR NEFARIOUS MIND CONTROL CULT BRAINWASHING!
SOME HAVE TRIED TO LEAVE THE CULT.
"NIGEL TAKES IT IRL"
"NIGEL WILL TRASH YOUR REPUTATION"
THE TENTACLES OF NIGELCORP ARE OMNISCIENT, OMNIPRESENT AND UPPITY.
DID YOU SEE HER SIG? THIS WOMAN WEARS MOTHER TERESA'S SKULL.
RUN. RUN AS FAST AS YOU CAN AND DON'T STOP UNTIL YOU REACH THE SAFETY OF A DESOLATE RV PARK IN THE DESERT WHERE YOU CAN GO COMPLETELY BONKERS.
:roll:
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on April 27, 2012, 04:28:43 AM
NIGEL IS THE MASTERMIND WHO CONTROLS DOK, AND DOK CONTROLS THE CULT OF ROGER
WHEN WE AGREE WITH EITHER OF THEM OR CEDE A POINT WE WERE TRYING TO MAKE, IS IT BECAUSE THEY WERE CORRECT?
BECAUSE THEY SOMEHOW PROVOKED US TO SEE A SITUATION FROM ANOTHER ANGLE, OR POINTED OUT A FLAW IN OUR LOGIC, OR PROVIDED SOME FRESH INFORMATION?
OH HO, FOOLISH CABBAGES! HOW YOU HAVE BEEN DECEIVED! IT'S THEIR NEFARIOUS MIND CONTROL CULT BRAINWASHING!
SOME HAVE TRIED TO LEAVE THE CULT.
"NIGEL TAKES IT IRL"
"NIGEL WILL TRASH YOUR REPUTATION"
THE TENTACLES OF NIGELCORP ARE OMNISCIENT, OMNIPRESENT AND UPPITY.
DID YOU SEE HER SIG? THIS WOMAN WEARS MOTHER TERESA'S SKULL.
RUN. RUN AS FAST AS YOU CAN AND DON'T STOP UNTIL YOU REACH THE SAFETY OF A DESOLATE RV PARK IN THE DESERT WHERE YOU CAN GO COMPLETELY BONKERS.
:roll:
:lulz: ALL WHO AGREE WITH THE WICKED NIGEL ARE SIMPLY SQUISHY-MINDED PAWNS, BOWING TO THE MIGHTY POWERS OF MY THIRST FOR CORRUPTION!!!
:roll:
As if you aren't intelligent people who make up your own minds. Also, as if we haven't totally had arguments, sometimes quite heated ones.
Quote from: Nigel on April 27, 2012, 06:01:07 AM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on April 27, 2012, 04:28:43 AM
NIGEL IS THE MASTERMIND WHO CONTROLS DOK, AND DOK CONTROLS THE CULT OF ROGER
WHEN WE AGREE WITH EITHER OF THEM OR CEDE A POINT WE WERE TRYING TO MAKE, IS IT BECAUSE THEY WERE CORRECT?
BECAUSE THEY SOMEHOW PROVOKED US TO SEE A SITUATION FROM ANOTHER ANGLE, OR POINTED OUT A FLAW IN OUR LOGIC, OR PROVIDED SOME FRESH INFORMATION?
OH HO, FOOLISH CABBAGES! HOW YOU HAVE BEEN DECEIVED! IT'S THEIR NEFARIOUS MIND CONTROL CULT BRAINWASHING!
SOME HAVE TRIED TO LEAVE THE CULT.
"NIGEL TAKES IT IRL"
"NIGEL WILL TRASH YOUR REPUTATION"
THE TENTACLES OF NIGELCORP ARE OMNISCIENT, OMNIPRESENT AND UPPITY.
DID YOU SEE HER SIG? THIS WOMAN WEARS MOTHER TERESA'S SKULL.
RUN. RUN AS FAST AS YOU CAN AND DON'T STOP UNTIL YOU REACH THE SAFETY OF A DESOLATE RV PARK IN THE DESERT WHERE YOU CAN GO COMPLETELY BONKERS.
:roll:
:lulz: ALL WHO AGREE WITH THE WICKED NIGEL ARE SIMPLY SQUISHY-MINDED PAWNS, BOWING TO THE MIGHTY POWERS OF MY THIRST FOR CORRUPTION!!!
I DON'T REMEMBER WRITING THAT POST! I WAS SITTING HERE EATING A FRUIT SALAD AND THE NEXT THING I KNEW IT WAS THREE HOURS LATER! SHE
MADE ME DO IT!!!!!!!
Quote from: Nigel on April 27, 2012, 06:02:22 AM
:roll:
As if you aren't intelligent people who make up your own minds. Also, as if we haven't totally had arguments, sometimes quite heated ones.
Ya I mean I never ever ever EVER got into a stupid with Roger over my own stupidity. I have always been his dutiful thrall.
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on April 27, 2012, 06:14:39 AM
Quote from: Nigel on April 27, 2012, 06:01:07 AM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on April 27, 2012, 04:28:43 AM
NIGEL IS THE MASTERMIND WHO CONTROLS DOK, AND DOK CONTROLS THE CULT OF ROGER
WHEN WE AGREE WITH EITHER OF THEM OR CEDE A POINT WE WERE TRYING TO MAKE, IS IT BECAUSE THEY WERE CORRECT?
BECAUSE THEY SOMEHOW PROVOKED US TO SEE A SITUATION FROM ANOTHER ANGLE, OR POINTED OUT A FLAW IN OUR LOGIC, OR PROVIDED SOME FRESH INFORMATION?
OH HO, FOOLISH CABBAGES! HOW YOU HAVE BEEN DECEIVED! IT'S THEIR NEFARIOUS MIND CONTROL CULT BRAINWASHING!
SOME HAVE TRIED TO LEAVE THE CULT.
"NIGEL TAKES IT IRL"
"NIGEL WILL TRASH YOUR REPUTATION"
THE TENTACLES OF NIGELCORP ARE OMNISCIENT, OMNIPRESENT AND UPPITY.
DID YOU SEE HER SIG? THIS WOMAN WEARS MOTHER TERESA'S SKULL.
RUN. RUN AS FAST AS YOU CAN AND DON'T STOP UNTIL YOU REACH THE SAFETY OF A DESOLATE RV PARK IN THE DESERT WHERE YOU CAN GO COMPLETELY BONKERS.
:roll:
:lulz: ALL WHO AGREE WITH THE WICKED NIGEL ARE SIMPLY SQUISHY-MINDED PAWNS, BOWING TO THE MIGHTY POWERS OF MY THIRST FOR CORRUPTION!!!
I DON'T REMEMBER WRITING THAT POST! I WAS SITTING HERE EATING A FRUIT SALAD AND THE NEXT THING I KNEW IT WAS THREE HOURS LATER! SHE MADE ME DO IT!!!!!!!
:lol:
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 27, 2012, 06:15:43 AM
Quote from: Nigel on April 27, 2012, 06:02:22 AM
:roll:
As if you aren't intelligent people who make up your own minds. Also, as if we haven't totally had arguments, sometimes quite heated ones.
