A discordian take on this please...

[Doktor Howl]

I love how he pretty much called me a comatose sheep for needing actual evidence.

More of that, please.

Arhh, come on? Tsk tsk...

Are you just transcribing Alex Jones?

[LyingTruth]

The whole video was about looking at the appearance of the north tower and hypothesizing that it was demolished on purpose.  That's not really evidence, it's just tin foil hats.

Oh I see, the 'tin foil hats' obviously took pretty good care of that issue then.
And hey, while we're at it - let's say: Fuck Newton and his ludicrous ideas of how masses interact.
We are of course meant to disregard the fact that an accelerating object of relatively smaller mass
-hence insignificant inertia- cannot crush a significantly greater mass, at virtually free fall speed,
without the aid of something extra.  
The 'in plain view' lies we've been fed are so very grotesquely and awkwardly staged.
I am sorry though - I didn't mean to wake you up. Do stay asleep if that fills you with bliss.

Holy shit.  

Someone hasn't taken a basic physics course yet.

Or he thinks the impact of the plane was supposed to have caused the collapse.

MORE, PLEASE.

'MORE' is coming up: I specifically do not believe that the impact caused the collapse...

[LyingTruth]

Um, let's see...The government put bombs in the building, then shot a missle out of a jumbo jet, then crashed the jumbo jets into the WTC, because you know, the burning jet fuel would totally not set off the demo charges in the wrong order, and the government has secret laws of physics that let them implode the buildings from the top down, instead of the bottom up, and we all know that you need to totally melt steel (rather than just anneal it) to make it fail.

Did I miss anything?  

You'll believe your world is real, and I'll believe that mine is real.
Fair deal?

Yes, provided I can still point and laugh at "your world".

Hint:  You live in the real world, and it won't change to meet your biases, no matter how much you believe otherwise.

But be my guest, keep believing in a fantasy world.  

I'd never point and laugh at your world; and no, I don't consider myself as living in the real world btw.
'Real' is a very diffuse thing indeed. Can we be friends?

[Doktor Howl]

The whole video was about looking at the appearance of the north tower and hypothesizing that it was demolished on purpose.  That's not really evidence, it's just tin foil hats.

Oh I see, the 'tin foil hats' obviously took pretty good care of that issue then.
And hey, while we're at it - let's say: Fuck Newton and his ludicrous ideas of how masses interact.
We are of course meant to disregard the fact that an accelerating object of relatively smaller mass
-hence insignificant inertia- cannot crush a significantly greater mass, at virtually free fall speed,
without the aid of something extra.  
The 'in plain view' lies we've been fed are so very grotesquely and awkwardly staged.
I am sorry though - I didn't mean to wake you up. Do stay asleep if that fills you with bliss.

Holy shit.  

Someone hasn't taken a basic physics course yet.

Or he thinks the impact of the plane was supposed to have caused the collapse.

MORE, PLEASE.

'MORE' is coming up: I specifically do not believe that the impact caused the collapse...

Um...

And hey, while we're at it - let's say: Fuck Newton and his ludicrous ideas of how masses interact.
We are of course meant to disregard the fact that an accelerating object of relatively smaller mass
-hence insignificant inertia- cannot crush a significantly greater mass, at virtually free fall speed,
without the aid of something extra.  

Or were you referring to the upper floors?  Because the mass in question there only has to affect one lower floor at a time.  It's a building, not an iceberg.

[Doktor Howl]

I'd never point and laugh at your world; and no, I don't consider myself as living in the real world btw.
'Real' is a very diffuse thing indeed. Can we be friends?

1.  You're not going to go all Matrix-y on me, are you?

2.  I haven't said I don't like you.  I may HATE you, but that doesn't mean I can't LIKE you.  I'm a misanthrope, and laughing at human foibles is what I DO.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

Did this one turn out not to be a troll? I haven't been paying attention.

Well then, pay attenzione bud...

Why?

Because I'm not a troll. I'm....just me. I couldn't and wouldn't be anybody else.

OK... so what about just being you makes you deserving of my attention? And... are you even sure you want my attention?

[Doktor Howl]

Did this one turn out not to be a troll? I haven't been paying attention.

Well then, pay attenzione bud...

Why?

Because I'm not a troll. I'm....just me. I couldn't and wouldn't be anybody else.

OK... so what about just being you makes you deserving of my attention? And... are you even sure you want my attention?

Say yes, kid. 

If you say it nicely enough, she may beat you.

[LyingTruth]

Um, let's see...The government put bombs in the building, then shot a missle out of a jumbo jet, then crashed the jumbo jets into the WTC, because you know, the burning jet fuel would totally not set off the demo charges in the wrong order, and the government has secret laws of physics that let them implode the buildings from the top down, instead of the bottom up, and we all know that you need to totally melt steel (rather than just anneal it) to make it fail.

Did I miss anything?   

This theory does not account for the giant space laser that really destroyed WTC.

How much energy would a laser have to start out with to be able to collapse a building of that magnitude through the atmosphere. That just seems fucking retarded.