Ya I mean I never ever ever EVER got into a stupid with Roger over my own stupidity. I have always been his dutiful thrall.
That's the thing. We have all had arguments, and maybe even fallings-out. And we have worked it out.
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 03:11:04 AM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:08:33 AM
Nope, she sticks to trashing reputations, like she did with me, like she did with Cram, like she did with TTM, like she did with PurpleEris, anyone she doesn't like. She doesn't get threads, she gets personal. Good on you for sticking up for that.
I'm done with you, think what you want. I won't lose any sleep over it.
Even if that were accurate, it beats some shitneck who waits for someone to post threads, and then does his level best to trash them. I spent the last week writing. You, with some help from QG, killed damn near every thread I made.
So what you're here for is to fight. It's all you've been here for, for at least a year.
I wonder why that is, RWHN?
Fuck off, I haven't done anything to any of your threads this week. This one was a stupid joke with absolutely ZERO connections to your thread except for the connection you invented in your mind.
And QG is her own person, take up whatever she did to piss you off with her.
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 03:12:55 AM
Also, I gotta ask you, RWHN...You want to keep this up? I mean, if I know that each and everything I write is going to get chewed up by RWHN's butthurt, I'll just say fuck it, and go at it with you hammer and tongs.
So, I'm gonna ask you one more time...How far do you want to go down this road?
I'm going to post what I'm going to post. I'm not going to walk on eggshells. If I want to post jokes, I'm going to post jokes. I will avoid pun riffing on your thread titles, since you seem to be a sensitive little flower lately. So you can rest assured there.
However, If you want to continue to invent reasons to be upset with what I post that's your deal, and has nothing to do with me. I suggest maybe pulling away from the computer a little more often, that might help.
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on April 27, 2012, 03:32:37 AM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:08:33 AM
Nope, she sticks to trashing reputations, like she did with me, like she did with Cram, like she did with TTM, like she did with PurpleEris, anyone she doesn't like. She doesn't get threads, she gets personal. Good on you for sticking up for that.
I'm done with you, think what you want. I won't lose any sleep over it.
Dude, you're coming off like Khara's pet parrot.
:lulz:
That's very funny coming from you.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 10:53:33 AM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 03:12:55 AM
Also, I gotta ask you, RWHN...You want to keep this up? I mean, if I know that each and everything I write is going to get chewed up by RWHN's butthurt, I'll just say fuck it, and go at it with you hammer and tongs.
So, I'm gonna ask you one more time...How far do you want to go down this road?
I'm going to post what I'm going to post. I'm not going to walk on eggshells. If I want to post jokes, I'm going to post jokes. I will avoid pun riffing on your thread titles, since you seem to be a sensitive little flower lately. So you can rest assured there.
However, If you want to continue to invent reasons to be upset with what I post that's your deal, and has nothing to do with me. I suggest maybe pulling away from the computer a little more often, that might help.
I see. So you trash threads, but it's the other guy who needs to step away.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 10:51:01 AM
Fuck off, I haven't done anything to any of your threads this week.
Well, sure. Except for the death by pedantry on one rant, this shit, etc.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 10:51:01 AM
And QG is her own person, take up whatever she did to piss you off with her.
I did. So now I'm here taking up with YOU what you did to piss me off.
I mean, this is what you wanted, right?
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 01:58:15 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 10:51:01 AM
Fuck off, I haven't done anything to any of your threads this week.
Well, sure. Except for the death by pedantry on one rant, this shit, etc.
This shit was a joke that had nothing to do with you, other than borrowing your thread title for a visual pun-riff. You're too sensitive.
You'll have to link me up to the rant you are talking about because I'm not recalling it.
And I can play this game too if you want. Like my "Non-Answers" thread that you decided to turn into a brainstorming session with LMNO about a recording project.
I mean, really man, if you are going to assume that every piece of thread drift, side-bar, whatever is part of some grand scheme to "get you" you're going to be wasting a lot of time being butt-hurt about nothing. Life's waaay too short for that kind of nonsense.
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 01:56:21 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 10:53:33 AM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 03:12:55 AM
Also, I gotta ask you, RWHN...You want to keep this up? I mean, if I know that each and everything I write is going to get chewed up by RWHN's butthurt, I'll just say fuck it, and go at it with you hammer and tongs.
So, I'm gonna ask you one more time...How far do you want to go down this road?
I'm going to post what I'm going to post. I'm not going to walk on eggshells. If I want to post jokes, I'm going to post jokes. I will avoid pun riffing on your thread titles, since you seem to be a sensitive little flower lately. So you can rest assured there.
However, If you want to continue to invent reasons to be upset with what I post that's your deal, and has nothing to do with me. I suggest maybe pulling away from the computer a little more often, that might help.
I see. So you trash threads, but it's the other guy who needs to step away.
I don't trash threads skippy. I may be just as guilty as anyone else here about inadvertently causing a thread-jack, thread-drift, whatever, but that's just par for the course round here. It happens to my threads too, and sometimes you participate in those jacks and drifts. I don't assume it's part of some master plan you have against me. Really.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 02:16:02 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 01:58:15 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 10:51:01 AM
Fuck off, I haven't done anything to any of your threads this week.
Well, sure. Except for the death by pedantry on one rant, this shit, etc.
This shit was a joke that had nothing to do with you, other than borrowing your thread title for a visual pun-riff. You're too sensitive.
You'll have to link me up to the rant you are talking about because I'm not recalling it.
And I can play this game too if you want. Like my "Non-Answers" thread that you decided to turn into a brainstorming session with LMNO about a recording project.
I mean, really man, if you are going to assume that every piece of thread drift, side-bar, whatever is part of some grand scheme to "get you" you're going to be wasting a lot of time being butt-hurt about nothing. Life's waaay too short for that kind of nonsense.
Yeah, I'm too sensitive. Prone to hystrionics. I need my smelling salts. I'm the only person that's seeing this shit.
Hey, look, RWHN, when you piss dowh the back of my neck, at least have the decency to not try and tell me it's raining.
Oh, I remember now, you're talking about your "suicide prevention" thread. Meh, I will own that I threw out some information that obviously didn't interest anyone. However, the 5 or 6 other asshats who decided to jump in and get all butt-hurt over it, that's on them. (People could've simply ignored it and moved on instead of deciding they needed to be one of the cool kids and get their licks in.)
If everyone really didn't want that to "derail" that thread then...
"Oh. Well, Then Stop"
But I'm sorry that your thread ended up going wonky, but I think maybe you should encourage some of your fans to exercise a little more will power and restraint. That might go a long way to prevent matters from blowing up larger than they need to.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 02:19:04 PM
I don't trash threads skippy.
Uh huh. Then neither will I, to the same extent that you "don't".
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 02:26:57 PM
Oh, I remember now, you're talking about your "suicide prevention" thread. Meh, I will own that I threw out some information that obviously didn't interest anyone. However, the 5 or 6 other asshats who decided to jump in and get all butt-hurt over it, that's on them. (People could've simply ignored it and moved on instead of deciding they needed to be one of the cool kids and get their licks in.)
If everyone really didn't want that to "derail" that thread then...
"Oh. Well, Then Stop"
But I'm sorry that your thread ended up going wonky, but I think maybe you should encourage some of your fans to exercise a little more will power and restraint. That might go a long way to prevent matters from blowing up larger than they need to.
So it's not your actions that were wrong, it was everyone elses'.
It must be rough, being such a fucking saint surrounded by evil Roger cultists.
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 02:26:21 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 02:16:02 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 01:58:15 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 10:51:01 AM
Fuck off, I haven't done anything to any of your threads this week.
Well, sure. Except for the death by pedantry on one rant, this shit, etc.
This shit was a joke that had nothing to do with you, other than borrowing your thread title for a visual pun-riff. You're too sensitive.
You'll have to link me up to the rant you are talking about because I'm not recalling it.
And I can play this game too if you want. Like my "Non-Answers" thread that you decided to turn into a brainstorming session with LMNO about a recording project.
I mean, really man, if you are going to assume that every piece of thread drift, side-bar, whatever is part of some grand scheme to "get you" you're going to be wasting a lot of time being butt-hurt about nothing. Life's waaay too short for that kind of nonsense.
Yeah, I'm too sensitive. Prone to hystrionics. I need my smelling salts. I'm the only person that's seeing this shit.
Hey, look, RWHN, when you piss dowh the back of my neck, at least have the decency to not try and tell me it's raining.
You see what you want to see because I think, for whatever reason, you like the drama. I could be wrong, but it's how it appears from where I'm sitting.
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 02:27:35 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 02:19:04 PM
I don't trash threads skippy.
Uh huh. Then neither will I, to the same extent that you "don't".
Whatever floats your boat mac.
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 02:28:36 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 02:26:57 PM
Oh, I remember now, you're talking about your "suicide prevention" thread. Meh, I will own that I threw out some information that obviously didn't interest anyone. However, the 5 or 6 other asshats who decided to jump in and get all butt-hurt over it, that's on them. (People could've simply ignored it and moved on instead of deciding they needed to be one of the cool kids and get their licks in.)
If everyone really didn't want that to "derail" that thread then...
"Oh. Well, Then Stop"
But I'm sorry that your thread ended up going wonky, but I think maybe you should encourage some of your fans to exercise a little more will power and restraint. That might go a long way to prevent matters from blowing up larger than they need to.
So it's not your actions that were wrong, it was everyone elses'.
It must be rough, being such a fucking saint surrounded by evil Roger cultists.
Everyone else compounded the situation, whether you are willing to acknowledge that or not. See, it would be a lot different if it was just you and me discussing whatever our disagreement was. But that's not how it works. When you and I have a disagreement, Freeky HAS to jump in. Anna Mae HAS to jump in. Nigel HAS to jump in.
I mean, you and I are a couple of big boys, we should be able to sort out any disagreements on our own without a bunch of looky-loos deciding they need to have a piece of the action.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 02:32:56 PM
Everyone else compounded the situation, whether you are willing to acknowledge that or not.
Which totally justifies you initiating the situation.
I was, I thought, contributing to the topic. If you didn't like it, you could've just said so, I would've stopped (which I did), and that would be that. Instead you and your crew decided to go into drama mode. You guys own that, not me. I already said I was sorry that post screwed things up. But I'm not owning anything beyond my post. The behavior of others belongs with the others.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 02:36:37 PM
I was, I thought, contributing to the topic.
I don't believe that for a second. You're a smart guy, RWHN, and you're not some internet aspie. That thread was blatantly over the top, there was no fucking question about whether or not I was any sort of authority on suicide, or whatever.
But why let a joke run, when you can take out your personal issues on it by killing the joke with pedantic bullshit?
Then this little "joke".
I prefer to write at PD. It relaxes me. However, it seems that I can't relax by writing, because a few people, most notably yourself, insist on fucking with me every time I DO write something. So I won't be writing, because it isn't relaxing under these circumstances. Instead, we'll be doing this, or at the very least doing what you do on any threads you attempt to start.
I'm okay with this.
"Every time"
Yes, "every time". So if I go thread diving I will see that I, RWHN, have ruined every single one of the serious threads you started, right?
Because I trash all of them, right?
Every single one of them, right?
Me, posting a stupid joke riffing on your thread title and posting in your suicide thread is not "every time"
It is, in fact, two times, out of how many threads you've started in the past week?
And one of the two, this joke, had ZERO to do with you. I borrowed a thread title and did a pun-riff. End of story. Even the suicide thread, I was just sharing knowledge for anyone who was interested. It could've been ignored, but NO, everyone had to go on a two-page sarcastic posting spree to make sure we made a mountain of that molehill.
It is as it always is, overreaction to stupid, throw-away jokes/posts. I don't know why you can't see that, other than you don't want to see it.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 02:50:33 PM
It is as it always is, overreaction to stupid, throw-away jokes/posts. I don't know why you can't see that, other than you don't want to see it.
Then you'll have no objection when I return the favor forever, right? Because it's just a joke?
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 02:52:06 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 02:50:33 PM
It is as it always is, overreaction to stupid, throw-away jokes/posts. I don't know why you can't see that, other than you don't want to see it.
Then you'll have no objection when I return the favor forever, right? Because it's just a joke?
Dude, this isn't the first time we've been here. You had this same over-the-top reaction because I posted a stupid pun in a thread. ECH has threatened to do the same damned thing.
I mean really, if it is really going to make you feel better to trash any thread I start, go for it man. It ain't going to ruin my day.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 02:58:23 PM
Dude, this isn't the first time we've been here. You had this same over-the-top reaction because I posted a stupid pun in a thread. ECH has threatened to do the same damned thing.
Notice a pattern? You post some "funny" shit in or about someone's thread, and people get mad at you. You specialize in prevention, right? That is, correct me if I'm wrong, pretty heavily into cause & effect on a behavioral level. So why is it so hard to see the pattern here?
I'm assuming its not difficult to see at all. I'm working under the assumption that you do this shit on purpose, and I am doing so based on the fact that you are not stupid.
So, yeah, Nigel does a thread called "uncomfortable topics", so you run a thread under the same name. Not funny. I do a thread called "you people", so you do "ewe people". Not funny. I post a thread, you slay it with pedantic bullshit. Again, not funny.
You know precisely what you're doing. You've been doing it for just about a year. Maybe there's a pattern to that, too, right?
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 02:58:23 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 02:52:06 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 02:50:33 PM
It is as it always is, overreaction to stupid, throw-away jokes/posts. I don't know why you can't see that, other than you don't want to see it.
Then you'll have no objection when I return the favor forever, right? Because it's just a joke?
Dude, this isn't the first time we've been here. You had this same over-the-top reaction because I posted a stupid pun in a thread. ECH has threatened to do the same damned thing.
I mean really, if it is really going to make you feel better to trash any thread I start, go for it man. It ain't going to ruin my day.
It's not you, it's everyone else.
Do you also shift the blame for everything onto your (ex) wife?
Quote from: Nigel on April 27, 2012, 03:06:18 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 02:58:23 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 02:52:06 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 02:50:33 PM
It is as it always is, overreaction to stupid, throw-away jokes/posts. I don't know why you can't see that, other than you don't want to see it.