No, not retarded - tin foil hatish...

[LyingTruth]

Um, let's see...The government put bombs in the building, then shot a missle out of a jumbo jet, then crashed the jumbo jets into the WTC, because you know, the burning jet fuel would totally not set off the demo charges in the wrong order, and the government has secret laws of physics that let them implode the buildings from the top down, instead of the bottom up, and we all know that you need to totally melt steel (rather than just anneal it) to make it fail.

Did I miss anything?   

This theory does not account for the giant space laser that really destroyed WTC.

How much energy would a laser have to start out with to be able to collapse a building of that magnitude through the atmosphere. That just seems fucking retarded.

Sure, that's exactly what a Zionist/NWO shill would say, this doesn't "fit the facts" of your fancy "Jewish" Illuminati science. 

Humorous or Nazi?

[LyingTruth]

I have visual proof of what really brought down the tower...

When man can't explain or fathem, man uses satire...

[Doktor Howl]

When man can't explain or fathem, man uses satire...

It looks deeper when you spell "fathom" correctly.  Also, when it's used in a grammatically correct sentence.

Just saying.

[LyingTruth]

Um, let's see...The government put bombs in the building, then shot a missle out of a jumbo jet, then crashed the jumbo jets into the WTC, because you know, the burning jet fuel would totally not set off the demo charges in the wrong order, and the government has secret laws of physics that let them implode the buildings from the top down, instead of the bottom up, and we all know that you need to totally melt steel (rather than just anneal it) to make it fail.

Did I miss anything?   

The wizard, Dok.  You forgot about the wizard.

Thomas Edison?  He's in on the plot?   

I think he means Tommy Walker.  I clearly saw pinballs shooting out of the windows when the towers fell. 

Maybe it was Dumbledore, and that's why they could implode the WTC from the top down.

The towers could only collapse from top down by means of...blablablah - and you perfectly know what those means were.
Don't ya?
Pull the other one  

Yeah.  They'd collapse because their structural supports were annealed, ruining the temper, and combined with the missing windows allowing the wind to twist the building, cause the top several floors to pancake.

Learn2metallurgy, kid.

Buildings are imploded from the bottom up, not the top down.

I know that. Can we be friends now?

[Doktor Howl]

Um, let's see...The government put bombs in the building, then shot a missle out of a jumbo jet, then crashed the jumbo jets into the WTC, because you know, the burning jet fuel would totally not set off the demo charges in the wrong order, and the government has secret laws of physics that let them implode the buildings from the top down, instead of the bottom up, and we all know that you need to totally melt steel (rather than just anneal it) to make it fail.

Did I miss anything?   

The wizard, Dok.  You forgot about the wizard.

Thomas Edison?  He's in on the plot?   

I think he means Tommy Walker.  I clearly saw pinballs shooting out of the windows when the towers fell. 

Maybe it was Dumbledore, and that's why they could implode the WTC from the top down.

The towers could only collapse from top down by means of...blablablah - and you perfectly know what those means were.
Don't ya?
Pull the other one  

Yeah.  They'd collapse because their structural supports were annealed, ruining the temper, and combined with the missing windows allowing the wind to twist the building, cause the top several floors to pancake.

Learn2metallurgy, kid.

Buildings are imploded from the bottom up, not the top down.

I know that. Can we be friends now?

That depends.  Can you post outside of this thread, on a subject not related to 911?

[Doktor Howl]

What's really frustrating about this is that you're answering posts in no particular order.

It's like having a conversation with a 2 hour lag.

[Disco Pickle]

Um, let's see...The government put bombs in the building, then shot a missle out of a jumbo jet, then crashed the jumbo jets into the WTC, because you know, the burning jet fuel would totally not set off the demo charges in the wrong order, and the government has secret laws of physics that let them implode the buildings from the top down, instead of the bottom up, and we all know that you need to totally melt steel (rather than just anneal it) to make it fail.

Did I miss anything?   

The wizard, Dok.  You forgot about the wizard.

Thomas Edison?  He's in on the plot?   

I think he means Tommy Walker.  I clearly saw pinballs shooting out of the windows when the towers fell. 

Maybe it was Dumbledore, and that's why they could implode the WTC from the top down.

The towers could only collapse from top down by means of...blablablah - and you perfectly know what those means were.
Don't ya?
Pull the other one  

Yeah.  They'd collapse because their structural supports were annealed, ruining the temper, and combined with the missing windows allowing the wind to twist the building, cause the top several floors to pancake.

Learn2metallurgy, kid.

Buildings are imploded from the bottom up, not the top down.

I know that. Can we be friends now?

That depends.  Can you post outside of this thread, on a subject not related to 911 and not make an ass out of yourself in the process?

on the chance that it's pop tart: Fix'd

though, if you are,  you did make me lol this morning, and I appreciate that.  do more of that and less of the bumping-every-thread-and-posting-pictures-of-purple-poptarts thing that you did when you first got here.