Then you'll have no objection when I return the favor forever, right? Because it's just a joke?
Dude, this isn't the first time we've been here. You had this same over-the-top reaction because I posted a stupid pun in a thread. ECH has threatened to do the same damned thing.
I mean really, if it is really going to make you feel better to trash any thread I start, go for it man. It ain't going to ruin my day.
It's not you, it's everyone else.
Do you also shift the blame for everything onto your (ex) wife?
Yeah, speaking about patterns, the time he started acting like a dick was about the time he stopped mentioning his wife & kids, and just started mentioning his kids.
I mean, there's no harm there. Every dad wants to brag up his kids. I know I do. It's just the relatively recent omission of his wife at the same time that he started using this board for his "lol" at other peoples' expense was kind of noticeable.
But, hell, I'm just joking around, here. HAW HAW!
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 03:05:25 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 02:58:23 PM
Dude, this isn't the first time we've been here. You had this same over-the-top reaction because I posted a stupid pun in a thread. ECH has threatened to do the same damned thing.
Notice a pattern? You post some "funny" shit in or about someone's thread, and people get mad at you. You specialize in prevention, right? That is, correct me if I'm wrong, pretty heavily into cause & effect on a behavioral level. So why is it so hard to see the pattern here?
I'm assuming its not difficult to see at all. I'm working under the assumption that you do this shit on purpose, and I am doing so based on the fact that you are not stupid.
So, yeah, Nigel does a thread called "uncomfortable topics", so you run a thread under the same name. Not funny. I do a thread called "you people", so you do "ewe people". Not funny. I post a thread, you slay it with pedantic bullshit. Again, not funny.
You know precisely what you're doing. You've been doing it for just about a year. Maybe there's a pattern to that, too, right?
Yeah, the pattern is you reading things that aren't there.
You - Ewe was a pun riff.
The "uncomfortable topics" thing was categorical. Kinda like how we've had multiple "Difficult Choices" threads. I mean "uncomfortable topic
s" s, plural, kinda suggests that there is more than one topic that is uncomfortable, right? I mean, that's kind of how that part of the English language works. So race is an uncomfortable topic, it seemed kinda obvious, given the history here, that drugs are also an uncomfortable topic.
You made some stupid connection with Nigel's thread because you wanted to see that connection and get upset. You created that monster, not me. You and Nigel own that, not me.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:10:06 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 03:05:25 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 02:58:23 PM
Dude, this isn't the first time we've been here. You had this same over-the-top reaction because I posted a stupid pun in a thread. ECH has threatened to do the same damned thing.
Notice a pattern? You post some "funny" shit in or about someone's thread, and people get mad at you. You specialize in prevention, right? That is, correct me if I'm wrong, pretty heavily into cause & effect on a behavioral level. So why is it so hard to see the pattern here?
I'm assuming its not difficult to see at all. I'm working under the assumption that you do this shit on purpose, and I am doing so based on the fact that you are not stupid.
So, yeah, Nigel does a thread called "uncomfortable topics", so you run a thread under the same name. Not funny. I do a thread called "you people", so you do "ewe people". Not funny. I post a thread, you slay it with pedantic bullshit. Again, not funny.
You know precisely what you're doing. You've been doing it for just about a year. Maybe there's a pattern to that, too, right?
Yeah, the pattern is you reading things that aren't there.
Hey, you're the one that pointed the pattern out.
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 03:08:54 PM
Quote from: Nigel on April 27, 2012, 03:06:18 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 02:58:23 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 02:52:06 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 02:50:33 PM
It is as it always is, overreaction to stupid, throw-away jokes/posts. I don't know why you can't see that, other than you don't want to see it.
Then you'll have no objection when I return the favor forever, right? Because it's just a joke?
Dude, this isn't the first time we've been here. You had this same over-the-top reaction because I posted a stupid pun in a thread. ECH has threatened to do the same damned thing.
I mean really, if it is really going to make you feel better to trash any thread I start, go for it man. It ain't going to ruin my day.
It's not you, it's everyone else.
Do you also shift the blame for everything onto your (ex) wife?
Yeah, speaking about patterns, the time he started acting like a dick was about the time he stopped mentioning his wife & kids, and just started mentioning his kids.
I mean, there's no harm there. Every dad wants to brag up his kids. I know I do. It's just the relatively recent omission of his wife at the same time that he started using this board for his "lol" at other peoples' expense was kind of noticeable.
But, hell, I'm just joking around, here. HAW HAW!
Yeah, she left me for the mailman. Sad story.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:10:06 PM
Kinda like how we've had multiple "Difficult Choices" threads.
All started by Cram.
ETA: Or not, apparently.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:11:50 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 03:08:54 PM
Quote from: Nigel on April 27, 2012, 03:06:18 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 02:58:23 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 02:52:06 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 02:50:33 PM
It is as it always is, overreaction to stupid, throw-away jokes/posts. I don't know why you can't see that, other than you don't want to see it.
Then you'll have no objection when I return the favor forever, right? Because it's just a joke?
Dude, this isn't the first time we've been here. You had this same over-the-top reaction because I posted a stupid pun in a thread. ECH has threatened to do the same damned thing.
I mean really, if it is really going to make you feel better to trash any thread I start, go for it man. It ain't going to ruin my day.
It's not you, it's everyone else.
Do you also shift the blame for everything onto your (ex) wife?
Yeah, speaking about patterns, the time he started acting like a dick was about the time he stopped mentioning his wife & kids, and just started mentioning his kids.
I mean, there's no harm there. Every dad wants to brag up his kids. I know I do. It's just the relatively recent omission of his wife at the same time that he started using this board for his "lol" at other peoples' expense was kind of noticeable.
But, hell, I'm just joking around, here. HAW HAW!
Yeah, she left me for the mailman. Sad story.
Well, it would explain your shift in behavior last year, wouldn't it?
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 03:12:19 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:10:06 PM
Kinda like how we've had multiple "Difficult Choices" threads.
All started by Cram.
Most, with one exception.
http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php/topic,13435.0.html (http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php/topic,13435.0.html)
So, I guess this means 000 was having a go at Cram right? By borrowing a thread title for a different kind of topic.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:16:26 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 03:12:19 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:10:06 PM
Kinda like how we've had multiple "Difficult Choices" threads.
All started by Cram.
Most, with one exception.
http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php/topic,13435.0.html (http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php/topic,13435.0.html)
So, I guess this means 000 was having a go at Cram right? By borrowing a thread title for a different kind of topic.
Were they posted within the same day or two?
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:10:06 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 03:05:25 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 02:58:23 PM
Dude, this isn't the first time we've been here. You had this same over-the-top reaction because I posted a stupid pun in a thread. ECH has threatened to do the same damned thing.
Notice a pattern? You post some "funny" shit in or about someone's thread, and people get mad at you. You specialize in prevention, right? That is, correct me if I'm wrong, pretty heavily into cause & effect on a behavioral level. So why is it so hard to see the pattern here?
I'm assuming its not difficult to see at all. I'm working under the assumption that you do this shit on purpose, and I am doing so based on the fact that you are not stupid.
So, yeah, Nigel does a thread called "uncomfortable topics", so you run a thread under the same name. Not funny. I do a thread called "you people", so you do "ewe people". Not funny. I post a thread, you slay it with pedantic bullshit. Again, not funny.
You know precisely what you're doing. You've been doing it for just about a year. Maybe there's a pattern to that, too, right?
Yeah, the pattern is you reading things that aren't there.
You - Ewe was a pun riff.
The "uncomfortable topics" thing was categorical. Kinda like how we've had multiple "Difficult Choices" threads. I mean "uncomfortable topics" s, plural, kinda suggests that there is more than one topic that is uncomfortable, right? I mean, that's kind of how that part of the English language works. So race is an uncomfortable topic, it seemed kinda obvious, given the history here, that drugs are also an uncomfortable topic.
You made some stupid connection with Nigel's thread because you wanted to see that connection and get upset. You created that monster, not me. You and Nigel own that, not me.
You started that thread shortly after announcing "I hate you! Never talk to me again!", and it was some stupid joke thread making fun of the thread title. Why do you think everyone else here is stupid, RWHN?
You may be going through crap in your personal life, but can you maybe stop taking it out on the board?
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 03:16:57 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:16:26 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 03:12:19 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:10:06 PM
Kinda like how we've had multiple "Difficult Choices" threads.
All started by Cram.
Most, with one exception.
http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php/topic,13435.0.html (http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php/topic,13435.0.html)
So, I guess this means 000 was having a go at Cram right? By borrowing a thread title for a different kind of topic.
Were they posted within the same day or two?
I don't recall 000 telling Cram that he dislikes him and to never respond to him again, either.
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 03:13:07 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:11:50 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 03:08:54 PM
Quote from: Nigel on April 27, 2012, 03:06:18 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 02:58:23 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 02:52:06 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 02:50:33 PM
It is as it always is, overreaction to stupid, throw-away jokes/posts. I don't know why you can't see that, other than you don't want to see it.
Then you'll have no objection when I return the favor forever, right? Because it's just a joke?
Dude, this isn't the first time we've been here. You had this same over-the-top reaction because I posted a stupid pun in a thread. ECH has threatened to do the same damned thing.
I mean really, if it is really going to make you feel better to trash any thread I start, go for it man. It ain't going to ruin my day.
It's not you, it's everyone else.
Do you also shift the blame for everything onto your (ex) wife?
Yeah, speaking about patterns, the time he started acting like a dick was about the time he stopped mentioning his wife & kids, and just started mentioning his kids.
I mean, there's no harm there. Every dad wants to brag up his kids. I know I do. It's just the relatively recent omission of his wife at the same time that he started using this board for his "lol" at other peoples' expense was kind of noticeable.
But, hell, I'm just joking around, here. HAW HAW!
Yeah, she left me for the mailman. Sad story.
Well, it would explain your shift in behavior last year, wouldn't it?
Yeah, if it were true. That too, was a joke.
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 03:16:57 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:16:26 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 03:12:19 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:10:06 PM
Kinda like how we've had multiple "Difficult Choices" threads.
All started by Cram.
Most, with one exception.
http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php/topic,13435.0.html (http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php/topic,13435.0.html)
So, I guess this means 000 was having a go at Cram right? By borrowing a thread title for a different kind of topic.
Were they posted within the same day or two?
Uh oh, better put on the brakes because your goal posts seem to be moving on their own.
So, please share with me, the official criteria and waiting period for when one can use a similar thread title as someone else.
Does this apply to ATTN threads as well?
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:19:28 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 03:13:07 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:11:50 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 03:08:54 PM
Quote from: Nigel on April 27, 2012, 03:06:18 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 02:58:23 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 02:52:06 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 02:50:33 PM
It is as it always is, overreaction to stupid, throw-away jokes/posts. I don't know why you can't see that, other than you don't want to see it.
Then you'll have no objection when I return the favor forever, right? Because it's just a joke?
Dude, this isn't the first time we've been here. You had this same over-the-top reaction because I posted a stupid pun in a thread. ECH has threatened to do the same damned thing.
I mean really, if it is really going to make you feel better to trash any thread I start, go for it man. It ain't going to ruin my day.
It's not you, it's everyone else.
Do you also shift the blame for everything onto your (ex) wife?
Yeah, speaking about patterns, the time he started acting like a dick was about the time he stopped mentioning his wife & kids, and just started mentioning his kids.
I mean, there's no harm there. Every dad wants to brag up his kids. I know I do. It's just the relatively recent omission of his wife at the same time that he started using this board for his "lol" at other peoples' expense was kind of noticeable.
But, hell, I'm just joking around, here. HAW HAW!
Yeah, she left me for the mailman. Sad story.
Well, it would explain your shift in behavior last year, wouldn't it?
Yeah, if it were true. That too, was a joke.
Well, just saying. You still brag up your kids (and there's nothing wrong with that, I assure you), but when's the last time you mentioned Mrs RWHN in conversation?
I may be mistaken, but IIRC, it was about the time you decided to be "funny" all the time.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:21:15 PM
Uh oh, better put on the brakes because your goal posts seem to be moving on their own.
I don't care. I am merely giving you what you obviously wanted. You went out of your way to fuck with me, so I'm returning the favor.
ETA: And it's just a matter of my esteem for you that I do so. QG decided to get in on the act, but I hardly know her, so I wrote her off (especially given her employing the one insult guaranteed to piss off a Discordian...ie, that I am not actually a person. So far, you haven't done that, so I am showing a little restraint, here).
There's this kind of huge difference between people who are friendly riffing off each other's topics, and people who are hostile riffing on the topics of those they are being actively hostile toward.
This is kindergarten sociology... I don't think it really needs to be spelled out, does it?
If your best friend walks up to you at lunch and takes a bite of your apple, well shit, it's your best friend, right? It's a gesture of closeness.
If the kid who told you to stop fucking looking at him or else does it, it's hard to interpret that as anything other than a deliberately provocative hostile action.
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 03:21:20 PM
Well, just saying. You still brag up your kids (and there's nothing wrong with that, I assure you), but when's the last time you mentioned Mrs RWHN in conversation?
I may be mistaken, but IIRC, it was about the time you decided to be "funny" all the time.
Well, if it makes you feel any better. I am still very happily married to my drop-dead gorgeous wife. I am a very lucky man!
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 03:22:22 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:21:15 PM
Uh oh, better put on the brakes because your goal posts seem to be moving on their own.
I don't care. I am merely giving you what you obviously wanted. You went out of your way to fuck with me, so I'm returning the favor.
ETA: And it's just a matter of my esteem for you that I do so. QG decided to get in on the act, but I hardly know her, so I wrote her off (especially given her employing the one insult guaranteed to piss off a Discordian...ie, that I am not actually a person. So far, you haven't done that, so I am showing a little restraint, here).
Okay, thanks, I guess.
If it makes you feel any better, I still have a healthy respect for you. I think you're a damned good (and prolific in a high-quality kind of way) writer. This place would suffer mightliy without your content.
But I do feel like you are prone, with me, to read things that aren't there.
I do disagree with you a lot. We have different philosophies that guide us, I think it is fair to say. But I think you often mistake my disagreement on any particular topic of discussion, including discussions of board dynamics, as some kind of personal thing, when it isn't.
Yes, sometimes it IS personal with Nigel. I just don't like her, and I've been doing my best to avoid her, but however smart and intelligent I may be, I'm still human. In fact I have her on ignore and only see her posts when others are quoting her.
But I really don't go out of my way to purposefully and subliminally poke at you. I really don't.
The suicide thing came out of the fact that it is something I deal with occassionally in my job, so I wanted to share, and tried to preface that post with the fact that I was just interested in sharing the info. This stupid thread was honestly just a stupid visual pun riffing on the You People thread title. I honestly couldn't even tell you what that thread was about. I only barely skimmed it.
Anyway, I've said my piece. Take it for whatever it is worth.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:26:19 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 03:21:20 PM
Well, just saying. You still brag up your kids (and there's nothing wrong with that, I assure you), but when's the last time you mentioned Mrs RWHN in conversation?
I may be mistaken, but IIRC, it was about the time you decided to be "funny" all the time.
Well, if it makes you feel any better. I am still very happily married to my drop-dead gorgeous wife. I am a very lucky man!
"Happily" in the same way you "basically" have the same degree as my best friend? :lulz:
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:38:08 PM
Yes, sometimes it IS personal with Nigel. I just don't like her, and I've been doing my best to avoid her, but however smart and intelligent I may be, I'm still human. In fact I have her on ignore and only see her posts when others are quoting her.
But you have no problem talking about her. :kingmeh:
QuoteBut I really don't go out of my way to purposefully and subliminally poke at you. I really don't.
It's really simple. I like to write, to relax. It isn't very relaxing when you have what can be viewed as a heckler, especially when they quote "just skim your threads". I will not tolerate being the butt of your "jokes", at least not without a little reciprocation. I really can't make it any plainer than that.
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 04:19:07 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:38:08 PM
Yes, sometimes it IS personal with Nigel. I just don't like her, and I've been doing my best to avoid her, but however smart and intelligent I may be, I'm still human. In fact I have her on ignore and only see her posts when others are quoting her.
But you have no problem talking about her. :kingmeh:
Not when she's a part of the discussion at hand.
QuoteQuoteBut I really don't go out of my way to purposefully and subliminally poke at you. I really don't.
It's really simple. I like to write, to relax. It isn't very relaxing when you have what can be viewed as a heckler, especially when they quote "just skim your threads". I will not tolerate being the butt of your "jokes", at least not without a little reciprocation. I really can't make it any plainer than that.
Again, you are selectively ignoring pieces of my response, particularly the pieces of my response that address your concerns.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 04:31:19 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 04:19:07 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:38:08 PM
Yes, sometimes it IS personal with Nigel. I just don't like her, and I've been doing my best to avoid her, but however smart and intelligent I may be, I'm still human. In fact I have her on ignore and only see her posts when others are quoting her.
But you have no problem talking about her. :kingmeh:
Not when she's a part of the discussion at hand.
QuoteQuoteBut I really don't go out of my way to purposefully and subliminally poke at you. I really don't.
It's really simple. I like to write, to relax. It isn't very relaxing when you have what can be viewed as a heckler, especially when they quote "just skim your threads". I will not tolerate being the butt of your "jokes", at least not without a little reciprocation. I really can't make it any plainer than that.
Again, you are selectively ignoring pieces of my response, particularly the pieces of my response that address your concerns.
That (my response) is my only actual concern.
Then your concerns are misplaced because you have not been the butt of any jokes and the "skimming" is solely in reference to the You People thread. Par for the course you take that and generalize it to the larger whole.
Now, I'm not going to say I read every word of every thread you start or every rant you write. I don't. I have a limited amount of free time at home and at work. But I do read a lot of your stuff, because as I said, I think you are a great writer. I don't always agree with what you write, and most of the time I keep that to myself, precisely because I don't want to piss you off and start drama. But, that I don't read everything isn't a slight. I'm a busy guy these days.
Due to the cumbersome nature of reading and posting on the phone on my lunch break im not going to get through the rest of this thread. However my two cents- trip is correct. If someone did something to a thread i wrote i would be miffed. Whether i voiced that would be dependent on my mood. That said i cant comment on rwhns motives but even in the event that he was meaning no harm he really ought to have known better. What ive read so far is pretty much what i epected the result to be. He should have expected it too.
What I expected was what I usually get with one of my pun/gag threads. Silence or groans and eye-rolls. Irrational knee-jerk responses are not my responsibility. Am I still on a Discordian website?
Are you really going to go so far as to blatantly ignore previous reactions to this type of thing?
When every other person posting, even people who have no personal problem with you are pointing out that given past events this result was expected and you should have known that this would happen, maybe it's you.
Quote from: Doktor M. Phox0 on April 27, 2012, 06:57:01 PM
Are you really going to go so far as to blatantly ignore previous reactions to this type of thing?
When every other person posting, even people who have no personal problem with you are pointing out that given past events this result was expected and you should have known that this would happen, maybe it's you.
No, no... how many times does he have to say it? It's not him, it's
everybody else. :lol:
Dude- people get miffed if it seems like youre frivolizing something they put thought into.
Quote from: Doktor M. Phox0 on April 27, 2012, 06:57:01 PM
Are you really going to go so far as to blatantly ignore previous reactions to this type of thing?
When every other person posting, even people who have no personal problem with you are pointing out that given past events this result was expected and you should have known that this would happen, maybe it's you.
Again, irrational knee-jerk reactions are not my responsibility. Whether they are one or three. I am not going to censor myself because others are itching to find reasons to be offended. Especially, when I am in no way attempting to stir up trouble.
Quote from: The Twiddlerat0r on April 27, 2012, 07:05:30 PM
Dude- people get miffed if it seems like youre frivolizing something they put thought into.
But, I don't know how many times I've explained this, I was not. People can hang on to their miffiness if that yanks their chain, but that doesn't retroactively change my intent. I'm not going to own that.
Ever think its a knee jerk reaction for a reason? That maybe stuff thats offensive is offensive because its offensive?
I probably have no idea what I'm talking about so if I'm wrong just disregard this message.
Proposed solution: All parties apologize for any butthurt they may have caused (intentional or not) and agree to drop any past vendettas (regardless of who they think started it) and refrain from aggressive (whether passive or not) posts. These ideas will be expanded upon in the historic Declaration of Codependence. Come on guys, we Discordians have to stick apart.
This message was brought to you by: Level Heads.
Annnnnnd with that I will remove my nose from where it doesn't belong.
Quote from: Insanity on April 27, 2012, 07:14:07 PM
Annnnnnd with that I will remove my nose from where it doesn't belong.
Probably a good idea.
Quote from: Insanity on April 27, 2012, 07:14:07 PM
I probably have no idea what I'm talking about so if I'm wrong just disregard this message.
Proposed solution: All parties apologize for any butthurt they may have caused (intentional or not) and agree to drop any past vendettas (regardless of who they think started it) and refrain from aggressive (whether passive or not) posts. These ideas will be expanded upon in the historic Declaration of Codependence. Come on guys, we Discordians have to stick apart.
This message was brought to you by: Level Heads.
Annnnnnd with that I will remove my nose from where it doesn't belong.
You just don't get it, kid. :lulz:
Quote from: The Twiddlerat0r on April 27, 2012, 07:08:45 PM
Ever think its a knee jerk reaction for a reason? That maybe stuff thats offensive is offensive because its offensive?
I think it is offensive for an invented reason, yes. See, people keep talking about the past, about the past.
But people are selectively forgetting the part of the past where I have routinely posted stupid puns, pun threads, visual pun threads. I mean, hello, let's remember who we are talking to here.
That part of the context is ALSO important to keep in mind.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 07:23:42 PM
Quote from: The Twiddlerat0r on April 27, 2012, 07:08:45 PM
Ever think its a knee jerk reaction for a reason? That maybe stuff thats offensive is offensive because its offensive?
I think it is offensive for an invented reason, yes. See, people keep talking about the past, about the past.
But people are selectively forgetting the part of the past where I have routinely posted stupid puns, pun threads, visual pun threads. I mean, hello, let's remember who we are talking to here.
That part of the context is ALSO important to keep in mind.
Before, you ran pun threads for their own sake. House of Puns, etc.
Now you do it to heckle. It's gone from funny in a dorky kinda way, to a mean-spirited dig.
Yes, when they are misinterpreted in that way.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 07:23:42 PM
Quote from: The Twiddlerat0r on April 27, 2012, 07:08:45 PM
Ever think its a knee jerk reaction for a reason? That maybe stuff thats offensive is offensive because its offensive?
I think it is offensive for an invented reason, yes. See, people keep talking about the past, about the past.
But people are selectively forgetting the part of the past where I have routinely posted stupid puns, pun threads, visual pun threads. I mean, hello, let's remember who we are talking to here.
That part of the context is ALSO important to keep in mind.
No, RWHN, no one is forgetting that. You are not acknowledging that regardless of your intent, you really, REALLY should have foreseen this outcome given the events that transpired beforehand. Everyone else did, even those who weren't at all involved in it. Either you seriously lack the ability to foresee the most likely outcome to your actions, or you simply don't care. Given how you're digging in your heels, I'm more inclined to think the latter.
And yes you ARE responsible for knee-jerk reactions, when you have done similar things in the past, with similar results, and have the empirical evidence at your disposal to make a judgement call with regard to how a post is going to be received.
But, by all means, continue screeching how your not responsible. :lulz:
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 07:39:00 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 07:36:39 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 07:33:18 PM
Yes, when they are misinterpreted in that way.
Not buying it, dude.
That's your problem, not mine.
Well, not really.
It's both of our problem.
I see it as being awfully similar to the classic (for a reason) scenario where someone steps on your toes. You say "Ow, that hurt! You stepped on my toes!" and they say "Sorry, I didn't mean to".
But it keeps happening. How many times does it have to happen for it to stop being accidental? How many times for carelessness to become cruelty?
Quote from: Doktor M. Phox0 on April 27, 2012, 07:38:30 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 07:23:42 PM
Quote from: The Twiddlerat0r on April 27, 2012, 07:08:45 PM
Ever think its a knee jerk reaction for a reason? That maybe stuff thats offensive is offensive because its offensive?
I think it is offensive for an invented reason, yes. See, people keep talking about the past, about the past.
But people are selectively forgetting the part of the past where I have routinely posted stupid puns, pun threads, visual pun threads. I mean, hello, let's remember who we are talking to here.
That part of the context is ALSO important to keep in mind.
No, RWHN, no one is forgetting that. You are not acknowledging that regardless of your intent, you really, REALLY should have foreseen this outcome given the events that transpired beforehand. Everyone else did, even those who weren't at all involved in it. Either you seriously lack the ability to foresee the most likely outcome to your actions, or you simply don't care. Given how you're digging in your heels, I'm more inclined to think the latter.
And yes you ARE responsible for knee-jerk reactions, when you have done similar things in the past, with similar results, and have the empirical evidence at your disposal to make a judgement call with regard to how a post is going to be received.
But, by all means, continue screeching how your not responsible. :lulz:
I am not Responsible for the behavior of other autonomous individuals.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 07:40:57 PM
I am not Responsible for the behavior of other autonomous individuals.
But you are responsible for your own actions.
Action/reaction. What else would you expect?
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 07:40:57 PM
Quote from: Doktor M. Phox0 on April 27, 2012, 07:38:30 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 07:23:42 PM
Quote from: The Twiddlerat0r on April 27, 2012, 07:08:45 PM
Ever think its a knee jerk reaction for a reason? That maybe stuff thats offensive is offensive because its offensive?
I think it is offensive for an invented reason, yes. See, people keep talking about the past, about the past.
But people are selectively forgetting the part of the past where I have routinely posted stupid puns, pun threads, visual pun threads. I mean, hello, let's remember who we are talking to here.
That part of the context is ALSO important to keep in mind.
No, RWHN, no one is forgetting that. You are not acknowledging that regardless of your intent, you really, REALLY should have foreseen this outcome given the events that transpired beforehand. Everyone else did, even those who weren't at all involved in it. Either you seriously lack the ability to foresee the most likely outcome to your actions, or you simply don't care. Given how you're digging in your heels, I'm more inclined to think the latter.
And yes you ARE responsible for knee-jerk reactions, when you have done similar things in the past, with similar results, and have the empirical evidence at your disposal to make a judgement call with regard to how a post is going to be received.
But, by all means, continue screeching how your not responsible. :lulz:
I am not Responsible for the behavior of other autonomous individuals.
No, but you are responsible for setting up the situation in the first place. Are you really so stupid that you are unable to comprehend that "THINK BEFORE YOU SPEAK" is applicable here? Or are you seriously just trying to stir the shit?
The basic problem here, RWHN, is that your actions are open to subjective interpretation, and that you are suffering something of a credibility gap with those you are arguing with.
There seem two basic ways to resolve this. You can either in the future push the subjective interpretation in such a way it seems less an attempt to attack someone, for example, by waiting a day or two after the original post, so it can be interpreted more as a riff and less of a response. I'm sure you save up puns for when you have a dry spell.
The second way would be to try and repair the credibility gap which is currently impeding your efforts. There are a number of ways in which this could happen, and while it would probably not please everyone, it would help your position, when it comes to interpretating future statements of an ambiguous nature. I know you have some background knowledge of rational choice theory and similar, so I'm sure you can think of a few ways to go about this. If you are struggling for inspiration, I suggest chapter one of Gambetta's Codes of the Underworld, a very useful book because it deals in particular with systems where enforcement is difficult (notably, criminal syndicates, but it can equally apply to international politics, or internet forums).
I will go as far as to say I should not in retrospect, have used the monkey-sheep pic, even though again it was not aimed at anyone. Shouldve just used a regular ewe. I can see how that may have heightened the reaction. But I don't apologize for the pun.
RWHN, I get that you think the reactions are irrational, but did you expect that kind of reaction? i haven't seen you address that yet.
(And then it seems to come down to
If yes, then you're knowingly stirring the shit. If no, then you're ignoring history.)
C) I expect people to recognize an obvious pun coming from an obvious punster.
Rwhn- if it were one of my threads you were spoofing i would have taken offense too even though you and i have no problems with each other.
Also like everyone is saying- everyone seems to have expected this but you. I figured this is what the thread would have been like before i even clicked on it.
Well, I certainly didn't expect the part where they dragged my wife into it.
Nobody's questioning your wife. Just you, and trying to make sense of why you've been such a douche for the last year or so.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 08:50:53 PM
Well, I certainly didn't expect the part where they dragged my wife into it.
Who said anything about your wife? I was talking about you. I've never met your wife, I've never spoken to your wife, I know nothing about her, and thus have no opinion whatsoever.
But why does my wife, or my relationship with my wife, even need to be a part of the conversation?
Though, I do have to say that one isn't nearly as entertaining as the theory posited early on that I'm some kind of brilliant, sociological mad scientist who carefully crafted and engineered this exact response from beginning to end.
I mean, fuck, that sounds much more impressive than a guy just trying to throw out a gag.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 09:15:43 PM
But why does my wife, or my relationship with my wife, even need to be a part of the conversation?
Speculation. SCIENCE, in fact. How DOES a perfectly nice guy turn into a complete prick in 12 months?
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:38:08 PM
Yes, sometimes it IS personal with Nigel. I just don't like her, and I've been doing my best to avoid her, but however smart and intelligent I may be, I'm still human. In fact I have her on ignore and only see her posts when others are quoting her.
Quote from: Nigel on April 27, 2012, 08:56:48 PM
Nobody's questioning your wife. Just you, and trying to make sense of why you've been such a douche for the last year or so.
Not taking sides, just thought that you should be aware of a part of the conversation you're ignoring.
Quote from: Insanity on April 27, 2012, 09:22:04 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:38:08 PM
Yes, sometimes it IS personal with Nigel. I just don't like her, and I've been doing my best to avoid her, but however smart and intelligent I may be, I'm still human. In fact I have her on ignore and only see her posts when others are quoting her.
Quote from: Nigel on April 27, 2012, 08:56:48 PM
Nobody's questioning your wife. Just you, and trying to make sense of why you've been such a douche for the last year or so.
Not taking sides, just thought that you should be aware of a part of the conversation you're ignoring.
Well, aren't you just the little helper?
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 09:17:55 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 09:15:43 PM
But why does my wife, or my relationship with my wife, even need to be a part of the conversation?
Speculation. SCIENCE, in fact. How DOES a perfectly nice guy turn into a complete prick in 12 months?
Maybe all of that other stuff (i.e. - the false accusations) that you are conveniently, again, ignoring.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 09:32:55 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 27, 2012, 09:17:55 PM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 09:15:43 PM
But why does my wife, or my relationship with my wife, even need to be a part of the conversation?
Speculation. SCIENCE, in fact. How DOES a perfectly nice guy turn into a complete prick in 12 months?
Maybe all of that other stuff (i.e. - the false accusations) that you are conveniently, again, ignoring.
Well, here's the thing, RWHN...I'm kinda dumb, but a year of pattern recognition will eventually pound its way through even my thick skull.
Tell you what.
You tell me, with a straight face, that there was no malice whatsoever behind this sort of shit, and I'll take you at your word.
Well, no, of course there was no malice behind this because....wait for it....
It
wasn't
directed
at
you.
It....was.....a.....pun!
I'm not going to validate this conspiracy theory you've concocted. Sorry, I'm just not. There is no malice because it isn't there.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 11:43:13 PM
Well, no, of course there was no malice behind this because....wait for it....
It
wasn't
directed
at
you.
It....was.....a.....pun!
I'm not going to validate this conspiracy theory you've concocted. Sorry, I'm just not. There is no malice because it isn't there.
Okay.
Quote from: Nigel on April 27, 2012, 06:35:38 AM
Quote from: Guru Coyote on April 27, 2012, 06:15:43 AM
Quote from: Nigel on April 27, 2012, 06:02:22 AM
:roll:
As if you aren't intelligent people who make up your own minds. Also, as if we haven't totally had arguments, sometimes quite heated ones.
Ya I mean I never ever ever EVER got into a stupid with Roger over my own stupidity. I have always been his dutiful thrall.
That's the thing. We have all had arguments, and maybe even fallings-out. And we have worked it out.
But we're not
Nice PeopleTM.Nice People
TM don't keep hanging around that mean old peedee (except to lurk and copypaste so they have material for the NICE forums.)
Nice People
TM are TRULY DEEPLY BUTTHURT if you snark at them for ANY reason and they will NEVER GET OVER IT NEVER NEVER NEVER. Because their butts are WOUNDED. Maybe even CRIPPLED FOR LIFE.
We're talking INCURABLE TERMINAL BUTTHURT. Please CALL IN AND PLEDGE AS MUCH AS YOU CAN so that we can someday find the CURE. *cue video of butthurt Nice People
TM with "Wind Beneath My Wings" playing in the background*
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 10:56:21 AM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on April 27, 2012, 03:32:37 AM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 03:08:33 AM
Nope, she sticks to trashing reputations, like she did with me, like she did with Cram, like she did with TTM, like she did with PurpleEris, anyone she doesn't like. She doesn't get threads, she gets personal. Good on you for sticking up for that.
I'm done with you, think what you want. I won't lose any sleep over it.
Dude, you're coming off like Khara's pet parrot.
:lulz:
That's very funny coming from you.
And he still believes in Mind Control Laz0rz. :lulz:
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 28, 2012, 03:47:27 AM
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 27, 2012, 11:43:13 PM
Well, no, of course there was no malice behind this because....wait for it....
It
wasn't
directed
at
you.
It....was.....a.....pun!
I'm not going to validate this conspiracy theory you've concocted. Sorry, I'm just not. There is no malice because it isn't there.
Okay.
Just saw this. (Been out of town and then catching up on sleep.)
Okay. For now.
I have little to no concern whether you or okay with this or not.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 29, 2012, 01:15:25 AM
I have little to no concern whether you or okay with this or not.
Are you concerned about
any poster's reaction to you?
Well, sure. (do you want me to make you a list?)
Just not sure why AMB feels the need to announce she is okay with something that is between me and Dok. Especially when it seemed like it was left in a, relatively and comparatively, "resolved" spot.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 29, 2012, 01:26:29 AM
Well, sure. (do you want me to make you a list?)
Glad to hear it, and no I don't want a list.
Quote from: Reverend What's-His-Name? on April 29, 2012, 01:26:29 AM
Just not sure why AMB feels the need to announce she is okay with something that is between me and Dok. Especially when it seemed like it was left in a, relatively and comparatively, "resolved" spot.
I thought she was riffing on Dok's "okay for now" sign-off.
I was.
And if something is on list and I have the time and inclination to respond, I see no reason not to.
If something is truly private between you and somebody else, that's what PM's are for.
Posting something publicly and then whining when people comment strikes me as - how shall I say? - passive-aggressive.